정보관리학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society for information Management)

  • 제41권3호
  • /
  • Pages.487-509
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 1013-0799(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2586-2073(eISSN)
한국정보관리학회 (Korean Society for Information Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

'도서관과 정보생활'과 국내외 디지털 리터러시 내용 체계 비교 분석

A Comparative Analysis of 'Library and Information Life' and Domestic and International Digital Literacy Content Frameworks

  • 임정훈 (계명대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Jeonghoon Lim
  • 투고 : 2024.08.23
  • 심사 : 2024.08.26
  • 발행 : 2024.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 정보 리터러시 교육과정인 '도서관과 정보생활'과 국내외 디지털 리터러시 교육과정의 내용 체계를 비교 분석하여, 정보 리터러시 기반의 디지털 리터러시 수용 범위를 논의하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 국내외 디지털 리터러시 교육과정의 공통 영역과 학습 요소를 추출하고, '도서관과 정보생활' 교육과정과의 내용 매핑 분석을 수행하였다. 분석 결과, 중학교 과정에서는 정보 활용, 창작 및 공유, 디지털 윤리 영역에서 일치점을 보였으나, '도서관과 정보생활'에서는 ICT 활용, 소통 및 협업 역량이 언급되지 않았다. 고등학교 과정인 '미디어와 정보생활'에서도 ICT 활용과 소통 및 협업 역량은 여전히 제한적으로 다루어지는 것으로 확인되었다. 본 연구는 정보 리터러시를 기반으로 한 디지털 리터러시의 수용 범위에 대한 구체적인 논의를 제시하였다는 점에서 의의가 있으며, 연구 결과는 향후 '도서관과 정보생활' 교육과정 개정 시 디지털 리터러시 영역의 적용 범위 설정을 위한 기초 자료로 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

