• Proceedings of the Korean Institute Of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• 2008.11a
• /
• pp.568-571
• /
• 2008

To help a owner selecting proper contractors about the specified contract, the Evaluation and Public Announcing System of the Contractor's Construction Capacity has been introduced since 1997. But, the system has been done violence to its original meaning and purpose as time went on. When annually announcing the Contractor's Construction Capacity, especially, there was frequently a large range of opinion on the issues. On that account, MLTM(Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs) has had to make a alteration to improve those and is making efforts for a constructive policy now. The purpose of this paper is to conduct a basis study on the Integrated System after reflecting points to be considered about improvements and the current of the times.

• 월간 기계설비
• /
• s.164
• /
• pp.13-14
• /
• 2004

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.14 no.6
• /
• pp.78-89
• /
• 2013

Post-evaluation system reflects the results of performing a public construction project in the future similar public construction projects to be utilized in the planning. However, the current system simply compares the expected values, such as demand, B/C ratio, cost of construction, construction period, with the actual values after the completion of construction. In addition, most public owner does not actively conduct the post-construction evaluation tasks, so that the evaluation results has not been returned to early stage of a construction project. In this study, status of the post-construction evaluation system is investigated by a survey of the public owner and the construction project evaluation system of the United States and Japan was analyzed. This paper presents the improvement scheme of utilization of the results of the post-construction evaluation system. Through improving the post-construction evaluation system, it is expected that public agencies would easily utilize the post-construction evaluation.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Building Construction Conference
• /
• 2012.05a
• /
• pp.185-188
• /
• 2012

As a separate project unit, the domestic construction policy evaluation is independently evaluated and managed by different involvements, so that it has been difficult to have a consistent policy evaluation to be performed. In this paper, thus, it is aimed to give an overview of the evaluation system and issues of domestic construction policy and suggest strategies of a improved evaluation system by a comprehensive benchmarking of construction policy evaluation system of Japan. The implications of this paper will serve a basis of improvement of a better construction policy evaluation system in Korea.

• 월간 기계설비
• /
• s.284
• /
• pp.60-64
• /
• 2014

불공정 하도급거래 행위로 인한 회원사의 피해방지를 위해 대한설비건설협회는 국토부, 공정위, 국회 등에 지속적으로 제도개선을 추진한 결과 지난해 6월 국토부, 기재부, 공정위 등 5개 부처 합동 국가정책조정회의에서 '건설산업 불공정 거래관행 개선방안'이 발표됐다. 그 후속조치로 지난 2월, 하도급부당특약 설정금지를 비롯해 보증기관의 하도급대금지급보증금 지급사유 법제화, 하도급대금지급보증서 면제대상(2개 이상 신용평가 기관의 회사채평가 A이상 등급업체) 삭제 등 관련 법령이 개정됐다.

• 월간 기계설비
• /
• s.250
• /
• pp.28-43
• /
• 2011

정부가 대 중소기업간 상생협력을 본격 추진하기 위해 지난해 말 동반성장위원회를 구성하면서 동반성장 정책이 활기를 띄고 있다. 올해 말에는 56개 대기업(건설사 12개 업체)의 동반성장 및 공정거래 협약 실적이 평가 된다. 이에 따라 대기업은 동반성장 협력 방안을 잇달아 내놓고 있다. 지난 4월 15일 10대 대형건설사가 공정거래 및 동반성장 협약을 체결한 것도 정부의 이러한 정책을 반영하기 위함이다. 서울시 등 일부 지자체도 상생을 위한 하도급 정책을 속속 내놓고 있다. 서울시는 하도급 문화 개선 을 위해 ${\Delta}$하도급 직불제 ${\Delta}$표준계약서 사용 ${\Delta}$주계약자 공동도급제 등 3가지 분야를 확대시행 정책 과제로 삼고 올해부터 집중 추진하기로 했다. 인천시 종합건설본부도 4월부터 하도급 대금 직불제 시행에 들어갔다. 본지는 핫이슈로 떠오르고 있는 정부의 동반성장 정책 방향 및 제도개선 현황과 서울시의 하도급 정책, 동반성장지수 평가 대상업체인 12개 건설사의 상생협력 방안에 대해 알아본다.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.8 no.2
• /
• pp.93-100
• /
• 2007

Performance measurement and evaluation is a critical issue in public funded civil infrastructure projects in recent years. As a results, Korean government has introduced the related policies and regulations based on the foreign cases to evaluate public construction projects. However, construction circumstances are different from other countries and the results from adopted regulations are not satisfied. Therefore this research proposes the critical success factors(schedule, cost, productivity, change order, safety, quality) for public construction projects based on previous related research outputs to successfully implement construction performance evaluation. Then, this paper also proposes the weights for the critical success factors. The proposed weights are developed by AHP of construction experts. Furthermore, the paper shows the difference of the weights of the critical success factors by project participants (owner, constructor, engineering, and inspector). This efforts will enhance the ability to develop an effective performance evaluation process and system for public construction projects.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.13 no.5
• /
• pp.76-83
• /
• 2012

The purposes of this study are both to identify suggestions regarding the evaluation framework of construction policy performance based on the analysis of the 4th Master Plan for Improvement of Construction Technology and to provide recommendations that can be used for developing the 5th Master Plan for Improvement of Construction Technology. In order to achieve this purpose, a questionnaire was distributed to construction industry-related professionals and makes them evaluate the performance of the 4th Master Plan for Improvement of Construction Technology by performance index appropriacy, measurement appropriacy, and target level. In addition, comprehensive literature review was implemented to extract important points, which are related to policy evaluation, that can be considered factors in developing the 5th Master Plan for Improvement of Construction Technology.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.11 no.2
• /
• pp.124-136
• /
• 2010

International construction market has been depressed significantly after 2000. Exclusive techniques and advanced construction management methods are desperately in demand so as to ensure the competitiveness in unlimited competition. Although public construction delivery system has been revised several times starting with introduction of the lowest bidding system in 1951, there has been no remarkable achievement whenever new system was introduced. This study analyzed the successful stories of developed countries like Europe, USA and Japan to settle successful rating system down and vitalize the best value system in Korea, which was introduced in October 2007. We constructed the bidder evaluation system for domestic situation, and designed the evaluation tool which is useful in utilization. Since this study were analyzed on only same systems of developed countries and domestic similar cases, this study is limited to typical construction in Korea. The study of specialized rating system in the field related should be followed.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.19 no.1
• /
• pp.65-73
• /
• 2018

Since unfair trading practices between participants in construction project are common, the government has enforced several policies and systems to prevent or minimize the unfair trading practices in construction industry. However, not much attention has been paid to figure out which policies or acts are working or not. This paper analyzed the effectiveness of the policies and acts which are being implemented to prevent unfair trading practices and provided several suggestions to improve the performance of those acts. Survey was conducted to industry experts to collect data regarding their perceptions on those policies and acts. Then the effectiveness of the policies and acts were analyzed in terms of their importance and performance through IPA (Importance-Performance Analysis) based on the survey result. It was found through IPA that execution related acts such as investigation, exposure, and punishment for unfair trading practice have shown low effectiveness in entire construction process and dispute arbitration and mediation related center operated by authority showed low performance too. To improve the effectiveness of those acts, dispute arbitration system improvement, investigation & reporting system consolidation and enhancement practical binding force of punishment and penalty were suggested. Most of all, rules and culture for fair trading should become more established in construction industry by preventing conflict among participants through active communication.