• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제10권3호
• /
• pp.211-217
• /
• 2018

PURPOSE. To evaluate the effect of prolonged sandblasting on the bond durability of dual-cure adhesive resin cement to computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) restoratives. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Nano-ceramic LAVA Ultimate and hybrid-ceramic VITA Enamic CAD/CAM blocks were used for this study. Each CAD/CAM block was sectioned into slabs of 4-mm thickness for the microtensile test (${\mu}TBS$) test and 2-mm thickness for the surface roughness test. Three groups were created according to the sandblasting protocols; group 1: specimens were sandblasted for 15 seconds, group 2: specimens were sandblasted for 30 seconds, and group 3: specimens were sandblasted for 60 seconds. After sandblasting, all specimens were luted using RelyX Ultimate Clicker. Half the specimens were subjected to ${\mu}TBS$ tests at 24 hours, and the other half were subjected to tests after 5000 thermocycles. Additionally, a total of 96 CAD/CAM block sections were prepared for surface roughness tests and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) evaluations. The Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance, and Dunn's post hoc test were used to compare continuous variables among the groups. RESULTS. At baseline, group 1, group 2, and group 3 exhibited statistically similar ${\mu}TBS$ results for LAVA. However, group 3 had significantly lower ${\mu}TBS$ values than groups 1 and 2 for VITA. After 5000 thermocycles, ${\mu}TBS$ values significantly decreased for each block (P<.05). CONCLUSION. It is important to perform controlled sandblasting because it may affect bond strength results. Sixty seconds of sandblasting disturbs the initial ${\mu}TBS$ values and the stability of adhesion of CAD/CAM restoratives to dual-cure adhesive resin cement for VITA Enamic.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제43권4호
• /
• pp.40.1-40.10
• /
• 2018

Objectives: This study evaluated the microtensile bond strength (${\mu}TBS$) of polymer-ceramic and indirect composite resin with 3 classes of resin cements. Materials and Methods: Two computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM)-fabricated polymer-ceramics (Enamic [ENA; Vita] and Lava Ultimate [LAV; 3M ESPE]) and a laboratory indirect composite resin (Gradia [GRA; GC Corp.]) were equally divided into 6 groups (n = 18) with 3 classes of resin cements: Variolink N (VAR; Vivadent), RelyX U200 (RXU; 3M ESPE), and Panavia F2 (PAN; Kuraray). The ${\mu}TBS$ values were compared between groups by 2-way analysis of variance and the post hoc Tamhane test (${\alpha}=0.05$). Results: Restorative materials and resin cements significantly influenced ${\mu}TBS$ (p < 0.05). In the GRA group, the highest ${\mu}TBS$ was found with RXU ($27.40{\pm}5.39N$) and the lowest with VAR ($13.54{\pm}6.04N$) (p < 0.05). Similar trends were observed in the ENA group. In the LAV group, the highest ${\mu}TBS$ was observed with VAR ($27.45{\pm}5.84N$) and the lowest with PAN ($10.67{\pm}4.37N$) (p < 0.05). PAN had comparable results to those of ENA and GRA, whereas the ${\mu}TBS$ values were significantly lower with LAV (p = 0.001). The highest bond strength of RXU was found with GRA ($27.40{\pm}5.39N$, p = 0.001). PAN showed the lowest ${\mu}TBS$ with LAV ($10.67{\pm}4.37N$; p < 0.001). Conclusions: When applied according to the manufacturers' recommendations, the ${\mu}TBS$ of polymer-ceramic CAD/CAM materials and indirect composites is influenced by the luting cements.

• 대한소아치과학회지
• /
• 제36권3호
• /
• pp.348-357
• /
• 2009

본 연구는 유구치 상아질의 각기 다른 부위(표층부, 심층부, 치경부)에서 복합레진 접착제의 접착강도를 비교, 평가하기 위하여 임상에서 흔히 사용하고 있는 서로 다른 4종의 접착방식(3-step total etch: 1군, 2-step total etch: 2군, 2-step self-etch: 3군, all-in-one: 4군)을 적용하고 복합 레진 ($Light-Core^{TM}$ Core Build-Up Composite)을 적층한 후, 미세인장접착강도를 비교하였을 때 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. 접착방식간의 비교에서 레진의 접착방식에 따른 상아질 각 부위에서의 미세인장접착강도는 제 1군이 표층부에서 뚜렷이 높았으나(p<0.05) 2, 3, 4군은 부위에 따른 차이가 없었다. 2. 부위별 미세인장접착강도를 비교하여 보았을 때 상아질 표층부에서의 미세인장접착강도는 레진의 접착 방식간에 차이가 없었으나, 심층부에서는 2군, 3군, 4군 및 1군의 순으로 나타났고(p<0.05), 치경부에서는 2군과 3군이 1군과 4군에 비하여 현저히 높았다(p<0.05).

