DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

전쟁 패러다임의 전환에 따른 잠수함의 역할 변화에 대한 고찰

A Review on the Change in Submarine Roles in Naval Warfare: Based on Warfare Paradigm

  • 투고 : 2020.01.09
  • 심사 : 2020.01.30
  • 발행 : 2020.02.28

초록

The longing for submarine manufacture and the fear of her power had exited for a long time, but submarine that could submerge and attack was built from 20th century by science technology development. The question, 'Submarine can exercise her power in naval warfare?' had exited before World War I, but the effective value of submarine was shown in the procedure of a chain of naval warfare during World War I and World War II. Germany and the United States made the best use of submarines at that time. The submarines of these nations mounted fierce attack on the enemy's battleships and merchant ships and blocked the sea lanes for war material. These fierce attack on ships became impossible After World War II, and the major powers reduced and coordinated the defence budget, so they considered the role of submarine. However, submarine is still powerful weapon system because she can secretly navigate under the water, and one of the most important force in the navy. The aim of this thesis is analyzing submarine roles in each naval warfare and integrating maritime strategy and weapon system technology into her roles. First, the research about represent submarine roles like anti-surfaceship warfare, anti-submarine warfare, intelligence gathering, land attack, supporting special operation and mine landing warfare will be presented, then the major naval warfare where submarine participated(during ex-World War I, World War I, World War II, The Cold War Era and post Cold War) and the analyzing of submarine roles by time will be presented. Submarine was developed for anti-surfaceship warfare during ex-World War I but could not make remarkable military gain in naval warfare because her performance and weapon was inadequate. However, the effective value of submarine in the procedure of a chain of naval warfare was shown during World War I and World War II. The major powers put battleships into naval warfare undiscriminatingly to command the sea power and submarines did massive damage to enemy navy power, so put a restraint the maritime power of enemy, and blocked the sea lanes for war material. After World War II, the battlefield situation changed rapidly and the concept of preemption became difficult to apply in naval warfare. Therefore, the submarine was unable to concentrate on anti-surfaceship mission. Especially during the Cold War era, nuclear submarine came to appear and her weapon system developed rapidly. These development gave submarines special missions: anti-submarine warfare and intelligence gathering. At that time, United States and Soviet submarines tracked other nation's submarines loaded with nuclear weapons and departing from naval their base. The submarines also collected information on the volume of ships and a coastal missile launching site in company with this mission. After Cold War, the major powers despatched forces to major troubled regions to maintain world peace, their submarines approached the shores of these regions and attacked key enemy installations with cruise missiles. At that time, the United States eased the concept of preemption and made the concept of Bush doctrine because of possible 911 terrorism. The missiles fired from submarines and surface battleships accurately attacked key enemy installations. Many nations be strategically successful depending on what kind of mission a submarine is assigned. The patterns of future naval warfare that my country will provide against will be military power projection and coalition/joint operations. These suggest much more about what future missions we should assign to submarines.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 공군대학, 항공전략 이론의 이해 (대전: 공군본부, 2000).
  2. 국방대학교, 안보관계용어집 (서울: 국방대학교, 2005).
  3. 권영근 편, 미래전과 군사혁신 (서울: 연경문화사, 1999).
  4. 권영일, "미 해군의 해양전략 발전과 우리의 과제," Strategy 21 제 41호, 2017년.
  5. 권윤탁, "미래 합동작전 기여를 위한 해상화력 발전방안 연구," 합동군사대학교 논문, 2017년.
  6. 김용조, "미국의 전쟁수행 사례에 관한 연구," 국방대학교 논문, 2005년.
  7. 박승환, "미래전에 대비한 군사전력 발전방향," 국방대학교 논문, 2010년.
  8. 박순식, "합동작전 수행능력 강화를 위한 잠수함전력 발전방향," 국방대학교 논문, 2012년.
  9. 박창희, 군사전략론 (서울: 플래닛미디어, 2013).
  10. 신용두, "선제의 그 요건에 관한 연구: 이라크전쟁을 중심으로," 국방대학교 논문, 2008년.
  11. 양용모, "중심의 개념을 통한 잠수함전 분석," 국방대학교 안보과정 논문, 2001년.
  12. 오충근, "현대전에서의 전략타격체계 발전방향 연구," 국방대학교 석사과정 논문, 2008년.
  13. 이상근 등, 잠수함에 대한 이해 100문 100답 (진해: 잠수함사령부, 2015).
  14. 이석호, "선제공격의 개념과 정당성에 관한 연구," 군사 제 58호, 2006년.
  15. 이용권, "한국의 해양전략과 잠수함 전력의 발전방향," 국방대학교 안보과정 논문, 2005년.
  16. 이정모, "억제전략 구현을 위한 잠수함 전력 운용과 발전방향에 관한 연구," 국방대학교 합동 참모대학 논문, 2004년.
  17. 이홍희, "통일한국의 해군력 발전방향에 관한 연구," 국방대학교 안보과정 논문, 1997년.
  18. 앨빈 토플러 등, 전쟁과 반전쟁 (서울: 한국경제신문사, 1994).
  19. 윌리엄 W. 등, 선제공격(Hitting First) : 미국의 안보전략과 예방공격 (서울: 국방대학교, 2008).
  20. 장준섭, 원자력 추진 잠수함에 대한 100문 100답 (진해: 잠수함사령부, 2017).
  21. 장진오 등, "북한 SLBM 위협에 대비한 원자력 잠수함의 효용성 검토," 한국국방연구원 논문, 2017년.
  22. 최진철, "한국해군의 잠수함전력 발전 방향에 관한 연구," 국방대학교 석사논문, 2010년.
  23. Bharat Verma, "Indian Defence Review," Jan-Mar. 2004.
  24. Bernard Brodie, Strategy in the Missile Age (New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1959).
  25. James Clay Moltz, "Submarine and Autonomous Vessel Proliferation: Implications for Future Strategy Stability at Sea," U.S. Naval Postgraduate School, 2012.
  26. Myra S. Mckirrick, Submarine: Weapon of Choice in Future Warfare (Virginia: Lexington Institute, 2003).
  27. Normann Friedmann, "New Roles for Submarine," Naval Forces, Vol. 25, No. 3, 2004.
  28. Stansfield Turner, "Mission of U.S. Navy," Naval War College Review, March, 1974.
  29. U.S Department of Defence, Dictionary of Millitary and Associated Terms (Washington D.C.: Joint Chefs of Staff, 2001).
  30. Warrior Maven, "Navy Test & Refines New Attack Submarine Stealth Technology," Defence Maven, 2018.
  31. HMS Splendid, wikipedia (검색일: 2019. 9. 16.)
  32. 선제, http://www.korean.go.kr (검색일: 2019. 9. 10.)
  33. MIRV, wikipedia (검색일: 2019. 9. 11.)
  34. Submarine Warfare, Military Analysis Network (검색일: 2019. 9. 16.)
  35. Submarine Wafare, wikipedia (검색일: 2019. 9. 16.)