인터넷 쇼핑몰 수용에 있어 사용자 능력의 조절효과 분석

An Analysis of the Moderating Effects of User Ability on the Acceptance of an Internet Shopping Mall

  • 서건수 (순천향대학교 경영학과)
  • 발행 : 2008.12.31

초록

Due to the increasing and intensifying competition in the Internet shopping market, it has been recognized as very important to develop an effective policy and strategy for acquiring loyal customers. For this reason, web site designers need to know if a new Internet shopping mall(ISM) will be accepted. Researchers have been working on identifying factors for explaining and predicting user acceptance of an ISM. Some studies, however, revealed inconsistent findings on the antecedents of user acceptance of a website. Lack of consideration for individual differences in user ability is believed to be one of the key reasons for the mixed findings. The elaboration likelihood model (ELM) and several studies have suggested that individual differences in ability plays an moderating role on the relationship between the antecedents and user acceptance. Despite the critical role of user ability, little research has examined the role of user ability in the Internet shopping mall context. The purpose of this study is to develop a user acceptance model that consider the moderating role of user ability in the context of Internet shopping. This study was initiated to see the ability of the technology acceptance model(TAM) to explain the acceptance of a specific ISM. According to TAM. which is one of the most influential models for explaining user acceptance of IT, an intention to use IT is determined by usefulness and ease of use. Given that interaction between user and website takes place through web interface, the decisions to accept and continue using an ISM depend on these beliefs. However, TAM neglects to consider the fact that many users would not stick to an ISM until they trust it although they may think it useful and easy to use. The importance of trust for user acceptance of ISM has been raised by the relational views. The relational view emphasizes the trust-building process between the user and ISM, and user's trust on the website is a major determinant of user acceptance. The proposed model extends and integrates the TAM and relational views on user acceptance of ISM by incorporating usefulness, ease of use, and trust. User acceptance is defined as a user's intention to reuse a specific ISM. And user ability is introduced into the model as moderating variable. Here, the user ability is defined as a degree of experiences, knowledge and skills regarding Internet shopping sites. The research model proposes that the ease of use, usefulness and trust of ISM are key determinants of user acceptance. In addition, this paper hypothesizes that the effects of the antecedents(i.e., ease of use, usefulness, and trust) on user acceptance may differ among users. In particular, this paper proposes a moderating effect of a user's ability on the relationship between antecedents with user's intention to reuse. The research model with eleven hypotheses was derived and tested through a survey that involved 470 university students. For each research variable, this paper used measurement items recognized for reliability and widely used in previous research. We slightly modified some items proper to the research context. The reliability and validity of the research variables were tested using the Crobnach's alpha and internal consistency reliability (ICR) values, standard factor loadings of the confirmative factor analysis, and average variance extracted (AVE) values. A LISREL method was used to test the suitability of the research model and its relating six hypotheses. Key findings of the results are summarized in the following. First, TAM's two constructs, ease of use and usefulness directly affect user acceptance. In addition, ease of use indirectly influences user acceptance by affecting trust. This implies that users tend to trust a shopping site and visit repeatedly when they perceive a specific ISM easy to use. Accordingly, designing a shopping site that allows users to navigate with heuristic and minimal clicks for finding information and products within the site is important for improving the site's trust and acceptance. Usefulness, however, was not found to influence trust. Second, among the three belief constructs(ease of use, usefulness, and trust), trust was empirically supported as the most important determinants of user acceptance. This implies that users require trustworthiness from an Internet shopping site to be repeat visitors of an ISM. Providing a sense of safety and eliminating the anxiety of online shoppers in relation to privacy, security, delivery, and product returns are critically important conditions for acquiring repeat visitors. Hence, in addition to usefulness and ease of use as in TAM, trust should be a fundamental determinants of user acceptance in the context of internet shopping. Third, the user's ability on using an Internet shopping site played a moderating role. For users with low ability, ease of use was found to be a more important factors in deciding to reuse the shopping mall, whereas usefulness and trust had more effects on users with high ability. Applying the EML theory to these findings, we can suggest that experienced and knowledgeable ISM users tend to elaborate on such usefulness aspects as efficient