• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제30권1호
• /
• pp.1-14
• /
• 1992

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of reproduction of stone casts made from complete-arch impressions using different trays. The trays used were : 1) nonperforated custom tray, 2) perforated custom tray, 3) nonperforated Rim-Lock tray, 4) perforated stock tray. Impressions were made from an dentulous acrylic resin model with metal inserts in first premolars and second molars. Transverse distance, sagittal distance and diagonal distance were measured using 4 landmarks. Measurements were made by using 3 dimensional measuring machine. The impression material used was an addition silicone. Impressions were poured at once with a Type IV dental stone. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and student t-test with a sample size of five. The results were as follows : 1. There were statistical differences in amount of dimensional change in according to the tray types. In amount of mean dimensional change, perforated custom tray was the first smallest, nonperforated custom tray was the second, nonperforated Rim-Lock tray and perforated stock tray were the largest. 2. There were statistical differences in amount of dimensional change between nonperforated custom tray and nonperforated Rim-Lock tray, and between perforated custom tray perforated stock tray. 3. There were satistical differences in amount of dimensional change between nonperforated custom tray and perforated custom tray, but there was not a statistical difference between nonperforated Rim-Lock tray and perforated stock tray. 4. There was not a statistical difference in amount of dimensional change between upper and lower arch in all tray types.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제27권2호
• /
• pp.131-141
• /
• 1989

This study was designed to investigate the fitness of stock tray in Korean adults. 107 dental students (male: 87, female: 20) who have normal occlusion and symmetric facial fom were selected. The upper and lower stock tray (Osungtray, Osung Co., Korea) fit with dental arch were selected for taking irreversible hydrocolloid impression. The author measured the thickness of impression material about two items, that is, width and length on the flange of stock tray. Several measuring points on the dental arches and palatal area were checked with Goldman Fox prove (Hu-Friedy, U.S.A.). The obtained results were as follows: 1. The width of impression material on buccal flange of upper and lower trays were narrower than any other measuring point, but the thickness of impression material on the palatal area of upper stock tray was the widest of all measuring points. 2. The length on buccal flange of lower stock tray was shorter, but the length on tray flange of lower stock tray at lingual frenum area was longer. 3. On upper dental arch, the upper extra-large tray was used in 53% of subjects, but upper small tray was not used. 4. On lower dental arch, the large tray was used in 55% of subjects. 5. There was not adequate tray on upper dental arch in 4 subjects.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제1권2호
• /
• pp.63-67
• /
• 2009

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM. Use of custom tray and tray adhesive is clinically recommended for elastomeric impression material. However there is not clear mention of drying time of tray adhesive in achieving appropriate bonding strength of tray material and impression material. PURPOSE. This study is to investigate an appropriate drying time of tray adhesives by evaluating tensile bonding strength between two types of polyvinylsiloxane impression materials and resin tray, according to various drying time intervals of tray adhesives, and with different manufacturing company combination of impression material and tray adhesive. MATERIAL AND METHODS. Adhesives used in this study were Silfix (Dentsply Caulk, Milford, Del, USA) and VPS Tray Adhesive (3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) and impression materials were Aquasil Ultra (monophase regular set, Dentsply Caulk, Milford, Del, USA) and Imprint II Garant (regular body, 3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany). They were used combinations from the same manufacture and exchanged combinations of the two. The drying time was designed to air dry, 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes, 20 minutes, and 25 minutes. Total 240 of test specimens were prepared by auto-polymerizing tray material(Instant Tray Mix, Lang, Wheeling, Il, USA) with 10 specimens in each group. The specimens were placed in the Universal Testing machine (Instron, model 3366, Instron Corp, University avenue, Nowood, MA, USA) to perform the tensile test (cross head speed 5 mm/min). The statistically efficient drying time was evaluated through ANOVA and Scheffe test. All the tests were performed at 95% confidence level. RESULTS. The results revealed that at least 10 minutes is needed for Silfix-Aquasil, and 15 minutes for VPS Tray Adhesive-Imprint II, to attain an appropriate tensile bonding strength. VPS Tray Adhesive-Imprint II had a superior tensile bonding strength when compared to Silfix-Aquasil over 15 minutes. Silfix-Aquasil had a superior bonding strength to VPS Tray Adhesive-Aquasil, and VPS Tray Adhesive-Imprint II had a superior tensile bonding strength to Silfix-Imprint II at all drying periods. CONCLUSION. Significant increase in tensile bonding strength with Silfix-Aquasil and VPS Tray adhesive-Imprint II combination until 10 and 15 minutes respectively. Tray adhesive-impression material combination from the same company presented higher tensile bonding strength at all drying time intervals than when using tray adhesive-impression material of different manufactures.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제48권1호
• /
• pp.48-54
• /
• 2010

