Asia pacific journal of information systems

  • 제18권4호
  • /
  • Pages.57-81
  • /
  • 2008
  • /
  • 2288-5404(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-6818(eISSN)
한국경영정보학회 (The Korea Society of Management Information Systems)
권호 표지

소규모 기업에 있어서 지식소싱 전략이 기업성과에 미치는 영향 고찰

An Examination of Knowledge Sourcing Strategies Effects on Corporate Performance in Small Enterprises

  • 최병구 (국민대학교 경영대학 경영학부)
  • 발행 : 2008.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Knowledge is an essential strategic weapon for sustaining competitive advantage and is the key determinant for organizational growth. When knowledge is shared and disseminated throughout the organization, it increases an organization's value by providing the ability to respond to new and unusual situations. The growing importance of knowledge as a critical resource has forced executives to pay attention to their organizational knowledge. Organizations are increasingly undertaking knowledge management initiatives and making significant investments. Knowledge sourcing is considered as the first important step in effective knowledge management. Most firms continue to make an effort to realize the benefits of knowledge management by using various knowledge sources effectively. Appropriate knowledge sourcing strategies enable organizations to create, acquire, and access knowledge in a timely manner by reducing search and transfer costs, which result in better firm performance. In response, the knowledge management literature has devoted substantial attention to the analysis of knowledge sourcing strategies. Many studies have categorized knowledge sourcing strategies into intemal- and external-oriented. Internal-oriented sourcing strategy attempts to increase firm performance by integrating knowledge within the boundary of the firm. On the contrary, external-oriented strategy attempts to bring knowledge in from outside sources via either acquisition or imitation, and then to transfer that knowledge across to the organization. However, the extant literature on knowledge sourcing strategies focuses primarily on large organizations. Although many studies have clearly highlighted major differences between large and small firms and the need to adopt different strategies for different firm sizes, scant attention has been given to analyzing how knowledge sourcing strategies affect firm performance in small firms and what are the differences between small and large firms in the patterns of knowledge sourcing strategies adoption. This study attempts to advance the current literature by examining the impact of knowledge sourcing strategies on small firm performance from a holistic perspective. By drawing on knowledge based theory from organization science and complementarity theory from the economics literature, this paper is motivated by the following questions: (1) what are the adoption patterns of different knowledge sourcing strategies in small firms (i,e., what sourcing strategies should be adopted and which sourcing strategies work well together in small firms)?; and (2) what are the performance implications of these adoption patterns? In order to answer the questions, this study developed three hypotheses. First hypothesis based on knowledge based theory is that internal-oriented knowledge sourcing is positively associated with small firm performance. Second hypothesis developed on the basis of knowledge based theory is that external-oriented knowledge sourcing is positively associated with small firm performance. The third one based on complementarity theory is that pursuing both internal- and external-oriented knowledge sourcing simultaneously is negatively or less positively associated with small firm performance. As a sampling frame, 700 firms were identified from the Annual Corporation Report in Korea. Survey questionnaires were mailed to owners or executives who were most erudite about the firm s knowledge sourcing strategies and performance. A total of 188 companies replied, yielding a response rate of 26.8%. Due to incomplete data, 12 responses were eliminated, leaving 176 responses for the final analysis. Since all independent variables were measured using continuous variables, supermodularity function was used to test the hypotheses based on the cross partial derivative of payoff function. The results indicated no significant impact of internal-oriented sourcing strategies while positive impact of external-oriented sourcing strategy on small firm performance. This intriguing result could be explained on the basis of various resource and capital constraints of small firms. Small firms typically have restricted financial and human resources. They do not have enough assets to always develop knowledge internally. Another possible explanation is competency traps or core rigidities. Building up a knowledge base based on internal knowledge creates core competences, but at the same time, excessive internal focused knowledge exploration leads to behaviors blind to other knowledge. Interestingly, this