• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.1-18
• /
• 2004

Current interest in mathematics learning that focuses on understanding, mathematical reasoning and meaning making underscores the need to develop ways of analyzing classrooms that foster these types of learning. In this paper, the author show that the constructs of social and socio-mathematical norms, which grew out of taking a symbolic interactionist perspective, and Toulmins scheme for argumentation, as elaborated for mathematics education by Krummheuer [The ethnology of argumentation. In: The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures (1995, pp. 229-269). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum], provide us with means to analyze aspects of explanation, justification and argumentation in mathematics classrooms, including means through which they can be fostered. Examples from a variety of classrooms are used to clarify how these notions can inform instruction at all levels, from the elementary grades through university-level mathematics.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.1-18
• /
• 2004

Current interest in mathematics learning that focuses on understanding, mathematical reasoning and meaning making underscores the need to develop ways of analyzing classrooms that foster these types of learning. In this paper, I show that the constructs of social and sociomathematical norms, which grew out of taking a symbolic interactionist perspective, and Toulmins scheme for argumentation as elaborated for mathematics education by Krummheuer, provide us with means to analyze aspects of explanation justification and argumentation in mathematics classrooms, including means through which they can be fostered. Examples from a variety of classrooms are used to clarify how these notions can inform instruction at all levels, from the elementary grades through university-level mathematics.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제43권1호
• /
• pp.97-107
• /
• 2004

Current interest in mathematics learning that focuses on understanding, mathematical reasoning and meaning making underscores the need to develop ways of analyzing classrooms that foster these types of learning. In this paper, I show that the constructs of social and sociomathematical norms, which grew out of taking a symbolic interactionist perspective, and Toulmin's scheme for argumentation, as elaborated for mathematics education by Kummheuer, provide us with means to analyze aspects of explanation, justification and argumentation in mathematics classrooms, including means through which they can be fostered. Examples from a variety of classrooms are used to clarify how these notions can inform instruction at all levels, from the elementary grades through university-level mathematics.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제31권3호
• /
• pp.475-489
• /
• 2011

The purposes of this study were to inform the exemplary models of integrated science and mathematics and to analyze and discuss their similarities and differences of the models. There were two steps to select the exemplary models of integrated science and mathematics. First, the second volume (Berlin & Lee, 2003) of the bibliography of integrated science and mathematics was analyzed to identify the models. As a second step, we selected the models that are dealt with in the School Science Mathematics journal and were cited more than three times. The findings showed that the following four exemplary theoretical models were identified and published in the SSM journal: the Berlin-White Integrated Science and Mathematics (BWISM) Model, the Mathematics/Science Continuum Model, the Continuum Model of Integration, and the Five Types of Science and Mathematics Integration. The Berlin-White Integrated Science and Mathematics (BWISM) Model focused an interpretive or framework theory for integrated science and mathematics teaching and learning. BWISM focused on a conceptual base and a common language for integrated science and mathematics teaching and learning. The Mathematics/Science Continuum Model provided five categories and ways to clarify the extent of overlap or coordination between science and mathematics during instructional practice. The Continuum Model of Integration included five categories and clarified the nature of the relationship between the mathematics and science being taught and the curricular goals for the disciplines. These five types of science and mathematics integrations described the method, type, and instructional implications of five different approaches to integration. The five categories focused on clarifying various forms of integrated science and mathematics education. Several differences and similarities among the models were identified on the basis of the analysis of the content and characteristics of the models. Theoretically, there is strong support for the integration of science and mathematics education as a way to enhance science and mathematics learning experiences. It is expected that these instructional models for integration of science and mathematics could be used to develop and evaluate integration programs and to disseminate integration approaches to curriculum and instruction.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈C:초등수학교육
• /
• 제25권4호
• /
• pp.361-375
• /
• 2022

이 연구에서는 2015 개정 교육과정에 따른 초등학교 1~2학년 수학 교과서 어휘를 등급 및 유형에 따라 분석하였다. 어휘 유형은 학습 도구어, 수학 교과 특수 개념어, 수학 교과 일반 개념어로 구분하여 분석하였다. 어휘 등급별 분석 결과, 1~2학년 수학 교과서에서는 1등급과 2등급 어휘가 대부분을 차지하고 있었다. 어휘 유형별 분석 결과, 학습 도구어 중 일부 어휘가 3등급 어휘로 나타났으며, 수학 교과 특수 개념어의 경우 미등록어이거나 1등급 어휘인 경우들이 많았다. 수학 교과 일반 개념어는 2학년 교과서에서의 빈도수가 1학년 교과서에 비해 크게 증가하였다. 이러한 결과를 기반으로 수학 교과서 어휘 지도를 위한 시사점을 제시하였다.

