• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제15권12호
• /
• pp.7372-7379
• /
• 2014

본 연구는 다니엘 리베스킨트의 건축을 대상으로 건축물 내 외부에서 지각되는 공간감과 시각적으로 인지되는 외형적 특성을 분석함으로써 리베스킨트 건축의 경관적 특성을 살펴보고자 하였다. 분석결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 다니엘 리베스킨트는 '느껴지는 공간'을 통해 과거의 흔적, 형태적 모순 등을 계획하였고, 다이나믹한 공간과 더불어 불안정한 긴장감을 유발시켰다. 특히, 그는 공간과 시간 사이의 벽을 허물어 그 간격을 모호하게 함으로써 이용자가 보는 것뿐만 아니라 느낄 수 있는 지각적 공간 차원의 경관을 만들고 있다. 다시 말해, 리베스킨트 건축은 과거 역사적 사건을 현대인들이 직간접적으로 체험하고 느낄 수 있는 지각적 공간으로서의 경관으로 이해된다.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.793-800
• /
• 2015

본 연구는 다니엘 리베스킨트 건축작품을 분석함에 있어 어린 시절 습득하였던 일련의 음악 작업과 오페라 아론과 모세에 대한 영향을 고찰하여 리베스킨트 건축과의 상관성을 분석하고자 하였다. 그 분석의 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 리베스킨트는 악보 위에서 자유롭게 흘러다니는 음계들의 구성을 그의 건축에 차용하여 보이지 않는 선들의 집합을 만들어냈다. 둘째, 음악구조에서의 2중 선율, 즉 다성음악적 비례 형태를 바탕으로 리베스킨트는 대위법(countepoint)적 중첩의 기하학적 형태를 구성하였다. 또한, 건축과 음악과의 상호 텍스트적 결합의 결과로서 재료, 형태 등의 대비를 계획하여 하이브리드(hybrid) 즉, 다차원적인 공간구성을 계획하여 기하학적이면서도 자유로운 선적 리듬을 표현하였다. 셋째, 리베스킨트는 과거의 아픔, 공포, 불안감 등을 공간적으로 나타내고자 노력하였으며 아놀드 쉰베르크의 작품에서의 영감을 통해 그의 작업에서 부재의 공간을 구축하였다.

• 건축사
• /
• 4호통권336호
• /
• pp.72-83
• /
• 1997

• 주택과사람들
• /
• 통권214호
• /
• pp.58-63
• /
• 2008

• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.97-104
• /
• 2013

This study aims at finding out the characteristics and influences of Libeskind's early drawing works through comparisons of each drawing. The importance of his experimental drawing works is not only their uniqueness but also relationship to creation and development of his architecture. Libeskind's musical and educational background had great impacts on forming his early drawings. A series of drawings including 'Micromegas', 'Chamberworks', and 'Theatrum Mundi' shows variety and experiments about reconstruction of three dimensional architectural fragments, abstractive line drawing and plane oriented painting. Libeskind himself cease to experiment drawing techniques but their characteristics still remain in his sketches, diagram and conceptual drawings. In spite of influences of undergraduate design studios, theoretical background of graduate studies, their experimental features are due to his continuous endeavor to make and develop his drawing skills and contents. As a result, his early drawings act as media and way to communicate and develop his concepts.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.163-170
• /
• 2006

• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.207-214
• /
• 2012

Today, museum exhibition can be divided into two sub-categories: a. informative exhibition with various useful auxiliary media to convey knowledge and b. appreciative exhibition considering aesthetic conveyance and visual/perceptual environment. In addition to this, the concept of memorial exhibition as a field that tangible and intangible memories are transmitted and reproduced is creating another genre of exhibition. As an example of such a memorial exhibition above, the work of de-constructive architect Daniel Libeskind was selected. Jewish Museum and Imperial War Museum North both of which maximized the exhibition space by grafting architectural language to exhibition narrative were analyzed and compared to see if the same architectural language can be displayed differently in another form of exhibition after being drawn into the exhibition space depending on the changes in time and perspective. Therefore, in the narrative display combining the selection of exhibition contents and storytelling, the formative language of space can confirm that exhibition narrative as an ending structure changed into a retelling story with more extended meanings through interactive factors. Eventually, in this formative narrative, when the display of historical facts and exhibition themes is combined with the architectural language in an exhibition hall according to the approach direction, the memorial exhibition can create a formative language stimulating sensibility in the memories of space and a differentiated formative exhibition space where one is truly moved by oneness of contents.

• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.89-99
• /
• 2013

The comtemporary architecture has not an discourse on form and representative style, but a new architectural concept of the generative process through the various relationship of the urban context, the continuity of the time and the experience of the people. This architectureal concepts make new and various architectural attempts to have a virtuality. The viruality is a reality to coexist with the present in contemporary philosophy. Daniel libeskind makes various arhcitectural experimentative attempts to reveal his virtuality through his memory as the Jews and his unconscious virtuality. The 'line' has the connotation of architectural reality and virtuality. Every line drawn becomes architectural form for example, walls, windows and makes spaces, and reveal a boundary as a connection. Architecture's visibility understates and structures its invisible aspect, so that the visible and the invisible make the architecture together. Daniel libeskind maks the virtual lines having the invisible of unconsious, time, and place. He no longer divide the form of architecture, its spatiality from all the implications which it adresses beyond its own particular built time and place and public unconsious mind. He demands the 'virtual line' that remembers distress and the past and reveal the virtuality of time and place. The virtual line is the sentimental communication of architecture.

• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.46-55
• /
• 2012

This study aims to analyze the design concepts of Libeskind's Jewish museums through their comparisons for figuring out his design intentions and characteristics in the realization process. Libeskind's realized four Jewish museums are chosen for this study. For more concrete study, their extracting and application process are also reviewed. The comparison of his museum designs can be good examples in that they show different design approaches on the same architectural type, Jewish museum, to tell their something in common from differences. He could realize his architectural thoughts and configuration methods made by experimental drawings for the first time as real buildings through a series of Jewish museum projects. The commonness of Libeskind's Jewish museums lie on their sharing design concept of Jewish 'history and memory', especially Holocaust, and realized as in contrast to surroundings and 'labyrinth' of spatial configuration to maximize spectator's experiences. As Libeskind regards museum architecture as a carrier of 'time and place', he tried to reflect surrounding context including places, cities, persons and events about museum programs. As a result, unprecedented museums which are not related to traditional museum systems about circulation and spatial configuration are suggested for users to experience Jewish life and history through architecture.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제24권3호
• /
• pp.7-16
• /
• 2015

It is not easy to clarify the historical perspective of architect through his architecture. Exceptional cases, it will be the time to design a history museum. As an institution, a Museum already became an apparatus to represent the history to it itself. Libeskind's Jewish museum Berlin has been presented as the controversial case most of all. In particular, in that it instead of dealing with history positive, that contains a tragic history, this building is a building that history a unique interpretation of the architect has been a problem. Therefore, it is difficult to find a suitable example to Libeskind's Jewish museum in Berlin to try and look at the problem of the history of contemporary history and interpretation of the architect. In this paper, I am trying to interpret Libeskind's Jewish Museum Berlin through the aesthetics and history philosophy of Theodor Adorno and Walter Benjamin. They are Jewish and the central figures of the Frankfurt School, known as 'critical theorists'. Their critical theory was formed based on the experience of the Jewish genocide and war.