study found that Internal- and external-oriented knowledge sourcing strategies had a substitutive relationship, which was inconsistent with previous studies that suggested complementary relationship between them. This result might be explained using organizational identification theory. Internal organizational members may perceive external knowledge as a threat, and tend to ignore knowledge from external sources because they prefer to maintain their own knowledge, legitimacy, and homogeneous attitudes. Therefore, integrating knowledge from internal and external sources might not be effective, resulting in failure of improvements of firm performance. Another possible explanation is small firms resource and capital constraints and lack of management expertise and absorptive capacity. Although the integration of different knowledge sources is critical, high levels of knowledge sourcing in many areas are quite expensive and so are often unrealistic for small enterprises. This study provides several implications for research as well as practice. First this study extends the existing knowledge by examining the substitutability (and complementarity) of knowledge sourcing strategies. Most prior studies have tended to investigate the independent effects of these strategies on performance without considering their combined impacts. Furthermore, this study tests complementarity based on the productivity approach that has been considered as a definitive test method for complementarity. Second, this study sheds new light on knowledge management research by identifying the relationship between knowledge sourcing strategies and small firm performance. Most current literature has insisted complementary relationship between knowledge sourcing strategies on the basis of data from large firms. Contrary to the conventional wisdom, this study identifies substitutive relationship between knowledge sourcing strategies using data from small firms. Third, implications for practice highlight that managers of small firms should focus on knowledge sourcing from external-oriented strategies. Moreover, adoption of both sourcing strategies simultaneousiy impedes small firm performance.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Alavi, M. and Leidner, D.E., "Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2001, pp. 107-136 https://doi.org/10.2307/3250961
  2. Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., and Holm, U., "The Strategic Impact of External Networks: Subsidiary Performance and Competence Development in the Multinational Corporation," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 23, No. 11, 2002, pp. 979-996 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.267
  3. Arend, R.J., "SME-Supplier Alliance Activity in Manufacturing: Contingent Benefits and Perceptions," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 27, No. 8, 2006, pp. 741-763 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.538
  4. Arora, A., "Testing for Complementarities in Reduced-Form Regressions: A Note," Economics Letters, Vol. 50, No. 1, 1996, pp. 51-55 https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(95)00707-5
  5. Athey, S. and Stern, S., "An Empirical Framework for Testing Theories About Complementarity in Organizational Design," National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, 1998
  6. Barney, J.B., "Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage," Journal of Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, 1991, pp. 99-120
  7. Bierly, P.E. and Chakrabarti, A., "Generic Knowledge Strategies in the U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, Winter Special, 1996, pp. 123-135 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171111
  8. Bierly, P.E. and Daly, P.S., "Sources of External Organisational Learning in Small Manufacturing Firms," International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 38, No. 1/2, 2007, pp. 45-68 https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2007.012429
  9. Bogner, W.C. and Bansal, P., "Knowledge Management as the Basis of Sustained High Performance," Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2007, pp. 165-188 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00667.x
  10. Bonaccorsi, A., "On the Relationship between Firm Size and Export Intensity," Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 23, No. 4, 1992, pp. 605-635 https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490280
  11. Branzei, O. and Vertinskyb, I., "Strategic Pathways to Product Innovation Capabilities in Smes," Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2006, pp. 75-105 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.10.002
  12. Cassiman, B. and Veugelers, R., "In Search of Complementarity in the Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition," Management Science, Vol. 52, No. 1, 2006, pp. 68-82 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0470
