• Strategy21
• /
• 통권46호
• /
• pp.89-122
• /
• 2020

The longing for submarine manufacture and the fear of her power had exited for a long time, but submarine that could submerge and attack was built from 20th century by science technology development. The question, 'Submarine can exercise her power in naval warfare?' had exited before World War I, but the effective value of submarine was shown in the procedure of a chain of naval warfare during World War I and World War II. Germany and the United States made the best use of submarines at that time. The submarines of these nations mounted fierce attack on the enemy's battleships and merchant ships and blocked the sea lanes for war material. These fierce attack on ships became impossible After World War II, and the major powers reduced and coordinated the defence budget, so they considered the role of submarine. However, submarine is still powerful weapon system because she can secretly navigate under the water, and one of the most important force in the navy. The aim of this thesis is analyzing submarine roles in each naval warfare and integrating maritime strategy and weapon system technology into her roles. First, the research about represent submarine roles like anti-surfaceship warfare, anti-submarine warfare, intelligence gathering, land attack, supporting special operation and mine landing warfare will be presented, then the major naval warfare where submarine participated(during ex-World War I, World War I, World War II, The Cold War Era and post Cold War) and the analyzing of submarine roles by time will be presented. Submarine was developed for anti-surfaceship warfare during ex-World War I but could not make remarkable military gain in naval warfare because her performance and weapon was inadequate. However, the effective value of submarine in the procedure of a chain of naval warfare was shown during World War I and World War II. The major powers put battleships into naval warfare undiscriminatingly to command the sea power and submarines did massive damage to enemy navy power, so put a restraint the maritime power of enemy, and blocked the sea lanes for war material. After World War II, the battlefield situation changed rapidly and the concept of preemption became difficult to apply in naval warfare. Therefore, the submarine was unable to concentrate on anti-surfaceship mission. Especially during the Cold War era, nuclear submarine came to appear and her weapon system developed rapidly. These development gave submarines special missions: anti-submarine warfare and intelligence gathering. At that time, United States and Soviet submarines tracked other nation's submarines loaded with nuclear weapons and departing from naval their base. The submarines also collected information on the volume of ships and a coastal missile launching site in company with this mission. After Cold War, the major powers despatched forces to major troubled regions to maintain world peace, their submarines approached the shores of these regions and attacked key enemy installations with cruise missiles. At that time, the United States eased the concept of preemption and made the concept of Bush doctrine because of possible 911 terrorism. The missiles fired from submarines and surface battleships accurately attacked key enemy installations. Many nations be strategically successful depending on what kind of mission a submarine is assigned. The patterns of future naval warfare that my country will provide against will be military power projection and coalition/joint operations. These suggest much more about what future missions we should assign to submarines.

• 문화기술의 융합
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.321-325
• /
• 2020

본 연구는 첨단과학 기술이 전투개념에 미치는 영향과 AICBM 기술을 접목한 미래 육군의 전투를 새롭게 개념화 하는데 목적이 있다. '전투개념'은 시대 상황에 따라 변화하고, 다음 두 가지 사례를 통해 볼 수 있다. 첫째, 적을 분석 하여 상대적 우위를 달성하는 개념이다. 이러한 대표적인 사례가 미군이 '공지합동전투'를 '다영역작전(Multi-Domain Operations)'으로 발전시킨 경우를 들 수 있다. 둘째, 전투개념의 변화를 이끄는 '과학기술'이다. 세계 1차 대전시 육상과 해상에서의 화력전이 항공기의 출현으로 인해 세계 2차 대전에서 '공중전'으로 발전된 것이 대표적 사례이다. 이와 관련하여 미군은 '미래사령부' 창설 등을 통해 첨단과학기술을 기반으로 미래 작전환경에 부합한 싸우는 개념과 미래 군 건설에 집중하고 있다. 따라서 우리 군도 4차 산업혁명의 주요기술을 기회로 활용하여 미래 전투개념을 발전시킬 필요가 있으며, 미래의 전쟁은 첨단과학기술이 전쟁을 수행하는 개념 발전에 영향을 크게 미칠 것이며, 이는 4차 산업혁명을 근간으로 한 AICBM 기술이 초연결·초지능·초융합의 형태로 국방운영에서의 혁신을 촉진할 것이기 때문이다. 따라서 본 연구는 첨단과학 기술이 전투개념에 미치는 영향과 AICBM 기술을 접목한 미래 육군의 전투개념을 제시할 것이다.

• 전자통신동향분석
• /
• 제35권6호
• /
• pp.56-67
• /
• 2020

The core technologies of the 4th Industrial Revolution, such as artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things, the cloud, big data, and mobile networks, are inspiring major changes and innovations in the defense sector worldwide. The United States, China, and Russia are pursuing defense research and development strategies that seek to maintain their leadership on the battlefield in the future through the overwhelming superiority of defense science technology. Defense science and technology concentrate on the development of challenging new disruptive technologies to efficiently respond to future battlefield environments, where the immediate process of determining the outcome of a war will lead to combat power. In this paper, we first look at the development strategies of the 4th Industrial Revolution in major countries and describe the latest trends in defense science and technology accordingly.

• 지능정보연구
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.55-72
• /
• 2010

최근, NCW에 적합한 C4I 체계의 전투력 상승효과 평가의 필요성이 제기되고 있다. 기존의연구는 체계 자체에 중점을 두었으며, 인적 요소를 중요한 요소로 고려하지 않았다. 따라서, C4I 체계의 전투력 상승효과 평가 시 기술 및 인적 요소를 고려하여 평가하는 것이 필요한 시점이라고 할 수 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 E-TechMan(A Combat Effectiveness Evaluation Algorithm Considering Technical and Human Factors in C4I System)이라 불리는 전투력 상승효과 평가 알고리즘을 제안한다. E-TechMan 알고리즘은 합동화력체계(Joint Fire Operating System-Korea)에 적용되어 전투력 상승효과를 평가해보았다. 또한, 기존의 연구방법인 C2 이론 및 고전 역학에 의한 결과와 비교를 하였다. 본 연구는 인적요소에 의한 영향을 반영함으로써 기존의 연구보다 현실적인 전투력 상승효과 결과를 제시했다는데 가치가 있다.