Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2013.14.6.078

Improvement scheme of utilization of the results of the post-construction evaluation system  

Lee, Du-Heon (Korea Institute of Construction Technology)
Park, Jae-Woo (Korea Institute of Construction Technology)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management / v.14, no.6, 2013 , pp. 78-89 More about this Journal
Abstract
Post-evaluation system reflects the results of performing a public construction project in the future similar public construction projects to be utilized in the planning. However, the current system simply compares the expected values, such as demand, B/C ratio, cost of construction, construction period, with the actual values after the completion of construction. In addition, most public owner does not actively conduct the post-construction evaluation tasks, so that the evaluation results has not been returned to early stage of a construction project. In this study, status of the post-construction evaluation system is investigated by a survey of the public owner and the construction project evaluation system of the United States and Japan was analyzed. This paper presents the improvement scheme of utilization of the results of the post-construction evaluation system. Through improving the post-construction evaluation system, it is expected that public agencies would easily utilize the post-construction evaluation.
Keywords
Post-construction evaluation system; Benchmarking; Construction policy;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Construction Industry Advancement Committee (2009). "The public projects efficiency plan". Construction Industry Institute of US
2 Korea Institute of Construction Technology (2012). "Study on the substantiality plan of construction project post-evaluation systems", Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs,
3 Korea Institute of Construction Technology (2009). "Study on the improvement plan of Construction Project Performance Management and Evaluation Systems", Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs.
4 Lee, D., Park, H., and Lee, K. (2006). "Industry's Perception of Construction Technology Policy for Public Sector Projects", Korean journal of Construction Enginnering and Management, KICEM, 7(3), pp. 122-129.   과학기술학회마을
5 Ministry of Construction and Transportation (1999). "Comprehensive plan for the efficiency of public construction projects".
6 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of Japan
7 Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (2011). "Transportation facility investment evaluation guidelines (4th revision)".
8 National Assembly Budget Office (2009). "Evaluation of total operating expenses management system".
9 Public Procurement Service (2012). "Analysis of construction cost for each type of Public Buildings in 2011".
10 The Korea Transport Institute (2010). "Study on the improvements of the post-evaluation implementation methods of transportation Investment Projects".
11 Transportation Research Institute (2001). "Study on the investment evaluation Guidelines of transportation facilities".
12 The Board of Audit and Inspection of Korea, Evaluation and Research Institute (2006). "Study on the improvement plan of evaluation systems for Efficient SOC project operation", pp. 9-14.
13 Yoon, T., and Lee, S. (2011), "A Study on the Improvement of Item for Discrimination Increasing in Post Evaluation of Public Building Construction Project", Korean journal of Construction Enginnering and Management, KICEM, 12(2), pp. 21-31.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn