Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.2.153

EFFECT OF REWETTING AGENT ON DENTINAL MICROTENSILE BOND STRENGTH  

Kang, Hee-Young (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Cho, Young-Gon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Kim, Jong-Uk (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Park, Byung-Cheul (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Yoo, Sang-Hoon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Jin, Cheul-Hee (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Choi, Hee-Young (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Ki, Young-Jae (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Publication Information
Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics / v.29, no.2, 2004 , pp. 153-161 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study investigated that the effect of rewetting agent on dentinal microtensile bond strength(${\mu}TBS$). Human molars were sectioned to expose the superficial dentin surfaces. Samples were divided into two groups according to type of adhesives-Single Bond (S) and One-Step (0)], and again subdivided into five groups by different dentin surface treatment-dry for 15s (D), blot dry (BD) or dry for 15s, and rewet with different rewetting agents [distilled water (DW), Gluma Desensitizer (GD) and Aqua-Prep (AP)] for 30s. After application of adhesive, composite resin was built up on the bonding surface. Each tooth was sectioned to obtain stick with $1\textrm{mm}^2$ cross sectional area and the ${\mu}TBS$ was determined by EZ test. In the S group, the mean ${\mu}TBS$ of GD, AP, and BD group was significantly higher than that of DW and D group (p < 0.05), In the O group, the mean, ${\mu}TBS$ of AP, GD, BD and DW group was significantly higher than that of D group (p < 0.05). The data suggested that Gluma Desensitizer and Aqua-Prep could be successfully used as rewetting agents, and Distilled water could be acceptable in aceton based adhesive system only.
Keywords
Microtensile bond strength; One-bottle adhesive; Rewetting agent; Distilled water; Gluma Desensitizer; Aqua-Prep;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Sugizaki J. The effects of various primers on dentin adhesion of resin composites. SEM and TEM observation of the resin impregnated layer and adhesion promoting effect of the primer. Jap J Cons Dent 34:228 265, 1991
2 Hansen EK, Asmussen E. Improved efficacy of dentin bonding agents. Europ J Oral Sci 105(5) :434 439, 1997   DOI
3 Nakabayashi N, Takarada K. Effects of HEMA on bonding to dentin. Dent Mater 8:125 130, 1992   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Pioch T, Staehle HJ, Schneider H, Duschner H, Dorfer CE. Effect of intrapulpal pressure simulation in vitro on shear bond strenghs and hybrid layer formation Am J Dent 14(5) :319 323, 2001
5 Erick JD, Robinson SJ, Chappell RP, Cobb CM, Spencer P. The dentinal surface: its influence on dentinal adhesion Ⅲ Quint Int 24(8) :571 574, 1993
6 Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: a review. Dent Mater 11:117 125, 1995   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Perdiggao J, Geraldeli S, Carmo ARP, Dutra HR. In vivo influence of residual moisture on microtensile bond strength of one bottle adhesives. J Esth Rest Dent 14(1) :31 38, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas P, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 28:215 235, 2003
9 Suzuke K, Takahashi M, Nakai H, Treatment of dentin by aqueous solution of amino acid derivatives: HEMA. J Adhes Dent 8:43 51, 1990
10 Cardoso PEC, Braga RR. Carrilho MRO. Evaluation of micro tensile, shear and tensile tests determining the bond strengths of three adhesive systems. Dent Mater 18:359369.2002   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Kwong SM, Cheung GSP, Kei LH, Itthagatun A, Smales RJ, Tay FR. Micro tensile bond strengths to sclerotic dentin using a self etching and a total etching technique. Dent Mater 18: 359 369, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Tay FR. Gwinnett AJ , Pang KM, Wei SHY. Resin per meation into acid conditioned, moist，and dry dentin: a paradigm using water free adhesive primers. J Dent Res 75:1034 1044. 1996   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SHY. Ultrastruture of the resin dentin interface following reversible and irreversible re wetting. Am J Dent 10:77 82, 1997
14 Perdigao J , Van Meerbeek B, Lopes MM , Ambrose WW. The effec of a re wetting agent on dentin bonding. Dent Mater 15;282 295, 1999   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Nakabayashi N, Watanae A, Gendusa NJ. Dentin adhesion of modified 4 META/MMA TBB resin: function of HEMA. Dent Mater 8:259 264, 1992   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas M. The influence of cross sectional shape and surface area on the microtensile bond test. Dent Mater 14:212 222, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Kanca J. Effect of resin primer solvents and surface wetness on resin composite bond strength to dentin Am J Dent 5:213 215, 1992
18 Kanca J. Wet bonding: Effect of drying time and distance. Am J Dent 9:273 276, 1996
19 Carvalho RM, Yoshima M, Pashley EL, Pashley DH. In vitro study on the dimensional changes of human after demineralization. Arch Oral Biol 41:369 377, 1996   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Gallo JR , Henderson M, Burgess JO. Shear bond strength to moist and dry dentin of four dentin bonding systems. Am J Dert 13(5) :267 270, 2000
