The Effect of Purchasing Factors of Environment-Friendly Agricultural Products on Consumer Attitude and Purchasing Intention

친환경농산물의 구매요인이 소비자태도와 구매의도에 미치는 영향

  • Lee, Jong-Ho (Dept. of Hospitality and Tourism Mnagement, Kyungsung University)
  • 이종호 (경성대학교 호텔관광외식경영학부)
  • Received : 2016.05.18
  • Accepted : 2016.06.11
  • Published : 2016.06.30

Abstract

The study tested the moderating effect of 215 women living in Busan to analyze the purchase intention (awareness, health interests, environmental interests) of environment-friendly agricultural products and it's the causal relationship between consumer attitudes and purchasing intention. The results confirmed that all purchase factors for environment-friendly agricultural products had significant causality on consumer attitudes. Significant causality of consumer attitudes on purchase intention was also confirmed. The moderating effect of the number of purchases was analyzed to only significantly affect consumer attitudes on purchase intention and consumer attitudes according to number of purchases were analyzed to vary depending on the intensity of purchase. Information presented in this study means that consumers who are aware of environment-friendly agricultural products, interested in health, and interested in protecting the environment exhibit positive attitudes on environment-friendly agricultural products as well as higher purchase intentions. Therefore, if government and local organizations strengthen the promotion of environment-friendly agricultural products, there may be an acceleration of the consumption of environment-friendly agricultural products, followed by an increase in the income of farmers as well as an increase in the number of farmers who cultivate environment-friendly agricultural products. This may ultimately aid in the conservation of the natural environment of Korea and enhance the health and well-being of the public.

