• Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education
• /
• v.16 no.1
• /
• pp.30-42
• /
• 2023

The purpose of this study is to quantitatively and qualitatively analyze the science journals written by pre-service elementary school teachers, and to categorize the view on the nature of science and the process of their change. For this purpose, 112 science journals written by 13 pre-service elementary school teachers were analyzed. The frequency of each area was analyzed using the research framework of the four areas of the nature of science, and the pattern of change in perspective on the nature of science was inductively derived and classified using the VNOS-C test analysis framework. As a result, The nature of scientific thinking, nature of scientific knowledge, nature of STS, and nature of scientific inquiry were described in relatively similar proportions, but among them, The nature of scientific thinking appeared in the largest percentage, and the nature of scientific inquiry was described in the smallest percentage. The variability of scientific knowledge, the importance of empirical evidence, and the positive and negative effects of science were especially intensively addressed. In addition, the changing aspects of pre-service elementary school teachers' perspectives on the nature of science could be categorized into 'naive view maintenance type', 'informed view maintenance type', 'regression type', 'development type', and 'mixed type'. The element of 'the empirical nature of scientific knowledge' showed various patterns of change depending on the students, and most of the students maintained a informed view on the tentativeness of scientific knowledge for several sessions.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.38 no.5
• /
• pp.721-738
• /
• 2018

Nature of Science(NOS) has been a well-organized focus of science education and one of the key elements in defining and cultivating scientific literacy for more than a century. In recent years, a specific description of NOS, which is often known as 'the consensus view of NOS', has become very influential and has gained ready acceptance as an arrangement for both curriculum building and research into understanding of NOS by students and teachers in many countries around the world. This study has two purposes; one is to review some debates and criticism on the consensus view of NOS which consists of a list of sentences to describe nature of refined and general science, which have been heated up for the last few years by many prominent science education researchers, and the other is to consider alternative perspectives on NOS for the purpose of a new direction of NOS education. As a result of an investigation into such views as 'Teaching about NOS', 'Critical NOS', 'Critical Thinking-NOS', 'Whole Science', 'Features of Science' and 'Reconceptualized Family Resemblance Approach to NOS', some implications which focus on the generality and plurality of content knowledge of NOS based on current philosophy of science and sociology of scientific knowledge are suggested for the improvement of teaching and learning NOS.

• Journal of Science Education
• /
• v.38 no.2
• /
• pp.454-469
• /
• 2014

Teachers' presuppositions of nature of science, scientific causality, and nature are unconsciously constructed through interactions with his or her physical and social environment everyday and it began even before they were in any formal education. It directly influences their teaching later. Thus, this study examined what comprehensive presuppositions in nature of science, scientific causality, and nature are held by in-service secondary science teachers. For the study, Q-methodology was used. Q-sorting was done on 81 statements from three instruments: Nature statements, the Test of Preferred Explanations, and the Nature of Science Scale with twelve in-service science teachers. Teachers sorted the statements along a presented agreement scale of their viewpoint and the collected data was analyzed using recommended procedures for Q-sorts in order to group teachers with similar views. As a result, ten participants were placed in five factors based on their presuppositions of science, scientific causality, and nature and distinctive features of each factor were discovered. In addition, the study confirmed that presuppositions of science, scientific causality, and nature are interrelated. This study method will be helpful to discover more relationships regarding teachers' various viewpoints further.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.18 no.1
• /
• pp.109-121
• /
• 1998

Scientific literacy implies an adequate understanding of the nature of science. However, little is known about factors that can influence students' conceptions of the nature of science. The purpose of this study was to test the validity of the prevalent assumption that teachers' philosophical perspectives of science directly influence their students' conceptions of the nature of science. A comparison between science teachers' and students' perspectives of science did not support the assumption that a science teachers' perspectives of science is significantly related to students' conceptions of science. The data clearly indicated that there was no relationship between teachers' philosophical perspectives and those of their students. The results convincingly indicated that the nature of science was not being considered or taught to students as a consequence of students' needs and curriculum guide objectives. It is believed that the results of this investigation will help to redirect the focus of future efforts to promote more adequate conceptions of the nature of science in our secondary schools.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.26 no.1
• /
• pp.58-67
• /
• 2006

Student understanding of the nature of science is necessary not only because it is helpful for solving everyday problems with growing science literacy, but also because it influences students' science learning. Therefore, it was necessary to investigate student views on the nature of science under the 7th national curriculum and compare with those before the 7th national curriculum in order to probe the elements which contribute to changes in student views on the nature of science. A significant number of differences were found between subdimensions of views on the nature of science through the comparison. High school students under the 7th national curriculum had more relativistic, instrumental, and deductive but less process-oriented views than high school students before the 7th national curriculum. The differences between mean values which showed high school student views on the nature of science under and before the 7th national curriculum were significant, except for the subdimension of instrumentanlism/realism. In particular, high school students under the 7th national curriculum possessed a contextual view, whereas those before the 7th national curriculum possessed a decontextual view. Although other factors might be the cause for differences found in this study, we argued by discussion that differences among textbook contents seemed to be the major factor.

