DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

디지털 수술용 가이드의 지지타입에 따른 정확도 평가

The accuracy evaluation of digital surgical stents according to supported type

  • 이준연 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 윤민호 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 박태석 (디맥스) ;
  • 전인곤 (디맥스) ;
  • 윤귀덕 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실)
  • Lee, Junyoun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Yoon, Minho (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Park, Taeseok (DMAX Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Chun, Inkon (DMAX Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Yun, Kwidug (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
  • 투고 : 2017.09.06
  • 심사 : 2017.12.28
  • 발행 : 2018.01.31

초록

목적: 본 연구의 목적은 디지털 소프트웨어를 이용하여 제작된 수술용 스텐트를 이용하여 지지 형태에 따른 수술용 스텐트의 정확성을 분석하는 것이다. 재료 및 방법: 총 5세트의 치아모형에 대하여 양측에 지대치가 있는 치아지지형 무치악 모델과 근심에만 지대치가 있는 치아-조직 지지형 무치악 모델을 제작하였다. 모델을 스캐닝을 시행하고, 전산화 단층 촬영을 실시하여 In2Guide 소프트웨어를 이용하여 전산화 단층 촬영술의 정보와 모델 스캐닝 정보를 중첩하여 임플란트 고정체(USII, $4{\times}10mm$, Osstem, Seoul, Korea)에 대한 가상적인 위치배열을 실시하고 수술용 스텐트 제작하였다. DMAX 수술 키트을 사용하여 임플란트 고정체를 식립하였다. 식립후 전산화 단층 촬영을 실시하여 찍어 술전에 계획된 임플란트와 실제 식립된 임플란트 사이에 오차(angle difference, coronal difference, apical difference)를 측정하여 통계분석을 시행하였다. 결과: 악궁에 따른 정확도 결과에서 하악이 전반적으로 각도, 길이오차의 값이 작게 나타났으나 이는 통계적 유의성이 없었다. 스텐트의 지지 형태에 따른 정확도 결과에서 치아지지형 스텐트가 치아-조직지지형 스텐트보다 길이오차와 각도오차의 값이 통계적으로 유의하게 작은 값을 보였다. 결론: 악궁(상악, 하악)은 수술용 스텐트의 정확도에 영향을 미치지 않았으며, 치아 지지형 스텐트는 치아-조직지지형 스텐트보다 더 적은 오차를 보여 주었다.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of surgical stent according to the supported type. Materials and methods: 5 sets of dental models which have tooth supported edentulous area and tooth-tissue supported edentulous area were made. Dental model were scanned with model scanner, and CBCT was taken. CT data and model scan data were overlapped using In2Guide software, implant were virtually planned in the software. Surgical stents are fabricated by 3D printing. The implant fixture were installed using the surgical stent, CBCT were retaken. CBCT before surgery and after surgery were overlapped, and the differences (angle difference, coronal difference, apical difference) were evaluated using statistical analysis. Results: In the assessment of the accuracy of surgical guides according to arch type, there are no statistically significant differences between maxilla and mandible. In the case of support type, tooth supported stents showed lower angle difference and length difference than tooth-tissue supported stents, which are statistically significant. Conclusion: Arch type does not affect the accuracy of surgical stents. But tooth support stents are more accurate than tooth-tissue support stents in the case of angle and length difference.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Van Steenberghe D, Malevez C, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Bou Serhal C, Dhoore E, Schutyser F, Suetens P, Jacobs R. Accuracy of drilling guides for transfer from three-dimensional CT-based planning to placement of zygoma implants in human cadavers. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:131-6. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140118.x
  2. Ramasamy M, Giri, Raja R, Subramonian, Karthik, Narendrakumar R. Implant surgical guides: From the past to the present. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2013;5:S98-S102.
  3. Malo P, de Araujo Nobre M, Lopes A. The use of computerguided flapless implant surgery and four implants placed in immediate function to support a fixed denture: preliminary results after a mean follow-up period of thirteen months. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:S26-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60005-5
  4. Somogyi-Ganss E, Holmes HI, Jokstad A. Accuracy of a novel prototype dynamic computer-assisted surgery system. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:882-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12414
  5. Stumpel LJ. Deformation of stereolithographically produced surgical guides: an observational case series report. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:442-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00268.x
  6. Karami D, Alborzinia HR, Amid R, Kadkhodazadeh M, Yousefi N, Badakhshan S. In-Office Guided Implant Placement for Prosthetically Driven Implant Surgery. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2017;10:246-54. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1584891
  7. Nickenig HJ, Eitner S. Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2007;35:207-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2007.02.004
  8. Widmann G, Widmann R, Widmann E, Jaschke W, Bale R. Use of a surgical navigation system for CT-guided template production. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:72-8.
  9. Holst S, Blatz MB, Eitner S. Precision for computer-guided implant placement: using 3D planning software and fixed intraoral reference points. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:393-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.10.050
  10. Di Giacomo GA, Cury PR, de Araujo NS, Sendyk WR, Sendyk CL. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results. J Periodontol 2005;76:503-7. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.4.503
  11. Van Assche N, van Steenberghe D, Guerrero ME, Hirsch E, Schutyser F, Quirynen M, Jacobs R. Accuracy of implant placement based on pre-surgical planning of three-dimensional cone-beam images: a pilot study. J Clin Periodontol 2007;34:816-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01110.x
  12. Tardieu PB, Vrielinck L, Escolano E, Henne M, Tardieu AL. Computer-assisted implant placement: scan template, simplant, surgiguide, and SAFE system. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2007;27:141-9.
  13. Park C, Raigrodski AJ, Rosen J, Spiekerman C, London RM. Accuracy of implant placement using precision surgical guides with varying occlusogingival heights: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101:372-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60080-9
  14. Block MS, Chandler C. Computed tomography-guided surgery: complications associated with scanning, processing, surgery, and prosthetics. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:13-22.
  15. Egbert N, Cagna DR, Ahuja S, Wicks RA. Accuracy and reliability of stitched cone-beam computed tomography images. Imaging Sci Dent 2015;45:41-7. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2015.45.1.41