and effective shopping performance and trust factors as ability, benevolence, integrity, and predictability of a shopping site before they become repeat visitors of the site. In contrast, novice users tend to rely on the low elaborating features, such as the perceived ease of use. The existence of moderating effects suggests the fact that different individuals evaluate an ISM from different perspectives. The expert users are more interested in the outcome of the visit(usefulness) and trustworthiness(trust) than those novice visitors. The latter evaluate the ISM in a more superficial manner focusing on the novelty of the site and on other instrumental beliefs(ease of use). This is consistent with the insights proposed by the Heuristic-Systematic model. According to the Heuristic-Systematic model. a users act on the principle of minimum effort. Thus, the user considers an ISM heuristically, focusing on those aspects that are easy to process and evaluate(ease of use). When the user has sufficient experience and skills, the user will change to systematic processing, where they will evaluate more complex aspects of the site(its usefulness and trustworthiness). This implies that an ISM has to provide a minimum level of ease of use to make it possible for a user to evaluate its usefulness and trustworthiness. Ease of use is a necessary but not sufficient condition for the acceptance and use of an ISM. Overall, the empirical results generally support the proposed model and identify the moderating effect of the effects of user ability. More detailed interpretations and implications of the findings are discussed. The limitations of this study are also discussed to provide directions for future research.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 대한상공회의소, "인터넷 쇼핑몰의 구매행태조사 보고서," 2007
  2. 한국소비자보호원, "전자상거래 관련 소비자 피해 실태," 2007
  3. Adamic, L. and Huberman, B., "The nature of markets in the World Wide Web," Quarterly Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 1, 2000, pp. 5-12
  4. Adams, D.A., Nelson, R.R., and Todd, P.A., "Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 16, No. 2, 1992, pp. 227-247 https://doi.org/10.2307/249577
  5. Ajzen, I., From intentions to actins: a theory of planned behavior, in J. Kuhl and J. Beckmann (eds.), Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior, New York: Springer Verlag, 1985, pp. 11-39
  6. Andaleeb, S., "An experimental investigation of satisfaction and commitment in marketing channels: the role of trust and dependence," Journal of Retailing, Vol. 72, No. 1, 1996, pp. 77-93 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(96)90006-8
  7. Atkinson, M.A. and Kydd, C., "Individual characteristics associated with World Wide Web use: an empirical study of playfulness and motivation," the DATA BASE for Advances in Informations Systems, Vol. 28, No. 2, 1997, pp. 53-61 https://doi.org/10.1145/264701.264705
  8. Bagozzi, R.P. and Yi, Y., "On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 16, No. 1, 1988, pp. 74-94 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
  9. Bandura, A., "Social Foundations of Thought and Action,"Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1985
  10. Bart, Y., Shankar, V., Sultan, F., and Urban, GL., "Are the drivers of role of online trust the same for all web sites and consumers? A large-scale exploratory empirical study," Journal of Marketing, Vol. 69, No. 4, 2005, pp. 133-152 https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.133
  11. Bauer, H., Grether, M., and Leach, M., "Building consumer relations over the Internet," Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 31, 2002, pp. 155-163 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(01)00186-9
  12. Benbasat, I. and DeSantis, G., "Communication challenges: A value network perspective," in G.W. Dickson and G. Desantis (eds.), Information Technology and the Future Enterprise: New Models for Managers, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2001, pp. 144-162
  13. Bhattacherjee, A., "Individual Trust in Online Firms: Scale Development and Initial Test," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2002, pp. 211-241 https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2002.11045715
  14. Bhattacherjee, A. and Sanford, C., "Influence Processes for Information Technology Acceptance: An Elaboration Likelihood Model," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 4, Dec. 2006, pp. 805-825 https://doi.org/10.2307/25148755
  15. Buttner, O.B., Schultz, S., and Silberer, G., "Perceived risk and deliberation in retailer choice: consumer behavior towards online pharmacies," in Advances in Consumer Research, Pechmann C, Price L. (eds.), Vol. 33, Association for Consumer Research: Duluth, MN; 2006, pp. 197-202
  16. Buttner, O.B. and Goritz, A.S., "Perceived trustworthiness of online shops," Journal of Consumer Behavior, Vol. 35, Jan-Feb. 2008, pp. 35-50
  17. Castaneda, J.A., Munoz-Levia, F., and Luque, T., "Web acceptance model: Moderating effects of user experience," Information and Management, Vol. 44, 2007, pp. 384-396 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2007.02.003
  18. Chau, P.Y.K., "An Empirical Assessment of a Modified Technology Acceptance Model," Journal of Management Information Systems, Fall 1996, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 185-204 https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1996.11518128