연구 목적: 보편화된 임플란트 치료의 장기적인 성공을 위해서는 임플란트와 상부 보철물의 연결 시 완전한 수동적 적합을 이루는 것이 중요하며, 이를 위해서는 정확하게 인상 채득하는 것이 필요하다. 이 연구에서는 임플란트 고정체 수준 인상 채득 방법 중 인상체 제거 후 인상용 코핑이 인상체에 남아있는 open tray 인상법과 구강 내에 남아있는 closed tray 인상법, 그리고 인상 채득 시 사용될 수 있는 여러 트레이에 대해 비교 연구해 보고자 하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 실험 모형은 하악 악궁 형태로 열중합형 아크릴릭 레진을 이용하여 제작하였고, vertical gap을 관찰할 20 mm 간격의 기준 구조물을 제작한 후 이를 이용하여 실험 모형에 임플란트 유사체를 매몰하였다. 실험군은 트레이 레진으로 제작한 개인 트레이, 폴리카보네이트 기성 트레이 그리고 금속 기성 트레이 등의 3가지 트레이를 이용하였고, closed tray 인상법과 open tray 인상법의 2가지 인상 채득법에 따라 5개 군으로 나누었다. 그리고 위치에 따른 오차를 관찰하기 위해 시편 모형을 전치부, 구치부로 다시 나누어 총 10개의 실험군을 구성하였다. 1군당 총 9개의 시편을 제작하였고, 시편에 기준 구조물을 한 쪽 지대주만 20 Ncm으로 고정시킨 후 관찰하는 1-screw test를 이용하여 반대쪽의 임플란트 유사체와 지대주와의 gap을 입체 광학 현미경을 이용하여 관찰하였다. 1시편당총6부위를 측정하였고, 3회씩 측정하여 동일한 결과를 얻었을 때 수치를 기록하여 통계 처리하였다. 결과: Closed tray 인상법 사용 시 폴리카보네이트 기성 트레이와 개인 트레이 간에 유의한 차이를 보였지만, open tray 인상법 사용 시 폴리카보네이트 기성 트레이와 개인 트레이 간에 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 폴리카보네이트 기성 트레이를 이용한 인상 채득 시 open tray 인상법과 closed tray 인상법 간에 유의한 차이를 보였고 (P<.05), 폴리카보네이트 트레이를 이용한 closed tray 인상법을 개인 트레이를 이용한 open tray 인상법과 비교 시 전치부, 구치부 모두에서 유의한 차이를 보였다 (P<.05). 결론: 폴리카보네이트 기성 트레이를 사용 시에는 open tray 인상법이 더 추천되는 바이며, 생체 외 실험의 한계성에 유의해야 하며, 정확한 임플란트 고정체 수준 인상 채득에 대해 더 많은 연구가 필요하다고 사료된다.

• 한국치위생학회지
• /
• 제8권2호
• /
• pp.53-66
• /
• 2008

There was to purpose of this study improves analyzing cause that prosthesis brings bite engaging that is inaccurate in patient's mouth, when supposed that all conducts that do in operatory and dental laboratory are perfect. Impression did check bite by alginate impression material and polymerization style silicon impression material that use usually in presence at a sickbed Irreversibility, hydrocolloid, alginate impression material washed in flowing water and poured anhydrite after wait about 8 minutes so that region that charge interest after impression check bite may become undoing. And hydrophile property addition polymerization style impression material poured anhydrite after blow 30 considering impression material dwell time and H2 gas occurrence time (5~15 minute) after have washed in flowing water. I got each 7 models, result that manufactures total 28 and measures by third dimension measuring instrument (Meteo, Korea) following sequence curing in tray holder and floor 1, By Alginate impression when is hardened in tray holder and when is hardened in the floor after do check bite, SPH 4, SPH5 all as there is synonymy appeared(P<0.05). By in case do not use average 0.1741 in case use tray holder in 0.0447 SPH5s in case do not use average 0.2838 pastas in case use tray holder in SPH4 0.0309, When did not use both SPH4 and SPH5 tray holder, when used tray holder, 1 appeared more greatly. 2. By amity sex addition polymerization style silicon impression when is hardened in tray holder after do check bite and when is hardened in the floor SPH 4, a11 of the SPH5s very big synonymy be(P>0.05). And in case use tray holder in 0.000657 pasta SPH5s in case do not use average 0.000129 pastas in case use tray holder in SPH4 average 0.000114 pastas, by in case do not use 0.000757, I appeared more greatly when used tray when did not use both SPH4 and SPH5 tray holder, but 1 appeared is not level to keep in mind(Table 8~9). 3 SPH4 was looked very big mindfulness in model that manufacture doing impression check bite by Alginate and model that do impression check bite by amity sex accessory penalty silicon without using tray holder(P< 0.001). I use tray holder and SPH4 did not appear synonymy in model that manufacture doing impression check bite by Alginate and model that do impression check bite by amity sex accessory penalty silicon(P>0.05). Study finding of above when see synthesis Alginate certainly tray holder use must and I could know that hardening method does not exert big influence on volume stability if remove impression sieve of excess because amity sex accessory penalty silicon passes over tray, Also, Alginate impression material previewed can get heading a conspiracy style that volume stability of accessory penalty silicon impression material degree is if use tray holder.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제39권4호
• /
• pp.351-365
• /
• 2001

