• Proceedings of the Korean Information Science Society Conference
• /
• 1998.10b
• /
• pp.3-5
• /
• 1998

WWW(World Wide Web)의 발전은 인터넷의 대중화에 크게 기여를 했다. WWW은 쉬운 사용자 인터페이스와 다양한 멀티미디어 정보의 제공, 통일된 그래픽 사용자 인터페이스, 그리고 전세계 어디에서라도 손쉽게 접근할 수 있는 장점을 가지고 있다. WWW이 점차 발전하면서 인터넷을 통한 대용량의 멀티미디어 데이터의 처리가 필요하게 되었다. 이러한 변화에 따라 대용량의 데이터를 저장, 관리, 검색할 수 있는 데이터베이스 시스템과 WWW을 연결한 것이 WWW 데이터베이스이다. 본 논문에서는 기존에 서면으로 제출되어 심사되고 HARD COPY 형태로 보관되어 오던 논문심사 관리 과정을 개선하기 위해 WWW 데이터베이스를 사용한 논문심사 관리 시스템을 개발한다. WWW 데이터베이스를 사용함으로써 기존의 방법에서 발생되던 논문의 우편 전송 시간의 지연문제, 논문심사 시간의 지연문제, HARD COPY 논문 관리의 한계 등을 해결하였다. 본 논문에서 제시한 논문 심사 관리 시스템을 사용함으로써 학회 회원은 WWW을 이용해서 논문을 논문심사 관리 시스템 서버로 제출할 수 있다. 논문심사 과정의 내역이 데이터베이스에 저장되기 때문에 논문 제출자는 WWW을 이용해서 논문심사 결과를 조회할 수 있다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference
• /
• 2014.11a
• /
• pp.1119-1121
• /
• 2014

저널 논문 투고 및 심사시스템에서의 논문 제출은 상시 이루어진다는 특성 때문에 논문이 제출된 시점에 적절한 심사자들을 찾아 배정하기란 쉽지 않은 문제이다. 본 논문에서는 이러한 문제를 해결하기 위하여 제출된 논문에 적절한 심사자들을 추천해주는 알고리즘을 제시하고자 한다. 심사자 추천 알고리즘에서는 해당 논문의 전문가를 심사자로써 추천하기 위하여 제출된 논문들의 키워드(Keyword)와 심사자들의 전문지식태그(Expertise Tag) 정보를 활용한다. 또한 심사자들의 기존의 심사 정보를 토대로 심사활동지수를 평가하여 이를 심사자 추천에 활용하고자 한다. 제안하는 알고리즘을 검증하기 위하여 본 논문에서는 실제 저널 논문투고시스템에 추천 알고리즘을 적용해보고 이의 결과를 제시한다.

• KIPS Transactions on Software and Data Engineering
• /
• v.4 no.8
• /
• pp.321-330
• /
• 2015

In journal manuscript submission and review systems, authors can submit their manuscript at any time and editorial members are struggling to find proper reviewers for the submitted manuscripts and assign them to such reviewers. In order to solve this problem, we propose a greedy algorithm and a genetic algorithm to recommend proper reviewers for the submitted manuscripts. The proposed algorithms evaluate reviewers' speciality for the submitted manuscripts by using the submitted manuscripts' keywords and the reviewers expertises. In addition to that, they take the fairness among the reviewers' speciality and the review frequency for consideration. To verify the proposed algorithms, we apply them to the JIPS manuscript submission and review system that the Korea Information Processing Society has operated, and present the results in this paper. By performing the performance evaluation of the proposed algorithms, we finally show that the genetic algorithm outperforms the greedy algorithm in terms of the recommended reviewers' fitness.

• Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies
• /
• v.48 no.1
• /
• pp.55-89
• /
• 2017

This study suggests future directions or approaches as to how we should appraise qualitative studies by reviewing previous studies on this topic written in English and published outside of Korea. This study explored experiences and perspectives of qualitative researchers in Korea by conducting a focus group discussion on this topic. Results of this focus group discussion indicated that qualitative researchers often face manuscript reviewers who are overly biased with quantitative paradigm which result in feeling of frustration. They also shared feeling burdened and confused as reviewers due to their own lack of training and preparedness in reviewing qualitative articles. However, participants also stressed the feeling of gratitude and being rewarded because of the experience of mutual growth and partnership with peer qualitative researchers as they strive towards improving the quality and completion of peer researchers' work. Previous studies on this topic included wide range of issues concerning qualitative research appraisal from reflections on the experiences as submitters and reviewers of qualitative studies to academic conceptual papers that discussed researchers' dilemma on research paradigms and qualitative research appraising methods. This study ends with suggestions for the future directions for qualitative researchers in Korea.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Information and Commucation Sciences Conference
• /
• v.9 no.2
• /
• pp.971-974
• /
• 2005

Science and technology-related societies in the interior of a country sum up to approximately 660, and are increasing yearly, due to the development of new research fields and segmentation of past studies. Such societies are contributed with latest academic research information, and the submitted studies go through an review process before publication. A majority of the societies employ the traditional off-line review method; various problems and issues occur in delay of submission, review, revision, and management of the numerous paper submitted and published. Therefore, this study suggests the design of, and implemented an on-line paper review system which processes on-line submission and review of paper, facilitates swift and review progress, and enables efficient control and management on general tasks and academic information through integrated administration of members and published works.

• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.54 no.3
• /
• pp.321-346
• /
• 2023

A data paper describing research data helps credit researchers producing the data while helping other researchers verify previous research and start new research by reusing the data. Publishing a data paper and depositing data to a public data repository are increasing with these benefits. A domestic academic society that plans to publish data papers faces challenges, including timely acquiring tremendous knowledge concerning data paper structures and templates, peer review policy and process, and trustworthy data repositories, as a data paper has different characteristics, unlike a research paper. However, the need for more research and information concerning the critical elements of data paper and the peer-review process makes it difficult to operate for data paper review and publication. To address these issues, we propose essential concepts of the data paper and the data paper peer-review, including the process model of the peer-review with in-depth analysis of five data journals' data paper templates, articles, and other guides worldwide. Academic societies intending to publish or add data papers as a new type of paper may establish policies and define a peer-review process by adopting the proposed conceptual models, effectively streamlining the preparation of data paper publication.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering
• /
• v.23 no.11
• /
• pp.1462-1470
• /
• 2019

The researcher writes the result of the research in the form of paper. The submitted papers gets careful peer review by the reviewers and used for the development of academic studies after it gets published. There has been numerous debate about the review system, as the review process determines whether the results will be known to academia. In this paper, we investigate the problems in the present review system and propose a open peer review system based on blockchain. The proposed system has an open peer review structure unlike the existing one and ensures fair and in-depth evaluation through transparency. The system also provides a solution to the privacy and capacity problems that may arise from the use of blockchain. Lastly, we implement the proposed peer review system and show the results.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.22 no.10
• /
• pp.59-73
• /
• 2022

Open peer review intends to help review a manuscript in a transparent and accountable manner, opening up the identity of a reviewer and authors in a scholarly journal. Although some research about open peer review, for example, authors' understanding of open peer review, exists, research about editors' perspectives of a scholarly journal in Korean domestic science and technology fields has not been found. Editors' views may include whether an academic journal plans to adopt open peer review, when they might adopt it, or what the possible benefits, challenges, and issues in adopting open peer review would be. This paper presents a survey scheme, data, and analysis of Korean editors' perspectives on open peer review. Specifically, we designed the online survey questionnaire, collected the survey data from journal editors, and analyzed the survey results to explore editors' understanding of open peer review. We then compared our research with previous work, such as our Focused Group Interview and other similar domestic and foreign analysis. This study result is expected to help make an open peer review policy for public institutes to provide essential services for scholarly journals, including a scholarly peer review system. Academic society may also get some insights in adopting the open peer review method in the peer-review process.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference
• /
• 2012.07a
• /
• pp.75-77
• /
• 2012

최근 국내 과학기술분야 학회에서는 발행 학술지를 세계적인 학술지로 등재하고자 하는 노력이 증가하고 있다. 이에 따라, 해외연구자들을 학술지 편집위원으로 참여 시키고 많은 해외 연구자들이 자체 학술지에 논문을 많이 투고하도록 독려하고 있다. 해외 연구자들간에 이메일로 투고 심사를 처리하고 심사 총평을 작성하는 논문투고심사 프로세스는 심사 이력이 관리도 안 될 뿐만 아니라 논문투고 심사 진행 상황을 알 수 없음으로 인한 이용자의 불편함, 시간적 비효율성 등의 많은 단점이 있다. 이에 KISTI는 해외 연구자들이 학술지 생산을 위한 학술활동 전 과정에 참여할 수 있도록 하고자, 학술지를 체계적으로 운영하고 투명한 상호심사(Peer Review) 과정을 포함하는 학술지 전자 출판과정을 온라인으로 처리하고 모든 메뉴 용어를 국제적인 수준의 영어로 기술한 영문 Article Contribution Management System(ACOMS Ver. 4.0)를 개발하였다. 영문ACOMS는 기존 국문 ACOMS와 달리, 학술지 홈페이지를 포함하고 있으며, 저자와 편집위원 혹은 저자와 판사 간의 온라인 논문 교정 프로세스가 들어가 있다. 영문 ACOMS는 2012년 현재에도 국제적인 시스템으로 거듭나기 위해 지속적인 기능개선을 추진하고 있다. 개발된 영문 ACOMS 기능에 대해 살펴보고, 향후 개선방안에 대해 기술한다.

• Journal of KIISE:Computing Practices and Letters
• /
• v.8 no.2
• /
• pp.141-154
• /
• 2002

More efforts have been given to solve the problems related to computer software by process assessment. ISO/IEC 15504(SPICE) has been developed as standardized means for process assessment. The purpose of this paper is to design and implement a process assessment system which is appropriated to the Korean assessment environment based on ISO/IEC 15504. Referring documents are: IS0/1EC 15504 standardized documents, the assessment provisions of the SPICE committee in Korea, and research papers applied the existing process assessment system to real cases. Among a lot of processes, this system is designed for (ENG2). The proposed system in the paper will support the whole process of assessment, presenting the goals and end-products for each assessment step and making it possible to compose and save the product on the same screen. In determining process rating, assessors can retrieve the saved data and documents. By doing so, the system will improve reliability in process rating. The proposed system includes 7 steps of pre-assessment and 9 steps of actual assessment in order to fully prepare assessors for process assessment. And each step has been standardized to improve user-friendliness. This system is designed to provide assessors with specific details of standardized documents, the goals of the process, outcomes of implementing the process, and presentations of base practices and input/output products. Above all, the system automatically generates an assessment rating, by calculating based on input data which assessors make out. It also presents outcomes graphically.