This study aimed to compare and analyze the content structures of the information literacy curriculum 'Library and Information Life' and domestic and international digital literacy curricula to discuss the scope of digital literacy integration based on information literacy. Common areas and learning elements were extracted from domestic and international digital literacy curricula and mapped against the 'Library and Information Life' curriculum. Results showed that while the middle school curriculum aligned in information literacy, creation and sharing, and digital ethics, 'Library and Information Life' did not mention ICT utilization, communication, and collaboration competencies. The high school 'Media and Information Life' curriculum also addressed ICT utilization, communication, and collaboration competencies in a limited manner. This study is significant in proposing a concrete discussion on the scope of digital literacy integration based on information literacy. The findings can serve as foundational data for determining the scope of digital literacy application when revising the 'Library and Information Life' curriculum in the future.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Busan Metropolitan City Office of Education [n.d.]. Digital literacy learning models and performance standards. Available: https://www.dilit.kr/framework-standard 
  2. Han, Jung sun & Oh, Jung-Sook (2006). Operationalizing Digital Literacy and Identifying Subdomains to Enable 21st Century Knowledge and Information Competencies(RM 2006-78). Korea Education and Research Information Service. 
  3. Kim, Jin Sook (2023). Research to Develop Curriculum-Aligned Digital Literacy Instructional Guidelines(CR 2023-1), Korea Education and Research Information Service. 
  4. Kim, Sung-Jun (2011). A study on the development of information literacy textbook, school library and information literacy. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 42(3), 271-292. http://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.42.3.201109.271 
  5. Korean Library Association School Library Curriculum Committee (2007). Standards for Library and Information Life Curriculum. Seoul: Korean Library Association. 
  6. Kye, Bokyung (2017). Trends in International Digital Literacy Courses and Programs(RM 2017-1). Korea Education and Research Information Service. 
  7. Lee, Byeong-Ki (2011). A study on the developmental tools of performance task for information literacy instruction. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 42(4), 31-50. http://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.42.4.201112.31 
  8. Lee, Byeong-Ki (2019). A study on the direction of 'Library and Information Life' curriculum revision based on '2015 Revised National Curriculum'. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 53(2), 49-68. http://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2019.53.2.049 
  9. Lee, Byeong-Ki (2020). Information Literacy Instruction (3rd ed.). Daegu: Taeilsa. 
  10. Lee, Won-Woo (2023). Changing state-market relations by digital technologies and the role of public law. Journal of Law & Economic Regulation, 16(2), 9-28. https://doi.org/10.22732/CeLPU.2023.16.2.9 
  11. Lee, Woon Jee, Lee, Eun-Hwan, & Kim, Soohwan (2019). Developing a digital literacy curriculum framework. CNU Journal of Educational Studies, 40(3), 201-221. http://doi.org/10.18612/cnujes.2019.40.3.201 
  12. Lee, Youngho, Yoo, Inhwan, Bae, Youngkwon, & Kim, Wooyeol (2022). A proposal of informatics curriculum content system for kindergarten and elementary school in connection with the 2022 revised curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 26(6), 491-505. http://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2022.26.6.491 
  13. Park, Hana, Jin, Myunghwa, Park, Jiu, & Lim, Kyu Yon (2021). The analysis of national and international curricula for digital literacy education. Journal of Education & Culture, 27(5), 75-101. http://doi.org/10.24159/joec.2021.27.5.75 
  14. Park, Juhyeon, Kang, Bong-suk, & Lee, ByeongKi (2021). A study on the development of curriculum content structure for information literacy education. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 52(1), 229-254. http://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.52.1.202103.229 
  15. Sohn, Ji Hyun & Kim, Young Joo (2023). Proposal for digital literacy in the revised 2022 art education curriculum through overseas case analysis. Journal of Art Education, 75, 89-112. https://doi.org/10.35657/jae.2023.75..004 
  16. Ulsan Metropolitan City Office of Education [n.d.]. Digital Literacy. Available: https://use.go.kr/uldilit/literacy/literacy_1.jsp 
  17. Yoon, Hee-Yoon (2010). Korean Library Standards Revision Study: Final Report. Seoul: National Library of Korea. 
  18. Yu, Sun Young (2009). An analysis of international kindergarten curriculum in Korea: focused on international primary curriculum. The Journal of Korea Open Association for Early Childhood Education, 14(3), 447-465.
  19. American Library Association Digital Literacy Task Force (2013). Digital Literacy, Libraries, and Public Policy. Avalable: https://alair.ala.org/bitstream/handle/11213/16261/2012_OITP_digilitreport_1_22_13_Marijke%20Visser.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y 
  20. Breivik, P. S. (2000). Information Literacy and Lifelong Learning: The Magical Partnership [Conference presentation]. International Lifelong Learning Conference, Central Queensland University, Australia. 
  21. British Columbia Governments (2022). BC's Digital Literacy Framework. Avalable: https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/education-training/k-12/teach/resources-for-teachers/digital-literacy 
  22. Calvani, A., Fini, A., & Ranieri, M. (2009). Assessing Digital Competence in Secondary Education: Issues, Models and Instruments. In M. Leaning (Ed), Issues in Information and Media Literacy: Education, Practice and Pedagogy, 2, 153-172. Informing Science Press. 
  23. Digital Intelligence Quotient Institute (2019). What is the DQ framework? DQ Institute. Avalable: https://live.dqinstitute.org/global-standards/#contentb1 
  24. Eshet, Y. (2012). Thinking in the digital era: A revised model for digital literacy. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 9(2), 267-276. http://doi.org/10.28945/1621 
  25. European Council (2018). Council Recommendation of 22 May 2018 on Key Competences for Lifelong Learning. Publications Office of the European Union. Avalable: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv%3AOJ.C_.2018.189.01.0001.01.ENG
  26. Finnish National Agency for Education (2014). National Core Curriculum for Primary and Lower Secondary (Basic) Education. Helsinki: National Board of Education. Available: https://www.oph.fi/en/education-and-qualifications/national-core-curriculum-primary-and-lower-secondary-basic-education 
  27. Glister, P. (1997). Digital Literacy. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 
  28. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (2015). IFLA School Library Guidelines. Hague, Netherlands: IFLA. 
  29. Joint Research Centre (2022). DigComp 2.2: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens with Examples of Knowledge, Skills and Attitudes. Avalable: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC128415 
  30. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (2016). Digital Literacy and Computer Science Curriculum Framework. Available: https://www.doe.mass.edu/frameworks/dlcs.pdf 
  31. National Council for Curricucum and Assessment (2016). Short Course Digital Media Literacy. Avalable: https://www.curriculumonline.ie/getmedia/53e11a1c-ff88-419b-ac4e-6d4fa9c5518b/NCCA-JC-Short-CourseDML.pdf 
  32. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2010). PISA 2009 Results: What Students Know and can Do: Student Performance in Reading, Mathematics and Science (Volume I). Avalable: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2009-results-what-students-know-and-can-do_9789264091450-en