• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.9 no.3
• /
• pp.164-174
• /
• 2008

It is crucial In decision making to select a project delivery system (PDS) adjusted accordingly to the project characteristics. Furthermore, selecting a tendering system is the kernel in the process of selecting PDS. In October 2007, the Ministry of Finance and the Economy of Korea launched two new project delivery systems, "Best Value Contract (Design-Bid-Build)" and "Bridging Contracts (Design-Build)" by revising enforcement ordinances of "Act on Contracts to Which the State is a Party" to provoke the tendering systems. In order to support the proposed purpose, this research developed a selection model for suitable tendering system, which helps a public owner select a tendering system appropriate to the project characteristics. First, the framework of the model was set throughout analyzing previous researches and interviewing relevant experts. Additionally, by analyzing the survey result from 265 experts engaged in architectural and civil engineering business, the relative weights of the selection factors and the effectiveness values of the alternatives were suggested as the quantitative evaluation references. Finally, the practical guideline was suggested to apply this model to three public projects scheduled to be delivered. The result of applying the model to three case projects showed that further researches were needed to make the selection process logical and to suggest the standard weights and effectiveness values according to project type.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.7 no.5
• /
• pp.159-166
• /
• 2006

It was found that Korean Standard of Estimate which has been used as the only basis of cost estimate of public construction projects had some side effects such as jerry-build construction and over-estimation because it failed to reflect the current price and the state-of-the-art construction methods in a changing construction environment. Therefore, the government decided to gradually introduce historical construction cost into cost estimate of public construction projects from 2004. This paper presents analytic criteria and a process model for deducing more current and reasonable historical construction cost for contract items from not only previous contract prices but also all of the other bid prices that were not contracted. The procedure of estimating actual unit cost proposed in this paper focuses on the removal of abnormal values including strategically too low or high prices and the time correction. In addition, basic research is conducted for the correction of actual unit cost through the analysis of fluctuation of bid price depending on bidding types and rates of successful bid. It is anticipated that the effective use of the proposed process model for estimating actual unit cost would make the cost estimation more current and reasonable.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Building Construction Conference
• /
• 2009.05b
• /
• pp.107-111
• /
• 2009

This research provided the technology for the proposed bids to the efficient operation conditions for the application of the existing system of bids and bid proposal, the current technology of the institutional, problems were analyzed. The results of the technical proposal, the current bidding system has been exposed very early points, as ways to overcome these problems and to suggest effective operating plan was to define the details.

• Proceedings of the Korean Association of Geographic Inforamtion Studies Conference
• /
• 2008.10a
• /
• pp.236-242
• /
• 2008

설계용역과 통합하여 발주되는 측량용역의 입찰 제도를 보면 계획기관에서 설계예산서를 작성하여 해당 부처 분임경리관을 경유하여 공개경쟁입찰 또는 입찰참가자격제도(PQ) 등으로 발주하게 된다. 이 과정에서 측량용역과 설계용역을 분리하지 않고 측량용역 비를 설계용역비에 통합예산으로 발주 처리하고 있어 측량회사는 설계용역사로부터 불법으로 하도급 받고 있다. 설계용역회사는 엔지니어링등록과 측량업(공공측량)을 동시에 등록하여 용역수주를 하므로 기술력이 부족한 측량용역을 당연히 저가하도급으로 처리하는 커다란 모순이 발생하고 있다. 따라서 저가하도급으로 인한 측량성과의 부실은 건설공사의 부실시공으로 이어져 커다란 공사비손실과 안전 및 유지관리에 큰 문제점을 야기하고 있다. 이와 같은 문제점을 해결하기 위하여 본 연구에서는 측량용역 등록업체의 현황 및 현행 발주제도 방법 등의 분석을 통하여 발주제도의 개선방안을 제안하고자 한다.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction
• /
• v.9 no.5
• /
• pp.111-117
• /
• 2009

