Journal of Engineering Education Research (공학교육연구)

Korean Society for Engineering Education (한국공학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Engineering College Students' Experience of Online Discussion Activities Using the Visual Dashboards

공과대학 학생들의 시각적 대시보드를 활용한 온라인 토론활동 경험

  • Jin, Sung-Hee (Division of Humanities and Liberal Art, Hanbat National University) ;
  • Yoo, Mina (Department of Lifelong Education Consulting, Kyungil University) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Hyun (Teaching & Learning) ;
  • Kim, Seong-Eun (Department of Electronics and Control Engineering, Hanbat National University) ;
  • Yi, Hyunbean (Department of Computer Engineering, Hanbat National University) ;
  • Choi, Haknam (Information and Communication Engineering, Inha University)
  • 진성희 (한밭대학교 인문교양학부) ;
  • 유미나 (경일대학교 평생교육컨설팅학부) ;
  • 김태현 (티칭앤러닝) ;
  • 김성은 (한밭대학교 전자제어공학과) ;
  • 이현빈 (한밭대학교 컴퓨터공학과) ;
  • 최학남 (인하대학교 정보통신공학과)
  • Received : 2021.01.11
  • Accepted : 2021.01.20
  • Published : 2021.01.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

As online learning continues to be extended, many engineering colleges are engaged in online learning activities. One of the core competencies required of engineering students in a knowledge-convergence society is communication skills. Online discussion activities are frequently used in educational field to improve communication skills. Efforts are being made to provide visual dashboards in online discussion activity systems to more effectively support online discussion activities. However there is less qualitative studies on students' experience in discussion activities. The purpose of this study is to explore the experience of engineering students participating in discussion activities using online discussion systems and visual dashboards. We interviewed 15 students who participated in online discussion activities to achieve their research objectives about their experience in utilizing the online discussion system, their perception of visual dashboards, and their experience in discussion activities. As a result of the study, students' perception of the use of the online discussion activity system, the visual dashboard, and the perception of a sense of social presence were understood. To be more effective in providing tool support, such as discussion activity systems and visual dashboards in online discussion activities, instructors need to understand the nature of learners' online discussion activities.

Keywords

References

  1. 강명희 외(2010). 온라인 토론 학습에서 인식된 튜터의 역할, 사회적 실재감, 학습결과 간의 관계 규명. 평생교육.HRD 연구, 6(4), 159-183.
  2. 김은주.성명희(2017). 산업체가 인식하는 대학 교양교육과 핵심역량 교육요구도 분석: 보건업을 중심으로. 교양교육연구, 11(2), 121-145.
  3. 김희배(2015). 스마트미디어를 활용한 토론수업의 효과분석: 웹기반 수업과의 비교를 중심으로. 교육정보미디어연구, 21(4), 645-665.
  4. 남기찬.임효창.황국재(2002). 온라인 교육훈련의 효과성에 관한 연구. 한국경영과학회지, 27(1), 75-94.
  5. 남창우.이영태(2020). 포스트 코로나 공학교육에 대한 소고(小考) 포스트 코로나 교육의 대전환을 위한 공학교육의 중단기적 계획. Ingenium, 27(2), 31-33.
  6. 신선경(2010). 공학인을 위한 발표와 토론 교육의 방향. 사고와표현, 3(1), 83-105. https://doi.org/10.19042/KSTC.2010.3.1.83
  7. 유미나.진성희(2018). 온라인 토론활동의 참여를 촉진하기 위한 대시보드 개발 및 적용. 교육정보미디어연구, 24(3), 517-542.
  8. 이응규.이종기(2006). e-Learning 에서의 학습환경과 학습자 자기효능감이 학습 유효성에 미치는 영향. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 16(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2006.00210.x
  9. 임규연.박하나.김희준(2014). 온라인 토론학습에서 사회연결망분석 기반 피드백이 상호작용 및 성취도에 미치는 영향. 교육공학연구, 30(3), 443-466.
  10. 임지영 외(2020). 사회비교 정보를 제공하는 대시보드에 대한 학습자 인식 탐색. 교육공학연구, 36(3), 443-477.
  11. 조영환 외(2015). 온라인 토론 촉진을 위한 피드백의 역할 탐색. 아시아교육연구, 16(2), 289-313. https://doi.org/10.15753/AJE.2015.16.2.011
  12. 진성희(2019). 비동시적 온라인 토론에서 대시보드 유형과 학습자 특성이 교육효과에 미치는 영향. 교육공학연구, 35(2), 339-364.
  13. 진성희.유미나(2019). 온라인 토론에서 찬반토론 현황 대시보드가 학습성과 및 학습자 인식에 미치는 영향. 학습자중심교과 교육연구, 19(7), 41-61.
  14. 진성희.유미나(2020). 온라인 토론활동 참여정보에 대한 피드백 유형이 학습참여 및 학습성과에 미치는 영향. 교육공학연구, 36(3), 561-588.
  15. 진성희.유미나.김태현(2015). 이러닝 학습참여활동 및 상호작용에 대한 대시보드 설계 연구. 교육공학연구, 31(2), 159-189.
  16. Cilesiz, S.(2011). A phenomenological approach to experiences with technology: Current state, promise, and future directions for research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(4), 487-510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9173-2
  17. Gao, F., Wang, C. X. & Sun, Y.(2009). New Model of Productive Online Discussion and Its Implications for Research and Instruction. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 2(1), 65-78.
  18. Govaerts, S. et al.(2012). The student activity meter for awareness and self-reflection. In Proceedings of CHI'12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 869-884). ACM.
  19. Hewitt, J.(2003). How habitual online practices affect the development of asynchronous discussion threads. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 28(1), 31-45. https://doi.org/10.2190/PMG8-A05J-CUH1-DK14
  20. Iandoli, L. et al.(2014). Socially augmented argumentation tools: Rationale, design and evaluation of a debate dashboard. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 72(3), 298-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2013.08.006
  21. Larson, B. E. & Keiper, T. A.(2002). Classroom discussion and threaded electronic discussion: Learning in two arenas. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 2(1), 45-62.
  22. Murray, T. et al.(2013). A prototype facilitators dashboard: assessing and visualizing dialogue quality in online deliberations for education and work. Paper presented at the International Conference on e-Learning, e-Business, Enterprise Information Systems, and e-Government, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
  23. Tan, J. P. L. et al.(2017). Learner dashboards a double-edged sword? Students' sense-making of a collaborative critical reading and learning analytics environment for fostering 21st century literacies. Journal of Learning Analytics, 4(1), 117-140.
  24. Thomas, J.(2013). Exploring the use of asynchronous online discussion in healthcare education: a literature review. Computers & Education, 69, 199-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.005
  25. Weinberger, A. & Fischer, F.(2006). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 46(1), 71-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.003