  19. Chau, P.Y.K. and Hu, P.J-H., "Investigating Healthcare Professional's Decision to Accept Telemedicine Technlogy: An Empirical Test of Competing Theories," Information and management, Vol. 39, No. 4, 2002, pp. 297-311 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00098-2
  20. Chen, Q. and Chaiken, S., "The Huristic- Systematic Model in its borader context," in S. Chaiken, Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process Theories in Social Psychology, The Guildford Press, New York, 1999
  21. Cheung, W., Chang, M.K., and Lai, V.S., "Prediction of Intention and World Wide Web Usage at Work: A Test of and Extended Triandis Model," Decision Support Systems, Vol. 30, 2000, pp. 83-100 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(00)00125-1
  22. Compeau, D.R. and Higgins, C.A., "Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 2, 1995, pp. 189-211 https://doi.org/10.2307/249688
  23. Coulter, K. and Coulter, R., "Determinants trust in a service provider: the moderating role of length of relationship," Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2002, pp. 35-50 https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040210419406
  24. Davis, F.D., "Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3, 1989, pp. 319-340 https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  25. Davis, F.D. and Bagozzi, R.P. and Warsaw, P.R., "Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace," Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 22, No. 14, 1992, pp. 1111-1132 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x
  26. Dabholkar, P.A. and Bagozzi, R.P., "An Attitudinal Model of Technology-Based Self- Service: Moderating Effects of Consumer Traits and Situational Factors," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2002, pp. 184-201 https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070302303001
  27. EUROSTAT, Information Society Statistics: Individuals-Internet use; e-commerce, science and technology, European Communities, 2006
  28. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I., Belief, Attitude, Intentions and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Boston: Addison-Wesley, 1975
  29. Flavian, C., Guinaliu, M., and Gurrea, R., "The role played by perceived ysability, satisfaction and consumer trust on website loyality," Information and Management, Vol. 43, 2006, pp. 1-14 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.01.002
  30. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F., "Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, Issue 1, 1981, pp. 39-50 https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  31. Friedman, B., Kahn, P.H., and Howe, D.C., "Trust online," Communications of the ACM, Vol. 43, No. 12, 2000, pp. 34-40
  32. Ganesan, S., "Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships," Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58, No. 2, 1994, pp. 1-19
  33. Garbarino, L. and Lee, O.F., "Dynamic pricing in internet retail: effects of consumer trust," Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 20, No. 6, 2003, pp. 495-513 https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.10084
  34. Garrity, E.J., Glassberg, B., Kim, Y.J., Sanders, G.L., and Shin, S.K., "An Experimental Investigation of Web-based Information Systems Success in the Context of Electronic Commerce," Decision Support Systems, Vol. 39, No. 3, 2005, pp. 485-503 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2004.06.015
  35. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E. and Straub, D., "Trust and TAM in online shoppings: an integrated model," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2003, pp. 51-90 https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519
  36. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., and Straub, D., "Inexperience and experience with online stores: the importance of TAM and trust," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 50, No. 3, 2003, pp. 1-15 https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2002.807327
  37. Geyskens, I., Steenkemp, J., and Kumar, N., "Generalizations about trust in marketing channel relationships using meta-analysis," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 15, 1998, pp. 223-248 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8116(98)00002-0
  38. Gundlach, G. and Murphy, P.E., "Ethical and legal foundations of relational marketing exchanges," Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57, 1993, pp. 35-46 https://doi.org/10.2307/1252217
  39. Hair, J.E. Jr., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., and Black, W.C., Mlutivariate Data Analysis, Fifth Edition, Prentice-Hall International, Inc., 1998
  40. Harris, L.C. and Goode M.M.H., "The four levels of loyalty and the pivotal role of trust: a study of online service dynamics," Journal of Retailing, Vol. 80, No. 2, 2004, pp. 139-158 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2004.04.002
  41. Hoffman, D.L. and Novak, T.P., "Merketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: conceptual foundations," Journal of Marketing, Vol. 60, No. 3, 1996, pp. 50-68 https://doi.org/10.2307/1251841
