• Title/Summary/Keyword: 국가항공안전프로그램

Search Result 12, Processing Time 0.033 seconds

시스템 안전 개념 기반 국가해상교통안전프로그램의 개발 연구

  • Jang, Eun-Gyu
    • Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
    • /
    • 2016.05a
    • /
    • pp.273-275
    • /
    • 2016
  • 해사안전기본계획 등 해사분야에서 시행되고 있는 해상교통안전제도와 항공분야에서 시스템 안전 개념에 기반하여 개발 시행중인 국가항공안전프로그램(SSP)과의 비교를 통해 국가해상교통안전프로그램의 개발 및 도입을 제안하고자 한다.

  • PDF

A Study on Aviation Safety Plan and Safety Performance Indicator of the Domestic and International Case Studies (국내외 항공 안전계획 및 안전성과지표 동향 및 사례분석)

  • Lee, Ji Seon;Lee, Dong Houn;Yoon, Yoon Jin
    • Journal of Korean Society of Transportation
    • /
    • v.32 no.5
    • /
    • pp.431-440
    • /
    • 2014
  • According to the State Safety Program (SSP) of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), it is essential to establish and manage Safety Performance Indicators (SPIs) which are used for monitoring the safety performance to achieve the national aviation safety goal. There have been enormous efforts to develop the framework of SPIs by considering the current status for each country. In case of Republic of Korea, however, there has been limited research and policy projects related to the framework for SPIs. Furthermore, Korea has used identical SPIs since the SSP was legislated in 2008. With this background, this research is, as part of strategy for the state level of SPI development, the study cases of advanced aviation countries for SPI development plans, such as the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) of the EU, the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) of the UK, the Finish Transport Safety Agency (FTSA) of the Finland and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) of the U.S. The comparison between the foreign and domestic policies for SPI development strategies are provided in the conclusion of this study. The results and analyses of the case studies performed in this research will be helpful to provide some valuable development strategies for further SPI research in Korea.

Quantitative Safety Risk Assessment using Aviation Safety Data (항공안전데이터를 사용한 위해요인 위험도 정량적 평가기법)

  • Hyunjin Paek;Jun Hwan Kim;Jae Jin Lim;Sungjin Jeon;Young Jae Choi
    • Journal of the Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics
    • /
    • v.30 no.4
    • /
    • pp.145-158
    • /
    • 2022
  • To manage State Safety Program (SSP) in a more integrative and proactive manner, an aviation safety authority of the state shall detect and assess the risk of emerging or hidden safety hazards before they provoke accidents or incidents(ICAO, 2018). In case of South Korea, safety risk assessment is conducted by calculating the likelihood and severity of the hazard following ICAO's safety management manual. It is reasonable to extract the safety risk likelihood by calculating the number of occurrence caused by the hazard. However, it is ambiguous to assess the safety risk severity defined as the extent of harm that might be expected to occur as a consequence of the identified hazard. In this paper, a safety risk assessment method which quantitatively calculates the risk of hazard using aviation safety data(i.e. aviation safety mandatory report, etc.) is proposed. By utilizing the proposed method, the existing process that safety risk is being subjectively assessed by safety inspectors can be supplemented. So that essential aviation safety policy decision making can be accomplished by the accurate result of safety risk assessment.

A Legal Study on Safety Management System (항공안전관리에 관한 법적 고찰)

  • So, Jae-Seon;Lee, Chang-Kyu
    • The Korean Journal of Air & Space Law and Policy
    • /
    • v.29 no.1
    • /
    • pp.3-32
    • /
    • 2014
  • Safety Management System is the aviation industry policy for while operating the aircraft, to ensure the safety crew, aircraft and passengers. For operating a safe aircraft, in order to establish the international technical standards, the International Civil Aviation Organization has established the Annex 19 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation. As a result, member country was supposed to be in accordance with the policy of the International Civil Aviation Organization, to accept the international standard of domestic air law. The South Korean government announced that it would promote active safety management strategy in primary aviation policy master plan of 2012. And, by integrating and state safety programmes(ssp) and safety management system(sms) for the safe management of Annex 19 is to enforce the policy on aviation safety standards. State safety programmes(ssp) is a system of activities for the aim of strengthening the safety and integrated management of the activities of government. State safety programmes(ssp) is important on the basis of the data of the risk information. Collecting aviation hazard information is necessary for efficient operation of the state safety programmes(ssp) Korean government must implement the strategy required to comply with aviation methods and standards of the International Civil Aviation Organization. Airlines, must strive to safety features for safety culture construction and improvement of safety management is realized. It is necessary to make regulations on the basis of the aviation practice, for aviation safety regulatory requirements, aviation safety should reflect the opinion of the aviation industry.