  13. Chen, C.-J. and Lin, B.-W., "The Effects of Environment, Knowledge Attribute, Organizational Climate, and Firm Characteristics on Knowledge Sourcing Decisions," R&D Management, Vol. 34, No. 2, 2004, pp. 137-146 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2004.00329.x
  14. Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A., "Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, No. 1, 1990, pp. 128-152 https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  15. De Clercq, D., and Dimov, D., "Internal Knowledge Development and External Knowledge Access in Venture Capital Investment Performance," Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 45, No. 3, 2008, pp. 585-612 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00747.x
  16. Dillman, D.A., Mail and Internet Surveys: Total Design Method, New York: John Wiley, 2000
  17. Dyer, J.H. and Singh, H., "The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, No. 4, 1998, pp. 660-679 https://doi.org/10.2307/259056
  18. Ebben, J.J. and Johnson, A.C., "Efficiency, Flexibility, or Both? Evidence Linking Strategy to Performance in Small Firms," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 26, 2005, pp. 1249-1259 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.503
  19. Edgeworth, F.Y., Mathematical Psychics: An Essay on the Application of Mathematics to the Moral Sciences, London: Kegan Paul, 1881
  20. Fey, C.F. and Birkinshaw, J., "External Sources of Knowledge, Governance Mode, and R&D Performance," Journal of Management, Vol. 31, No. 4, 2005, pp. 597-621 https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206304272346
  21. Forbes, D. and Milliken, F., "Cognition and Corporate Governance: Understanding Boards of Directors as Strategic Decision-Making Groups," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24, No. 3, 1999, pp. 489-505 https://doi.org/10.2307/259138
  22. Gopalakrishnan, S. and Bierly, P.E., "The Impact of Firm Size and Age on Knowledge Strategies During Product Development: A Study of the Drug Delivery Industry," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 53, No. 1, 2006, pp. 3-16 https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2005.861807
  23. Grant, R.M., "Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, Winter Special Issue, 1996, pp. 109-122 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199602)17:2<109::AID-SMJ796>3.0.CO;2-P
  24. Grant, R.M. and Baden-Fuller, C., "A Knowledge Accessing Theory of Strategic Alliances," Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2004, pp. 61-84 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00421.x
  25. Gray, P.H. and Meister, D.B., "Knowledge Sourcing Effectiveness," Management Science, Vol. 50, No. 6, 2004, pp. 821-834 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0192
  26. Gulati, R., Nohria, N., and Zaheer, A., "Strategic Networks," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2000, pp. 203-215 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<203::AID-SMJ102>3.0.CO;2-K
  27. Haas, M.R. and Hansen, M.T., "When Using Knowledge Can Hurt Performance: The Value of Organizational Capabilities in a Management Consulting Company," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2005, pp. 1-24 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.429
  28. Haas, M.R. and Hansen, M.T., "Different Knowledge, Different Benefits: Toward a Productivity Perspective on Knowledge Sharing in Organizations," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 28, No. 11, 2007, pp. 1133- 1153 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.631
  29. Henderson, R.M. and Cockburn, I., "Measuring Competence? Exploring Firm Effects in Pharmaceutical Research," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 15, Winter Special Issue, 1994, pp. 63-84
  30. Howell, J.M. and Avolio, B.J., "Transformational Leadership, Transactional Leadership, Locus of Control, and Support Fir Innovation: Key Predictors of Consolidated-Business- Unit Performance," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 78, No. 6, 1993, pp. 891-902 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.6.891
  31. Jaccard, J. and Turrisi, R., Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2003
  32. Kerlinger, F.N., Foundations of Behavioral Research, Fort Worth, TX: Rinehart and Winston, 1986
  33. Kessler, E.H., Bierly, P.E., and Gopalakrishnan, S., "Internal Vs. External Learning in New Product Development: Effects of Speed, Costs and Competitive Advantage," R&D Management, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2000, pp. 213-223 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00172
  34. Kim, L., "Building Technological Capability for Industrialisation: Analytical Frameworks and Korea's Experience," Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 8, No. 2, 1999, pp. 111-136 https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/8.1.111
  35. Kyriakopoulos, K. and Ruyter, K.d., "Knowledge Stocks and Information Flows in New Product Development," Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 41, No. 8, 2004, pp. 1469-1498 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00482.x