  42. Javenpaa, S.L., Tractinsky, N., Saarinen, L., and Vitale, M., "Consumer trust in an Internet store: a cross-cultural validation," Journal of Computer-Mediated communications, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1999
  43. Javenpaa, S.L., Tractinsky, N., and Vitale, M., "Consumer trust in an internet store," Information Technology and Management, Vol. 1, No. 1/2, 2000, pp. 45-71 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019104520776
  44. Johnson, W., Bellman, S., and Lohse, G., "What makes a website 'sticky'? Cognitive lock-in and the power of law of practice," Working Paper, Columbia School of Business, Columbia University, New York, 2000
  45. Kantowitz, B.H., Hankowski, R.J., and Kantowitz, S.C., "Driver acceptance of unreliable traffic information in familiar and unfamiliar settings," Human Factors, Vol. 39, No. 2, 1997, pp. 164-176 https://doi.org/10.1518/001872097778543831
  46. Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W., and Chervany, N.L., "Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 2, 1999, pp. 183-13 https://doi.org/10.2307/249751
  47. Keen, P.G.W., Relationships: The electronic commerce imperative. In G.W. Dickson and G. Desantis (eds.), Information Technology and the Future Enterprise: New Models for Managers, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2001, pp. 163-185
  48. Kennedy, M., Ferrell, L., and LeClair, D., "Consumer's trust of salesperson and manufacturer: an empirical study," Journal of Business Research, Vol. 51, 2001, pp. 73-86 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00039-9
  49. Kim, J. and Moon, J., "Designing towards emotional usability in consumer interfaces +- trustworthiness of cyber-banking system interfaces," Interacting with Computers, Vol. 19, No. 1, 1998, pp. 1-29 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2006.07.006
  50. Kim, H.W., Xu, Y., and Koh, J.A., "A Comparison of online trust building factors between potential customers and recent customers." Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 21, No. 1, summer 2004, pp. 115-135
  51. Korgaonkar, P. and Wolin, L., "A multivariate analysis of web usage," Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 22, 1999, pp. 53-68
  52. Koufaris, M., "Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and flow theory to online consumer behavior," Information Systems Research, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2002, pp. 205-223 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.2.205.83
  53. Kozlowski, S.W., Kirsch, M.P., and Ghao, G.T., "Job knowledge, conceptual similarity and halo error: an exploration," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 71, No. 1, 1986, pp. 45-49 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.1.45
  54. Larzelere, R. and Huston, T., "The dyadic trust scale: toward understanding interpersonal trust in close relationships," Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol. 42, No. 3, 1980. pp. 595-604 https://doi.org/10.2307/351903
  55. Lee, J., Kim, J., and Moon, J., "What make internet users visit cyber stores again? Key design factors for customer loyalty," in Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems, CHI 2000, ACM, New York, 2000, pp. 305-312
  56. Li, D., Browne, G.J., and Wetherbe, J.C., "Why Do Internet Users Stick with a Specific Web-Site? A Relationship Perspective," International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Summer 2006, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 105-141 https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415100404
  57. Lippert, S.K., "Investigating Postadoption Utilization: An Examination Into the Role of Interorganizational and Technology Trust," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 54, No. 3, 2007, pp. 468-483 https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2007.900792
  58. Lu. H.P. and Gustafson, D.H., "An empirical study of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on computerized support system use over time," International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 14, No. 5, 1994, pp. 317-329 https://doi.org/10.1016/0268-4012(94)90070-1
  59. Ma, Q. and Liu, L., "The Technology Acceptance Model: a meta-analysis of empirical findings," Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, Vol. 16. No. 1, 2004, pp. 59-72
  60. Malhotra, Y. and Galletta, D.F., "Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to account for social influence: theoretical bases and empirical validation," in Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Science, 1999, pp. 1-14
  61. Mathieson, K., "Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology of Planned Behavior," Information Systems esrarch, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1991, pp. 173-191 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.3.173
  62. McKnight, D.H., Choudhury, V. and Kacmar, C., "Trust in e-commerce vendors: a twostage model," in Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Information Systems, 2000, pp. 532-536
  63. McKnight, D.H., Choudhury, V., and Kacmar, C., "Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology," Information Systems Research, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2002, pp. 334-359 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81
  64. Moore, G.C. and Benbasat, I., "Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation," Information Systems Research, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1991, pp. 192-222 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.3.192