A Study on Priority of Aviation Safety Oversight Inspection Elements (항공안전감독 점검 요소 우선순위 결정에 관한 연구)

  • Kim, Woong-Yi;Ahn, Joohyun;Choi, Young J.
    • Journal of the Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics
    • /
    • v.27 no.3
    • /
    • pp.90-97
    • /
    • 2019
  • The International Civil Aviation Organization(ICAO) recently established the Global Aviation Safety Plan(GASP) for national aviation safety management, along with the enactment of Annex 19, Safety Management System(SMS). ICAO require the establishment of the 'States Safety Programs(SSP)' for countries with excellent safety evaluation, including Korea, and the establishment of aviation safety supervision systems for all Contracting States by 2017 under the enactment of ICAO Annex 19. Required. The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport has continuously invested in R&D to secure such aviation safety systematically, and is making efforts to develop and disseminate related technologies by establishing long-term R&D roadmaps. A study on aviation safety supervision among the system-based aviation safety supervision support technology development R&D project, which is underway as part of the aviation safety technology development project of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. We conducted a study to see if this methodology logically guarantees reasonableness.

Comparative of Safety Culture Perceptions of European and Korean Airline Flight Crews (유럽과 국내 항공사 운항승무원의 안전문화 인식도 비교)

  • Kim Hyeon-deok
    • Journal of Advanced Navigation Technology
    • /
    • v.27 no.4
    • /
    • pp.346-350
    • /
    • 2023
  • The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) introduced a safety management system in the aviation sector for aviation safety and mandated the implementation of safety management systems and national safety programs. The activation of the airline's safety management system is not just a requirement for organizational members to create and comply with necessary regulations, but a safety culture to promote and improve flight safety must be established within the organization. Therefore, the safety culture of airlines acts as a major key variable in the safety management system that directly affects safety performance. This study compared the data from the European pilot safety culture awareness, which was the basic data of the survey, with statistics on the safety culture awareness of domestic flight attendants to analyze the differences in safety culture between the two groups.

Privilege and Immunity of Information and Data from Aviation Safety Program in Unites States (미국 항공안전데이터 프로그램의 비공개 특권과 제재 면제에 관한 연구)

  • Moon, Joon-Jo
    • The Korean Journal of Air & Space Law and Policy
    • /
    • v.23 no.2
    • /
    • pp.137-172
    • /
    • 2008
  • The earliest safety data programs, the FDR and CVR, were electronic reporting systems that generate data "automatically." The FDR program, originally instituted in 1958, had no publicly available restrictions for protections against sanctions by the FAA or an airline, although there are agreements and union contracts forbidding the use of FDR data for FAA enforcement actions. This FDR program still has the least formalized protections. With the advent of the CVR program in 1966, the precursor to the current FAR 91.25 was already in place, having been promulgated in 1964. It stated that the FAA would not use CVR data for enforcement actions. In 1982, Congress began restricting the disclosure of the CVR tape and transcripts. Congress added further clarification of the availability of discovery in civil litigation in 1994. Thus, the CVR data have more definitive protections in place than do FDR data. The ASRS was the first non-automatic reporting system; and built into its original design in 1975 was a promise of limited protection from enforcement sanctions. That promise was further codified in an FAR in 1979. As with the CVR, from its inception, the ASRS had some protections built in for the person who might have had a safety problem. However, the program did not (and to this day does not) explicitly deal with issues of use by airlines, litigants, or the public media, although it appears that airlines will either take a non-punitive stance if an ASRS report is filed, or the airline may ignore the fact that it has been filed at all. The FAA worked with several U.S. airlines in the early 1990s on developing ASAP programs, and the FAA issued an Advisory Circular about the program in 1997. From its inception, the ASAP program contained some FAA enforcement protections and company discipline protections, although some protection against litigation disclosure and public disclosure was not added until 2003, when FAA Order 8000.82 was promulgated, placing the program under the protections of FAR 193, which had been added in 2001. The FOQA program, when it was first instituted through a demonstration program in 1995, did not contain protections against sanctions. Now, however, the FAA cannot take enforcement action based on FOQA safety data, and an airline is limited to "corrective action" under the program. Union contracts can exclude FOQA from the realm of disciplinary action, although airline practice may be for airlines to require retraining if there is no contract in place forbidding it. The data is protected against disclosure for litigation and public media purposes by FAA Order 8000.81, issued in 2003, which placed FOQA under the protections of FAR 193. The figure on the next page shows when each program began, and when each statute, regulation, or order became effective for that program.

  • PDF

A Study on Legal and Institutional Improvement Measures for the Effective Implementation of SMS -Focusing on Aircraft Accident Investigation-