For accurate impression taking, accurate impression material, solid individual tray, and bond strength between impression materials and resin tray are important factors. The purpose of this study was to evaluate tensile bond strength of rubber impression materials to various tray resin materials. This study tested the time dependent tensile bond strength between commercial brands or poly ether, polysulfide, additional silicone impression materials and commercial brands of self curing tray resin. light activited tray resin when applying adhesive Resin specimens were made with 20mm in diameter, 2mm in thickness. 1 made total 360 specimens, 10 per each group and the tensile bond strength was measured by using the Instron($M100EC^{(R)}$, Mecmesin Co., England). The results were as follows ; Comparisons of various impression materials. 1. In case of Impregum $F^{(R)}$, the bond strength of tray resin was decreased in order of SR $Ivolen^{(R)}$, Ostron $100^{(R)}$ Instant tray $mix^{(R)}$, $Lightplast^{(R)}$. All groups excluding Ostron $100^{(R)}$, Instant tray $mix^{(R)}$ are significant difference (p<0.05). Drying time after applying adhesive, the tensile bond strength of tray resin was insignificantly decreased in order of 10 min drying time group. 1 min drying time group. 5 min drying time group. 2. In case of Permlastic $regular^{(R)}$ the bond strength of tray resin was insignificantly decreased in order of Ostron $100^{(R)}$. SR $Ivolen^{(R)}$, Instant tray $mix^{(R)}$ $Lightplast^{(R)}$. About drying time after applying adhesive, the tensile bond strength of tray resin was significantly decreased in order of 5 min drying time group, 10 min drying time group, 1 min drying time group(p<0.05). 3. In case of Exaflex $regular^{(R)}$. the bond strength of tray resin was decreased in order of $Lightplast^{(R)}$, SR $Ivolen^{(R)}$, Instant tray $mix^{(R)}$, Ostron $100^{(R)}$. $Lightplast^{(R)}$ was significant difference(p<0.05). About drying time after applying adhesive, the tensile bond strength of tray resin was decreased in order of 5 min drying time group, 10 min drying time group, 1 min drying time group(p<0.05). Especially 5 min ding time group was significant difference(p<0.05). According to the results of this study, we can see the greatest tensile bond strength when using Impregrm $F^{(R)}$ and Permlastic $regular^{(R)}$ with self curing tray resin, when using Exaflex $regular^{(R)}$ with light activated tray resin In my opinion, adhesive should be dried more than 5 min before impression taking to achieve the greatest tensile bond strength.

• Journal of Biosystems Engineering
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.19-24
• /
• 2000

This study was carried out to develop gripper which to adaptive variable tray and to develop automatic transplanting system for seedling-production system between tray. This system consisted of five set of gripper and end-effector, a planting-width control unit, a tray transfer unit, and gripper moving device which move gripper between nursing tray and growing tray. This system used push-out rod to grasp plant instead of pull-out end -effector. Several types of fingers, which physically grip seedlings, were also developed and tested to ensure reliable transplanting operation of the gripper. The transplanting system detaches seedlings from a tray with push-o0ut rods, which were installed under the tray transfer unit. The performance of the transplanting system was evaluated by successive transplanting experiments. Using the best type of finger , the transplanting system produced 94.6% of transplanting success rate.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제42권1호
• /
• pp.11-20
• /
• 2004

Problem : The several studies were reported to the effects of individual tooth tray with the parallel tooth, but not reported to the effect of individual tooth tray with severe undercut in impression making. Purpose : The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of individual tooth tray; 1) the accuracy of impression in terms of distance. 2) reproducibility of pocket. Material and methods : In this study, a metal model with 3 teeth including tooth prepared 30-degree undercut and gingival crevice of the depth 5mm, width 0.4mm was cast. Impressions of the metal model were taken in 5 times used 4 kinds of impression materials with individual tooth tray and another impression taking were made with conventional method without individual tooth, used same materials, procedure. The stone models were made. Distances between abutments were measured with a Micromeasurescoup-mm. Result : The following results were obtained ; 1. In the comparisonof inter-abutment distance between parallel tooth without individual tooth tray, 4elastomeric materials have not significant difference to the metal model(p>0.05). 2. In the comparisonof inter-abutment distance with undercut tooth without individual tooth tray, 4elastomeric materials have a significant difference to the metal model(p<0.05), especially polyether's dimensional change is large. 3. If individual tooth tray was used to take impression in abutment teeth with severe undercut, more stable results was achieved easily than conventional method. (p>0.05). 4. It is not true that the pressure of impression material with individual tooth tray increased to gingival sulcus. Conclusion : By the results, I knew the fact that individual tooth tray was useful impression method on the teeth with severe undercut for the dimensional stability. Also, I could not confirm the fact that individual tooth tray would increase the penetrating pressure into cervice.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제46권2호
• /
• pp.201-208
• /
• 2008