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제35권6호
• /
• pp.461-472
• /
• 2010

연구목적: 본 연구는 미세인장결합강도와 파괴인성을 통해 복합 레진 수복물의 수리 시기와 표면 처리 방법에 따른 파괴 거동을 알아보고자 시행되었다. 연구 재료 및 방법: Short rod 시편과 composite resin specimen block을 준비하여 표면 처리 방법에 따라 none-treated, sand blasting, bur roughening 군으로 나누고 이를 다시 즉시군과 2주 지연군으로 나누어 수리했다. 결과: 미세인장결합강도와 파괴인성을 측정한 결과, 두 실험 모두에서 즉시군이 지연군보다 높은 값을 보였다. 기계적 표면 처리군이 none-treated군보다 높은 값을 보였고, sand blasting과 bur roughening 사이에 유의한 차이는 없었다. 파괴인성과 미세인장결합강도는 상관 관계가 없었다. FE-SEM을 보아 수복물의 탈락은 균열 전도와 관계가 있는 것으로 보인다. 결론: 수리된 복합 레진의 파괴 거동 평가에는 파괴인성 실험이 적합하다.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제7권4호
• /
• pp.317-322
• /
• 2015

PURPOSE. The aim was to evaluate the effect of curing mode and different dentin surface pretreatment on microtensile bond strength (${\mu}TBS$) of self-adhesive resin cements. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thirty-six extracted human permanent molars were sectioned horizontally exposing flat dentin surface. The teeth were divided into 12 groups (3 teeth/group) according to the dentin surface pretreatment methods (control, 18% EDTA, 10% Polyacrylic acid) and curing mode (self-curing vs. light-curing) of cement. After pretreatment, composite resin blocks were cemented with the following: (a) G-CEM LinkAce; (b) RelyX U200, followed by either self-curing or light-curing. After storage, the teeth were sectioned and ${\mu}TBS$ test was performed using a microtensile testing machine. The data was statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA, Student T-test and Scheffe's post-hoc test at P<.05 level. RESULTS. For G-CEM LinkAce cement groups, polyacrylic acid pretreatment showed the highest ${\mu}TBS$ in the self-cured group. In the light-cured group, no significant improvements were observed according to the dentin surface pretreatment. There were no significant differences between curing modes. Both dentin surface pretreatment methods helped to increase the ${\mu}TBS$ of RelyX U200 resin cement significantly and degree of pretreatment effect was similar. No significant differences were found regarding curing modes except control groups. In the comparisons of two self-adhesive resin cements, all groups within the same pretreatment and curing mode were significantly different excluding self-cured control groups. CONCLUSION. Selecting RelyX U200 used in this study and application of dentin surface pretreatment with EDTA and polyacrylic acid might be recommended to enhance the bond strength of cement to dentin.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제29권3호
• /
• pp.233-238
• /
• 2004

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of immediate or delayed composite resin filling on dentinal microtensile bond strength (${\mu}TBS$) after applied the adhesive. The coronal dentin of human third molars was exposed. Single-Bond or One-Step was applied on the dentin surfaces. and composite resin were constructed immediately (group 1) or 5min., 10min., 15min., 20min. and 30min. (groups 2-6) after an adhesive was applied. The specimens were sectioned and made bar-shaped. Each surface area of them was about $1\textrm{mm}^2$. The ${\mu}TBS$ test was performed by EZ test. The results were analysed by One-way ANOVA and Tukey's test at 95% significance level. The results suggested that the ${\mu}TBS$ of Single-Bond to dentin was decreased when the composite resin was constructed 20min. and 30min. after Single-Bond was applied. But the ${\mu}TBS$ of One-Step was not affected by delayed composite resin filling.

• Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain
• /
• 제31권3호
• /
• pp.211-221
• /
• 2006

목적 전통적 고속 회전식 절삭기구 또는 Er:YAG 레이저로 삭제된 상아질에, 두가지 다른 접착 시스템을 적용한 후, 축조한 컴포지트 레진의 미세인장결합강도를 비교하고, 다양한 Er:YAG 레이저 에너지가 미세인장결합강도에 미치는 영향을 평가한다. 재료 및 방법 40개의 제3대구치를 사용하여, 평평한 상아질면을 만든 후 8개의 군으로 나누어, 4가지 절삭방법 (고속 회전식 절삭기구, 2 W, 3 W, 4 W 출력의 Er:YAG 레이저) 중 한 가지로 삭제하고, 2가지 접착 시스템 (Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus, Clearfil SE bond) 중 한 가지로 처리하여 컴포지트 레진을 축조하였다. 24시간의 저장 후, 각 시편을 결합면에 수직으로 자르고, 미세인장결합강도를 측정하였다. 각 군의 미세인장결합강도는 평균$\pm$표준 편차로 표현하였고, 통계분석을 위해 two-way ANOVA, one-way ANOVA, student-Newman-Keuls' multiple comparison test, 그리고 t-test가 사용되었다. 결과 및 결론 1. 접착시스템과 관계없이, 절삭방법에 따른 미세인장결합강도의 유의한 차이가 있었고, 높은 순서대로 나열하면 다음과 같다: 3 W, 2 W, Bur, 4 W (p<0.001). 2. 절삭방법과 관계없이, Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus로 처리한 군이 Clearfil SE bond로 처리한 군보다 유의하게 높은 미세인장결합강도를 나타냈다 (p<0.001). 3. Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus로 처리한 군 중에서, 3 W 레이저 절삭군이 가장 높은 미세인장결합강도를 나타냈고, 다음이 Bur, 2 W, 4 W 절삭군 순이었다 (p<0.001). 4. Clearfil SE bond로 처리한 군 중에서 3 W 레이저 절삭군이 가장 높은 미세인장결합강도를 나타냈고, 다음이 2 W, 4 W, Bur 절삭군 순이었다 (p<0.001). 5. 두 가지 접착 시스템 모두에서, 레이저로 절삭한 군의 미세인장결합강도의 차이가 있었고, 높은 순서대로 나열하면 3 W, 2 W, 4 W 순이었다 (p<0.001). :상아질에 접착된 컴포지트 레진의 미세인장결합강도는 절삭방법과 접착시스템의 상호작용에 의해 유의한 영향을 받았다. 임상에서 레진 수복시, 2 W-3 W 범위내로 Er:YAG laser를 사용한다면 전통적 핸드피스 못지않게 수복물의 우수한 결합강도를 얻을 수 있다. 특히 시술시간의 단축, 과도한 산부식에 따른 부작용의 예방을 위해 Clearfil SE bond를 포함한 self etching system을 사용하고자 한다면 bur보다 Er:YAG laser를 이용한 삭제방법이 더 유용한 결합력을 제공할 것이다.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제6권3호
• /
• pp.165-170
• /
• 2014

PURPOSE. This study was aimed to evaluate effect of the desensitizing pretreatments on the micro-tensile bond strengths (${\mu}TBS$) to eroded dentin and sound dentin. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Forty-two extracted molars were prepared to form a flat dentin surface, and then they were divided into two groups. Group I was stored in distilled water while group II was subjected to a pH cycling. Each group was then subdivided into three subgroups according to desensitizing pretreatment used: a) pretreatment with desensitizer (Gluma); b) pretreatment with $CO_2$ Laser (Ultra Dream Pluse); c) without any pretreatment. All prepared surfaces were bonded with Single Bond 2 and built up with resin composite (Filtek Z250). The micro-tensile bond test was performed. Fracture modes were evaluated by stereomicroscopy. Pretreated surfaces and bonded interfaces were characterized by scanning electron microscope (SEM). The data obtained was analyzed by two-way ANOVA (${\alpha}$=0.05). RESULTS. For both sound and eroded dentin, samples treated with desensitizer showed the greatest ${\mu}TBS$, followed by samples without any treatment. And samples treated with $CO_2$ laser showed the lowest ${\mu}TBS$. SEM study indicated that teeth with eroded dentin appeared prone to debonding, as demonstrated by existence of large gaps between adhesive layers and dentin. CONCLUSION. Pretreatment with Gluma increased the ${\mu}TBS$ of Single Bond 2 for eroded and sound teeth. $CO_2$ laser irradiation weakened bond performance for sound teeth but had no effect on eroded teeth.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제29권2호
• /
• pp.153-161
• /
• 2004

