DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

학령전기 아동 성장발달의 PBL 모듈 개발

Development of a Problem-Based Learning Module for Preschoolers' Growth & Development

  • 이명남 (강원대학교 간호학과) ;
  • 손해경 (성신여자대학교 간호학과)
  • 투고 : 2018.08.09
  • 심사 : 2018.10.26
  • 발행 : 2018.11.28

초록

문제중심학습(PBL)은 간호 임상실습 시 간호 지식, 기술과 태도를 통합하는 학습자 중심의 교육이다. 본 연구는 간호학 교과과정 가운데 학령전기 아동 성장발달의 PBL 모듈을 적용하기 위한 사전 연구이다. 이에 본 양적연구는 PBL 모듈을 Dick과 Carye의 프로그램 개발 과정(계획, 개발, 적용, 평가 단계)에 따라 개발하였고 2학년 간호대학생을 대상으로 구조화된 설문지를 활용하여 그 효과를 평가하였다. PBL 모듈은 각 팀 당 4-5명의 학생이 약 40분 정도 참여하였다. 수집된 자료는 기술통계, t-test, 내용분석을 하였다. 그 결과 간호대학생의 메타인지 수준이 유의하게 증가하였고, 팀 효능감은 모듈 참여 전후로 유의한 차이가 없었으며, 사후 학습만족도가 높은 수준으로 나타났다. 간호대학생은 PBL 모듈 참여 후 학령전기 아동성장발달에 관한 지식 및 문제해결능력을 습득하였고 PBL 참여 시 팀워크에 대해 만족한다고 응답하였다. 따라서 본 연구 결과는 간호 교과과정 내 PBL 모듈의 적용을 고려하기 위한 근거 자료를 제공하였다.

Problem-Based Learning (PBL) is a student-centered pedagogy that integrates nursing knowledge, skills, and attitudes into clinical nursing practice. This pilot aims to apply a PBL module on preschoolers' growth and development in the nursing curriculum. This quantitative study was performed to develop a PBL module following Dick and Carye's program development process (planning, development, application, and evaluation phases), and to evaluate its effects using structured questionnaires among sophomore nursing students. These students formed teams of four or five people each and spent 40 minutes participating in the PBL module. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-tests, and content analysis. Metacognition level increased significantly. There was no significant difference in team efficacy between pre-test and post-test. Post-test learning satisfaction was high. Students reported obtaining knowledge and problem-solving ability with respect to preschoolers' growth and development and were satisfied with teamwork. This finding offers fundamental knowledge concerning the application of a PBL module in nursing curricula.

키워드

CCTHCV_2018_v18n11_393_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Development process of a PBL module

Table 1. Contents of Scenario I and Scenario II

CCTHCV_2018_v18n11_393_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Group Activity Evaluation after Problem-based Learning

CCTHCV_2018_v18n11_393_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. General Demographic Characteristics in Nursing Students

CCTHCV_2018_v18n11_393_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Comparison of Changes in Metacognition, Team Efficacy, and Learning Satisfaction before and after PBL module

CCTHCV_2018_v18n11_393_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Content Analysis of Personal Reflective Reports (Multiple Choices)

