Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

EFFECT OF REWETTING AGENT ON DENTINAL MICROTENSILE BOND STRENGTH

상아질에 적용된 재 습윤제가 미세인장 결합강도에 미치는 영향

  • Kang, Hee-Young (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Cho, Young-Gon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Uk (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Park, Byung-Cheul (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Yoo, Sang-Hoon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Jin, Cheul-Hee (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Choi, Hee-Young (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Ki, Young-Jae (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
  • 강희영 (조선대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 조영곤 (조선대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 김종욱 (조선대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 박병철 (조선대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 유상훈 (조선대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 진철희 (조선대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 최희영 (조선대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 기영재 (조선대학교 치과대학 보존학교실)
  • Published : 2004.03.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study investigated that the effect of rewetting agent on dentinal microtensile bond strength(${\mu}TBS$). Human molars were sectioned to expose the superficial dentin surfaces. Samples were divided into two groups according to type of adhesives-Single Bond (S) and One-Step (0)], and again subdivided into five groups by different dentin surface treatment-dry for 15s (D), blot dry (BD) or dry for 15s, and rewet with different rewetting agents [distilled water (DW), Gluma Desensitizer (GD) and Aqua-Prep (AP)] for 30s. After application of adhesive, composite resin was built up on the bonding surface. Each tooth was sectioned to obtain stick with $1\textrm{mm}^2$ cross sectional area and the ${\mu}TBS$ was determined by EZ test. In the S group, the mean ${\mu}TBS$ of GD, AP, and BD group was significantly higher than that of DW and D group (p < 0.05), In the O group, the mean, ${\mu}TBS$ of AP, GD, BD and DW group was significantly higher than that of D group (p < 0.05). The data suggested that Gluma Desensitizer and Aqua-Prep could be successfully used as rewetting agents, and Distilled water could be acceptable in aceton based adhesive system only.

