Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2014.25.3.235

A Study on the Describing Attributes and Relationships of Person in Cataloging Rules  

Ahn, Seohyeon (경북대학교 대학원 문헌정보학과)
Lee, Changsoo (경북대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보학과)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science / v.25, no.3, 2014 , pp. 235-261 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to suggest the ways to apply describing attributes and relationships of person to Korean Cataloging Rules. In order to achieve the objective of this study, the conceptual models such as FRBR and FRAD, and the cataloging rules such as AACR2R, RDA, and KCR2 were compared and analyzed. For describing attributes of person, this study analyzed names, dates, titles, fuller form of names, genders, places, affiliations, languages, fields of activity, professions or occupations, biographical information, and identifiers of person. For describing relationships of persons, this study investigated describing relationships to persons associated with each resource, such as a work, an expression, a manifestation, and an item, and describing relationships between persons, relationships between persons and families, and relationships between persons and corporate bodies. Based on these analyses, this study suggested the application methods of describing attributes and relationships of persons in Korean Cataloging Rules.
Keywords
AACR, Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules; Describing Attributes of Person; Describing Relationships of Person; KCR, Korean Cataloging Rules; RDA, Resource Description and Access;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 6  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Tosaka, Yuji and Jung-ran Park. 2013. "RDA: Resource Description & Access - a Survey of the Current State of the Art." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(4): 651-662.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 韓國圖書館協會 目錄委員會 編. 2003. 韓國目錄規則. 第4版. 서울: 韓國圖書館協會. (Korean Library Association. 2003. Korean Cataloging Rules, 4th ed. Seoul: Korean Library Association.)
3 ALA. 2002. Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules. 2nd ed., 2002 rev. Chicago: American Library Association.
4 Chapman, Ann. 2010. "The Case of AACR2R Versus RDA." Legal Information Management, 10(3): 210-213.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Duke, Judy. 2010. "JPL to Be First Public Library to Adopt RDA/FRBR." Advanced Technology Libraries, 41(2): 7.
6 IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. 1998. Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: Final Report. Munchen: K.G. Saur.
7 IFLA Working Group on FRANAR. 2009. Functional Requirements for Authority Data: A Conceptual Model. Munchen: K.G. Saur.
8 JSC for Development of RDA. 2010. RDA: Resource Description & Access. Chicago: American Library Association. 영미권의 차세대 목록규칙 "자원의 기술과 접근(RDA)" (9)(최종) (8-10, 17-22, 24-32), [online]. [cited 2014.5.23]. .
9 McCutcheon, Sevim. 2012. "RDA and the Reference Librarian: What to Expect from the New Cataloging Standard." Reference Librarian, 53(2): 123-137.   DOI
10 Mering, Margaret. 2014. The RDA Workbook: Learning the Basics of Resource Description and Access. Santa Barbara, Calif.: Libraries Unlimited.
11 Stephens, Jenny. 2013. "RDA Implementation at the National Library of Australia." CDNLAO Newsletter, 76: [online]. [cited 2014.5.21]. .
12 Taniguchi, Shoichi. 2012. "Viewing RDA from FRBR and FRAD: Does RDA Represent a Different Conceptual Model?" Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 50(8): 929-943.   DOI
13 도태현. 2012. RDA의 저작과 표현형의 접근점 규정에 관한 연구. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 43(3): 27-48. (Doh, Tae-Hyeon. 2012. "A Study on Instructions for Access Points Representing Works and Expressions in RDA." Journal of Korea Library and Information Science Society, 43(3): 27-48.)
14 박진희. 2009a. RDA의 제정동향 및 내용구조에 관한 연구. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 40(1): 317-338. (Park, Jin-Hee. 2009a. "A Study on Movements to Establish RDA and Its Contents Structure." Journal of Korea Library and Information Science Society, 40(1): 317-338.)   과학기술학회마을
15 박진희. 2009b. RDA와 KCR4의 기술규칙 분석에 관한 연구. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 40(2): 111-138. (Park, Jin-Hee. 2009b. "Comparative Analysis on Descriptive Rules of RDA and KCR4." Journal of Korea Library and Information Science Society, 40(2): 111-138.)   과학기술학회마을
16 이경호. 2012. RDA에 나타난 이용자 과업에 대한 연구. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 43(1): 99-122. (Lee, Kyung-Ho. 2012. "A Study on the User Task in Resource Description & Access." Journal of Korea Library and Information Science Society, 43(1): 99-122.)   과학기술학회마을
17 이미화. 2010. MARC 데이터의 RDA 저작 및 표현형 요소 분석을 통한 한국목록규칙 및 KORMARC의 고려사항. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 41(2): 251-272. (Lee, Mihwa. 2010. "A Study on Suggestion for KCR and KORMARC by Analyzing Work and Expression Element of RDA in MARC." Journal of Korea Library and Information Science Society, 41(2): 251-272.)   과학기술학회마을
18 韓國圖書館協會 制定. 1983. 韓國目錄規則. 3版. 서울: 韓國圖書館協會. (Korean Library Association. 1983. Korean Cataloging Rules, 3rd ed. Seoul: Korean Library Association.)
19 이미화. 2011a. AACR2에서 RDA로 목록규칙 변화에 따른 KCR4의 고려사항에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 28(1): 23-42. (Lee, Mihwa. 2011a. "A Study on Considerations in KCR4 through Changes of Cataloging Rules from AACR2 to RDA." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(1): 23-42.)   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
20 이미화. 2011b. RDA 자원유형의 KCR4 적용에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 28(3): 103-121. (Lee, Mihwa. 2011b. "A Study on Application of Resource Types of RDA to KCR4." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(3): 103-121.)   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
21 韓國圖書館協會 編. 1966. 韓國目錄規則. 修正版. 서울: 韓國圖書館協會. (Korean Library Association. 1996. Korean Cataloging Rules, 2nd ed. Seoul: Korean Library Association.)
22 김정현, 문지현, 김효숙. 2013. RDA의 이해: AACR2에서 RDA로. 광주: 전남대학교출판부. (Kim, Jeong-Hyen, Ji-Hyun Moon, and Hyo-Sook Kim. 2013. Introduction to RDA: from AACR2 to RDA. Gwangju: Chonnam National University Press.)