References
- 김선희, 이종희(2002). 수학기호와 그 의미에 대한 고찰 및 도입 방법. 학교수학, 4(4), pp. 539-554.
- 김선희, 이종희(2003). 기호학 관점에서의 문자와 식 분석. 학교수학, 5(1), pp. 59-76.
- 송상헌, 신은주(2007). 수학 영재의 추상화 학습에서 기호의 의미 작용 과정 사례 분석. 학교수학, 9(1), pp. 161-180.
- 최병철(2016). 질량중심 개념의 구조적 개념 형성에 관한 연구. 수학교육학연구, 26(1). pp. 23-45.
- Azarello, F., Bazzini, L., & Chiappini, G.(2001). A Model For Analysing Algebraic Processes of Thinking. In Sutherland et al.(eds), Perspectives on School Algebra. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht. pp. 13-36.
- Bakker, A.(2004). Design research in statistics education On symbolizing and computer tools. Dissertation Utrecht University.
- Bakker, A., & Hoffmann, M. H. G.(2005). Diagrammatic reasoning as the basis for developing concepts: A semiotic analysis of students' learning about statistical distribution. Educational Studies in Mathematics 60, pp. 333-358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-5536-8
- Bakker, A.(2007). Diagrammatic reasoning and hypostatic abstraction in statistics and education. Semiotica 164. pp. 9-29.
- Cobb, P. (2002). Modeling, symbolizing, and tool use in statistical data analysis. In K. P. E. Gravemeijer, R. Lehrer, B. van Oers & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Symbolizing, modeling and tool use in mathematics education. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 171-196.
- Davis, R. B. & Maher, C. A.(1997). How students think: The role of representation. In English, L. D.(Eds.), Mathematical reasoning: Analogies, metaphors, and images. pp. 93-115.
- Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learnin of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics 61, pp. 103-131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-0400-z
- Gravemeijer, K. & Stephan, M.(2002). Emergent models as an instructional design heuristic. In K. P. E. Gravemeijer, R. Lehrer, B. van Oers & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Symbolizing, modeling and tool use in mathematics education. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 145-169.
- Otte, M.(2006). Mathematical epistemology from a Peircean semiotic point of view. Educational Studies in Mathematics 61, pp. 11-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-0082-6
- Presmeg, N.(2006) Semiotic and the "connections" standards: Signification of semiotics for teachers of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics 61, pp. 163-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-3365-z
- Saussure, F, de (1986). Course in General Linguistics. Eds. Charles Bally, Albert Sechehaye, and Albert Riedlinger. Trans. Roy Harris. LaSalle, Ill: Open Court.
- Sfard, A.(1991). on the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics 22. pp. 1-36.
- Thomas, G. B., Weir, M.D. & Hass, J. R(2010). Thomas' Calculus: Early Transcendentals. Twelfth Edition. PEARSON: International Edition.
- Vygotsky, L. S.(1987). Thinking and speech. In Rieber, R. W. & Caton, A. S.(Eds.), The collection works of L.S. Vygotsky: Volume 1, Problems of general Psychology. New York and London: Plenum Press. pp. 39-285.
- Whitson, J. A. (1997). Cognition as a semiotic process: From situated mediation to critical reflective transcendence. In D. Kirshner & J. A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition theory: Social, semiotic, and neurological perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. pp. 97-150.