Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science (한국문헌정보학회지)

Korean Society For Library And Information Science (한국문헌정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Analysis of Classical Data in KCR 4 and CCR 2

한국목록규칙과 중국문헌편목규칙의 고전자료 목록기술규칙 비교 분석

  • 한미경 (경기대학교 인문대학 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2013.07.16
  • Accepted : 2013.08.12
  • Published : 2013.08.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study conducted comparative analysis of cataloging descriptions and rules in KCR 4 and CCR 2, as follows, for the purpose of seeking understanding of classical materials cataloging rules and networking of oriental historical data cataloging (bibliographical descriptions). First, to compare the general rules, the objects of descriptions and composition of descriptions, recording order, and punctuation and information source of descriptions were analyzed. As a result, KCR 4 is more detailed in terms of author role identifications and information source regulations and CCR2 is more detailed in terms of regulations related to printing and publications and serial publications. Second, to compare the details, the main titles and liability indications, edition details, publication details and format details, and note details. As a result, regarding the description of edition type and publication details, KCR4 has detailed regulations and CCR2 has characteristic summary in terms of note details.

이 연구는 고전자료 이용에 필요한 목록기술규칙의 이해와 동양 고전자료 목록(서지기술) 네트워크를 위하여 한국목록규칙 4판(KCR 4)과 중국문헌편목규칙 2판(CCR 2)에서의 고전자료의 목록기술 규칙을 다음과 같이 비교 분석하였다. 첫째, 기술총칙의 비교를 위하여 기술의 대상과 기술사항의 구성, 기재순위와 구두점 그리고 기술의 정보원을 대상으로 진행하였다. 그 결과 KCR 4는 책임표시와 판사항의 정보원 규정이 상세하며, CCR 2는 출판 발행사항 및 총서사항의 정보원 규정이 상세하였다. 둘째, 세부사항의 비교를 위하여 표제와 책임표시사항, 판사항, 발행사항 및 형태사항 그리고 주기사항을 대상으로 진행하였다. 그 결과 판종의 기술과 발행사항의 경우 KCR 4가 상세하게 규정하고 있으며, 주기사항의 경우 CCR 2의 제요가 특징적이었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 한국도서관협회. 2003. 한국목록규칙. 4판. 서울: 한국도서관협회. (Korean Library Association. 2003. Korean Cataloging Rules 4th. Seoul: Korean Library Association.)
  2. 姜新年. 2007. "編目規則差异和統一進展." 公共圖書館 [online]. [cited 2013.6.30]. . (Jiang, Xinnian. 2007. "The Differences and Unify Standard Progress on Cataloging Rules." Public Library Journal. [online]. [cited 2013.6.30]. .)
  3. 國家圖書館中國文獻編目規則修訂組 編. 2005. 中國文獻編目規則. 2版. 北京: 北京圖書館出版社. (CCR Revision Team, China National Library ed. 2005. Chinese Cataloging Rules 2ed. Beijing: Beijing Library Public.)
  4. 段明莲. 2006. "中國文獻編目規則的現狀与發展趨势." 中國圖書館學報, 32(3). [online]. [cited 2013.6.30]. . (Duan, Minglian. 2006. "Present Status and Future Trends of Chinese Cataloging Rules." Journal of Library Science in China, 32(3). [online]. [cited 2013.6.30]. .)
  5. 梁儉. 2008. "圖書館編目規則的應用現狀及問題分析." 圖書館界, 2: 91-94. (Linag, Jian. 2008. "Application Status and Problem Analysis of Library Cataloging Rules." Library World, 2: 91-91.)
  6. 楊小雲. 2006. "中國文獻編目規則 和 西文文獻著彔條例之比較." 現代情報, 26(11). (Yang, Xiayun. 2006. "Comparison between China Cataloging Rules and ISBD." Modern Information, 26(11). [online]. [cited 2013.6.30]. .) [online]. [cited 2013.6.30]. .
  7. 鄭衡泌. 2004. "海峡兩岸中文圖書編目規則比較." 文獻信息論壇, 2(總第70期): 50-53. (Zhong, Hengbi. 2004. "Comparison between CCR and TCR." Discussions on Documentary Information, 2: 50-53.)
  8. "Descriptive Cataloging of East Asian Material: CJK Examples of AACR2 and Library of Congress Rule Interpretations." 2004. [online]. [cited 2013.6.20]. .
  9. GB 3469-83(Document Types and Document Media Codes). [online]. [cited 2013.7.1]. .
  10. Gu, Ben et al. "Chinese Cataloging Rules and International Cataloging Principles: A Report of Similarities and Differences." [online]. [cited 2013.7.2]. .
  11. Pong, Joanna, & Cheung, Celine. 2006. "Cataloging of Chinese Language Materials in the Digital Era: The Cataloging Standards and Practices in China, Taiwan and Hong Kong." Library and Information Science, 32(1): 53-56.