Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2007.32.4.385

Comparison of shaping ability between single length technique and crown-down technique using Mtwo rotary file  

Lim, Yoo-Kyoung (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Park, Jeong-Kil (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Hur, Bock (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Kim, Hyeon-Cheol (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Publication Information
Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics / v.32, no.4, 2007 , pp. 385-396 More about this Journal
Abstract
The aims of this study were to compare the shaping effect and safety between single length technique recommended by manufacturer and crown-down technique using Mtwo rotary file and to present a modified method in use of Mtwo file. Sixty simulated root canal resin blocks were used. The canals were divided into three groups according to instrument and the manner of using methods. Each group had 20 specimens. Group MT was instrumented with single length technique of Mtwo, group MC was instrumented with crown-down technique of Mtwo and group PT was instrumented with crown-down technique of ProTaper. All of the rotary files used in this study were operated by an electric motor. The scanned canal images of before and after preparation were superimposed. These superimposed images were evaluated at apical 1 to 8 mm levels Angle changes were calculated. The preparation time, weight loss, instrument failure and binding, canal aberrations, and centering ratio were measured. Statistical analysis of the three experimental groups was performed with ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range tests for post-hoc comparison and Fisher's exact test was done for the frequency comparison. In total preparation time, group MT and group MC were less than group PT. In the aberrations, group MT had more elbows than those of group MC and group PT. The binding of group MC was least and group MT was less than group PT (P < 0.05). Under the condition of this study, crown-down technique using Mtwo rotary file is better and safer method than single length technique recommended by the manufacturer.
Keywords
Mtwo file; Single length technique; Crown-down technique; Shaping ability; Binding;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Walia HM, Brantley WA, Gerstein H, An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod 14:346-351. 1988   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Bergmans L, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Beullens M, Wevers M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P. Progressive versus constant tapered shaft design using Ni-Ti rotary instruments. Int Endod J 36:288-295, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Calhoun G, Montgomery S. The effects of four instrumentation techniques on root canal shape. J Endod 14:273-277, 1988   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Berutti E, Chiandussi G. Gaviqlio I. Ibba A. Comparative analysis of torsional and bending stresses in two mathematical models of nickel-titanium rotary instruments: ProTaper versus ProFile. J Endod 29:15-19, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Diemer F, Calas P. Effect of pitch length on the behaviour of rotary triple helix root canal instruments. J Endod 30: 716-718, 2004   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg 32:271-275, 1971   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Foschi F, Nucci C, Montebugnoli L, Marchionni S. Breschi L, Malagnino VA. Prati C. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper Ni-Ti rotary instruments. Int Endod J 37:832-839, 2004   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Schrader C, Peters OA. Analysis of torque and force with differently tapered rotary endodontic instruments in vitro. J Endod 31: 120-123, 2005   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Cohen S, Burns RC. Pathways of the pulp. 7th edition Translation Shinhung International, Inc. p252-254, 1999
10 Peters OA, Peters CI, Schoneberger K. Barbakov F. ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: effect of canal anatomy on final shape analyzed by micro CT. Int Endod J 36:86-92, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Pettiette MT, Delano EO, Trope M. Evaluation of success rate of endodontic treatment performed by students with stainless-steel K-files and nickel-titanium hand files. J Endod 27:124-127, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Peters OA. Current Challenges and Concepts in the Preparation of Root Canal Systems: A Review. J Endod 30:559-567, 2004   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Leeb JI. Canal orifice enlargement as related to biomechanical preparation. J Endod 9:463-470, 1983   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
14 Schafer E, Erler M, Dammaschke T. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. Int Endod J 39: 196-202, 2006   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Iqbal MK. Firic S, Tulcan J, Karabucak B. Kim S. Comparison of apical transportation between ProFile and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments. Int Endod J 37: 359-364, 2004   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Veltri M, Mollo A, Mantovani L, Pini P, Balleri P, Grandini S. A comparative study of Endoflare-Hero Shaper and Mtwo NiTi instruments in the preparation of curved root canals. Int Endod J 38:601-616, 2005
17 Gunday M, Sazak H. Garip Y. A comparative study of three different root canal curvature measurement techniques and measuring the canal access angle in curved canals. J Endod 31: 796-798, 2005   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Yun HH, Kim SK. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 95:228-233, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Kum KY, Spangberg L, Cha BY, Jung IY, Lee SJ, Lee CY. Shaping ability of three ProFile rotary instrumentation techniques in simulated resin root canals. J Endod 26:719-723, 2000   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. J Endod 26:161-165, 2000   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Kosa DA. Marshall G, Baumgartner JC. An analysis of canal centering using mechanical instrumentation techniques. J Endod 25:441-445, 1999   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Garip Y. Gunday M. The use of computed tomography when comparing nickel-titanium and stainless steel files during preparation of simulated curved canals. Int Endod J 34:452-457, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Schafer E, Erler M, Dammaschke T. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J 39: 203-212, 2006   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Schafer E. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickeltitanium instruments and stainless steel hand K-Flexofiles in simulated curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 92:215-220, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Schafer E, Vlassis M. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. Int Endod J 37:229-238, 2004   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Peters OA, Peters CI, Schonenberger K. Barbakow F. ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: assessment of torque and force in relation to canal anatomy. Int Endod J 36:93-99. 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Calberson FL, Deroose CA, Hommez GM, De Moor RJ. Shaping ability of Pro Taper nickel-titanium files in simulated resin root canals. Int Endod J 37:613-623, 2004   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Schafer E, Schulz-Bongert U. Tulus G. Comparison of hand stainless steel and nickel titanium rotary instrumentation: a clinical study, J Endod 30:432-435, 2004   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Chen JL, Messer HH. A comparison of stainless steel hand and rotary nickel-titanium instrumentation using a silicone impression technique, Aust Dent J 47:12-20, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Kim HC, Park JK, Hur B. Relative efficacy of three NiTi file systems used by undergraduates. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 30:38-48, 2005   DOI
31 Bergmans L, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Wevers M, Lambrechts P. Mechanical root canal preparation with NiTi rotary instruments: Rationale, performance and safety. Status Report for the Am J Dent 14:324-333, 2001
32 Glosson CR. Haller RH, Dove SB, del Rio CE. A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand. Ni-Ti engine-driven. and K-Flex endodontic instruments, J Endod 21:146-151. 1995   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Hong ES, Park JK. Hur B, Kim HC. Comparison of shaping ability between various hybrid instrumentation methods with ProTaper. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 31: 1119, 2006   과학기술학회마을   DOI