A Comparative Study between Korea and the United States on Executive and Supportive Programs for the Multifamily Housing Remodeling

공동주택 리모델링 시행 프로그램에 관한 한.미간 비교연구 - 미국 리모델링 관련 제도와 전문가 대상 면접조사 결과를 중심으로 -

  • Published : 2007.12.25

Abstract

The study is based on a two-year research study titled 'A study on the Development of the Programs for Housing Policy to support Multi-family Housing Remodeling in Korea'. The primary purpose of this two-year study was to recommend governmental program initiatives for supporting multi-family housing remodeling activities in Korea. As a part of this research study, this article was written based on the results from the two surveys regarding multi-family housing remodeling in the United States and Korea, and a focus group with housing researchers affiliated to the Joint Center for Housing Studies. Major research findings are presented as follows: First, there have been various types of supportive programs for single- and multi-family housing remodeling in the United States. Those have focused on lower income families than middle income families. Compared with the programs in the United States, the apartment remodeling in Korea has been focusing on small population of the multi-family housing owners. Apartment remodeling in Korea needs supportive programs for rental housing remodeling and the housing remodeling for low-incomes. Second, there have been various types of remodeling activities made in multi-family housing properties in the United States. Size of remodeling project also varied. Their remodeling activities were based on the long-term repairing plans initiated by professional apartment management groups. For making our multi-family housing properties more sustainable, we also need to have the long-term repairing plans. Third, the apartment property remodeling has been regarded as a substitute of reconstruction of apartment properties. However, remodeling should be regarded as one of the most efficient ways to extend the life-cycle of apartment buildings. Thus, benefits and executive plans of apartment remodeling should be studied by a professional research center under our governmental responsibilities as done in the United States.

Keywords

References

  1. 강신은(2003), 공동주택 리모텔링 활성화를 위한 여건과 정책과제, 공동주택 리모델링 활성화를 위한 정책방안 세미나
  2. 김석경 . 정유션 . 윤정숙(2001), 생애주기 개념을 도입한 공동주택 의 개조서비스 계획연구, 대한건축학회논문집 17(7), 3-12
  3. 김용성(2003 ), 공동주택 리모델링 활성화를 위한 제도 개 선방안, 인천대학교 석사학위 논문
  4. 김진우(2001), 공동주택 리모텔링 활성화를 위한 발주제도 개선 방안에 관한 연구 - 적정 발주모텔 개발을 중심으로, 연세대학교 석사학위논문
  5. 방경식(1999). 주택의 보수개량 필요성 및 대책방안, 주택 포럼 1호, 119-128
  6. 윤영선 (2001), 기존 건축물의 리모델링 활성화를 위한 제 도개선 방안, 건축물 리모텔링을 위한 신축건축물의 설계 기준 수립 토론회 자료집, 145-167
  7. 윤정숙 . 김석경 (2005), 미국 공동주택단지의 리모델링 특 성에 대 한 조사연구, 대한건축학회논문집 계획계, 21(9), 87-94
  8. 윤정숙 . 김수정 . 신수영 . 김석경 . 로빈에브람스(2006), 공동주택 거주 자의 주거환경 만족도 및 개선요구를 통한 공동주택 장기수선계획연구, 한국주거학회논문집, 17(4), 37-46
  9. 윤정숙 . 신수영 . 김수정 . 김석경 . 앤드류사이델 (2006), 공동주택의 생애주기를 고려한 단계별 리모텔링 위한 거주 자 의식조사 연구, 대한건축학회논문집, 22(8), 11-18
  10. 임태모(2001), 건축리모델링의 현황과 전망, 한국그린빌딩 협의회 학술강영회논문집
  11. 주택산업연구원(2000), 주택 개보수의 필요성과 시장규모
  12. 최민수 . 이상영 . 서후석 (2001) 저건축물 설비의 리모텔링 활성화, 방안설비저널, 30(10), 37-45
  13. Alexander, B. et al. (2001), Remodeling homes for changing households. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
  14. Baker, K. (2003), Measuring the benefits of home remodeling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
  15. Baker, K. (1999), Improving America's housing. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University
  16. Duda, M. (2001), Federally sponsored rehabilitation activity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
  17. Joint Center for Housing Studies & The NAHB Research Center (2002), Rehabilitation data needs: A building industry forum. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
  18. Reade, J., & Zhu, X. (2000), Residential conversions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University