21 Kanca J. Resin bonding to wet substrate. I. bonding to dentin. Quint Int 23 (1) :39 41, 1992.
22 Jacobsen T, Soderholm KJ. Effect of primer solvent, primer agitation and dentin dryness on shear bond strength to dentin. Am J Dent 11(5) :225 228, 1998
23 Maciel KT, Carvalho RM, Rin히e RD, Preston CD, Russell CM, Pashley DH. The effects of acetone, ethanol, HEMA, and air on the stiffness of human decalcified dentin matrix. J Dent Res 75:1851 1858, 1996   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Harashima I, Hirasawa T. Adsorption of 2 hydrox yethyl methacrylate on dentin from aqueous solution. Dent Mater 9:36 46, 1990   DOI
25 Erickson RL, Glasspoole EA. Bonding to tooth structure: a comparison of glass ionomer and composite resin system. J Esth Dent 6:227 244, 1994   DOI
26 Nunes MF, Swift EJ, Perdigao J, Effects of adhesive composition on microtensile bond strength to humam dentin. J Dent Res 75:1851 1858, 1996   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Ritter AV, Heymann HO, Swift Jr EJ , Perdigao J, Rosa BT. Effects，of different re wetting techniques on dentin shear bond strengths. J Esth Dent 12(2) :85 96, 2000   DOI
28 Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Nakajima M, Yoshiyama M, Shono T, Fernades CA, Tay F: The micro tensile bond test: a review. J Adhes Dent 1:299 309, 1999
29 Chappell RP, Schreiner RF. Glaros AG. Eixk J. Pilot study of determine size for micro testing. J Dent Res 76:38, 1997
30 Sano H, Shono T, Shono H, Takatsu T, Ciccuchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH, Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength Evaluation of a microtensile bond test. J Dent Res 74:1093 1102, 1995   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Schreiner RF, Chappell RP, Glaros AG, Erick JD. Microtensile testing of dental adhesives. Dent Mater 14(3):194 201, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciccuchi B, Horner JA Phashley DH, Tensile bond strength versus surface area for dentin bonding Evaluation of a method using limited surface areas. J Conserv Dent 37:882 887, 1994
33 Perinka L, Sano H, Hosoda H, Dentin thickness, hardness, and Ca concentration vs bond strength of dentin adhesives. Dent Mater 8:229 233, 1992   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Nakajima M, Kanemura N, Pereira PNR, Tagami J, Pashley DH, Comparative microtensile bond strength and SEM analysis of bonding to wet and dry dentin. Am J Dent 13(6) :354 328, 2000
35 Amaral CM, Hara AT, Pimenta LAF, Rodrigues Jr AL. Microleakage of hydrophillic systems in class V com posite restorations. Am J Dent 14(1):31 34, 2001
36 조영곤 박일윤 이영곤 재습융제의 적용이 상아질 접착에 미치는 효과 대한치과보존학회지 28 (1):11 19,2003   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
37 Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The prmotion of adhesion by infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Res 6:265 273, 1982
38 Nakajima M, Sano H, Urabe I. Bond strength of single bottle dentin adhesives to caries affevted dentin. Oper Dent 25:2 10, 2000
39 Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SHY. Micromorphological spectrum from overdrying to overwetting acid conditioned dentin in water free, acetone based, single bottle the primer adhesives. Dent Mater 12:236 244,1996   DOI   ScienceOn
40 Perdigao J , Swift EJ, Heymann HO, Malek MA. Effect of a re wetting agent on the performance of acetone based dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 11:207 213, 1999
41 Perdigao J. Frankenberger R, Effect of solvent and rewetting time on dentin adhesion. Quint Int 32(5) :385 390, 2001
42 Gwinnett AJ. Moist versus dry dentin : its effect on shear bond strength. Am J Dent 5: 127 129, 1992
43 Kanca J: Effect of drying on bonding strength. J Dent Res 70:304 (Abstract 1029), 1991
44 Gwinnett AJ. Dentin bond strength after air drying and rewetting. Am J Dent 7(3) :144 148, 1994
45 Marsh GW, Watanabe LG, Wu Magidi IL. AFM study of drying and rehydration of etched dentin. J Dent Res 75:390, 1996