Keywords

References

  1. Amaral CM, Hara AT, Pimenta LAF, Rodrigues Jr AL. Microleakage of hydrophillic systems in class V com posite restorations. Am J Dent 14(1):31 34, 2001
  2. Nakajima M, Sano H, Urabe I. Bond strength of single bottle dentin adhesives to caries affevted dentin. Oper Dent 25:2 10, 2000
  3. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SHY. Micromorphological spectrum from overdrying to overwetting acid conditioned dentin in water free, acetone based, single bottle the primer adhesives. Dent Mater 12:236 244,1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(96)80029-7
  4. Nakajima M, Kanemura N, Pereira PNR, Tagami J, Pashley DH, Comparative microtensile bond strength and SEM analysis of bonding to wet and dry dentin. Am J Dent 13(6) :354 328, 2000
  5. Perdigao J , Swift EJ, Heymann HO, Malek MA. Effect of a re wetting agent on the performance of acetone based dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 11:207 213, 1999
  6. Perdigao J. Frankenberger R, Effect of solvent and rewetting time on dentin adhesion. Quint Int 32(5) :385 390, 2001
  7. Gwinnett AJ. Moist versus dry dentin : its effect on shear bond strength. Am J Dent 5: 127 129, 1992
  8. Kanca J: Effect of drying on bonding strength. J Dent Res 70:304 (Abstract 1029), 1991
  9. Gwinnett AJ. Dentin bond strength after air drying and rewetting. Am J Dent 7(3) :144 148, 1994
  10. Marsh GW, Watanabe LG, Wu Magidi IL. AFM study of drying and rehydration of etched dentin. J Dent Res 75:390, 1996
  11. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SHY. Ultrastruture of the resin dentin interface following reversible and irreversible re wetting. Am J Dent 10:77 82, 1997
  12. Perdigao J , Van Meerbeek B, Lopes MM , Ambrose WW. The effec of a re wetting agent on dentin bonding. Dent Mater 15;282 295, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00049-4
  13. Ritter AV, Heymann HO, Swift Jr EJ , Perdigao J, Rosa BT. Effects，of different re wetting techniques on dentin shear bond strengths. J Esth Dent 12(2) :85 96, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00205.x
  14. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Nakajima M, Yoshiyama M, Shono T, Fernades CA, Tay F: The micro tensile bond test: a review. J Adhes Dent 1:299 309, 1999
  15. Erickson RL, Glasspoole EA. Bonding to tooth structure: a comparison of glass ionomer and composite resin system. J Esth Dent 6:227 244, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1994.tb00864.x
  16. Chappell RP, Schreiner RF. Glaros AG. Eixk J. Pilot study of determine size for micro testing. J Dent Res 76:38, 1997
  17. Sano H, Shono T, Shono H, Takatsu T, Ciccuchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH, Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength Evaluation of a microtensile bond test. J Dent Res 74:1093 1102, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345950740041001
  18. Schreiner RF, Chappell RP, Glaros AG, Erick JD. Microtensile testing of dental adhesives. Dent Mater 14(3):194 201, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(98)00030-X
  19. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciccuchi B, Horner JA Phashley DH, Tensile bond strength versus surface area for dentin bonding Evaluation of a method using limited surface areas. J Conserv Dent 37:882 887, 1994
  20. Perinka L, Sano H, Hosoda H, Dentin thickness, hardness, and Ca concentration vs bond strength of dentin adhesives. Dent Mater 8:229 233, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(92)90090-Y
  21. 조영곤 박일윤 이영곤 재습융제의 적용이 상아질 접착에 미치는 효과 대한치과보존학회지 28 (1):11 19,2003 https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2003.28.1.011
  22. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The prmotion of adhesion by infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Res 6:265 273, 1982
  23. Pioch T, Staehle HJ, Schneider H, Duschner H, Dorfer CE. Effect of intrapulpal pressure simulation in vitro on shear bond strenghs and hybrid layer formation Am J Dent 14(5) :319 323, 2001
  24. Erick JD, Robinson SJ, Chappell RP, Cobb CM, Spencer P. The dentinal surface: its influence on dentinal adhesion Ⅲ Quint Int 24(8) :571 574, 1993
  25. Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: a review. Dent Mater 11:117 125, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80046-8
  26. Perdiggao J, Geraldeli S, Carmo ARP, Dutra HR. In vivo influence of residual moisture on microtensile bond strength of one bottle adhesives. J Esth Rest Dent 14(1) :31 38, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2002.tb00145.x
  27. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas P, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 28:215 235, 2003
  28. Suzuke K, Takahashi M, Nakai H, Treatment of dentin by aqueous solution of amino acid derivatives: HEMA. J Adhes Dent 8:43 51, 1990
  29. Cardoso PEC, Braga RR. Carrilho MRO. Evaluation of micro tensile, shear and tensile tests determining the bond strengths of three adhesive systems. Dent Mater 18:359369.2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00012-3
  30. Kwong SM, Cheung GSP, Kei LH, Itthagatun A, Smales RJ, Tay FR. Micro tensile bond strengths to sclerotic dentin using a self etching and a total etching technique. Dent Mater 18: 359 369, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00051-3
  31. Nunes MF, Swift EJ, Perdigao J, Effects of adhesive composition on microtensile bond strength to humam dentin. J Dent Res 75:1851 1858, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345960750110601
  32. Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas M. The influence of cross sectional shape and surface area on the microtensile bond test. Dent Mater 14:212 222, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(98)00034-7
  33. Kanca J. Effect of resin primer solvents and surface wetness on resin composite bond strength to dentin Am J Dent 5:213 215, 1992
  34. Kanca J. Wet bonding: Effect of drying time and distance. Am J Dent 9:273 276, 1996
  35. Carvalho RM, Yoshima M, Pashley EL, Pashley DH. In vitro study on the dimensional changes of human after demineralization. Arch Oral Biol 41:369 377, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(95)00115-8
  36. Tay FR. Gwinnett AJ , Pang KM, Wei SHY. Resin per meation into acid conditioned, moist，and dry dentin: a paradigm using water free adhesive primers. J Dent Res 75:1034 1044. 1996 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345960750040601
  37. Gallo JR , Henderson M, Burgess JO. Shear bond strength to moist and dry dentin of four dentin bonding systems. Am J Dert 13(5) :267 270, 2000
  38. Kanca J. Resin bonding to wet substrate. I. bonding to dentin. Quint Int 23 (1) :39 41, 1992.
  39. Jacobsen T, Soderholm KJ. Effect of primer solvent, primer agitation and dentin dryness on shear bond strength to dentin. Am J Dent 11(5) :225 228, 1998
  40. Maciel KT, Carvalho RM, Rin히e RD, Preston CD, Russell CM, Pashley DH. The effects of acetone, ethanol, HEMA, and air on the stiffness of human decalcified dentin matrix. J Dent Res 75:1851 1858, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345960750110601
  41. Harashima I, Hirasawa T. Adsorption of 2 hydrox yethyl methacrylate on dentin from aqueous solution. Dent Mater 9:36 46, 1990 https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.9.36
  42. Nakabayashi N, Takarada K. Effects of HEMA on bonding to dentin. Dent Mater 8:125 130, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(92)90067-M
  43. Nakabayashi N, Watanae A, Gendusa NJ. Dentin adhesion of modified 4 META/MMA TBB resin: function of HEMA. Dent Mater 8:259 264, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(92)90096-U
  44. Sugizaki J. The effects of various primers on dentin adhesion of resin composites. SEM and TEM observation of the resin impregnated layer and adhesion promoting effect of the primer. Jap J Cons Dent 34:228 265, 1991
  45. Hansen EK, Asmussen E. Improved efficacy of dentin bonding agents. Europ J Oral Sci 105(5) :434 439, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1997.tb02140.x