With the current trend in the industry toward increasingly complex, diversified and large construction projects, advanced countries in the construction field have already introduced and applied a variety of methods for placing orders in order to cope with such changes in construction circumstances. In Korea, there have been efforts to continuously improve approaches to placing an order. With the aim of diversifying the methods of Delivery Systems, the "Technical Proposal Type Bid," and the "Design Competition and Technical Proposal Type Bid" were introduced through a revision of Korea's contract law enforcement ordinance. In line with the government's efforts, criteria for a method of placing an order that is suitable for a public construction project should be presented. This study enumerates the current issues using a survey for construction projects already placed and an analysis of the current status, and presents the selection criteria for Delivery Systems by business type as an improvement for the problem.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute Of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• 2008.11a
• /
• pp.509-512
• /
• 2008

Clients demands have been changed by construction circumstances such as high-technology, mega-projects, and the complexity of construction. Advanced foreign countries have already introduced and applied new project delivery systems(i.e, CM, DB, etc.) to deal with the change of such that. Recently, Korea also launched two new project delivery systems, "Best Value Contracts to which the State is a Party" to provoke the project delivery system, which helps a public owner select a project delivery system appropriate to the project characteristics. Even though government has made his efforts as stated above, some clients have still used those to public construction projects uniformly. That is because there are not a selection criteria of project delivery system for clients. Therefore, this paper proposes the selection criteria of project delivery system based on project types in the public large construction projects.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute Of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• 2008.11a
• /
• pp.634-637
• /
• 2008

Performance-based Project Delivery System(PPDS) is one of Project Delivery System that when owner ask for performance than constructor feel free to choose materials, technology, an engineering method. PPDS rank higher position than Performance Warranty Contract and Technical Proposal Bid. This study aims to propose Improvement Idea for PPDS that based Housing Performance Grading Indication System. 'Request-performance Checklist' is used as communication means(between owner and constructor) and a kind of corroborative facts make the procedures achievement of project like contract easier.

• KIISE Transactions on Computing Practices
• /
• v.23 no.6
• /
• pp.359-370
• /
• 2017

In overseas-hospital construction, the digital hospital is a trend that is based on the developments of the information and communication technologies, state-of-the-art medical equipment, smart health, and telemedicine. Along with the increasing proportion of IT, this has resulted in the spreading of the concept throughout city-like hospitals and their transformation into digital hospitals. In the hospital-construction business, IT is a key element that will link the modernization of the mechanical, electrical, and equipment systems, construction, and medical equipment for efficiency maximization through integration. The purpose of this study is the analysis of the market-expansion success factors through the construction of a success-story-based, IT-driven overseas-hospital business. The digital-hospital concept and the development process are analyzed through a literature review, and the success factors are analyzed in terms of the cost, time, and quality that are proposed in the project-management body of knowledge. The main contributions of this study regarding the success factors are as follows: First, a cost-side need exists regarding the establishment of strategic-value engineering in terms of increasing the value from the perspectives of the IT and operational infrastructures; second, in terms of the construction time, all of the hospital systems must comply with the established deadlines for the integrated test and commissioning; and lastly, in terms of quality, it is important to ensure that the System Integration digital-hospital services are delivered according to the user requirements.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute Of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• 2007.11a
• /
• pp.412-415
• /
• 2007

Recently advanced nations utilize evaluation system about LCC, and KOREA begin to introduce the system to reduce construction expense. And Introducing "Technical proposal type bid" that is new government construction order mode made needs for valuation of price to evaluate facilities LCC. These days LCC is evaluated by BTL and turnkey project in KOREA, but it is suffering from difficulty in evaluation. because evaluation element and standard are indefinite. In addition LCC evaluation of public construction business except BTL and turnkey is not consisting. Therefore, in this research we present LCC evaluation Index for systematic and objective evaluation.

• Journal of KIBIM
• /
• v.11 no.4
• /
• pp.10-19
• /
• 2021

In the evaluation for ordering BIM-based projects (Design Build) of Korean National Railway, criteria of BIM-based smart construction technology are assessed. Unlike the existing assessment criteria, performance resources and detailed assessment guidelines have been added by this research. The purpose of this study is to propose qualification assessment standards according to specific guidelines when evaluating on the phase of bidding for BIM-based projects. In the study, an improved evaluation standard (draft) was arranged based on two consultation meetings and surveys of related companies, applied to existing projects with the companies that won the bid, and validated. As more specific and added criteria compared to the existing standards, it could reduce the difficulty of evaluation for BIM capability and lay the foundation for railway BIM-based project management.