Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2010.48.1.48

A comparative study on the accuracy of impression body according to the types of impression tray  

Yi, Hyun-Jung (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Lim, Jong-Hwa (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Lee, Joon-Seok (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.48, no.1, 2010 , pp. 48-54 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the accuracy of impression body taking by the closed and the open tray impression technique with 3 types of impression tray. Individual tray, metal stock tray and polycarbonate tray were used. Materials and methods: Nine closed tray impressions were taken by individual tray, metal stock tray and polycarbonate stock tray, respectively with polyether impression material. 9 open tray impressions were also acquired by same manner. Precision analysis on the master models was performed by attaching the reference frameworks with alternate single screws and measuring the vertical fit discrepancy of respective analogues in working cast with a stereo microscope. Data were analyzed by 1 way ANOVA and independent t-test. Results: The average fit accuracy of impression bodies was calculated. With the closed tray impression technique, there were significant statistical differences in vertical fit discrepancy according to the types of tray. The individual tray group showed the lowest value and the polycarbonate stock tray group represented the highest. With the open tray impression technique, there was no significant difference in vertical fit discrepancy. Significant statistical difference in vertical fit discrepancy was found between the open and the closed impression technique with the polycarbonate stock tray. Conclusion: From the results above, more precise impressions could be acquired by the rigid individual tray compared with the polycarbonate stock tray. It was hard to get consistent accuracy impressions by the closed tray impression technique with polycarbonate stock trays.
Keywords
Dental impression technique; Implants;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Waskewicz GA, Ostrowski JS, Parks VJ. Photoelastic analysis of stress distribution transmitted from a fixed prosthesis attached to osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:405-11.
2 Phillips KM, Nicholls JI, Ma T, Rubenstein J. The accuracy of three implant impression technique. A three dimensional analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 1994;9:533-40.
3 Rangert B, Jemt T, Jorneus L. Forces and moments on Branemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:241-7.
4 Sones AD. Complications with osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:581-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Spector MR, Donovan TE, Nicholls JI. An evaluation of impression techniques for osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:444-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Liou AD, Nicholls JI, Yuodelis RA, Brudvik JS. Accuracy of replacing three tapered transfer impression copings in two elastomeric impression materials. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:377-83.
7 Johnson GH, Craig RG. Accuracy of addition silicones as a function of technique. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:197-203.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Cho GC, Chee WW. Distortion of disposable plastic stock trays when used with putty vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:354-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416.   DOI
10 Cho GC, Chee WW. Distortion of disposable plastic stock trays when used with putty vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:354-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Burton JF, Hood JA, Plunkett DJ, Johnson SS. The effects of disposable and custom-made impression trays on the accuracy of impressions. J Dent 1989;17:121-3.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Phillips RW. Skinner's Science of Dental Materials. 8th ed., WB Saunders Co., Philadelphia, 1982:137-156, 177-215.
13 Carr AB. Comparison of impression techniques for a five-implant mandibular model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:448-55.
14 Eames WB, Sieweke JC, Wallace SW, Rogers LB. Elastomeric impression materials: effect of bulk on accuracy. J Prosthet Dent 1979;41:304-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Burawi G, Houston F, Byrne D, Claffey N. A comparison of the dimensional accuracy of the splinted and unsplinted impression techniques for the Bone-Lock implant system. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:68-75.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Leonhardt A, Renvert S, Dahlen G. Microbial findings at failing implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10:339-45.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Bomberg TJ, Hatch RA, Hoffman W Jr. Impression material thickness in stock and custom trays. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:170-2.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Naconecy MM, Teixeira ER, Shinkai RS, Frasca LC, Cervieri A. Evaluation of the accuracy of 3 transfer techniques for implant-supported prostheses with multiple abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:192-8.
19 Binon PP. The effect of implant/abutment hexagonal misfit on screw joint stability. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:149-60.
20 Skalak R. Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:843-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Reisbick MH, Matyas J. The accuracy of highly filled elastomeric impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 1975;33:67-72.   DOI
22 Inturregui JA, Aquilino SA, Ryther JS, Lund PS. Evaluation of three impression techniques for osseointegrated oral implants. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:503-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Humphries RM, Yaman P, Bloem TJ. The accuracy of implant master casts constructed from transfer impressions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:331-6.
24 Rodney J, Johansen R, Harris W. Dimensional accuracy of two implant impression copings. J Dent Res 1991;70:385(abstract no. 953).
25 Lee H, So JS, Hochstedler JL, Ercoli C. The accuracy of implant impressions: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:285-91.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Masri R, Driscoll CF, Burkhardt J, Von Fraunhofer A, Romberg E. Pressure generated on a simulated oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different designs. J Prosthodont 2002;11:155-60.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Bohsali K, Goodacre CJ, Lang BR. Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:7-13.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Wee AG. Comparison of impression materials for direct multi-implant impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:323-31.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Nissan J, Barnea E, Krauze E, Assif D. Impression technique for partially edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:103-4.   DOI
30 Ryu SI, Chang IT, Kim KN. The influence of impression trays on the accuracy of the stone casts poured from complete-arch impressions. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1992;30:1-14.