한국안광학회지 (Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society)

한국안광학회 (The Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

스마트폰 사용에 의한 40대 중년층의 조절 및 폭주기능 변화

The Functional Change of Accommodation and Convergence in the Mid-Forties by Using Smartphone

  • 권기일 (서울과학기술대학교 안경광학과) ;
  • 김현진 (서울과학기술대학교 안경광학과) ;
  • 박미정 (서울과학기술대학교 안경광학과) ;
  • 김소라 (서울과학기술대학교 안경광학과)
  • Kwon, Ki-il (Dept. of Optometry, Seoul National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kim, Hyun Jin (Dept. of Optometry, Seoul National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Park, Mijung (Dept. of Optometry, Seoul National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kim, So Ra (Dept. of Optometry, Seoul National University of Science and Technology)
  • 투고 : 2016.05.26
  • 심사 : 2016.06.22
  • 발행 : 2016.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적: 본 연구에서는 스마트폰을 이용한 과도한 근거리 작업이 40대 중년층의 자각증상과 조절 및 폭주 기능에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 하였다. 방법: 단안과 양안의 시력이 각각 0.8 및 1.0 이상인 40대 중년층 40명(남자 10명, 여자 30명, 평균나이 $43{\pm}7.2$세)을 노안과 비노안으로 나누고 30분 동안 스마트폰으로 영상을 시청하도록 하였다. 스마트폰 사용 전과 후에 최대조절력, 조절용이성 및 상대조절을 측정, 비교하였다. 또한 스마트폰 사용에 따른 융합버전스와 근거리 사위도의 변화를 평가하였으며, 자각적 증상의 변화는 설문조사하였다. 결과: 40대 노안은 스마트폰 사용으로 안정피로, 흐림 현상 및 건조감의 순으로 불편감을 호소하였으며, 조절기능과 비사시성 양안시 기능이 전반적으로 감소하였다. 즉, 단안 조절용이성, 상대조절 등의 조절관련 기능은 통계적으로 유의하게 감소하였으며, 폭주 및 개산력 역시 저하되어 사위도의 변화가 나타났고, 음성융합버전스 값이 통계적으로 유의하게 감소하였다. 반면 40대 비노안의 경우는 안정피로, 건조감, 흐림 현상의 순으로 불편감을 호소하였고, 조절기능 중에서는 최대조절력 만이 통계적으로 유의하게 감소하였으며, 음성융합버전스 값의 유의한 감소를 나타내었다. 결론: 따라서 40대 중년층이 근거리 작업 후 자각적으로 느끼는 불편감의 원인은 노안여부에 따라 다르게 나타날 수 있으며, 단순히 조절기능의 감소에 의한 것이 아니라 사위, 융합력 등을 포함한 시기능의 전반적인 저하에 기인한 것임을 확인할 수 있었다. 따라서 40대 중년층이 근거리 작업으로 불편한 증상을 느낄 경우에는 연령증가로 인한 조절력 감소뿐만 아니라 사위, 융합력 검사 등 전반적인 시기능 검사를 통하여 그 원인을 정확히 판단해야 할 필요가 있음을 제안할 수 있다.

