Nuclear Engineering and Technology

Korean Nuclear Society (한국원자력학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

High performance 3D pin-by-pin neutron diffusion calculation based on 2D/1D decoupling method for accurate pin power estimation

  • Received : 2021.01.21
  • Accepted : 2021.05.20
  • Published : 2021.11.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The methods and performance of a 3D pin-by-pin neutronics code based on the 2D/1D decoupling method are presented. The code was newly developed as an effort to achieve enhanced accuracy and high calculation performance that are sufficient for the use in practical nuclear design analyses. From the 3D diffusion-based finite difference method (FDM) formulation, decoupled planar formulations are established by treating pre-determined axial leakage as a source term. The decoupled axial problems are formulated with the radial leakage source term. To accelerate the pin-by-pin calculation, the two-level coarse mesh finite difference (CMFD) formulation, which consists of the multigroup node-wise CMFD and the two-group assembly-wise CMFD is implemented. To enhance the accuracy, both the discontinuity factor method and the super-homogenization (SPH) factor method are examined for pin-wise cross-section homogenization. The parallelization is achieved with the OpenMP package. The accuracy and performance of the pin-by-pin calculations are assessed with the VERA and APR1400 benchmark problems. It is demonstrated that pin-by-pin 2D/1D alternating calculations within the two-level 3D CMFD framework yield accurate solutions in about 30 s for the typical commercial core problems, on a parallel platform employing 32 threads.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by a research grant provided by KEPCO Nuclear Fuel Company (No. 12193).

References

  1. Y.S. Jung, H.G. Joo, Decoupled planar MOC solution for dynamic group constant generation in direct three-dimensional core calculations, Int. Conf. Math. Comput. Methods, React. Phys. (2009) 2157-2167.
  2. H.G. Joo, J.Y. Cho, K.S. Kim, C.C. Lee, S.Q. Zee, Methods and performance of a three-dimensional whole-core transport code DeCART, Int. Conf. Phys. React. 2004 (2004) 21-34.
  3. B. Kochunas, B. Collins, D. Jabaay, T.J. Downar, W.R. Martin, Overview of development and design of MPACT: Michigan parallel characteristics transport code, Int. Conf. Math. Comput. Methods, React. Phys. (2013) 42-53.
  4. W. Boyd, S. Shaner, L. Li, B. Forget, K. Smith, The OpenMOC method of characteristics neutral particle transport code, Ann. Nucl. Energy 68 (2014) 43-52, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2013.12.012.
  5. S. Choi, D. Lee, Three-dimensional method of characteristics/diamond-difference transport analysis method in STREAM for whole-core neutron transport calculation, Comput. Phys. Commun. (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107332, 107332.
  6. J.F. Briesmeister, MCNP-A General Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code, 2003 (No. LA-UR-03-1987), version 5.
  7. L.M. Petrie, Keno IV: an improved Monte Carlo criticality program (No. ORNL-4938). https://doi.org/10.2172/4158205, 2005.
  8. P.K. Romano, B. Forget, The OpenMC Monte Carlo particle transport code, Ann. Nucl. Energy 51 (2013) 274-281, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ANUCENE.2012.06.040.
  9. H.J. Shim, B.S. Han, S.J. Jong, H.J. Park, C.H. Kim, McCARD: Monte Carlo code for advanced reactor design and analysis, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 44 (2012) 161-176, https://doi.org/10.5516/NET.01.2012.503.
  10. H. Lee, W. Kim, P. Zhang, M. Lemaire, A. Khassenov, J. Yu, Y. Jo, J. Park, D. Lee, Mcs - a Monte Carlo particle transport code for large-scale power reactor analysis, Ann. Nucl. Energy 139 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2019.107276, 107276.
  11. D. Lee, T.J. Downar, Y. Kim, A nodal and finite difference hybrid method for pin-by-pin heterogeneous three-dimensional Light water reactor diffusion calculations, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 146 (2004) 319-339, https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE04-A2412.
  12. K.S. Smith, Multidimensional Nodal Transport Using the Simplified PL Method, Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 1986.
  13. M. Tatsumi, M. Tabuchi, K. Sato, Y. Kodama, Y. Ohoka, H. Nagano, Recent Advancements in AEGIS/SCOPE2 and Its Verifications and Validations, PHYSOR-2006: American Nuclear Society's Topical Meetings on Reactor Physics (2017). https://www.kns.org/files/int_paper/paper/MC2017_2017_9/P363S09-04TatsumiM.pdf.
  14. Y. Akio, T. Masahiro, K. Yasunori, Y. Yoshihiro, Improvement of the SPH method for pin-by-pin core calculations, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 41 (2004) 1155-1165, https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.2004.9726344.
  15. Y. Li, W. Yang, S. Wang, H. Wu, L. Cao, A three-dimensional PWR-core pin-byp-in analysis code NECP-Bamboo 2.0, Ann. Nucl. Energy 144 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2020.107507, 107507.
  16. H.G. Joo, D.A. Barber, G. Jiang, T.J. Downar. PARCS: Purdue Advanced Reactor Core Simulator PU/NE-08-26, Purdue University, 1998.
  17. Kaeri, APR1400 reactor core benchmark problem book. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004, 2019.
  18. A.T. Godfrey, VERA Core Physics Benchmark Progression Problem Specifications, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2014.
  19. Y. Saad, Iterative Methods for Sparse Linear Systems, 2000.
  20. H. Finnemann, F. Bennewitz, M.R. Wagner, Interface current techniques for multidimensional reactor calculations, Atomkernenergie 30 (1977) 123-128, accessed, https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:9350107. (Accessed 11 January 2021).
  21. K. Smith, An Analytic Nodal Method for Solving the Two-Group, Multidimensional, Static and Transient Neutron Diffusion Equations, MIT, 1979.
  22. T.M. Sutton, B.N. Aviles, Diffusion theory methods for spatial kinetics calculations, Prog. Nucl. Energy 30 (1996) 119-182, https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-1970(95)00082-U.
  23. K. Smith, Nodal method storage reduction by nonlinear iteration, Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc. 44 (1983) 265-266, accessed, https://inis.iaea.org/search/search. aspx?orig_q=RN:15010017. (Accessed 11 January 2021).
  24. H.G. Joo, T.J. Downar, An incomplete domain decomposition preconditioning method for nonlinear nodal kinetics calculations, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 123 (1996) 403-414, https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE96-A24203.
  25. K. Koebke, A new approach to homogenization and group condensation, in: IAEA Tech. Comm. Meet. Homog. Methods React. Phys., Lugano, Switzerland, 1978.
  26. K.S. Smith, Spatial Homogenization Methods for Light Water Reactors, MIT, 1980.
  27. A. Hebert, A consistent technique for the pin-by-pin homogenization of a pressurized water reactor assembly, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 113 (1993) 227-238, https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE92-10.
  28. J.A. Turner, K. Clarno, M. Sieger, R. Bartlett, B. Collins, R. Pawlowski, R. Schmidt, R. Summers, The virtual environment for reactor Applications (VERA): design and architecture, J. Comput. Phys. 326 (2016) 544-568, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCP.2016.09.003.
  29. J.I. Yoon, H.G. Joo, Two-level coarse mesh finite difference formulation with multigroup source expansion nodal kernels, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 45 (2008) 668-682, https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.2008.9711467.