  • Yoo, Kyung-In
    • The Korean Journal of Air & Space Law and Policy
    • /
    • v.32 no.2
    • /
    • pp.101-127
    • /
    • 2017
  • Even with the most advanced aviation technology benefits, aircraft accidents are constantly occurring while air passenger transportation volume is expected to double in the next 15 years. Since it is not possible to secure aviation safety only by the post aircraft accident safety action of accident investigations, it has been recognized and consensus has been formed that proactive and predictive prevention measures are necessary. In this sense, the aviation safety management system (SMS) was introduced in 2008 and has been carried out in earnest since 2011. SMS is a proactive and predictive aircraft accident preventive measure, which is a mechanism to eliminate the fundamental risk factors by approaching organizational factors beyond technological factors and human factors related to aviation safety. The methodology is to collect hazards in all the sites required for aircraft operations, to build a database, to analyze the risks, and through managing risks, to keep the risks acceptable or below. Therefore, the improper implementation of SMS indicates that the aircraft accident prevention is insufficient and it is to be directly connected with the aircraft accident. Reports of duty performance related hazards including their own errors are essential and most important in SMS. Under the policy of just culture for voluntary reporting, the guarantee of information providers' anonymity, non-punishment and non-blame should be basically secured, but to this end, under-reporting is stagnant due to lack of trust in their own organizations. It is necessary for the accountable executive(CEO) and senior management to take a leading role to foster the safety culture initiating from just culture with the safety consciousness, balancing between safety and profit for the organization. Though a Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport's order, "Guidance on SMS Implementation" states the training required for the accountable executive(CEO) and senior management, it is not legally binding. Thus it is suggested that the SMS training completion certificates of accountable executive(CEO) and senior management be included in SMS approval application form that is legally required by "Korea Aviation Safety Program" in addition to other required documents such as a copy of SMS manual. Also, SMS related items are missing in the aircraft accident investigation, so that organizational factors in association with safety culture and risk management are not being investigated. This hinders from preventing future accidents, as the root cause cannot be identified. The Aircraft Accident Investigation Manuals issued by ICAO contain the SMS investigation wheres it is not included in the final report form of Annex 13 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. In addition, the US National Transportation Safety Board(NTSB) that has been a substantial example of the aircraft accident investigation for the other accident investigation agencies worldwide does not appear to expand the scope of investigation activities further to SMS. For these reasons, it is believed that investigation agencies conducting their investigations under Annex 13 do not include SMS in the investigation items, and the aircraft accident investigators are hardly exposed to SMS investigation methods or techniques. In this respect, it is necessary to include the SMS investigation in the organization and management information of the final report format of Annex 13. In Korea as well, in the same manner, SMS item should be added to the final report format of the Operating Regulation of the Aircraft and Railway Accident Investigation Board. If such legal and institutional improvement methods are complemented, SMS will serve the purpose of aircraft accident prevention effectively and contribute to the improvement of aviation safety in the future.

  • PDF

Software Security Quality Improvement Using Secure Coding Standard (소프트웨어 보안품질 향상을 위한 시큐어 코딩표준 활용)

  • Jang, Young Su;Choi, Jin Young
    • Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference
    • /
    • 2010.11a
    • /
    • pp.1101-1103
    • /
    • 2010
  • 과거 인터넷을 사용하지 않는 시스템의 경우 소프트웨어의 안전성과 강건성은 철도, 국방, 우주, 항공, 원자력 등 오류 없이 수행되어야 하는 임베디드 소프트웨어에 국한되어 있었다. 그러나 인터넷의 발전으로 인터넷을 통한 정보의 교류 및 서비스가 증대하면서 소프트웨어의 보안품질은 개인, 사회, 국가 모두에게 정보보호의 중요성을 더욱 강조하고 있다. 특히 오류 없이 수행되어야 하는 고안전성 소프트웨어의 개발 기법은 이제 응용 소프트웨어의 보안강화 활동에 활용 되고 있다. 시큐어 코딩 (Secure Coding)은 방어적 프로그램(Defensive Programming)을 포함하는 개념으로 소프트웨어의 안전성과 보안성을 향상 시킬 수 있다. 본 논문에서는 C 언어의 취약가능성 유발 명령어를 예를 들고 시큐어 코딩 기법을 적용하여 취약한 코드를 개선하였다. 이러한 개선을 통해 보안 취약성 유발 가능한 코드 부분을 손쉽게 수정하여 소프트웨어 보안품질을 개선할 수 있다.

Software Security Vulnerability Improvement Using Open Static Analysis Tool (공개 정적 분석도구를 활용한 소프트웨어 보안취약성 개선)

  • Jang, Young Su;Jung, Geum Taek;Choi, Jin Young
    • Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference
    • /
    • 2010.04a
    • /
    • pp.796-799
    • /
    • 2010
  • 인터넷의 발전으로 인터넷을 통한 서비스가 증대하고 있다. 반면 응용 소프트웨어의 보안 취약점으로 인해 국가, 기업, 개인 모두에게 정보보호의 중요성이 더욱 강조 되고 있다. 임베디드 소프트웨어인 우주, 항공, 원자력 소프트웨어 등 오류 없이 수행되어야 하는 고안전성 소프트웨어의 개발기법은 이제 응용 소프트웨어의 보안강화 활동에 활용 되고 있다. 특히 시큐어 코딩 (Secure Coding)은 방어적 프로그램(Defensive Programming)을 포함하는 개념으로 소프트웨어의 안전성과 보안성을 향상 시킬 수 있다. 본 논문에서는 범용 보안 취약가능성 분석 도구를 이용하여 소프트웨어의 취약 가능성을 분석하고 보안 취약점 유발 명령어를 분류한다. 그 다음에 시큐어 코딩 기법을 적용하여 취약한 코드를 개선하였다. 이러한 개선을 통해 보안 취약성 가능한 코드 부분을 손쉽게 수정하여 소프트웨어 보안을 개선할 수 있다.