DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Studies on the Operating Requirements of Multi-Resolution Modeling in Training War-Game Model and on the Solutions for Major Issues of Multi-Resolution Interoperation between Combat21 Model and TMPS

훈련용 워게임 모델의 다중해상도모델링 운영소요 및 전투21모델과 TMPS의 다중해상도 연동간 주요 이슈 해결 방안 연구

  • Moon, Hoseok (Department of National Defense Science, Korea National Defense University) ;
  • Kim, Suhwan (Department of National Defense Science, Korea National Defense University)
  • 문호석 (국방대학교 국방과학학과) ;
  • 김수환 (국방대학교 국방과학학과)
  • Received : 2018.07.04
  • Accepted : 2018.10.19
  • Published : 2018.12.05

Abstract

This study focuses on the operating requirements of multi-resolution modeling(MRM) in training war-game model and proposes solutions for major issues of multi-resolution interoperation between Combat21 model and tank multi-purpose simulator(TMPS). We study the operating requirements of MRM through interviews with defense M&S experts and literature surveys and report the various issues that could occur with low-resolution model Combat21 and high-resolution model TMPS linked, for example, when to switch objects, what information to exchange, what format to switch to, and how to match data resolutions. This study also addresses the purpose and concept of training using multi-resolution interoperation, role of each model included in multi-resolution interoperation, and issue of matching damage assessments when interoperated between models with different resolutions. This study will provide the common goals and directions of MRM research to MRM researchers, defense modeling & simulation organizations and practitioners.

Keywords

GSGGBW_2018_v21n6_865_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. An example of MRM operating requirement

GSGGBW_2018_v21n6_865_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. MRM operating requirement for BCTP

GSGGBW_2018_v21n6_865_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. MRM between Combat21 model and TMPS

Table 1. The contents of survey

GSGGBW_2018_v21n6_865_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. The entity-level objects that major commanders are interested in

GSGGBW_2018_v21n6_865_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Weather information transfer(Combat21→TMPS)

GSGGBW_2018_v21n6_865_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Object information lists

GSGGBW_2018_v21n6_865_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Object information transfer(Combat21→TMPS)

GSGGBW_2018_v21n6_865_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6. Combat21 model & TMPS weather information representation and converting method

GSGGBW_2018_v21n6_865_t0006.png 이미지

Table 7. Rules for converting TMPS tank damage results to Combat21 model information

GSGGBW_2018_v21n6_865_t0007.png 이미지

References

  1. P. K. Davis and J. H. Bigelow, "Experiments in Multiresolution Modeling(MRM)," RAND, 1998.
  2. S. H. Lee, “Need for Introduction of MRM and Analyzing the Validity of Applying MRM into Korean Army War Game Simulations,” Military Operations Research Society of Korea, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 42-57, 2005.
  3. Army, R. O. K., BCTP Corps, "2017 Creation21 Logic Simulation," Education Reference, 4-65-4-115, 2017.
  4. P. F. Reynolds and A. Natrajan, “Consistency Maintenance in Multiresolution Simulations,” ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 368-392, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1145/259207.259235
  5. S. G. Ko, T. E. Lee, D. K. Kim and M. S. Choi, “Interoperability between Combat 21 and K1 Tank Simulators using a Converter,” Journal of the Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 841-851, 2010.
  6. S. G. Kwon, M. S. Choi, M. S. Kim and T. E. Lee, “Test-Bed for the Interoperation of Virtual- Constructive Simulation,” The Korea Society for Simulation, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 1-15, 2010.
  7. D. G. Kim, H. L. Kwon, T. E. Lee and M. S. Kim, “A Study on Integration between an Entity-based War Game Model and Tank Simulators for Small- Unit Tactical Training,” Journal of the Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 36-45, 2012. https://doi.org/10.9766/KIMST.2012.15.1.036
  8. Army Mechanization School(AMC), R. O. K., "Introduction to Small-Unit Tactical Simulator of K-Series Tank," Education Reference, 2010.
  9. Army, R. O. K, Army Training & Doctrine Command, "Combat21 Logic Simulation," Education Reference, 2015.
  10. M. H. Huh, "R Programming," Freedom Academy INC., pp. 214-219, 2017.
  11. Army, R. O. K., BCTP Corps, "2017 Hwarang21 Logic Simulation," Education Reference, 8-7-35, 2017.
  12. H. S. Kim, H. S. Moon, D. K. Lee, M. S. Hwang and Y. K. Kim, “Developing an Expert System for Close Combat using Decision Tree,” Military Operations Research Society of Korea, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 83-93, 2010.
  13. H. S. Moon, H. S. Kim, M. S. Hwang, H. W. Bae and D. K. Lee, “Study on Consistency of Simulation Logic about Close Combat Damage Assessment among Constructive Models : Based on Combined Arms Integrated Interoperability System,” Military Operations Research Society of Korea, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 87-97, 2011.
  14. A. Bowers and D. L. Prochnow, "Multi-Resolution Modeling in the JTLS-JCATS Federation," The MITRE Corporation, pp. 1-11, 2003.