Journal of Convergence for Information Technology (융합정보논문지)

Convergence Society for SMB (중소기업융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on G2 Risk and Export Diversification: Focusing on Export Support System for SMEs

수출다변화를 통한 G2 리스크 극복 방안에 관한 연구: 중소기업 수출지원 정책을 중심으로

  • Choi, Don-Seung (School of Economics and International Trade, Andong National University) ;
  • Khoe, Kyung-Il (Division of Business and Commerce, Baekseok University)
  • 최돈승 (안동대학교 경제무역학부) ;
  • 고경일 (백석대학교 경상학부)
  • Received : 2019.08.05
  • Accepted : 2019.10.20
  • Published : 2019.10.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study argued problems and improvement of export support system for SMEs in the uncertain world global trade environment with G2(US-China) risk. In SMEs export support system, The authorities needs stronger control tower to promote consistent export support policies. There is also another problem of repetitious work that export support system has been operated by individual project. In order to overcome these problems, first, the authorities set clearly organization to control various export support policies. Second, export support system needs the efficient operation based on long term road map. Third, the authorities defines clear roles and responsibilities of supporting units, and enhances cooperation between the different organizations. Finally, the system should arrange performance evaluation index and feedback system to build the desirable export support system.

본 연구는 미-중 무역분쟁을 보다 장기적인 관점에서 'G2 리스크'로 정의하고 급변하는 세계무역환경 속에서 중소기업 수출지원제도의 문제점을 진단하고 개선방안을 논의하고 있다. 중소기업 수출지원제도는 이를 총괄하는 컨트롤 타워가 부재하고, 사업별로 제도가 운용되면서 정책 간 중복으로 인해 행정적 낭비가 발생할 수 있다는 문제점이 있다. 이러한 문제를 개선하기 위해서 첫째, 중소기업 수출지원제도를 총괄하는 컨트롤 타워를 명확하게 설정해야 할 것이다. 둘째, 컨트롤 타워를 명확하게 설정한 이후 중장기 로드맵을 구축하여 중소기업 수출지원제도의 효율적인 운영방안을 마련해야 할 것이다. 셋째, 개별 수출지원조직의 역할과 책임을 명확하게 한 후 조직 간 협력을 강화할 필요가 있다. 마지막으로 중소기업 수출지원제도가 잘 수립되고 운영되고 있는지 여부를 확인하기 위해서는 올바른 성과평가기준과 환류시스템을 마련하는 것이 중요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. D. Burns, J. Ekblom & A. Shalal (2019.08.10.). Timeline: Key dates in the U.S.-China trade war . Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-china-timeline/timeline-key-dates-in-the-us-china-trade-war-idUSKCN1UZ24U
  2. K. Hwang. (2019). Phenomenological Analysis for the Employment Policy and Creating Jobs: Understanding Small and Medium-sized Enterprises' Labors and Technology. Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(4), 29-39. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2019.17.4.029
  3. Institute for International Trade. (2019). The Effect of US.China Trade War on Export, Trade Focus, 24, Seoul : Korea International Trade Association.
  4. Institute for International Trade. (2019). 2019 Import and Export First Half Trends and Second Half Forecast. Trade Focus, 24, Seoul : Korea International Trade Association.
  5. J. H. Lee & T. H. Kim. (2018). A study on the problems and implications of export environment of small and medium enterprises in Korea. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 8(4), 225-230. DOI : 10.22156/CS4SMB.2018.8.4.225
  6. S. G. Kim & B. H. Hyun. (2019). Analysis of SMEs internationalization theory through systematic literature review. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 9(4), 88-99. DOI : 10.22156/CS4SMB.2019.9.4.088
  7. J. Larimo. (2006). Different types of exporting SMEs: similarities and differences in export performance. Advances in International Marketing, 17, 17-62. DOI : 10.1016/S1474-7979(06)17001-5
  8. L. C. Leonidou, C. S. Katsikeas & D. N. Coudounaris. (2010). Five decades of business research into exporting: a bibliographic analysis. Journal of International Management, 16(1), 78-91. DOI : 10.1016/j.intman.2009.06.001
