Asia pacific journal of information systems

  • 제18권4호
  • /
  • Pages.83-103
  • /
  • 2008
  • /
  • 2288-5404(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-6818(eISSN)
한국경영정보학회 (The Korea Society of Management Information Systems)
권호 표지

커뮤니케이션매체 특성과 교수행위 특성이 협력적 상호작용과 프로젝트 성과에 미치는 영향

The Impact of Characteristics of Communication Media and Instruction Behavior on Collaborative Interaction and Project Performance

  • 발행 : 2008.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In the new web based learning environment which has recently emerged, a variety of new learning objectives and teaching methods suited to this learning environment have been adopted. Recently, web based project-based learning methods have received a great deal of attention from those wishing to improve learning performance. The objective of this study is to identify the impact of characteristics of communication media and instruction behavior on collaborative interaction and project performance through web based group projects. The characteristics of communication media were divided into richness, flexibility, and ease of use, and the characteristics of instruction behavior were divided into support and expression, which are independent variables. Collaborative interaction as a mediate variable, was divided into information sharing and negotiation. Project performance was the dependent variable. To verify the proposed research model empirically, an experiment was conducted in which learners participated in on-line and off-line courses with group projects. The group project was conducted virtual product development(VPD), and designed a web-site about the VPD. At the end of the project, a survey was conducted. Of the 270 students, 239 responded. The students were assigned to groups of 3 or 4 members, and represented different genders and levels of computer competence. The reliability, validity, and correlation of research variables were analyzed using SPSS 14.0, and the measurement model and the structural goodness-of-fit of the research model were verified through SEM analysis using Lisrel 8.54. We found important results as follows; First, richness and ease of use has positive impacts on each of sharing information and negotiation. This suggests that richness and ease of use are useful in sharing information which is related to the task and agreeing in opinions among group members. However, flexibility has not positive impacts on sharing information and negotiation. This implies that there is no great difference in performance of PC and information literacy of user. Second, support and expression of instructor have positive impacts on sharing information and negotiation. This indicates that instructors play an important role in encouraging learners to participate in the project and communicating with them, sharing information related to the project, making a resonable decision and finally leading them to improve a project performance. Third, collaborative interaction has a positive impact on project performance. This result shows that if the ability to share information and negotiate among students was improved then a project performance would be improved as well. Recently, in the state of revitalized web based learning, it is opportune that web-based group project is practically conducted, and the impact of characteristics of communication media and characteristics of instruction behavior on sharing information, negotiating among group members and improving a project performance is verified. On the basis of these results, we propose that forms of learning, such as web based project, could be one of solution which is to enforce interaction among learners, and ultimately improve learning performance. Moreover web-based group project is able to make up for a weakness which makes it difficult to make interpersonal relations or friendship among learners in computer mediated communication or web based learning.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김병곤, 김종욱, "멀티미디어를 이용한 정보기술 교육의 학습효과에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구," 경영정보학연구, 제10권 제1호, 2000, pp. 37-59
  2. 김선동, 전우천, "초등사회와 웹기반 협동학습 시스템의 설계 및 구현," 한국정보교육학회 하계 학술발표논문집, 제5권 제2호, 2000, pp. 456-468
  3. 김성호, 김철호, "국내 포털 사이트 이용자의 서비스 수용과정에 관한 연구," 산업경제연구, 제18권 제1호, 2005, pp. 275-298
  4. 김정겸, "컴퓨터활용교육: 중학교 도덕과에서 ICT 활용 교수-학습과 도덕적 판단력 및 학업성취도와의 관계," 컴퓨터교육학회논문지, 제6권 제4호, 2003, pp. 135-146
  5. 멀티미디어 교육지원센터, "새빛을 활용한 멀티미디어 코스웨어 개발," 정보통신원 연구보고서, TM98-1, 1998
  6. 문정욱, "공공부문 정보화의 주요 성패요인과 정보공유 저해요인-공무원의 인식조사를 중심으로-," 정보통신정책, 제16권 제6호, 2007, pp. 1-17
  7. 박천일, "적소이론을 통해 본 PC통신과 인터넷 이용이 대학생 미디어 대치에 미치는 효과 연구," 정보사회연구, 2000
  8. 배경일, 허순영, "가상 조직의 유연하고 적응력있는 프로세스 정보공유를 위한 연합 프로세스 프레임웍에 관한 연구," 2001년도 한국경영학회 경영 관련학회 통합학술대회, 2001, p. 366
  9. 이구연, 이용, 김화종, 정충교, 이동은, "보안성과 유연성을 갖춘, Peer-to-Peer 데이터 공유기법의 설계 및 구현," 정보보호학회논문집, 제15권 제4호, 2005, pp. 61-70
