References
- Glosson CR. Haller RH, Dove SB, del Rio CE. A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand. Ni-Ti engine-driven. and K-Flex endodontic instruments, J Endod 21:146-151. 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80441-3
- Walia HM, Brantley WA, Gerstein H, An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod 14:346-351. 1988 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(88)80196-1
- Schafer E, Schulz-Bongert U. Tulus G. Comparison of hand stainless steel and nickel titanium rotary instrumentation: a clinical study, J Endod 30:432-435, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200406000-00014
- Chen JL, Messer HH. A comparison of stainless steel hand and rotary nickel-titanium instrumentation using a silicone impression technique, Aust Dent J 47:12-20, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2002.tb00297.x
- Garip Y. Gunday M. The use of computed tomography when comparing nickel-titanium and stainless steel files during preparation of simulated curved canals. Int Endod J 34:452-457, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00416.x
- Pettiette MT, Delano EO, Trope M. Evaluation of success rate of endodontic treatment performed by students with stainless-steel K-files and nickel-titanium hand files. J Endod 27:124-127, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200102000-00017
- Schafer E. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickeltitanium instruments and stainless steel hand K-Flexofiles in simulated curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 92:215-220, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2001.114622
- Peters OA. Current Challenges and Concepts in the Preparation of Root Canal Systems: A Review. J Endod 30:559-567, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.DON.0000129039.59003.9D
- Kum KY, Spangberg L, Cha BY, Jung IY, Lee SJ, Lee CY. Shaping ability of three ProFile rotary instrumentation techniques in simulated resin root canals. J Endod 26:719-723, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200012000-00013
- Schafer E, Erler M, Dammaschke T. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. Int Endod J 39: 196-202, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01074.x
- Veltri M, Mollo A, Mantovani L, Pini P, Balleri P, Grandini S. A comparative study of Endoflare-Hero Shaper and Mtwo NiTi instruments in the preparation of curved root canals. Int Endod J 38:601-616, 2005
- Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg 32:271-275, 1971 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(71)90230-1
- Gunday M, Sazak H. Garip Y. A comparative study of three different root canal curvature measurement techniques and measuring the canal access angle in curved canals. J Endod 31: 796-798, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000158232.77240.01
- Kim HC, Park JK, Hur B. Relative efficacy of three NiTi file systems used by undergraduates. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 30:38-48, 2005 https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2005.30.1.038
- Bergmans L, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Beullens M, Wevers M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P. Progressive versus constant tapered shaft design using Ni-Ti rotary instruments. Int Endod J 36:288-295, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00650.x
- Calhoun G, Montgomery S. The effects of four instrumentation techniques on root canal shape. J Endod 14:273-277, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(88)80025-6
- Kosa DA. Marshall G, Baumgartner JC. An analysis of canal centering using mechanical instrumentation techniques. J Endod 25:441-445, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80275-1
- Foschi F, Nucci C, Montebugnoli L, Marchionni S. Breschi L, Malagnino VA. Prati C. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper Ni-Ti rotary instruments. Int Endod J 37:832-839, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00887.x
- Schafer E, Erler M, Dammaschke T. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J 39: 203-212, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01075.x
- Berutti E, Chiandussi G. Gaviqlio I. Ibba A. Comparative analysis of torsional and bending stresses in two mathematical models of nickel-titanium rotary instruments: ProTaper versus ProFile. J Endod 29:15-19, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200301000-00005
- Calberson FL, Deroose CA, Hommez GM, De Moor RJ. Shaping ability of Pro Taper nickel-titanium files in simulated resin root canals. Int Endod J 37:613-623, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00860.x
- Iqbal MK. Firic S, Tulcan J, Karabucak B. Kim S. Comparison of apical transportation between ProFile and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments. Int Endod J 37: 359-364, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00792.x
- Schafer E, Vlassis M. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. Int Endod J 37:229-238, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0143-2885.2004.00786.x
- Yun HH, Kim SK. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 95:228-233, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2003.92
- Peters OA, Peters CI, Schoneberger K. Barbakov F. ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: effect of canal anatomy on final shape analyzed by micro CT. Int Endod J 36:86-92, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00626.x
- Hong ES, Park JK. Hur B, Kim HC. Comparison of shaping ability between various hybrid instrumentation methods with ProTaper. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 31: 1119, 2006 https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2006.31.1.011
- Peters OA, Peters CI, Schonenberger K. Barbakow F. ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: assessment of torque and force in relation to canal anatomy. Int Endod J 36:93-99. 2003 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00628.x
- Diemer F, Calas P. Effect of pitch length on the behaviour of rotary triple helix root canal instruments. J Endod 30: 716-718, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.DON.0000125877.26495.69
- Bergmans L, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Wevers M, Lambrechts P. Mechanical root canal preparation with NiTi rotary instruments: Rationale, performance and safety. Status Report for the Am J Dent 14:324-333, 2001
- Leeb JI. Canal orifice enlargement as related to biomechanical preparation. J Endod 9:463-470, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(83)80160-5
- Schrader C, Peters OA. Analysis of torque and force with differently tapered rotary endodontic instruments in vitro. J Endod 31: 120-123, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000137634.20499.1d
- Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. J Endod 26:161-165, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200003000-00008
- Cohen S, Burns RC. Pathways of the pulp. 7th edition Translation Shinhung International, Inc. p252-254, 1999