DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Self-absorption Correction Method of HPGe Gamma Spectrocopy Analysis System Using Check Source

Check Source를 이용한 HPGe감마핵종분석시스템의 자체흡수 보정방법 연구

  • Jeong-Soo, Park (Dept. of Health Science, Gachon University General Graduate School) ;
  • Hyo-Jin, Lim (Dept. of Radiological Science, Gachon University) ;
  • Hyun-Soo, Seo (Dept. of Radiological Science, Gachon University) ;
  • Da-bin, Jang (Dept. of Radiological Science, Gachon University) ;
  • Myoung-Joon, Kim (Dept. of Radiological Science, Gachon University) ;
  • Sang-Bok, Lee (Dept. of Health Science, Gachon University General Graduate School) ;
  • Sung-Min, Ahn (Dept. of Health Science, Gachon University General Graduate School)
  • 박정수 (가천대학교 일반대학원 보건과학과) ;
  • 임효진 (가천대학교 방사선학과) ;
  • 서현수 (가천대학교 방사선학과) ;
  • 장다빈 (가천대학교 방사선학과) ;
  • 김명준 (가천대학교 방사선학과) ;
  • 이상복 (가천대학교 일반대학원 보건과학과) ;
  • 안성민 (가천대학교 일반대학원 보건과학과)
  • Received : 2022.08.08
  • Accepted : 2022.12.08
  • Published : 2022.12.31

Abstract

Gamma spectroscopy analysis is widely used for radioactivity analysis, and various factors are required for radioactivity calculations. Among the factors, K3 for each sample significantly influences the results. The previous methods of correcting the self-absorption effect include a computational simulation method and a method that requires making a CRM(certified reference material) identical to the sample medium. However, the above methods have limitations when used in small institutions because they require specialized program utilization skills or high manufacturing costs and large facilities. The aim of this study is to develop a method that can be easily and rapidly applied to radioactivity analysis. After filling the beaker with water, we placed the radiation source in a uniform position and used the measured value as the benchmark. Next, a correction factor was derived based on the difference in the radiation source count of the benchmark and the identically measured sample. For the radiation source, Eu-152, which emits a broad range of energy within the measurement range of gamma rays, and Cs-134 and Cs-137, which are indicator nuclides in environmental radiation analysis, were used. The sample was selected within the density range of 0.26-2.11 g/cm3, and the correction factor was derived by calculating the count difference of each sample compared to the reference value of water. This study presents a faster and more convenient method than the existing research methods for determining the self-absorption effect correction, which has become increasingly necessary.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT(NRF-2020M2D6A2093776)

References

  1. Kim CJ, Lim CS, Lee WN, Jang M, Ji YY, Chung GH, et al. Survey Study on Radioactivity of Domestic Fishery Product. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015;47(6):789-92.  https://doi.org/10.9721/KJFST.2015.47.6.789
  2. Lee WN, Lee HP, Chung KH, Cho YH, Choi GS, Lee CW, Chung HW, et al. A Practical and Simple Method of Self-absorption Correction for Environmental Samples. Journal of Radiation Protection and Research. 2006;31(1):47-52. 
  3. Ji YY, Ryu YG, Kwak KK, Kang DW, Kim KH. Comparison of the Correction Methods for Gamma Ray Attenuation in the Radioactive Waste Drum Assay. Journal of the Korean Radioactive Waste Society. 2006;4(3):275-84. 
  4. Kim CJ, Byun JI, No JH, Yoon JY. A Study on the Determination Method of Line Dampening Coefficients for Self-absorption Correction in Gamma-ray Analysis. Journal of Radiation Protection and Research. 2010;11:122-3. 
  5. Seo BK, Lee DW, Lee KY, Yoon YY, Yang TK. Corrections of Self-Absorption Effect Using the Monte Carlo Method in the Radioactivity Analysis of Environmental Samples. Journal of Radiation Protection and Research. 2001;26(2):51-8. 
  6. Jang ES, Kim YS, Lee SY. Marinelli Beaker Measurement and Self Absorption Correction and Application for Various Environmental Samples in Monte Carlo Simulation. Journal of Radiation Science and Technology. 2017;40(4):605-11.  https://doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2017.40.4.10
  7. Lee KY, Kang BS. Calculation of the Correction Factors related to the Diameter and Density of the Concrete Core Samples using a Monte Carlo Simulation. Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology. 2020;14(5):503-10.  https://doi.org/10.7742/JKSR.2020.14.5.503
  8. KASTO 16-80212-062. Standard Calibration Procedure of Semiconductor Detector for Gamma-ray Measurements. Korea Association of Standard & Testing Organizations; 2016.11.30. 
  9. Jo MH, Lee YJ, Maeng SJ. Uncertainty Evaluation of Energy Calibration Function of Gamma Nuclide Analysis Device. Journal of Radiation Protection and Research. 2011;11:114-5. 
  10. Song BC, Kim YB, Han SH, Oh SJ, Lee MH, Song KS. Investigation on the techniques of quality control for radiation counting systems. Analytical Science & Technology. 2011;24(6):414-20.  https://doi.org/10.5806/AST.2011.24.6.414
  11. Lee WG, Goo SH. Gamma Measurement of Soil and Food in Gyeonggi Province. The Journal of Industrial Liaison Research Institute. 2007;13:35-43. 
  12. Yoo JH, Koh SM, Kim YU, Chang BU. Investigation for some of the consumer goods which contain radioactive materials on the viewpoint of mineralogical and chemical characteristics. Mineralogical Society of Korea and Petrological Society of Korea. 2009;(5):109-11. 
  13. Yun U, Cho BW. Evaluation of Terrestrial Gamma Radiation and Dose Rate of the Ogcheon Group Area. The Journal of Engineering Geology. 2020;30(4):577-88.  https://doi.org/10.9720/KSEG.2020.4.577
  14. MFDS Notice No. 2021-79(09.30.2021.) Standards and Specifications of Food-Part 8 General Test Method: 9.9.2. Testing of radionuclides by High Purity Germanium detector; 2021. 
  15. ISO. Measurement of radioactivity in the environment-Soil-Part.2: Guidance for the selection of the sampling strategy, Sampling and pre-treatment of samples; 2015. 
  16. Jo JW, Lee SB, Kim SC, Nam JH, Noh EJ, Beak HW, Lee YJ, et al. Evaluation of Radioactive Substance and Measurement of Harmfulness in Drinking Water. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2021;44(3):247-52.  https://doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2021.44.3.247
  17. Lee SR, Lee SB, Kim SC, Kim JY, Kim JM, Bang YJ, Lee DS, et al. Analysis of Radioactivity Concentrations in Cigarette Smoke and Tobacco Risk Assessment. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2021;44(5):489-94.  https://doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2021.44.5.489
  18. Lee YS, Lee SB, Kim SC, Kang MS, Kim JH, Oh YS, Park JS, et al. Radon Hazard Review of Spilled Groundwater and Tap Water in Incheon Metropolitan City Subway Station. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2021;44(6):671-7. https://doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2021.44.6.671