  10. 이상훈, 김기문, 이호근, "IT프로젝트 성과에 대한 지식전이의 매개효과에 관한 연구," 경영정보학연구, 제15권 제3호, 2005. pp. 9-39
  11. 이인숙, E-러닝: 사이버공간의 새로운 패러다임, 문음사, 2003
  12. 장혜진, "동기적 웹 브라우저 공유를 지원하는 협동작업 시스템," 정보처리학회논문지, 제8-B권, 제3호, 2001, pp. 283-288
  13. 정영란, "웹 기반 프로젝트 중심 학습이 학습자의 태도, 학습결과 및 성찰적 실천에 미치는 영향," 한양대학교 박사학위논문. 2003
  14. 채서일, 사회과학조사방법론, 학현사, 2005
  15. 함영기, "온라인 프로젝트 학습방법 개발연구," 연구보고 KR 2001-17, 서울: 한국교육학술정보원, 2001
  16. 허희옥, "사이버학습환경에서 '교육적 경험'을 지원하는 교수자의 역할 모형 설계," 교육정보미디어연구, 제13권 제2호, 2007, pp. 195-223
  17. 홍관수, 정기웅, "환경변화속도, 정보공유, 그리고 협력이 공급사슬의 성과에 미치는 영향," 중소기업연구, 제26권 제2호, 2004, pp. 77-100
  18. Roerden, L. P., Net lessons: Web-based projects for your classroom, 홍명희 외(역), 인터넷 활용수업의 이론과 실제, 한빛 미디어, 1999
  19. Anderson, J.C. and Gerbing, D.W., "Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach," Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 103, No. 3, 1988, pp. 411-423 https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
  20. Anderson, J.C. and Gerbing, D.W., "Assumptions and Comparative Strengths of the Two-Step Approach: Comment on Fornell and Yi," Sociological Methods and Research, Vol. 20, No. 1, 1992, pp. 321-333 https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192020003002
  21. Ashton, S., Roberts, T., and Teles, L., "Investigating the role of the instructor in online collaborative environments," Vancouver: Telelearn Canada, 2000, Available http://www.telelearn.ca/g_access/researc h_projects/indext.html Retrieved on June 25th, 2007
  22. Atkinson, R., "Project Management: Cost, Time and Quality, Two Best Guesses and a Phenomenon: It's Time to Accept Other Success Criteria," International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 17, No. 6, 1999, pp. 337-342 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00069-6
  23. Baccarini, D., "The Logical Framework Method for Defining Project Success," Project Management Journal, Vol. 30, No. 4, 1999, pp. 25-32 https://doi.org/10.1177/875697289903000405
  24. Bryant, J. and Zillman, D., "Usign humor to promote learning in the classroom," Journal of Children in Contemporary Society, Vol. 20, No. 1, 1988, pp. 49-78
  25. Collins, M. and Berge, Z.L., "Mailing lists as a venus for adult learning, Paper presented at the Eastern Adult," Continuing and Distance Education Research Conference, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 1996, pp. 24-26
  26. Dimmick, J.W. and Rothenbuhler, E., "Theory of the Niche: Quantifying Competition Among Media Industries," Journal of Communications, Vol. 34, 1984, pp. 106-116 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1984.tb02200.x
  27. Draft, R. and Lengel, R., "Information Richness: A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design," Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 6, 1984, pp. 191-233
  28. Fahy, P., Crawford, G., and Ally, M., "Pattern of interaction in a computer conference transcript," International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning IRRODL, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2001, pp. 1-24
  29. Gabarino, E.C. and Edell, J.A., "Cognitive effort, affect, and choice," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 24, 1997, pp. 147-158 https://doi.org/10.1086/209500
  30. Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., and Archer, W., "Critical thinking in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education," Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 11, 2001, pp. 1-14
  31. Gentilhomme, Y., "Humor: A didactic adjuvant," Int. J. Humor Res, Vol. 5, 1992, pp. 69-89 https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1992.5.1-2.69
  32. Gillies, R.M., "The effects of communication training on teachers' and students' verbal behaviors during cooperative learning," International Journal of Education Research, Vol. 41, 2004, pp. 257-279 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2005.07.004
  33. Gunawardena, C.N., Lowe, C.A., and Anderson, T., "Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing, Journal of Educational Computing Research, Vol. 17, 1997, pp. 395-429
  34. Guzdial, M., "Information ecology of collaborations in educational settings: Influence of tool," In Hall, R., Miyake, N., and Enyedy(Eds.), CSCL 97, Proceedings of computer supported collaborative learning conference, 1997, pp. 83-90
  35. Harris, J., "Organizing and Facilitating Telecollaborative Projects," The Computing Teacher, Vol. 22, No. 5, 1995, pp. 46-50
  36. Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. and Shachar, H., Teachers verbal behavior in cooperative and whole-class instruction, In S. Sharan(Ed), Cooperative Learning: Theory and Research(pp. 77-94). New York: Praeger
  37. Johnson, D.W. and Johnson, R.T., Cooperative learning and achievement, In S. Sharan(Ed.), Cooperative learning: Theory and Research (pp. 173-202), New York: Praeger, 1990