  9. J. Cieslik, R. Kaciak & D. H. B. Welsh. (2012). The impact of geographic diversification on export performance of small and medium-sized enterprises(SMEs). Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 10, 70-93. DOI : 10.1007/s10843-012-0084-7
  10. D. Crick, S. Chaudhry & S. Batstone. (2000). Revisiting the concentration versus spreading debate as a successful export growth strategy: the case of UK SMEs exporting agricultural-related products. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 12(1), 49-67. DOI : 10.1080/089856200283081
  11. E. S. Katsikea, M. Theodosiou. R. E Morgan & N. Papavassiliou. (2005). Export market expansion strategies of direct-selling small and medium-sized firms: implications for export sales management activities. Journal of International Marketing, 13(2), 57-92. DOI : 10.1509/jimk.13.2.57.64856
  12. E. Helpman & P. Krugman. (1985). Market structure and foreign trade: Increasing returns, imperfect competition and the international economy. MIT Press, Cambredge, MA.
  13. R. Feenstra. (1994). New product varieties and the measurement of international prices. The American Economic Review, 84(1), 157-177.
  14. D. Hummels, J. Peter & P. Klenow. (2005). The variety and quality of a nation's exports. The American Economic Review, 95(3), 704-715. DOI : 10.1257/0002828054201396
  15. D. Herzer & F. Nowak-Lehnmann. (2006). What does export diversification do for growth? An econometric analysis. Applied Economics, 38, 1825-1838. DOI : 10.1080/00036840500426983
  16. M. Heddad, J. J. Lim, C. Pancaro & C. Saborowski. (2010). Trade Openness reduces growth volatility when countries are well diversified. Canadian Journal of Economics, 46(2), 765-790 DOI : 10.1111/caje.12031
  17. E. Fischer & A. R. Reuber. (2003). Targeting export support to SMEs: Owners' International Experience as a Segmentation Basis. Small Business Economics, 20(1), 69-82. DOI : 10.1023/A.1020296405149
  18. J. Audet & E. St-Jean. (2007). Factors affecting the use of public support services by SME owners: Evidence from a periphery region of Canada. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 12(2), 165-180. DOI : 10.1257/0002828054201396
  19. H. Kang. (2013). A study on the problems and utilization of export support programs for SMEs: Focused on Daegu and Gyeongbuk Area. Korean International Commercial Review, 28(4), 363-382. https://doi.org/10.18104/kaic.28.4.201312.363
  20. C. Mason & R. Brown. (2013). Creating good public policy to support high-growth firms. Small Business Economics, 40(2), 211-225. DOI : 10.1257/0002828054201396
  21. M. Ciszewska-Minaric. (2018). Export intensity, geographic diversification and the role of public support: The evidence from old and new Europe SMEs. Entrepreneurial Business and Economic Review, 6(2), 45-69. DOI : 10.15678/EBER.2018.060203
  22. J. H. Choi. (2018). A study on the efficiency of the export support policy for the SME in Korea. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 18(3), 114-123. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2018.18.03.114
  23. K. I. Kim. (2018). The relationship between the type of R&D investment and a firm's performance. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 8(4), 213-217. DOI : 10.22156/CS4SMB.2018.8.4.213
  24. K. S. Park & J. S. Ko. (2018). The problems and improvement measures of the export support system of Korea SME. The International Commerce and Law Review, 79, 209-228. https://doi.org/10.35980/KRICAL.2018.08.79.209
  25. Korea Federation of SMEs (2018). The effects analysis report of US-China trade war on SMEs. Seoul : Korea Federation of SMEs.
  26. S. Y. Lee, K. H. Cho & K. K. Park. (2019). A Study on the Collaboration between Government Departments in the Fourth Industrial Revolution Era. Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(6), 35-42. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2019.17.6.035