  65. Morgan, R.M. and Hunt, S.D., "The committment- trust theory of relationship marketing," Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58, No. 3, 1994, pp. 20-38
  66. Muir, B.M. and Moray, N., "Trust in automation. Part II. Experimental Studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation," Ergonomics, Vol. 39, No. 3, 1996, pp. 429-460 https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139608964474
  67. Petty, R.E. and Cacioppo, J.T., "The elaboration likelihood model of persuation," Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych., Vol. 19, 1986, pp. 123-205 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2
  68. Porter, C.E. and Donthu, N., "Cultivating Trust and Harvesting Value in Virtual Communities," Management Science, Vol. 54, No. 1, 2008, pp. 113-128 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0765
  69. Sako, M. and Helper, S., "Determinants of trust in supplier relations: evidence from the automotive industry in Japan and the United States," Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, Vo.34, No. 3, 1997, pp. 387-417 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(97)00082-6
  70. Sanchez, M.J. and Rondan, J.L., "Web acceptance and usage model: a comparison between goal-directed and experiential Web users," Internet Research, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2005, pp. 21-48 https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240510577059
  71. Shang, E., Chen, T. and Shen, L., "Extrinsic versus intrinsic motivations for consumers to shop on-line," Information and Management, Vol. 42, 2005, pp. 401-413 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.01.009
  72. Singh, J. an Sirdeshmukh, D., "Agency and trust mechanisms in consumer satisfaction and loyalty judgements," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 28, No. 1, 2000, pp. 150-167 https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070300281014
  73. Sirdeshmukh, D., Singh, J., and Sabol, B., "Consumer trust and loyalty in relational exchanges," Journal of Marketing, Vol. 66, No. 1, 2002, pp. 15-37 https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.66.1.15.18449
  74. Solomon, M., Consumer Behavior, Byuing, Having and Being, Prentice Hall, New York, 1998
  75. Song, J. and Zahedi, F. M., "A Theoretical Approach to Web Design in E-Commerce: A Belief Reinforcement Model," Management Science, Vol. 51, No. 8, August 2005, pp. 1219-1235 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0427
  76. Srite, M. and Karahanna, E., "The Role of Espoused National Culture Values in Technology Acceptance," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2006, pp. 679-704 https://doi.org/10.2307/25148745
  77. Sussman, S.W. and Siegel, W.S., "Informational Influence in Organizations: An Integrated Approach to Knowledge Adoption," Information Systems Research, Vol. 14, No. 1, March 2003, pp. 47-65 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.14.1.47.14767
  78. Tan, Y.H. and Thoen, W., "Toward a generic model of trust for electronic commerce," International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2000, pp. 61-74 https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2000.11044201
  79. Taylor, S. and Todd P.A., "Understanding information technology usage: a test of computing models," Information Systems Research, Vol. 6, No. 2, 1995, pp. 144-176 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.144
  80. Teo, T.S.H., Vivien, K.G.L., and Raye, Y.C.I., "Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage," Omega, International Journal of Management Science, Vol. 27, No. 2, 1999, pp. 25-37 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(98)00028-0
  81. TRUSTE, Identity theft and spam will deter online shopping this holiday season, 2003, http://truste,org/about/Holiday-Shopping andPrivacySurvey.htm
  82. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D., "A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: four longitudinal field studies," Management Science, Vol. 46, No. 2, 2000, pp. 186-204 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  83. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., and Davis, F.D., "User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2003, pp. 425-478 https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  84. Wang, W. and Benbasat, I., "Trust in and Adoption of Online Recommendation Agents," Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2005, pp. 72-101 https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00065
  85. Wang, W. and Benbasat, I., "Recommendation Agents for Electronic Commerce: Effects of Explanation Facilities on Trusting Beliefs," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 23, No. 4, 2007, pp. 217-246 https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222230410
  86. Webster, J., Trevino, L.K., and Ryan, L., "The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human- computer interaction," Comput. Human Behavior, Vol. 9, No. 4, 1993, pp. 411-426 https://doi.org/10.1016/0747-5632(93)90032-N
  87. Wolfinbarger, M. and Gilly, M.C., "Shopping online for freedom, control, and fun," California Management Review, Vol. 43, No. 2, 2001, pp. 34-55 https://doi.org/10.2307/41166074