This study investigated that the effect of rewetting agent on dentinal microtensile bond strength(${\mu}TBS$). Human molars were sectioned to expose the superficial dentin surfaces. Samples were divided into two groups according to type of adhesives-Single Bond (S) and One-Step (0)], and again subdivided into five groups by different dentin surface treatment-dry for 15s (D), blot dry (BD) or dry for 15s, and rewet with different rewetting agents [distilled water (DW), Gluma Desensitizer (GD) and Aqua-Prep (AP)] for 30s. After application of adhesive, composite resin was built up on the bonding surface. Each tooth was sectioned to obtain stick with $1\textrm{mm}^2$ cross sectional area and the ${\mu}TBS$ was determined by EZ test. In the S group, the mean ${\mu}TBS$ of GD, AP, and BD group was significantly higher than that of DW and D group (p < 0.05), In the O group, the mean, ${\mu}TBS$ of AP, GD, BD and DW group was significantly higher than that of D group (p < 0.05). The data suggested that Gluma Desensitizer and Aqua-Prep could be successfully used as rewetting agents, and Distilled water could be acceptable in aceton based adhesive system only.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제36권4호
• /
• pp.280-289
• /
• 2011

연구목적: 본 연구의 목적은 다양한 소수성을 지닌 최신 상아질 접착시스템과 저수축 silorane 레진의 미세인장결합강도를 평가하는 것이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 36개의 갓 발치된 제3대구치를 이용했다. Low-speed diamond saw를 사용하여 교합면에 평행하게 치관을 잘라 middle dentin을 노출시켰다. 치아를 무작위로 9 group으로 나눴다. Silorane self-etch adhesives (SS), SS + phosphoric acid etching (SS + pa), Adper Easy bond (AE), AE + Silorane system bonding (AE + SSb), Clearfil SE bond (CSE), CSE + SSb, All-Bond 2 (AB2), AB2 + SSb, All-Bond 3 (AB3). 접착제를 적용한 후에 Filtek LS (3M ESPE)를 2 mm씩 3회 적층충전하였다. 각 층은 40s씩 광중합하였다. 0.8 mm ${\times}$ 0.8 mm stick을 Micro Tensile Tester로 1 mm/min cross-head speed의 인장력을 가하였다. 파절양상를 관찰하기 위해 광학현미경을 이용하였다. 5가지 접착제의 소수성정도를 결정하기위해 water sorption test하였다. 결과: silorane 레진과 5가지 접착제의 ${\mu}TBS$: SS, 23.2 ${\pm}$ 6.9 MPa; CSE, 19.4 ${\pm}$ 4.4 MPa; AB3, 30.3 ${\pm}$ 4.0 MPa; AB2와 AE, no bond. Additional layering of SSb: CSE + SSb, 26.2 ${\pm}$ 10.3 MPa; AB2 + SSb, 33.9 ${\pm}$ 7.3 MPa; AE + SSb, no bond. 높은 ${\mu}TBS$는 cohesive failure와 관련있었다. SS는 낮은 가장 낮은 water sorption을 보였고 다음으로 AB3, AE, CSE, AB2 순서였다. AE는 가장 높은 용해도를 나타냈고 다음으로 CSE, AB2였다. 결론: 접착제의 소수성이 증가할수록, silorane 레진의 접착강도도 증가하였다. 비전용접착제 위에 silorane adhesive bonding을 layering하는 것은 AB2 + SSb 그룹에서만 결합강도를 유의하게 증가시켰다. AB3는 SS와 유사한 ${\mu}TBS$ & water sorption을 나타냈다. 따라서 AB3는 siloran resin을 접착시키는데 SS를 대체할만한 경쟁력있는 접착제이다.