DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of the Number Concentration and the Chemical Composition of the Atmospheric PM2.5 in Jeju Area

  • Kang, Chang-Hee (Department of Chemistry, Jeju National University) ;
  • Hu, Chul-Goo (Department of Environmental Engineering, Jeju National University)
  • Received : 2013.12.09
  • Accepted : 2014.03.11
  • Published : 2014.05.30

Abstract

The number concentrations and the water soluble ionic concentrations of $PM_{2.5}$ have measured at Gosan site in Jeju, Korea, from March 2010 to December 2010, to clarify their characteristics. $PM_{2.5}$ number concentrations vary from 22.57 to $975.65particles/cm^3$ with an average value of $240.41particles/cm^3$, which have been recorded evidently high in spring season as compared with those in other season. And the concentrations in small size ranges are greatly higher than those in large size ranges, so the number concentration in the size range $0.25{\sim}0.45{\mu}m$ has more than 94% of the total number concentration of $PM_{2.5}$. The major ionic components in $PM_{2.5}$ are $SO{_4}^{2-}$, $NH_4{^+}$ and $NO_3{^-}$, which are mainly originated from anthropogenic sources, on the other hand, the concentrations of $Cl^-$, $K^+$, $Ca^{2+}$ and $Mg^{2+}$ are recorded relatively lower levels. The concentrations of the major ionic components are very high in spring season, but the concentration levels of the other components are recorded significantly high in winter season. On the other hand, in summer season, the lowest concentration levels are observed for overall components as well as the sum of them. The concentration ratios of nss-$SO{_4}^{2-}/SO{_4}^{2-}$ and nss-$Ca^{2+}/Ca^{2+}$ are 98.1% and 88.9%. And the concentration ratio of $SO{_4}^{2-}/NO_3{^-}$(3.64) is greatly higher than the value in urban area due to no large $NO_x$ emission sources in the measurement. In addition, the correlation and the factor analysis for the number and the ionic concentrations of $PM_{2.5}$ are performed to identify their sources. From the Pearson correlation analysis and the factor analysis, it can be suggested that the smaller parts(< $0.5{\mu}m$) of $PM_{2.5}$ is contributed by anthropogenic sources, but the sources of the remaining larger parts of $PM_{2.5}$ are not able to be specified sources in this study.

Keywords

References

  1. Bigi, A. B., Ghermandi, G., 2011, Particle number size distribution and weight concentration of background urban aerosol in a Po Valley site, Water Air Soil Pollut., 220, 265-278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-011-0752-6
  2. Buzorius, G., Hameri, K., Pekkanen, J., Kulmala, M., 1999, Spatial variation of aerosol number concentration in Helsinki city, Atmos. Environ., 33, 553-565. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00287-8
  3. Hieu, N. T., Lee, B. K., 2010, Characteristics of particulate matter and metals in the ambient air from a residential area in the largest industrial city in Korea, Atmos. Res., 98, 526-537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.08.019
  4. Jung, J. H., Han, Y. J., 2008, Study on Characteristics of $PM_{2.5}$ and Its Ionic Constituents in Chuncheon, Korea, J. of Korean Soc. for Atmos. Environ., 24(6), 682-692. https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2008.24.6.682
  5. Kim, N. K., Kim, Y. P., Kang, C. H., Moon, K. C., 2003, Characteristics of Ion Concentrations of $PM_{2.5}$ Measured at Gosan: Measurement Data between 1998 and 2002, J. of Korean Soc. for Atmos. Environ., 19(3), 333-343.
  6. Lee, D. E., Kim, W. H., Ko, H. J., Oh, Y. S., Kang, C. H., 2013, Chemical Composition Characteristics of Size-fractionated Particles during Heavy Asian Dust Event in Spring, 2010, J. of Korean Soc. for Atmos. Environ., 29(3), 325-337. https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2013.29.3.325
  7. Lee, M. J., Oh, S. N., Kim. E. Y., Chang. K. H., 2006, Relationship between Meteorological Elements and Aerosols Number Concentration at Gosan, Jeju for 2001-2003, J. of Korean Soc. of Hazard Mitigation, 6(3), 47-56.
  8. Lee, S. B., Jung, D. S., Cho, E. K., Kim, H. A., Hwang, E. Y., Kang, C. H., 2011, Composition and pollution characteristics of PM10 and PM2.5 particles at Gosan site of Jeju Island in 2008, Analytical Sci. & Technol., 24(4), 310-318. https://doi.org/10.5806/AST.2011.24.4.310
  9. Lundgren, D. A., Hlaing, D. N., Rich, T. A., Marple, V. A., 1996, $PM_{10}/PM_{2.5}/PM_{1}$ Data from a Trichotomous Sampler, Aerosol Sci. and Technol., 25, 353-357. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829608965401
  10. Park, K. J., Cho, K. S., Choi, B. C., Kim, J. Y., Choi, J. C., 2001, Characteristics of aerosol number concentration with meteorological factors in Seoul, Atmos., 11(1), 399-401.
  11. Sharma, D. K., Rai, J., Israil, M., Singh, P., 2003, Summer variations of the atmospheric aerosol number concentration over roorkee, india, J. of Atmos. and Solar-Terrestrial Phys., 65, 1007-1019. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(03)00146-9
  12. Sharma, N. L., Sharma, J. C., Singh, M., Sharma, P., Chand, K., Negi, A. K., Sharma, M., Thakur, H. K., 2011, Atmospheric ultrafine aerosol number concentration and its correlation with vehicular flow at two sites in the western Himalayan region: Kullu-Manali, India, J. Earth Syst. Sci., 130(2), 281-290.
  13. Song, S. H., Park, D. M., Lee, Y. M., Lee, C. W., Park, J. H., Yu, S. D., 2012, Ambient Fine and Ultrafine Particles Measurements and Their Correlations with Particulate PAHs at an Elementary School Near a Highway, Asian J. of Atmos. Environ., 6(2), 96-103. https://doi.org/10.5572/ajae.2012.6.2.096
  14. Watanabe, K., Honoki, H., 2003, On the Kosa(Asian Dust) Event in November 2002: Aerosol Number Concentrations and Precipitation Chemistry in Toyama, Japan, J. of the Meteor. Soc. of Japan, 81(6), 1489-1495. https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.81.1489
  15. Watanabe, K., Kasuga, H., Yamada, Y., Kawakami, T, 2006, Size distribution of aerosol number concentrations and water-soluble constituents in Toyama, Japan: A comparison of the measurements during Asian dust period with non-dust period, Atmos. Res., 82, 719-727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2006.02.026
  16. Yan, F., Hu, H., Yu, T., 2004, Analysis of particulate mass concentration, aerosol number concentration and visibility in Beijing, China Particuology, 2(1), 25-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-2515(07)60016-5
  17. Stanier, C. O., Khlystov, A. Y., Pandis, S. N., 2004, Ambient aerosol size distributions and number concentrations measured during the pittsburgh air quality study (PAQS), Atmos. Environ., 38, 3275-3284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.03.020

Cited by

  1. Analytical methods for atmospheric particulate aerosols: Focused on the physical properties and chemical composition of metals and water soluble ionic compounds vol.28, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5806/AST.2015.28.3.139
  2. Variability of Atmospheric Radon-222 and Secondary Aerosol Components in Accordance with Air Mass Transport Pathways at Jeju Island, Korea, during 2011-2014 vol.37, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/bkcs.10784