  36. Laden, K., "'Not Invented There,' or, the Other Person's Dessert Always Looks Better," Research Technology Management, Vol. 39, No. 6, 1996, pp. 10-12
  37. Lance, C., "Residual Centering, Exploratory and Confirmatory Moderator Analysis, and Decomposition of Effects in Path Models Containing Interactions," Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 12, No. 2, 1988, pp 163-175 https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168801200205
  38. Laursen, K. and Mahnke, V., "Knowledge Strategies, Firm Types, and Complementarity in Human-Resource Practices," Journal of Management and Governance, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2001, pp. 1-27 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017985623502
  39. Lee, H. and Choi, B., "Knowledge Management Enablers, Processes, and Organizational Performance: An Integrative View and Empirical Examination," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2003, pp. 179-228 https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045756
  40. Leonard-Barton, D., Wellsprings of Knowledge, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1995
  41. Levinthal, D.A. and March, J.G., "The Myopia of Learning," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, Special Issue, 1993, pp. 95-112 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009
  42. Lichtenthaler, U. and Ernst, H., "Attitudes to Externally Organising Knowledge Management Tasks: A Review, Reconsideration and Extension of the NIH Syndrome," R&D Management, Vol. 36, No. 4, 2006, pp. 367-386 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00443.x
  43. Lokshin, B., Carree, M., and Belderbos, R., "Testing for Complementarity and Substitutability in Case of Multiple Practices," METEOR Research Memorandum, 2004
  44. Maeil, B.N., Annual Corporation Reports, Maeil Business Newspaper Co., 2000
  45. Maranto-Vargas, D. and Rangel, R.G.-T., "Development of Internal Resources and Capabilities as Sources Differentiation of SME under Increased Global Competition: A Field Study in Mexico," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 74, No. 1, 2007, pp. 90-99 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2005.09.007
  46. Menon, T. and Pfeffer, J., "Valuing Internal Vs. External Knowledge: Explaining the Preference for Outsiders," Management Science, Vol. 49, No. 4, 2003, pp. 497-513 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.4.497.14422
  47. Milgrom, P. and Roberts, J., "The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy, and Organization," American Economic Review, Vol. 80, No. 3, 1990, pp. 511-528
  48. Milgrom, P. and Roberts, J., "Complementarities of Fit: Strategy, Structure, and Organizational Change," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 19, No. 2, 1995, pp. 179-208 https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(94)00382-F
  49. Mitchell, V.L., "Knowledge Integration and Information Technology Project Performance," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2006, pp. 919-939 https://doi.org/10.2307/25148759
  50. Mohnen, P. and Roller, L.-H., "Complementarities in Innovation Policy," European Economic Review, Vol. 49, No. 6, 2005, pp. 1431-1450 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2003.12.003
  51. Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal, S., "Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 22, No. 2, 1998, pp. 242-266
  52. Nevo, S., Wade, M.R., and Cook, W.D., "An Examination of the Trade-Off between Internal and External IT Capabilities," Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2007, pp. 5-23 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2006.10.002
  53. Oliver, C., "Sustainable Competitive Advantage: Combining Institutional and Resource- Based Views," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, No. 9, 1997, pp. 697-713 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199710)18:9<697::AID-SMJ909>3.0.CO;2-C
  54. Parmigiani, A., " Why Do Firms Both Make and Buy? An Investigation of Concurrent Sourcing," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 28, 2007, pp. 285-311 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.580
  55. Prabhu, J., Chandy, R., and Ellis, M., "The Impact of Acquisitions on Innovation: Poison Pill, Placebo, or Tonic?," Journal of Marketing, Vol. 69, No. 1, 2005, pp. 114-130
  56. Ravichandran, T. and Lertwongsatien, C., "Effect of Information Systems Resources and Capabilities on Firm Performance: A Resource-Based Perspective," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2005, pp. 237-276 https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2005.11045820
  57. Rosenkopf, L. and Nerkar, A., "Beyond Local Search: Boundary-Spanning Exploration, and Impact in Optical Disk Industry," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22, No. 4, 2001, pp. 287-306 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.160