• The Bulletin of The Korean Astronomical Society
• /
• v.37 no.2
• /
• pp.102.2-102.2
• /
• 2012

이 연구의 목적은 거시적인 관점에서 NOS의 중요한 요소들을 강조한 Flow map(oh, 2011)를 이용한 명시적이고 암시적인 교육의 본성교육이 얼마나 이루어졌는가를 알아본다. 과학의 본성은 지식의 내용뿐만 아니라 지식이 어떻게 형성되었는가에 있다. 이러한 과학의 본성을 이해한다는 것이 현대의 과학의 중요한 목적중의 하나인 과학적 소양을 얻는 것이다. 이를 구체적으로 실현하는 교수 모형으로 가장 중요한 이론의 생성과 실험에 의한 확증과 이론의 확증을 미시적인 관점으로 연구를 전개하였다. 따라서 먼저 Kuhn(1996)의 과학철학 이론과 NOS를 통한 Flow map 개발에 이론적 배경이 된 과학의 본성의 정의, 과학의 본성에 대해 합의된 핵심 요소들, Kuhn(1996)의 과학철학 이론을 바탕으로 한 Oh(2011)가 제안한 Flow map의 구조를 알아본다. 연구방법은 귀추(abduction)를 통한 가설의 생성과정과 확증을 보여주는 Oh(2012)의 자연과학의 추리과정을 이용하여 충북대학교 천문우주학과에서 자연과학캠프에 참여한 고등학생들을 대상으로, "Galileo의 흑점발견과정"으로부터 현대의 태양의 흑점 모형을 이해하도록 한다.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.27 no.3
• /
• pp.169-179
• /
• 2007

We investigated the effects of hypothetical deductive experiment on students' views about the nature of science (NOS). Participants were 212 eighth graders from a middle school and they were assigned to a control group and an experimental group. Students of the control group did guided experiment in small group and students of the experimental group did hypothetical deductive experiment in small group. The results revealed that both students of the control group and the experimental group possessed similar views about NOS in a pretest. But the experimental group exhibited more sophisticated views about the theory of dependance of observation, scientific reasoning and hypothesis in the posttest. Students who used mainly surface learning strategy within the experimental group exhibited more sophisticated views about hypothesis in the posttest. On the other hand, students who used mainly deep learning strategy within the experimental group exhibited more sophisticated views about the theory of dependance of observation, scientific reasoning and hypothesis in the posttest.

• Journal of Gifted/Talented Education
• /
• v.21 no.2
• /
• pp.511-530
• /
• 2011

This study aims to find out science talented students' percentage of cognition about the views of nature of science and science inquiry which are essential for having a good understanding with science concepts. Each group of 40 science gifted students and 35 ordinary students was tested with a test of views of nature of science and science inquiry which consisted of 19 items with index of content validity 97% and reliability index 0.86, then its results being compared and analyzed. A group of science gifted students' percentage of cognition about the views of nature of science ranges from 20% to 97.5% -although it differs according to detailed views-showing its mean of 67% (50% in a group of ordinary students). Especially, the percentage of cognition about the sub view that there can be different opinions among scientists was high among woman science gifted students. A group of science gifted students' percentage of cognition about the views of science inquiry ranges from 27.5% to 77.5% -although it differs according to detailed views- showing 53% in their mean (41.8% in a group of ordinary students). Especially, the percentage of cognition about the sub view that scientists can have different research methods was high among woman science gifted students. The percentage of mistaken cognition by science gifted students about views of nature of science and about views of science inquiry was 33%, 47% respectively.

• Journal of the Korean earth science society
• /
• v.29 no.7
• /
• pp.602-616
• /
• 2008

The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of global science literacy-oriented instruction on students' views of the nature of science. The participants were 65 male students in 8th grade, and they were taught for five weeks about the Unit of "Earth and Star" that was designed based on global science literacy. Survey was conducted to determine the students' views of the nature of science before and after the instruction. Results revealed that it was hard to change students' views of the nature of science during the short period of time; however, in the sociological aspect, the students acquired relatively more improved students' views of the nature of science than the other aspects including philosophical, psychological, and historical aspects.

• Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education
• /
• v.33 no.1
• /
• pp.44-56
• /
• 2014

이 연구의 목적은 인지적 전략인, 갈등도(Oh, 2011)를 기반으로 학생들이 명시적으로 과학의 본성(NOS)의 교육을 돕기 위하여 과학의 본성요소뿐만 아니라 과학의 역사를 담은 NOS Flow Map을 개발 제안하는 것이다. 예비적으로 과학의 본성의 교육을 위해 제안한 NOS Flow Map을 사용에 대한 이해를 탐색하기 위하여, 자신들의 NOS 이해를 강화하기 위해 우리가 제안한 NOS Flow Map의 유용성에 대한 예비 초등교사들의 인식를 조사하였다. 과학의 본성에 대한 중요한 관점들은 Kuhn의 과학철학과 역사가 아주 잘 일치된다. 즉 Kuhn의 과학혁명의 예로 가장 중요한 Copernicus의 혁명과정이 과학의 본성 중요한 요소들과 잘 일치됨을 보여준다. 따라서 이 연구에서 인지갈등을 통한 NOS 흐름도는 과학의 소양교육을 강화하는데 명시적이고 반성적인 도구이며 유망한 방법이라고 조심스럽게 제안한다.