연구목적: 시멘트 유지형 지대주를 인상용 코핑으로 이용하고 레진이나 금속 구조물에 접착하여 스플린팅하는 새로운 인상법을 시도하였다. 연구의 목적은 첫 번째, 3개의 임플랜트가 $15^{\circ}$ 경사지게 식립된 모형에서 closed tray 인상법과 레진 스플린팅한 open tray 인상법의 정확성을 비교하는 것이고 두 번째, 새로운 인상법의 정확성을 앞의 두 가지 인상법과 비교하는 것이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 3개의 임플랜트 아날로그가 선상으로 배열되고 가운데 아날로그는 모형에 수직이고 양쪽 끝 아날로그는 이것에 앞뒤로 $15^{\circ}$ 경사지게 배열된 주모형과 주모형에 잘 적합되는 기준구조물을 제작하였다. closed tray 인상법, 레진 스플린팅한 open tray 인상법, 지대주-레진구조물 접착 인상법, 지대주-금속구조물 접착 인상법, 각 10개씩 40번의 인상을 채득하여 복제모형을 제작하였다. 이미지 처리할 수 있는 광학 현미경을 이용하여 기준구조물과 복제모형내의 아날로그와의 수직간격을 측정하여 인상의 정확성을 평가하였다. 통계처리는 one-way ANOVA와 사후 검정으로 Tukey test를 5% 유의수준으로 시행하였다. 결과: closed tray 인상법;74.3 (${\pm}33.4$)${\mu}m$의 간격은 레진 스플린팅한 open tray 인상법과 다른 두 가지 새로운 인상법보다 간격의 크기가 통계적 유의성 있게 컸다(P<.05). 지대주-금속구조물 접착 인상법;42.5 (${\pm}11.9$)${\mu}m$은 다른 인상법들 보다 간격의 크기가 통계적 유의성 있게 작았다(P<.05). 지대주-레진구조물 접착 인상법;51.0 (${\pm}14.1$)${\mu}m$은 레진 스플린팅한 open tray 인상법50.3 (${\pm}16.9$)${\mu}m$과 통계적 유의성 있는 차이를 보이지 않았다(P>.05). 결론: 이 연구의 한계 내에서, 레진 스플린팅한 open tray 인상법은 closed tray 인상법보다 우수한 정확성을 나타내었고, 지대주를 금속구조물에 접착하는 새로운 인상법의 정확성은 레진 스플린팅한 open tray 인상법보다 우수하였다.

• 한국포장학회지
• /
• 제25권3호
• /
• pp.89-94
• /
• 2019

Among the many packaging materials used in cushion packaging, there is a lack of optimum design for the tray cup pad used in fruit packaging for export and domestic distribution. It causes over-packaging due to excessive material input, and this could be solved by applying various parameters needed to optimize the design of the tray cup pad considering the packaging material and the quantity of fruits in the box. In the case of a tray cup for fruits, the economic efficiency of material and thickness should be considered. Therefore, it is possible to design a tray cup pad depending on the packaging material used by applying appropriate design parameters. The static and dynamic characteristics of the materials used for packaging of pears were analyzed by using the FEM (finite element Method) simulation technique to derive the optimal design parameters. And by applying the appropriate design parameters considering the quantity of fruit and distribution environment, it is possible to design an appropriate fruit tray cup pad. In this study, as a result of simulating the contact stresses between the fruit and the tray cup for the PP, PE, and PS materials used in the fruit tray cup, the material with the lowest contact stress was PP and the value was found to be 398 Pa. The contact displacement between fruit and tray cup using this material was about 0.0463 mm, which was the lowest value compared with other materials. Also the resonance frequency band of tray cup made of PP material was below 36.81 Hz, and the strain energy was below 12.20 J. The resonant frequency band of the pear is more than 80 Hz and it could be applied to all the tray cup materials as compared with the resonance band of 38.81 Hz or less which is the resonance band of all tray cup pads for packaging. Finally, PP is the most suitable material for the tray cup pad.