CCTHCV_2018_v18n11_393_t0005.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. Y. Y. Hwang, C. S. Park, and M. S. Chu, “Correlations among meta cognition, critical thinking and self-efficacy of nursing students studying through problem based learning (PBL),” Journal of Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 146-155, 2007.
  2. Y. S. Roh, E. N. Ryoo, D. W. Choi, S. S. Baek, and S. S. Kim, “A survey of student perceptions, academic achievement, and satisfaction of team-based learning in a nursing course,” The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 239-247, 2012. https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2012.18.2.239
  3. J. M. Lee, S. H. Yoon, and H. S. You, “Identifying predictability of team efficacy, metacognition on PBL (Problem-Based Learning) outcomes,” Asian Journal of Education, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 105-123, 2012. https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2012.13.1.005
  4. C. Ozturk, G. K. Muslu, and A. Dicle, “A comparison of problem-based and traditional education on nursing students’ critical thinking dispositions,” Nurse Education Today, Vol. 28, No. 5, pp. 627-632, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2007.10.001
  5. T. Fujikura, T. Takeshita, H. Homma, K. Adachi, K. Miyake, M. Kudo, T. Takizawa, H. Nagayama, and K. Hirakawa, “Team-based learning using an audience response system : a possible new strategy for interactive medical education,” Journal of Nippon Medical School, Vol. 80, No. 1, pp. 63-69, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1272/jnms.80.63
  6. D. F. Wood, “ABC of learning and teaching in medicine : problem based learning,” British Medical Journal, Vol. 326, No. 7384, pp. 328-330, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7384.328
  7. Y. J. Son and Y. A. Song, “Effects of simulation and problem-based learning courses on student critical thinking, problem solving abilities and learning,” The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 43-52, 2012. https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2012.18.1.043
  8. Y. A. Song, “Effect of simulation-based practice by applying problem based learning on problem solving process, self-confidence in clinical performance and nursing competence,” Korean Society of Women Health Nursing, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 246-254, 2014. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2014.20.4.246
  9. M. R. Yoo, Y. J. Choi, and M. S. Kang, “The Effects of PBL (Problem-Based Learning) on the self-directed learning, critical thinking disposition, and problem solving process of nursing students,” The Korean Journal of Fundamentals of Nursing, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 46-55, 2009.
  10. H. R. Kim, E. Y. Choi, and H. Y. Kang, “Simulation module development and team competency evaluation,” Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 392-400, 2011.
  11. H. S. Kim, C. Y. Lee, T. H. Lee, and O. K. Ham, “Health problems and health behaviors of preschoolers,” Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 182-190, 2004. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2004.34.1.182
  12. H. Choi, “The effects of PBL (Problem-Based Learning) on the metacognition, critical thinking, and problem solving process of nursing students,” Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, Vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 712-721, 2004. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2004.34.5.712
  13. L. Baker and A. L. Brown, Metacognitive skills of reading, Longman, 1984.
  14. J. E. Lee, “Meta-cognition brain mechanism and direction and method of education,” Asia-pacific of Multimedia Services Convergnet with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, Vol. 8, No. 8, pp. 443-450, 2018.
  15. A. Bandura, Self-efficacy : The exercise of control, Freeman, 1997.
  16. M. K. Cho and M. Y. Kim, “Effects of self-directed learning readiness, teacher-student interaction, and academic achievement on core competency, learner motivation, and learner satisfaction in nursing students,” Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 161-170, 2018. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2018.19.3.161
  17. W. Dick, “The Dick and Carey model : will it survive the decade?,” Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 55-63, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300425
  18. B. L. Berelson, Content nalysis in communications research, New York, Free press, 1952.
  19. K. Krippendorff, Content nalysis : an introduction to its methodology, Thousand Oaks, California, Sage, 2004.
  20. J. L. Fleiss, “Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters,” Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 76, No. 5, pp. 378-382, 1971. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031619
  21. D. C. D. Klein, The effects of self-monitoring and multifile context instruction on knowledge representation and transfer among middle school students, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, University of California, 1998.
  22. S. G. Shin, Effects of mathematical achievement and meta-cognitive skills on mathematics problem solving the web based, self-directed learning environment, Korea National University of Education, Master's Thesis, 1999.
  23. L. C. Marshall, The relationship between efficacy, teamwork, effort and patient satisfaction, University of Southern California, Doctoral Dissertation, 2003.
  24. E. M. Kwon, The correlation among team efficacy, interpersonal understanding, proactivity in problem solving and team performance, Ewha Womans University, Master's Thesis, 2010.
  25. M. S. Yoo, “Development of standardized patient managed instruction for a fundamentals of nursing course,” The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 94-112, 2001.
  26. E. J. Barrow, G. Lyte, and T. Butterworth, “An evaluation of problem-based learning in a nursing theory and practice module,” Nurse Education in Practice, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 55-62, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1054/nepr.2002.0043
  27. M. Cooke and K. Moyle, “Students’ evaluation of problem-based learning,” Nurse Education Today, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 330-339, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1054/nedt.2001.0713
  28. S. Y. Hwang and M. J. Kim, “A comparison of problem-based learning and lecture-based learning in an adult health nursing course,” Nurse Education Today, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 315-321, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2005.11.002
  29. J. Strobel and A. Van Barneveld, “When is PBL more effective? A meta-synthesis of meta-analyses comparing PBL to conventional classrooms,” The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 44-58, 2009.
  30. S. J. Kim, “Tutors’ content expertise and experience on student satisfaction in problem-based learning nursing curriculum,” The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, Vol. 18, No. 7, pp. 551-559, 2018. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2018.18.07.551