대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제56권1호
  • /
  • Pages.1-7
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

토끼의 경골에서 RBM 표면처리 임플란트와 RBM 표면처리 후 Saline에 적신 임플란트의 제거회전력 및 표면분석 비교

Comparison of removal torque of saline-soaking RBM implants and RBM implants in rabbit tibias

  • 권재욱 (경북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 조성암 (경북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Kwon, Jae-Uk (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Cho, Sung-Am (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
  • 투고 : 2017.07.26
  • 심사 : 2017.12.14
  • 발행 : 2018.01.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적: RBM 표면처리한 티타늄 임플란트와 RBM 표면처리 후 saline에 적신 티타늄 임플란트에서 saline에 적신 경우 초기 골유착에 미치는 영향을 제거회전력 및 표면분석을 통해서 알아보고자 한다. 재료 및 방법: 대조군은 RBM 표면처리된 임플란트(이하 RBM)이고, 실험군은 RBM 표면처리 후 saline에 2주간 적신 임플란트(이하 RBM + Sal)이다. 토끼 10마리의 좌우측 경골에 각각 대조군 및 실험군 임플란트를 식립하고, 동시에 식립회전력(ITQ)을 측정한다. 10일 후 임플란트 식립부위를 노출시켜 제거회전력(RTQ)를 측정한다. 실험에 사용된 임플란트 시편의 표면분석을 위해 FE-SEM, EDS, 표면거칠기, Raman 분광분석을 시행하였다. 결과: RBM 표면처리한 티타늄 임플란트와 RBM 표면처리 후 saline에 적신 티타늄 임플란트 사이에 식립회전력 및 제거회전력은 유의미한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 결론: RBM 표면처리 후 saline에 적신 티타늄 임플란트는 RBM 표면처리만 한 티타늄 임플란트보다 초기 골유착에 긍정적인 영향을 미치지 않았다.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of the titanium implant soaked in saline after RBM surface treatment on the initial osseointegration by comparing the removal torque and the surface analysis compared to the titanium implant with only RBM surface treatment. Materials and methods: The control group was RBM surface treated implants (RBM), and the test group was implants soaked in saline for 2 weeks after RBM surface treatment (RBM+Sal). The control and test group implants were placed in the left and right tibiae of 10 rabbits, respectively, and at the same time, the insertion torque (ITQ) was measured. After 10 days, the removal torque (RTQ) was measured by exposing the implant site. FE-SEM, EDS, Surface roughness and Raman spectroscopy were performed for the surface analysis of the new implant specimens used in the experiments. Results: There was no significant difference in insertion torque and removal torque between RBM surface treated titanium implants and saline-soaked titanium implants after RBM surface treatment. Conclusion: Saline soaking after RBM surface treatment of titanium implants did not positively affect the initial osseointegration as compared to titanium implants with only RBM surface treatment.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Anil S, Anand PS, Alghamdi H, Jansen JA. Dental implant surface enhancement and osseointeration, implant dentistry - A rapidly evolving practice. Ilser Turkyilmaz eds. Intech; 2011, p. 83-108. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/ books/implant-dentistry-a-rapidly-evolving-practice/dentalimplant-surface-enhancement-and-osseointegration
  2. Parithimarkalaignan S, Padmanabhan TV. Osseointegration: An Update. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2013;13:2-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-013-0252-z
  3. Shalabi MM, Gortemaker A, Van't Hof MA, Jansen JA, Creugers NH. Implant surface roughness and bone healing: a systematic review. J Dent Res 2006;85:496-500. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910608500603
  4. Cooper LF. A role for surface topography in creating and maintaining bone at titanium endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:522-34. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.111966
  5. Dario M, Nicola M. Surface treatments for titanium implants. Int J Clin Dent 2015;8:139-49.
  6. de Jonge LT, Leeuwenburgh SC, Wolke JG, Jansen JA. Organic-inorganic surface modifications for titanium implant surfaces. Pharm Res 2008;25:2357-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-008-9617-0
  7. Coelho PG, Marin C, Granato R, Giro G, Suzuki M, Bonfante EA. Biomechanical and histologic evaluation of non-washed resorbable blasting media and alumina-blasted/acid-etched surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:132-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02147.x
  8. Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, Schenk RK, Denzer AJ, Cochran DL, Hoffmann B, Lussi A, Steinemann SG. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res 2004;83:529-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408300704
  9. Zhao G, Schwartz Z, Wieland M, Rupp F, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Cochran DL, Boyan BD. High surface energy enhances cell response to titanium substrate microstructure. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005;74:49-58.
  10. Carlsson L, Rotlund T, Albrektsson B, Albrektsson T. Removal torques for polished and rough titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:21-4.
  11. Schwarz F, Wieland M, Schwartz Z, Zhao G, Rupp F, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Schedle A, Broggini N, Bornstein MM, Buser D, Ferguson SJ, Becker J, Boyan BD, Cochran DL. Potential of chemically modified hydrophilic surface characteristics to support tissue integration of titanium dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009;88:544-57.
  12. Rupp F, Scheideler L, Eichler M, Geis-Gerstorfer J. Wetting behavior of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:1256-66.
  13. Lee HJ, Yeo IS, Kwon TK. Removal torque analysis of chemically modified hydrophilic and anodically oxidized titanium implants with constant angular velocity for early bone response in rabbit tibia. Tissue Eng Regen Med 2013;10:252-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-012-1086-1
  14. Fuming H, Guoli Y, Xiaoxiang W, Shifang Z. The removal torque of titanium implant inserted in rabbit femur coated with biomimetic deposited Ca-P coating. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:754-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01859.x
  15. Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Eriksson A, Lindstrom J. The preformed autologous bone graft. An experimental study in the rabbit. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1978;12:215-23. https://doi.org/10.3109/02844317809012997
  16. Sanz-Sanchez I, Sanz-Martin I, Figuero E, Sanz M. Clinical efficacy of immediate implant loading protocols compared to conventional loading depending on the type of the restoration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:964-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12428
  17. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Maghaireh H, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;(3):CD003878.
  18. Webb K, Hlady V, Tresco PA. Relative importance of surface wettability and charged functional groups on NIH 3T3 fibroblast attachment, spreading, and cytoskeletal organization. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;41:422-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19980905)41:3<422::AID-JBM12>3.0.CO;2-K
  19. Le Guehennec L, Soueidan A, Layrolle P, Amouriq Y. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent Mater 2007;23:844-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.025
  20. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. The impact of oral implants - past and future, 1966-2042. J Can Dent Assoc 2005;71:327.
  21. Hansson S, Norton M. The relation between surface roughness and interfacial shear strength for bone-anchored implants. A mathematical model. J Biomech 1999;32:829-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00058-5
  22. Brett PM, Harle J, Salih V, Mihoc R, Olsen I, Jones FH, Tonetti M. Roughness response genes in osteoblasts. Bone 2004;35:124-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2004.03.009
  23. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Albrektsson T. Oxidized titanium screws coated with calcium ions and their performance in rabbit bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17:625-34.

피인용 문헌

  1. The effects of saline soaking on the removal torque of titanium implants in rabbit tibia after 10 days vol.57, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2019.57.4.328