• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.47 no.3
• /
• pp.275-293
• /
• 2013

This study conducted comparative analysis of cataloging descriptions and rules in KCR 4 and CCR 2, as follows, for the purpose of seeking understanding of classical materials cataloging rules and networking of oriental historical data cataloging (bibliographical descriptions). First, to compare the general rules, the objects of descriptions and composition of descriptions, recording order, and punctuation and information source of descriptions were analyzed. As a result, KCR 4 is more detailed in terms of author role identifications and information source regulations and CCR2 is more detailed in terms of regulations related to printing and publications and serial publications. Second, to compare the details, the main titles and liability indications, edition details, publication details and format details, and note details. As a result, regarding the description of edition type and publication details, KCR4 has detailed regulations and CCR2 has characteristic summary in terms of note details.

• Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science
• /
• v.35 no.1
• /
• pp.5-26
• /
• 2024

The school library work support system was newly developed as 2024 Doksero DLS, but the DLS-compliant cataloging rules have not changed significantly since it was initially developed, and the current developed cataloging guidelines in 2020 also need to be updated. This study is to propose the considerations for developing guidelines for applying the DLS cataloging rules based on KCR4 by comparing the existing DLS (Ver. 2.0) cataloging rules, the 2024 DLS cataloging rules, and the 2020 bibliographic registration guidelines (Ver. 2.2). On this basis, considerations were suggested in terms of changing and expanding data elements, revising content rules for cataloging, method for recording access point, and developing controlled vocabularies. This study will allow to implement revision of DLS cataloging rules, development of guidelines, and system improvements.

• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.41 no.4
• /
• pp.171-189
• /
• 2010

This is the survey on the actual condition about the managing of headings in library cataloging. KCR4, the standard rules for the library cataloging in Korea, has no rules for the main entry headings and uniform headings. But the cataloging records are not standardized because a lot of libraries in Korea use the main entry headings and uniform headings yet. A structural revision of KORMARC is required in order that all library follow the rules on the KCR's main entry headings. And the rules for uniform heading used until KCR4's policy about the heading is decided according to international trends are needed.

• Journal of KIISE:Software and Applications
• /
• v.30 no.7_8
• /
• pp.659-671
• /
• 2003

This paper proposes a method of disambiguating the senses of words using decision lists, which consists of rules with confidence values. The rule of decision list is composed of a boolean function(=precondition) and a class(=sense). Decision lists classify the instance using the rule with the highest confidence value that is matched with it. Previous work disambiguated the senses using single feature decision lists, whose boolean function was composed of only one feature. However, this approach can be affected more severely by data sparseness problem and preprocessing errors. Hence, we propose multiple feature decision lists that have the boolean function consisting of more than one feature in order to identify the senses of words. Experiments are performed with 1 sense tagged corpus in Korean and 5 sense tagged corpus in English. The experimental results show that multiple feature decision lists are more effective than single feature decision lists in disambiguating senses.

• Journal of Information Management
• /
• v.34 no.3
• /
• pp.1-19
• /
• 2003

Due to rapid internet supply, the increase of electronic resources including network resources, and the appearance of metadate, there has been a sudden change in cataloguing fields. To deal with rapid changes, the related organizations such as IFLA are organizing the research team and revising rules. This study analyzes current trend of cataloguing digital resources, considering recent matters in regards with the revision of ISBD(ER), AACR2R 2002 edition, MARC 21, Dubin Core, KCR4 etc. This research discusses also the questions of how digital resources are organized; automatic indexing, matadata, and MARC format.

• Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science
• /
• v.25 no.3
• /
• pp.235-261
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this study is to suggest the ways to apply describing attributes and relationships of person to Korean Cataloging Rules. In order to achieve the objective of this study, the conceptual models such as FRBR and FRAD, and the cataloging rules such as AACR2R, RDA, and KCR2 were compared and analyzed. For describing attributes of person, this study analyzed names, dates, titles, fuller form of names, genders, places, affiliations, languages, fields of activity, professions or occupations, biographical information, and identifiers of person. For describing relationships of persons, this study investigated describing relationships to persons associated with each resource, such as a work, an expression, a manifestation, and an item, and describing relationships between persons, relationships between persons and families, and relationships between persons and corporate bodies. Based on these analyses, this study suggested the application methods of describing attributes and relationships of persons in Korean Cataloging Rules.

• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.52 no.3
• /
• pp.217-238
• /
• 2021

The purpose of this study is to identify the problems of describing bibliographic elements such as edition, impression, and year of publication in the current Cataloging Rules, and to present improvements to the KCR and the KORMARC Format. According to changes in the information technology environment in the library, the level and scope of the cataloging that can be provided to users should be adjusted. As data is diversified and descriptive method of metadata develops, the development of bibliographic elements and the change of the descriptive method are changing the framework of the existing standardization. As a research method, we will examine the concept of edition and impression, examine the transition process of description of edition and impression targeting KCR. And we would like to present the methods of bibliographic description to be added or modified through cataloging examples, and examine the format reflected in KORMARC. This study is intended to be limited to the descriptive form of books. The bibliographic elements of the entry in the library must be fully consistent with the bibliographic elements of the material to be catalogued. This study suggests an improvement to the cataloging rules. First, the edition of the cataloging rules shall describe the edition statement and the impression statement. In addition, the description of the year of publication describes the latest year, not the first year of publication of the edition of the material to be catalogued. The descriptive scope of the year of publication is extended to the month of publication. Second, in the KORMARC format, the description of impression in edition statement is given to the identifier in the 250 field, and is numerically described as the second impression. When presenting the month and year of publication, one identifier in the field 260 describes the year of publication and the other identifier describes the month of publication. The description for the month and year of publication is stated the latest month and year on the title page and the colophon of the publication.

• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.33 no.3
• /
• pp.235-256
• /
• 2002

The purpose of this study is to suggest a reform after detecting out issues and problems associated with the KCR 4th ed.(draft). KCR(Korean Cataloguing Rules) is representative cataloguing rules in Korea, the 4th ed.(draft) of which was prepared by Cataloguing Committee(department of KLA) in 2001. As a result of this study, a lot of problem which are glossary, context, inconsistency of the contents, rules applied to card catalog, and others, were found out. Thus, substantial improvements were able to be suggested.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.38 no.4
• /
• pp.149-166
• /
• 2004

This study make comparative analysis of the cataloging rules on the edition area included in the KCR4, NCR(2001), AACR2R, ISBD(M), and ISBD(ER). There is a delicate difference between the cataloging rules. The main features on the edition are as the follows. (1) In the bibliography description the concept of the edition is a general application. That is to say, the edition construct the new edition and the impression. The former comes the purview of a change content, the size, and a printing type. The latter publish newly- (2) The requisite for description of the edition area consists of a edition statement, statements of responsibility relating to the edition, additional edition statement, and statements of responsibility following an additional edition statement. Voluntary rules transcribe the parallel edition statement. (3) In the case of the electronic materials special versions on content and Auction indicates as the edition, but the environment of software does not indicate as it. (4) Parallel statement of responsibility relating to the edition, parallel additional edition statements, and parallel statements of responsibility following an additional edition statement are voluntary rules or not transcribed in the edition area.

• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.32 no.3
• /
• pp.199-226
• /
• 2001

This study is a part of the serial study on the historical development of cataloging rules in Korea, and focus on 'the period of international standardization'(from 1954 to 1980). In this period, Han-Un Catalog Rules, Dongseo pyeonmoggyujeong(cho), Korean Cataloging Rules 1st ed. and 2nd ed. were published in Korea. This study tries to review the structure and contents of these cataloging rules.