본 연구는 친환경농산물에 대한 여성들의 구매의도를 파악하기 위하여 부산에 거주하는 215명의 여성들을 대상으로 구매요인(인지도, 건강관심도, 환경관심도), 소비자태도, 구매의도와의 인과관계를 분석하고, 구매횟수에 따른 구매요인과 소비자태도, 그리고 소비자태도와 구매의도와의 조절효과를 검정하였다. 검정결과, 친환경농산물에 대한 구매요인은 모두 소비자태도에 유의한 인과관계를 확인하였다. 그리고 소비자태도 또한, 구매의도에 유의한 인과관계를 확인할 수 있었다. 구매횟수의 조절효과는 소비자태도가 구매의도에 미치는 영향에서만 유의하게 분석되어 구매횟수에 따른 소비자태도는 구매의도에 강도를 달리하는 것으로 분석되었다. 본 연구에 제시된 내용들은 친환경농산물에 대하여 인지하고, 건강에 관심이 있고, 환경보호에 관심을 가지는 소비자들은 친환경농산물에 대한 태도는 긍정적이며, 구매의도 또한 높다는 것을 의미하고 있다. 따라서 정부 및 지역단체에서도 국민들에게 친환경농산물에 대한 홍보를 강화한다면 친환경농산물의 소비는 촉진될 것이고, 이에 따라 농민들의 소득 또한, 증가한다면 친환경농산물을 재배하는 농민들은 늘어날 것이다. 이는 궁극적으로 우리나라 자연환경을 보호하고, 국민들의 건강증진에도 도움이 될 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. 네이버 지식백과(http:// terms.naver.com)
  2. 파이낸셜 뉴스, 2013.06.05.
  3. 국립농산물품질관리원, 2011.
  4. 김계수 (2010). Amos 18.0 구조방정식모형 분석. 경기, 한나래아카데미.
  5. 이학식, 안광호, 하영원 (2007). 소비자행동 4판 서울, 법문사.
  6. 이학식, 임지훈 (2009). 구조방정식 모형분석과 AMOS 16.0. 서울 법문사.
  7. Ajzen I (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50:179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  8. Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980). Understanding Attitude and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, New York, Prentice-Hall.
  9. Baldassare M, Katz C (1992). The personal threat of environmental problems as a predictor of environmental practices. Environment and Behavior 24:602-617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916592245002
  10. Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986). The moderatormediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality Social Psychology 51:1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  11. Cha YR (2005). A study on effect of a style of type and brand logotype of a hanging banner(placard) on advertising effect. Journal of Outdoor Advertising Research 2(2):63-80.
  12. Choi HR (2009). The study of the Effect of Brand Extrinsic Cueson Perceived Quality, Perceived Risk and Purchase Intention. Dept. of Business Administration The Graduate School of Kyunghee University.
  13. Choi JY (2002). The Influence of Pro-sports Consumer's Team Loyalty on Consumer Behavior. Dept. of Exercise, Sport Science The Graduate School of Ewha Womans University.
  14. Choi WS, Choi SK, Lee SB (2013). The effects of the attributes of the eco-friendly agricultural products traceability system on perceived value and behavioral intention. Korean Journal of Culinary Research 19(4):161-175.
  15. Engel J, Blackwell R, Miniard P (1995). Consumer Behavior(8th ed.), Forth Worth: The Dryden Press.
  16. Gwon EH, Park DC, Kim IS (2015). A study on the effects of purchasing decision factors of environment friendly agricultural products on the users' satisfaction, repurchase, and intention for recommend action. Journal of the Korean Regional Science Association 38(3):109-133.
  17. Ha JY, Choi EY (2013). Health perception, health concern, and health promotion behavior of the elder. Journal of Korean Gerontol Nutrition. 15(3):277-285.
  18. Heo WS, Lee JH (2016). The effect of the education environment of cooking institutes on trainees' satisfaction and reregistration intentions. Korean Journal of Culinary Research 22(2):136-1023.
  19. Honkanen P, Verplanken B, Olsen SO (2006). Ethical values and motives driving organic food choice. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 5(5):420-430. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.190
  20. Hur EJ, Kim JW (2010). Consumer knowledge and attitude to spending on environment-friendly agricultural products. Korean Journal of Human Ecology 19(5):883-896. https://doi.org/10.5934/KJHE.2010.19.5.883
  21. Hwang CJ, Lee SY (2010). An analysis on the purchasing behaviors and influence factors of the environment friendly agricultural products. The Korean Association for Local Government, Administration Studies 24(1):123-145.
  22. Janssen M, Hamm U (2012). Product labelling in the market for organic food : Comsumer preferences and willingness-to pay for different organic certification logs. Food Quality and Preference 25(1):9-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.12.004
  23. Jeong BG (2009). The research of the brand awareness which affects on brand preference and purchase intention. Journal of Digital Design 21:213-225.
  24. Jin YH, An SH, Kim YY (2016). Analysis of purchasing behavior of foodservice costomers using the extended theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research 30(1):151-162.
  25. Jina Yoo JA, Jeong HS (2011). Consumer awareness of nutrition labelling in restaurants according to level of health consciousness. The Korean Journal of Food And Nutrition 24(3):282-290. https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2011.24.3.282
  26. Jung HS, Hwang YH, Yoon HH (2015). The effects of consumer"s corporate association on selfimage congruence, and satisfaction in food company. Korean Journal of Culinary Research 21(5):1-13.
  27. Kang LJ (2008). Characteristics of purchase behavior of organically farmed produce by life styles in home makers. Consumption Culture Study 11(1):1-20.
  28. Keller KL (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing 57(1):1-22. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252054
  29. Kim KD, Lee JY, Nam KS (2008). Purchase behavior of environment-friendly agricultural products by housewives in Seoul area. Journal of the Korean Society of Science and Nutrition 37(12):1667-1673. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2008.37.12.1667
  30. Kim MS, Kim DH, Lee GH, Youn MK (2013). Effects of selection criteria for eco-friendly agricultural products on purchase intention. Journal of Distribution Science 11-12, 71-81.
  31. Kim SH, Jeong DW, Kim GH (2012). Analysis of the relationship among image, awareness, public confidence of certificate mark for environment-friendly agricultural products, and purchase intension. Journal of Foodservice Management Society of Korea 15(6):359-383.
  32. Kim SO, Kim MH, Shim JH (2008). Understanding of consumers' perceptions on environment-friendly agricultural products (EAP) and purchasing behaviors by comparing purchasers and nonpurchaser. Korean Journal of Organic Agriculture 16(1):21-42.
  33. Kim SS (2007). A study on consumer's attitude for food safety and purchase of environment friendly agricultural products. Journal of Korea Management Association 25(6):15-32.
  34. Lee JE (2011). The effectiveness of consumer's environmental consciousness on environmentfriendly agricultural products perception and purchase intention. Korea Journal of Agricultural Management and Policy 38(2):196-219.
  35. Lee SY, Kim IH, Jang JH (2011). A study on the relationship between health concern and purchase behavior of the environmental friendly agricultural products. Korean Journal of Local Government, Administration Studies 25(1):73-96.
  36. Lee YS, Hong MH, Ryu K, Kim AJ, Ha SD (2009). A survey of consumer's consumption characteristics of environmental-friendly agricultural products [EFAP] - Focused on consumers in discount stores. Journal of Food Hygiene and Safety 24(2):111-123.
  37. Lim HJ, Lee YB, Kim YD (2013). Impact of reason for purchasing environmentally-friendly agricultural products on intent to re-purchase. Journal of Industrial Economics and Business 26(6):2633-2654.
  38. Newsom JT, McFarland BH, Kaplan MS, Huguet N, Zani B (2005). The health consciousness myth: implications of the near independence of major health behaviors in the North American population. Social Science and Medicine 60:433-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.05.015
  39. Park HY (2005). A Study on the Effects of the Health Consciousness and Environment Consciousness on the Purchase Behavior of Organic Food. Department of Business Administration Graduate School of Chung-Ang University.
  40. Park MS, Lee BJ, Ham SO (2014). Comparison of consumer's perceptions of quality certified agricultural products by consumer's health-concern and environmental concern. Journal of Foodservice Management Society of Korea 17(5):107-132.
  41. Park YS (2016). Study on recongnition and purchase action OFECO-friendly agricultural products. Department of Business Administration Graduate School of Management Dong-guk University.
  42. Royne MB, Ley M, Martinez J (2011). The public health implications of consumers' environmental concern and their willingness to pay for an eco-friendly product. Journal of Consumer Affairs 45(2):329-343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2011.01205.x
  43. Shin KO, Chung KH (2010). Comparative study of dietary habits, mini dietary assessment scores, and health interest between female students in the department of food and nutrition and other departments, Sahmyook University. The East Asian Society of Dietary Life 20(3):341-351.
  44. Sin RC, Kim JS (2005). A survey on the consurmer's purchasing pattern for environmental-friendly agricultural products. Journal of Agriculture, Life Sciences 42(1):77-91.
  45. Van Liere KD, Dunlap RE (1981). Environmental concern, does make a difference how Lt's measured?, Environment and Behavior 13(6):651-676. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916581136001
  46. Yang JH (1992). Changes in environmental consciousness and its social base. The Korean Sociological Association 26:89-120.
  47. Yoo KJ, Yoon HH (2014). The influence of values on attitude and behavioral intention of consumers towards organic food. Korean Journal of Hotel Administration 23(2):47-68.