  38. Karlson, J.T. and Gottschalk, P., "Management Roles for Successful IT Projects," Project Management, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2002, pp. 7-13
  39. Karlson, J.T. and Gottschalk, P., "An Empirical Evaluation of Knowledge Transfer Mechanisms for IT Projects," Journal of Computer Information Systems, 2003, pp. 112-119
  40. Kearsley, G., "On-line education: learning and teaching in cyberspace," Belmont, CA: Wadworth, 2000, pp. 78-91
  41. Keider, S.P., "Why Systems Development Project Fail," Journal of Information Systems Management, Vol. 1, No. 3, 1984
  42. Kirschner, P.A., "Design, Development, and Implementation of Electronic Learning Environments for Collaborative Learning", Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 52, No. 3, 2004, pp. 39-46 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504674
  43. Koufaris, M., "Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow Theory to Online Consumer Behavior," Information Systems Research, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2002, pp. 205-223 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.2.205.83
  44. Kydd, C.T. and Ferry, D.L., "A Behavioral View of Computer Supported Cooperative Work Tools," The Journal of Management Systems, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1991, pp. 55-67
  45. Liaw, S.S., "Designing the Hypermediabased Learning Environment," International Journal of Instructional Media, Vol. 28, No. 1. 2001, pp. 43-56
  46. Lyytinen, K.J. and Hirschheim, R. A., "Information Systems Failures: A Survey and Classification of Empirical Literature," Oxford Surveys of Information Technology, Vol. 4, 1987. pp. 257-309
  47. Markus, M., "Towards a "Critical Mass" theory in Interactive Media," Communication Research, Vol. 14, No. 5, 1987, pp. 491-511 https://doi.org/10.1177/009365087014005003
  48. McNeil, S.G., Robin, B.R., and Miller, R.M., "Facilitating interaction, communication and collaboration in online courses," Computers and Geosciences, Vol. 26, 2000, pp. 699-708 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-3004(99)00106-5
  49. Moore, M. and Kearsley, G., Distance Education Planning: A Systems Approach, Belmont CA: Wadsworth, 1999
  50. Murphy, S.D., Integrated of Plant Science, University of Manitoba, Winninpeg, MB, 1995
  51. Norman, K., "Collaboration interactions in support of learning: models, metaphors and management," The digital university: Reinventing the academy. NY: Springer-Verlag, 1998, pp. 39-53
  52. Palloff, R.M. and Pratt, K., Lessons From the cyberspace classroom: The realities of online teaching, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 2001
  53. Pinto, J.K. and Slevin, D.P., "Project Success: Definitions and Measurement Techiques," Project Management Journal, Vol. 19, No. 1, 1988, pp. 53-58
  54. Puntambekar, S., "Analyzing collaborative interactions: divergence, shared understanding and construction of knowledge," Computers and Educations, 2005, pp. 1-20
  55. Rafaeli, S. and Sudweeks, F., "Networked interactivity," Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, Vol. 2, No. 4, 1997, edited by Sudweeks, F., McLaughlin, M., and Rafaeli, S., available online at http://www.ascusc. org/jcmc/vol2/issue4/editorsintro.html
  56. Schellens, T. and Valcke, M., "Collaborative learning in asynchronous discussion groups: What about the impact on cognitive processing?," Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 21, 2005, pp. 957-975 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.025
  57. Schonwetter D.J., Clifton R. A., and Perry R. P., "Content familiarity: Differential impact of effective teaching on student achievement outcomes," Research in Higher Education, Vol. 43, No. 6, 2002, pp. 625-655 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020999014875
  58. Sherwood, J.L., "Mechanisms of cross-protection between plant virus strains," Plant Resistance to Viruses, John Wiley and Sons, 1987, pp. 136-144
  59. Van Riel, A.C.R., Lemmick, J., and Ouwersloot, H., "Consumer evaluations of brand extension: differences between goods and services," Journal of Service Research, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2001, pp. 220-231 https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050133003
  60. Veerman, A. and Veldhuis-Diermanse, E., Collaborative learning through computer-mediated communication in academic education, In P. Dillenboug, A. Eurelings, and K. Hakkarinen( Eds), European perspectives on computer-supported collaborative learning proceedings of the first European conference on CSCL. Maastricht: McLuhan Institute, University of Maastricht, 2001
  61. Wateridge, J., "IT Projects: A Basis for Success," International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 13, No. 3, 1995, pp. 169-172 https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(95)00020-Q