Purpose: The present study was aimed to investigate the effect of excessive near work by using a smartphone on subjective symptoms and accommodative and convergent function in their 40s. Methods: A total of 40 subjects(male, 10; female, 30; age, $43{\pm}7.2year$) in their 40s who have monocular and binocular visual acuities of 0.8 and 1.0, respectively, were divided into presbyopia group and non-presbyopia group. The subjects were asked to watch a movie on the screen of smartphone for 30 minutes. Their accommodative amplitude and facility, and relative accommodation were measured and compared before and after the use of smartphone. Changes in fusional vergence and near heterophoria by using smartphone were also evaluated. Furthermore, the change of subjective symptoms was surveyed using a questionnaire. Results: The presbyopia in mid-40s reported discomfort in an order of asthenopia, blur and dryness after the use of smartphone. Accommodative function and non-strabismic binocular function were generally decreased. Accommodative functions such as monocular accommodative amplitude, and relative accommodation were significantly decreased after smartphone use, and the change of phoria was observed as a result of decreased convergence and divergence. Negative fusional vergence was also significantly reduced. On the other hand, non-presbyopia in mid-40s reported discomfort in an order of asthenopia, dryness and blur, and only accommodative amplitude among the accommodative functions was significantly reduced. Significant reduction of negative fusional vergence was also observed. Conclusion: From the results, it was confirmed that the subjective discomfort of mid-40s after smarphone use might be related to whether presbyopia or not. It was due to not only the reduction of accommodative function but also the overall deterioration of visual function including heterophoria and fusional vergence. Therefore, it suggests that the accurate determination of the cause based on the overall visual functional tests such as heterophoria, fusional vergence as well as the decrease of accommodation due to the aging may be necessary when the mid-40s feels discomfortable symptoms by near work.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kang WS, Kim MS, Go JU. Effects of the smartphone information use and performance on life satisfaction among the elderly. J Korean Gerontological Soc. 2013; 33(1):199-214.
  2. KISA(Korea Internet & Security Agency). 2012 Survey on the Smart Phone Usage, 2013. http://isis.kisa.or.kr/board/index.jsp?pageId=060200&bbsId=3&itemId=799&page-Index=2(20 May 2016).
  3. Kim TJ. Presbyopia and contact lenses. J Korean Med Assoc. 2013;56(4):303-309. https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2013.56.4.303
  4. US Census Bureau. Population by Age and Sex, 2013. https://www.census.gov/population/age/data/2013comp.html (17 May 2016).
  5. KOSIS(Korean Statistical Information Service). Resident midyear population, 2015. http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_1B040M5&vw_cd=MT_ZTITLE&list_id=A6&seqNo=&lang_mode=ko&language= kor&obj_var_id=&itm_id=&conn_path=E1(17 May 2016).
  6. Thomson WD. Eye problems and visual display terminals the facts and the fallacies. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1998; 18(2):111-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0275-5408(97)00067-7
  7. Seomoon GA, Kim EY. Factors of video display terminal syndrome in elementary school students who use digital textbooks. J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Edu. 2012;18(1):141-148. https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2012.18.1.141
  8. Kwon KI, Woo JY, Park M, Kim SR. The change of accommodative function by the direction of eye movements during computer game. J Korean Ophthalmic Opt Soc. 2012;17(2):177-184.
  9. Kim SI, Kwon KI, Lee J, Lee HJ, Park M, Kim SR. The change of near point of convergence and fusional reserves after computer gaming with different direction of eye movement. J Korean Ophthalmic Opt Soc. 2013;18(1):37-43. https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2013.18.1.037
  10. Tosha C, Borsting E, Ridder WH, Chase C. Accommodation response and visual discomfort. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2009;29(6):625-633. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2009.00687.x
  11. Kang YJ, Leem HS. Effects of smartphone usage with contents and smartphone addiction on accommodative function. Korean J Vis Sci. 2015;17(3):289-297.
  12. Park KJ, Lee WJ, Lee NG, Lee JY, Son JS, Yu DS. Changes in near lateral phoria and near point of convergence after viewing smartphones. J Korean Ophthalmic Opt Soc. 2012;17(2):171-176.
  13. Kim BH, Han SH, Shin YG, Kim DY, Park JY, Sin WC, Yoon JH. Aided distance visual acuity and refractive error changes by using smartphone. J Korean Ophthalmic Opt Soc. 2012;17(3):305-309.
  14. Park M, Ahn YJ, Kim SJ, You J, Park KE, Kim SR. Changes in accommodative function of young adults in their twenties following smartphone use. J Korean Ophthalmic Opt Soc. 2014;19(2):253-260. https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2014.19.2.253
  15. Kim HM, Son JS, Lee WJ, Lee JY, Cho HG. Comparison of relative accommodation, accommodative facility, and addition based on occupation of initial presbyopia. J Korean Ophthalmic Opt Soc. 2009;14(4):59-63.
  16. Anderson HA, Stuebing KK. Subjective versus objective accommodative amplitude: preschool to presbyopia. Optom Vis Sci. 2014;91(11):1290-301. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000000402
  17. Pan CW, Cheung CY, Aung T, Cheung CM, Zheng YF, Wu RY et al. Differential associations of myopia with major age-related eye diseases: the Singapore Indian Eye Study. Ophthalmology, 2013;120(2):284-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.07.065
  18. MOEL(Ministry of Employment and Labor, Korea). Guidance for employee using visual display terminal, 2015. http://www.moel.go.kr/view.jsp?cate=3&sec=1&smenu=2&mode=view&bbs_cd=116&state=A&seq=1442564393512(20 May 2016).
  19. Rosenfield M, Cohen AS. Repeatability of clinical measurements of the amplitude of accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1996;16(3):247-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/0275-5408(95)00093-3
  20. Yang SN, Tai YC, Hayes JR, Sheedy J. Superior smartphone display quality enhances viewing performance and comfort. Faculty Scholarship(COO). 2011;17.
  21. Kim DJ, Cha JW, Park MC, Lee WJ. The influence of temperature and relative humidity variation on the dry eye for using smart phone. Korean J Vis Sci. 2014;16(3):397-407.
  22. Yothers T, Wick B, Morse SE. Clinical testing of accommodative facility: development of amplitude-scaled test. Optometry. 2002;73(2):91-102.
  23. Scheiman M, Wick B. Clinical management of binocular vision: heterophoric, accommodative, and eye movement disorders, 4th Ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2013;22-65.
  24. Sreenivasan V, Irving EL, Bobier WR. Effect of heterophoria type and myopia on accommodative and vergence responses during sustained near activity in children. Vision Res. 2012;15(57):9-17.

피인용 문헌

  1. Changes in Heterophoria and Fusional Vergence after Near Work with Smartphone and Paper Book vol.21, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2016.21.4.385
  2. The Change of Accommodative Function of Vergence Anomalies Subjects in their Twenties after Near Work with Smartphone vol.22, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2017.22.1.71
  3. The Changes in Convergence Function of Accommodative Anomalies in their Twenties after Watching Video on a Smartphone vol.22, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2017.22.2.133
  4. Ocular and visual discomfort associated with smartphones, tablets and computers: what we do and do not know pp.08164622, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1111/cxo.12851
  5. Accommodative Insufficiency: Prevalence, Impact and Treatment Options vol.12, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2147/opto.s224216
  6. Correlation between Convergence Functional Changes and Subjective Symptoms after Near Work in a Virtual Walking Condition vol.25, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2020.25.1.41
  7. Smartphone Use and Effects on Tear Film, Blinking and Binocular Vision vol.45, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2019.1663542
  8. Accommodative and binocular disorders in preteens with computer vision syndrome: a cross‐sectional study vol.1492, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14553
  9. Binocular Accommodation and Vergence Dysfunction in Children Attending Online Classes During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Digital Eye Strain in Kids (DESK) Study-2 vol.58, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3928/01913913-20210217-02