  58. Rothwell, R. and Dodgson, M., "External Linkages and Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," R&D Management, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1991, pp. 125-137 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1991.tb00742.x
  59. Santoro, M.D. and Bierly, P.E., "Facilitators of Knowledge Transfer in University- Industry Collaborations: A Knowledge-Based Perspective," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 53, No. 4, 2006, pp. 495-507 https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2006.883707
  60. Schulz, M. and Jobe, L.A., "Codification and Tactiness as Knowledge Management Strategies: An Empirical Exploration," Journal of High Technology Management Research, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2001, pp. 139-165 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-8310(00)00043-2
  61. Song, M., Droge, C., Hanvanich, S., and Calantone, R., "Marketing and Technology Resource Complementarity: An Analysis of Their Interaction Effect in Two Environmental Contexts," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 26, No. 3, 2005, pp. 259-276 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.450
  62. Spragins, E. and Harnish, V. "Size Doesn't Matter-Profits Do," Fortune Small Business, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 37-42, 2004
  63. Stieglitz, N. and Heine, K., "Innovations and the Role of Complementarities in a Strategic Theory of the Firm," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 28, No. 1, 2007, pp. 1-15 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.565
  64. Stuart, T.E., "Interorganizational Alliances and the Performance of Firms: A Study of Growth and Innovation Rates in a High- Technology Industry," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 8, 2000, pp. 791-811 https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200008)21:8<791::AID-SMJ121>3.0.CO;2-K
  65. Teece, D.J., "Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing, and Public Policy," Research Policy, Vol. 15, No. 6, 1986, pp. 285-306 https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2
  66. Teigland, R. and Wasko, M.M., "Integrating Knowledge through Information Trading: Examining the Relationship between Boundary Spanning Communication and Individual Performance," Decision Sciences, Vol. 34, No. 2, 2003, pp. 161-286
  67. Tiwana, A. and Bush, A.A., "A Comparison of Transaction Cost, Agency, and Knowledge- Based Predictors of It Outsourcing Decisions: A U.S.-Japan Cross-Cultural Field Study," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2007, pp. 259-300 https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240108
  68. Van den Bosch, F., Volberda, H., and Boer, M., "Coevolution of Firm Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Environment: Organizational Forms and Combinative Capabilities," Organization Science, Vol. 10, No. 5, 1999, pp. 551-568 https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.5.551
  69. Whittington, R., Pettigrew, A., Peck, S., Fenton, E., and Conyon, M., "Change and Complementarities in the New Competitive Landscape: A European Panel Study, 1992- 1996," Organization Science, Vol. 10, No. 5, 1999, pp. 583-600 https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.5.583
  70. Whittington, R. and Pettigrew, A.M., "Complementarities Thinking," In A.M. Pettigrew, R. Whittington, L.M.C. Sanchez- Runde, F. Van Den Bosch, W. Ruigrok, and T. Numagami (Eds.), Innovative Forms of Organizing, pp. 125-132, London: Sage Publications, 2003
  71. Williamson, O., Markets and Hierarchies, New York: Free Press, 1975
  72. Zack, M.H., "Developing a Knowledge Strategy," California Management Review, Vol. 41, No. 3, 1999, pp. 125-145 https://doi.org/10.2307/41166000
  73. Zahra, S.A. and George, G., "Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2002, pp. 185-203 https://doi.org/10.2307/4134351
  74. Zahra, S.A. and Nielsen, A.P., "Sources of Capabilities, Integration and Technology Commercialization," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 23, No. 5, 2002, pp. 377-398 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.229
  75. Zander, U. and Kogut, B., "Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test," Organization Science, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1995, pp. 76-92 https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.1.76
  76. Zhang, M., Macpherson, A., and Jones, O., "Conceptualising the Learning Process in Smes: Improving Innovation through External Orientation," International Small Business Journal, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2006, pp. 299-321 https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242606063434
  77. Zhao, H., Tong, X., Wong, P.K., and Zhu, J., "Types of Technology Sourcing and Innovative Capability: An Exploratory Study of Singapore Manufacturing Firms," The Journal of High Technology Management Research, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2005, pp. 209-224 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2005.10.004