Journal of radiological science and technology (대한방사선기술학회지:방사선기술과학)

Korean Society of Radiological Science (대한방사선과학회)
권호 표지

Development and Evaluation Frameworks for PBL/S-PBL Packages: in the case of the Dept. in Allied Health Professionals and Nursing

PBL/S-PBL 패키지 평가도구 개발 및 평가 : 보건계열(학)과와 간호(학)과를 중심으로

  • 양정화 (제주한라대학 방사선과) ;
  • 김수진 (제주한라대학 간호과) ;
  • 김효실 (제주한라대학 보건행정과) ;
  • 임진형 (제주한라대학 유아교육과) ;
  • 채수경 (제주한라대학 작업치료과)
  • Received : 2010.07.31
  • Accepted : 2010.08.30
  • Published : 2010.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is meant to develop an evaluation framework for PBL and S-PBL package, as well as verify reliability and propriety of developed framework. To achieve the purpose, existing researches and related documents were considered, and composed basic questionnaire which fits to the basic frame of the framework, 3 categories 15 items for PBL/S-PBL. Verifying its contents propriety, examined by 9 experts who professors in college and made 14 items for PBL, 15 items for S-PBL. To verify construct validity of basic frameworks, carried out factor analysis. Final evaluation framework questionnaire were 15 items selected, its PBL for 3 items in motivating, 7 items in integrity, 4 items in systematic and total 14 items, S-PBL for 4 items in motivating, 6 items in integrity, 5 items in systematic and total 15 items, and was verify to have adequate reliability with Cronbach's $\alpha$ is 0.9112 in PBL, 0.9166 of S-PBL.

본 연구의 목적은 PBL/S-PBL에 사용되는 패키지(교재)를 측정할 수 있는 타당하고 신뢰할 수 있는 평가도구를 개발하는 것이다. 이러한 목적을 실현하기 위해 문헌 고찰을 통하여 PBL 및 S-PBL 패키지를 측정하는 도구의 3항목 15문항의 예비문항들을 만들었다. 예비문항을 대학의 교수 9인의 전문가를 통해 내용타당도를 검증하여 PBL은 14문항, S-PBL은 15문항으로 구성하였다. 개발된 평가도구의 구성 타당도 검증을 위하여 요인분석을 하였다. PBL은 동기부여 3항목, 통합성 7항목, 체계성 4항목, 총 14항목으로, S-PBL은 동기부여 4항목, 통합성 6항목, 체계성 5항목, 총 15항목으로 이루어진 평가도구가 제시되었으며 Cronbach's $\alpha$계수가 PBL은 0.9112, S-PBL은 0.9166으로 적절한 신뢰도를 갖는 평가도구로 검증되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Tracey W., Vicki S., Grant T., Bernadette D. & Jules K.: Developing problem-based learning packages internationally: an evaluation of outcomes, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(2), 125-144, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1080/1470329042000208666
  2. Kim SA, Kang IE, Kim SYJ, Nam KA & Park JH: Nursing curriculum development on implementation of Problem-based learning, Journal of Korean Psychiatric Nursing, 9(4), 559-570, 2000
  3. 김애리, 김영경, 송영선 외 4: 문제중심학습 패키지 개발: 지각 ․ 조정장애상황을 중심으로, 성인간호학회지, 13(3), 385-396, 2001
  4. Walton J., Clark D. & Glick N.: An outcomes assessment of a hybrid-PBL course in treatment planning, Journal of Dental Education, 61(4), 361-367, 1997
  5. Rohlin M., Petersson K. & Svensater G.: The Mallmo model: a problem based learning curriculum in undersgraduate dental education, European Journal of Dental Education, 2(3), 103-114, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0579.1998.tb00045.x
  6. Mullins G., Wetherell J., Townsend G., Winning T. & Greenwood F.: Problem based learning in dentistry: the Adelaide experience, Melbourne, David Lovell Publishing, 2001
  7. Winning T & Townsend G..: Problem-based learning in dental education: what's the evidence for and aging and is it worth the effort?, Australian Dental Journal, 52(1), 2-9, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2007.tb00458.x
  8. 강기선, 박미영, 이우숙: 기본간호학 PBL모듈(Module) 개발 및 적용의 일 예, 기본간호학회지, 8(2), 244-257, 2001
  9. Conway & Little P.: From practice to theory: Reconceptualising curriculum development for Problem-based learning, Educational innovations across disciplines. Selected papers from the Second Asia-pacific conference on Problembased learning, singapore, 2000
  10. 제주한라대학 PBL 교육연구원: Instructor manual for PBL workshop, 제주한라대학, 2007
  11. Brian T.: Intergrated problem-based learning in the neuroscience curriculum: the SUNY Downstate experience, BMC Medical Education, 6(47), 2006
  12. Charlin B., Mann K. & Hansen P.: The many faces of problem based learning: a framework for understanding and comparison, Medical Teacher, 20(4), 323-330, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1080/01421599880742
  13. PROBLARC: Development of PBL packages, White paper, 1-16, 2000
  14. Maudsley G.: What issues are raised by evaluationg problem-based undergraduate medical curricula? Making healthy connections across the literature, Journal of Evalution in Clinical Practice, 7(3), 311-324, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2753.2001.00303.x
  15. 김동헌, 정진섭, 정대수: 문제중심학습(PBL)을 대비한 교안개발, 한국의학교육, 11(1), 17-23, 1999
  16. 이우숙, 박미영: 문제중심학습매뉴얼, 제주한라대학 PBL 교육연구원, 2004
  17. 김윤미, 박영숙, 정재원, 김문정: 모성간호학 실습에서의 문제바탕학습(PBL) 적용과 평가, 여성건강학회지, 12(4), 326-337, 2006
  18. Bowers S.: The effect of problem-based learning on nursing students' clinical decision-making and learning satisfaction, Thesis, University of South Dakota, 2004
  19. Winning T. & Skinner V.: Package Evaluation Protocol, http://www.health.adelaide.edu.acu/$\sim$richards/anzd/report.htm, 2006
  20. The university of Newcastle: Student Evaluation of Courses, 2006
  21. The university of Newcastle: Student Evaluation of Teaching, 2006
  22. The university of Newcastle: Student Evaluation of Teaching elective item bank, 2006
  23. Dolmans D. & Schumidt HG.: What Drives the Student in Problem-based Learning?, Medical Education, 28(5), 372-380, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1994.tb02547.x
  24. University of Miami School of Medicine: Student assessment of PBL facilitators, Student assessment of transition, 2004
  25. Waltz C. & Bausell B.: Nursing Research: design, Statistics and Computer Analysis, Phil., 1981
  26. 한상숙, 이상철: 간호 보건 통계분석, 현문사, 2006
  27. 고유경, 이태화, 임지영: 임상 간호사의 간호업무성과 측정도구 개발, 한국간호과학회, 286-294, 2007
  28. Tabachnick G. & Fidell S.: Using multivariate statistics, Harper Collins, 1996
  29. Yoo DK & Kwon US.: SPSS-WIN 8.0 for statistics analysis, Seoul, 1999