Retraction: A numerical study on the fire smoke behavior by operating the fire prevention system in tunnel-type structure

논문 취소: 터널형 구조물의 방재시설 가동에 따른 화재연기 거동에 관한 수치 해석적 연구

Abstract

In this study, behaviors of fire smoke in the operation of disaster prevention facilities (smoke damper, jet fan) in a tunnel-type structure (soundproof tunnel) were investigated numerically and results of the investigation were compared and analyzed. Through the simulation and analysis, it was found that there was a significant change in the patterns of fire smoke between the opening of the ceiling of a fire vehicle and the closing, and it was shown that the critical temperatures of PC and PMMA, main materials of a soundproof tunnel were not exceeded. In addition, the simulation of installation intervals of smoke dampers showed that the maximum temperature of a soundproof tunnel without smoke dampers was $552^{\circ}C$ while it reached $405^{\circ}C$ when smoke dampers were installed at the installation interval of 50 m. The simulation of the operation of a jet fan showed that the maximum temperature of a soundproof tunnel without a jet fan was $549^{\circ}C$ while it reached only $86^{\circ}C$ when a jet fan was operating. Therefore, it is highly expected that they could create a favorable environment for evacuation and protection of soundproofing materials, and it would be necessary to promote basic studies on tunnels serving various functions and purposes.

본 연구에서는 배연댐퍼 또는 제트팬과 같은 방재시설이 설치된 터널형 구조물(방음터널)에 대하여 방재시설 가동에 따른 화재연기의 거동을 수치해석적으로 고찰하고 해석결과를 비교 검토하여 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 화재차량 천장부 개방 유무에 따라 방음터널 내 화재양상이 확연하게 달라지는 것을 확인하였으며, 방음터널의 주요 자재인 PC와 PMMA의 임계온도를 초과하지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 배연댐퍼의 설치간격에 따른 해석결과, 방음터널 내 발생하는 최대 온도가 미설치시에는 최대 $552^{\circ}C$인 반면, 설치간격이 50 m인 경우에는 $405^{\circ}C$로 나타났으며, 제트팬 가동 여부에 따른 해석결과, 방음터널 내 발생하는 최대 온도는 제트팬 미가동시에는 $549^{\circ}C$인 반면, 가동시에는 $86^{\circ}C$로 나타나 화재시 피난환경과 방음자재보호에 있어 매우 유리한 환경을 조성할 것으로 예상되며, 향후 다양한 목적을 가진 터널을 대상으로도 이러한 기초연구의 활성화가 필요할 것으로 사료된다.

Fig. 1. Grade distribution of expressway tunnels and soundproof tunnels

Fig. 2. Simulation case domain

Fig. 3. Temperature distribution by opening the ceiling to material

Fig. 4. Results of simulation - Effect of opening of the ceiling of a soundproof tunnels

Fig. 5. Results of simulation - Effect of exhaust damper installation

Fig. 6. Results of simulation - Effect of exhaust damper installation

Fig. 7. Results of simulation - Effect of smoke control system (jet-fan) operation

Fig. 8. Temperature distribution to smoke control system (jet-fan) operation

Table 1. Grade distribution of expressway tunnels and soundproof tunnels

Table 2. Boundary condition

Table 3. Simulation case

Table 4. Maximum diffusion distance of CO