• 한국초등수학교육학회지
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.93-113
• /
• 2017

본 연구는 평가의 형성적 관점에서 수시로 평가하고, 평가 결과를 평가지와 함께 가정에 통보하는 평가 체제를 따르고 있는 한 초등학교에서, 수업과 통합한 수학교과 역량 중심의 평가 실행 사례를 분석하였다. 그 결과 다음과 같은 결론을 내릴 수 있다. 첫째, 수업과 통합한 역량 중심의 평가는 교육과정 재구성 및 역량 중심의 수업을 가능하게 하였으나 평가 결과의 환류가 보다 강조될 필요가 있다. 둘째, 역량의 평가는 복합적으로 이루어지므로 역량 간의 중첩으로 인한 문제가 발생되지 않도록 운영할 필요가 있다. 셋째, 평가를 통해 부족한 역량을 파악하고 수업과 연계하여 이를 단계적으로 신장시킬 수 있는 가능성을 제기하였으나 이와 관련한 실행적인 연구가 행해질 필요가 있다. 넷째, 다양한 평가 방법의 사용은 평가의 공정성을 확보해 주지만 평가 결과의 차이를 올바르게 해석하여 종합적인 판단을 내릴 수 있도록 유의할 필요가 있다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집
• /
• 제33권3호
• /
• pp.207-229
• /
• 2019

제 4차 산업혁명 시대를 맞이하여 수학과 교수 학습에 ICT기술을 접목한 수업의 시도가 다양하게 이루어지고 있으며, 거꾸로 수업과 증강현실을 활용한 수업의 필요성과 효율성이 주목받고 있다. 이는 교육현장에서 거꾸로 수업과 증강현실을 활용한 수업 콘텐츠와 그 활용방안에 대한 수요의 증가로 이어지고 있다. 따라서 실제로 현장에 적용할 수 있는 수업 콘텐츠의 개발과 수업 방안에 대한 연구의 필요성이 커지고 있다. 이와 같은 관점에서 본 연구에서는 교수 학습 유형을 분류하고, 구성주의 수학 교육 원리와 증강현실 기반 모바일 앱을 활용한 거꾸로 교실 수업 방안과 교수 학습 유형별 수학 교수 학습 콘텐츠를 개발하고 교수 학습 현장에 적용할 수 있는 방안 및 수업지도안을 제시한다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제41권3호
• /
• pp.273-289
• /
• 2002

It tends to be emphasized that mathematics is the important discipline to develop students' mathematical reasoning abilities such as deduction, induction, analogy, and visual reasoning. This study is aimed for investigating the present state about mathematical reasoning in secondary school. We survey teachers' opinions and analyze the results. The results are analyzed by frequency analysis including percentile, t-test, and MANOVA. Results are the following: 1. Teachers recognized mathematics as knowledge constructed by deduction, induction, analogy and visual reasoning, and evaluated their reasoning abilities high. 2. Teachers indicated the importances of reasoning in curriculum, the necessities and the representations, but there are significant difference in practices comparing to the former importances. 3. To evaluate mathematical reasoning, teachers stated that they needed items and rubric for assessment of reasoning. And at present, they are lacked. 4. The hindrances in teaching mathematical reasoning are the lack of method for appliance to mathematics instruction, the unpreparedness of proposals for evaluation method, and the lack of whole teachers' recognition for the importance of mathematical reasoning

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈C:초등수학교육
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.71-94
• /
• 2001

The purposes of this study were to design small group collaborative learning models for developing the creativity and to analyze the effects on applying the models in mathematics teaching and loaming. The meaning of open education in mathematics learning, the relation of creativity and inquiry learning, the relation of small group collaborative learning and creativity, and the relation of assessment and creativity were reviewed. And to investigate the relation small group collaborative learning and creativity, we developed three types of small group collaborative learning model- inquiry model, situation model, tradition model, and then conducted in elementary school and middle school. As a conclusion, this study suggested; (1) Small group collaborative learning can be conducted when the teacher understands the small group collaborative learning practice in the mathematics classroom and have desirable belief about mathematics instruction. (2) Students' mathematical anxiety can be reduced and students' involvement in mathematics learning can be facilitated, when mathematical tasks are provided through inquiry model and situation model. (3) Students' mathematical creativity can be enhanced when the teacher make classroom culture that students' thinking is valued and teacher's authority is reduced. (4) To develop students' mathematical creativity, the interaction between students in small group should be encouraged, and assessment of creativity development should be conduced systematically and continuously.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제23권2호
• /
• pp.63-92
• /
• 2020

Student engagement in high-level, cognitively demanding instruction is pivotal for student learning. However, many teachers are unable to maintain such instruction, especially in instances of non-responsive students. This case study of three middle school teachers explores prompts that aim to move classroom discussions past student silence. Prompt sequences were categorized into Progressing, Focusing, and Redirecting Actions, and then analyzed for maintenance of high levels of cognitive demand. Results indicate that specific prompt types are prone to either raise or diminish the cognitive demand of a discussion. While Focusing Actions afforded students opportunities to process information on a more meaningful level, Progressing Actions typically lowered cognitive demand in an effort to get through mathematics content or a specific method or procedure. Prompts that raise cognitive demand typically start out as procedural or concrete and progress to include students' thoughts or ideas about mathematical concepts. This study aims to discuss five specific implications on how teachers can use prompting techniques to effectively maintain cognitively challenging discourse through moments of student silence.