DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Let's Think about 'POVERTY' in the 21st Century : Using the Q methodology of Subjective Study

21세기, '빈곤'을 생각해보다: 주관성연구, Q방법론을 활용하여

  • Lee, Doh-Hee (Division of Social Welfare, Kongju National University) ;
  • Kim, Gi-Woon (Division of Social Welfare, Kongju National University)
  • 이도희 (공주대학교 사회복지학과) ;
  • 김기운 (공주대학교 사회복지학과)
  • Received : 2019.06.28
  • Accepted : 2019.09.20
  • Published : 2019.09.28

Abstract

In this study, 'poverty', which we think in our daily life, started from something. In particular, this study typified the perception of poverty by using the 'Q methodology', a subjective research method, to examine individual subjective opinions. The results of the analysis are as follows. is a "Retraction type", and poverty is a problem of 'Retention', 'Individual Effort Problem', 'Social Structure Problem', 'Low Status' and 'Laziness'. is a "Individual Problem type", and emphasizes 'Individual Effort Problem', 'Laziness', 'Incompetence', 'Starvation' and so on. is a "Basic Problem type", and emphasizes the basic element of life such as 'The Food and Shelter problem', 'Starvation', 'Laziness', and 'No Money'. is a "Resource Distribution Problem Type" that emphasizes the problem of resource allocation according to social structural problems. This study typifies the perception of poverty using subjectivity research method on 21st century and expects converging extension study to empirical studies for generalization.

본 연구는 우리가 일상에서 생각하는 '빈곤'은 과연 무엇인가에서 출발하였다. 특히 본 연구는 개인적인 주관적 의견을 살펴보기 위하여 주관성연구방법인 'Q방법'을 활용하여 빈곤에 대한 인식을 유형화하였다. 분석결과 다음과 같이 4개의 유형으로 정의되었다. 은 "Retraction type"으로, 빈곤이란 'Retraction', 'Individual Effort Problem', 'Social Structure Problem', 'low status', 'Laziness' 등으로 '되물림의 문제'임을 강조하였다. 는 'Individual Effort Problem', 'Laziness', 'Incompetence', 'starvation' 등을 강조하고 있어, "Individual Problem type"으로 명명하였다. 은 'The food and shelter problem', 'starvation', 'Laziness', 'No Money' 등의 삶의 기본적인 요소인 의식주문제를 강조하고 있어, "Basic Problem type"으로 명명하였다. 는 "Resource Distribution Problem type"으로 사회의 구조적인 문제에 따른 '자원분배의 문제'를 강조하고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 주관성연구방법을 활용하여 21세기 빈곤에 대한 인식을 유형화하였으며, 이에 대한 일반화를 위해서 향후 본 연구에서 출발하여 실증연구로의 융합적 확장연구를 기대한다.

Keywords

References

  1. G. S. Her. (2002), The History of Poverty and Welfare, Hanwul Police Academy Series.
  2. S. J. Lee. (2010), The History of Poverty: Bronislaw Geremek, Gi Pub.
  3. Vetter & Reinhold. (2014), Bronislaw Geremek : Der stratege der polnischen Revolution. Herbert Kupferling
  4. P. Keith. (2017), The Broken Ladder: How Inequality Affects the Way We Think, Live, and Die?, Seoul : Penguin Books.
  5. K. W. Kim. (2019), The Theory of Poverty, Seoul : Jungmin Pub.
  6. B. I. Roh. (2013), The Theory of Poverty, Yangseuwon Books.
  7. YTN. (2018. 3.12). Poverty without Escape... Poverty Escape Rate after Financial Crisis '6%'. YTN
  8. OECD. (2009). Growing Unequal? : Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries.
  9. R. B Seebohm (2018), Poverty: A Study of Town Life , Oxford University Press, USA
  10. T. S. Kim & B. D. Soun. (2016), The Theory of Poverty, Seoul :HungJi Pub.
  11. T. W. Soun. (2009), The Theory of Poverty: Kawakami - Hasyme, Kuriye Books, 2009.
  12. J. Y. Lee. (2018. 03. 12). Poverty Escape Rate 6% after the Poor Financial Crisis, MKnews. https://www.mk.co.kr/news/economy/view/2018/03/159282/
  13. H. K Kim. (1992), The Understanding of Q methodolgy for Subjectivity Study, The Seoul Journal of Nursing, 6(1), 1-11.
  14. D. H. Lee & D. K. Lee. (2007), A Abductive Approach on the Perception of the Accounting of Nonprofit Organizations by Applying the Qualitative Methodology, Review of Accounting and Policy Studies, 12(1), 281-308. UCI : G704-001804.2007.12.1.013
  15. H. K. Kim. (2008), Q-Methodology:Philosophy of Science, Theory, Analysis and Application, Communication Books.
  16. R. S. Brown. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. Yale University Press. New Haven, Mass.
  17. W. Stephenson. (1968), Consciousness Out-Subjectivity in. The Psychological Record, 18, 500. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393799
  18. W. Stephenson. (1961), Scientific Creed. Philosophical Credo. The Psychological Record, 11, 9-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393381
  19. R. S. Brow. (1997), The History and Principles of Q Methodology in Psychology and the Social Sciences. Kent State University. Ohio.
  20. J. N. Jeon. (2012), Twitter Users' Perception about News Production, Distribution, and Consumption via Twitter, Journal of Human Subjectivity, 25, 195-216. UCI : G704-001986.2012..25.009
  21. D. H, Lee, H. J Park & W. S. Kim. (2019), The Typology of the Perception on Community Welfare using the Q Methodology, Journal of Korea Contents Society, 19(3), 615-623. DOI : 10.5392/JKCA.2018.18.03.320
  22. H, K Kim & S. J Oh. (2008), A Study of Audience Typology toward Citizen Journalism, Korean Broadcasting System, 20(2), 119-147. UCI : G704-001525.2008.20.2.005
  23. K. P. Sanders. (1974), William Stephenson: The Study of His Behavior. Mass Communication Review 2, 9-16.
  24. B. I. Roh. (2017), Social Security, Knowledge Community.
  25. S. K. Lee (2016), A Constitutional Approach to Poverty : Tasks to overcome the Poverty through Social Constitutional Rights and Constitutional Principles and the Limitation on the Fiscal Spending on Welfare Area, Public Law. 44(3), 27-59. UCI : G704-000436.2016.44.3.009