• East Asian mathematical journal
• /
• 제33권2호
• /
• pp.235-255
• /
• 2017

This study focuses on the teaching of fraction related to curriculum, introducing time of fraction, the meaning of fractions in textbook, material of teaching of fraction concept, teaching model of introducing time of fraction concept, special cases of teaching fraction and common points of representation of fraction among Korea, New Zealand and Singapore. For this study, Korea's mathematics textbooks(3-1, 3-2, 4-1, 5-1, 6-1) and New National Curriculum Mathematics(3, 4, 5. 6. 7)of New Zealand and New Syllabus Primary Mathematics(2B, 3B, 4A, 4B, 5A, 6A)of Singapore were selected for comparison and analysis. As a results we will suggest a reference to the development of mathematical curriculum, teaching fraction and improving the quality of the textbook through a method of comparative analysis of Korea, New Zealand and Singapore.

• 대한수학교육학회지:학교수학
• /
• 제1권2호
• /
• pp.571-588
• /
• 1999

Our mathematical curriculum has been revised frequently compared to another countries. The frequent revisions may mean that the current curriculum is not so complete in the selected contents of each grade levels. The idea is partially supported by the fact that the didactics of mathematics has both hypothesis-deductive and hypothesis-constructive property. Investigating the items which are used in TIMSS study and based on the relatively common curriculums of 40 more countries, the styles of them are a bit different from those of our textbooks of primary and secondary school. Hence, we consider that the construction and implementation of our mathematical curriculum may be a large scale of experiment for the improved curriculum carried by the nation. Additionally, we propose less compulsive curriculum than the current for minimizing the possible trial and errors.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.7-12
• /
• 1997

The curriculum differentiation is supposed to maximize individual strength and possibilities of the students, and to maximize educational efficiency by differentiating the instructions according to students' abilities, aptitudes, needs and interests. The Ministry of Education has suggested a stepwise model for school mathematics. This model is named "Stepwise Curriculum Differentiation"(段階別 敎育課程 差別化). In this paper, we would like to make a specific proposal for the 7th curriculum. Our proposal reflects fully the guidelines of the Ministry of Education. It is also based on the national curriculum history up to the present time. It could be used as a reference for the continuing work of curriculum reformation. We suggest dividing the contents of mathematics for 1-10th graders into about 15 steps, to use the step-based textbooks instead of the grade-based ones, and to prepare evaluation standards for each step. We also suggest that the classes for grades 11-12 be organized according to their optional courses and/or their steps.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집
• /
• 제20권3호
• /
• pp.483-502
• /
• 2006

이 연구에서는 학습결손이 심한 학생들에게 학교수업 정규시간에 이해하지 못한 내용을 별도로 보충할 수 있는 기회를 마련해 주고자 제7차 교육과정에서 도입한 중학교 수학교과 특별보충과정을 동료친구에 의한 멘토링 수업방법으로 운영하여 성과를 얻고 있는 사례를 질적으로 분석하여 멘토링 수업을 특별보충과정 운영에 적용할 수 있는 가능성을 탐색하고 이 방법의 효율적인 운영방안에 대해 알아보고자 한다.

• 한국학교수학회논문집
• /
• 제17권4호
• /
• pp.437-464
• /
• 2014

본 연구는 2009 개정 수학과 교육과정과 CCSSM의 초등학교 수학과 교육과정의 비교 분석을 통하여 한국과 미국의 교육과정에 대한 공통점과 차이점을 알아보고, 우리나라 초등 수학과 교육과정의 개발 방향에 대한 시사점을 얻고자 하였다. 이를 위해 한국의 2009 개정 초등학교 수학과 교육과정과 미국의 CCSSM에서 각각의 내용 영역명과 해당 영역의 학년 분포 및 내용 체계, 내용 규준으로 구분하여 분석하였다. 이 분석을 기반으로 첫째, CCSSM 내용 영역명에 따른 2009 개정 초등학교 수학과 교육과정의 해당 내용을 분류하여 학년군별로 취합하였고, 둘째, 한국과 미국의 교육과정 내용을 주제별로 분류하여 비교하였으며, 셋째, 이 과정에서 한국과 미국의 초등 수학교육의 특징을 살펴보았다.

• 아동학회지
• /
• 제25권4호
• /
• pp.129-145
• /
• 2004

This study examined the effects of Literature-based Mathematical Activities using scaffolding (LMS) on the mathematical achievement, interest, and vocabulary of day care children. The experimental group of 15 boys and 15 girls was exposed to both literature and teacher's scaffolding while the comparison group of 14boys and 16 girls had traditional mathematics curriculum. The experiment was carried out for 8 weeks. ANCOVA and T-test were employed for a statistical analysis. The results revealed statistically significant differences in mathematical achievement, interest, and vocabulary between an experimental and control groups. We can conclude, therefore, that LMS is more effective in developing children's mathematical thinking abilities than a traditional mathematical curriculum.

• 대한수학교육학회지:수학교육학연구
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.391-405
• /
• 2008

탱그램이라고 불리는 전통적인 칠교판(도형판)에 대한 기존의 연구들도 학교수학의 내용을 바탕으로 한 활동의 가능성에 초점을 두고 있다. 현행 수학과 교육과정에서 탱그램을 언급하고 있기는 하지만 교과서의 활용에서 탱그램의 유용한 특성을 제대로 반영하지 못할 뿐만 아니라 교육과정상의 다른 내용과 제대로 연결을 시키지 못하고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 초등학교 수학 교과서와 익힘책에 제시하고 있는 탱그램 사용이 교육과정과의 관련에서 갖는 문제점과 한계를 분석하면서, 학교 현장에서 바르게 활용할 수 있는 방안(제대로 그리기, 모양이 아닌 다각형 만들기, 수학적사고와 관련하여 현 교육과정의 수준에 적합한 활동분석, 교육과정의 한계를 넘나들며 활용할 수 있는 수준별 도형 탐구의 예시 등)과 유사탱그램까지 좀 더 확장하여 보다 적극적으로 활용할 수 있는 대안을 제안하였다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제44권4호
• /
• pp.477-496
• /
• 2005

This study looked into the procedures of and the status on the implementation of the new 7th national curriculum at the secondary school level. It examined the processes taken by the local boards of education in due course of facilitating the schools with the new curriculum implementation. More specifically the study examined, 1) the degree to which the particular innovation(i.e., student-centered, flexible and autonomous school-based curriculum, etc.) is being implemented as planned; and 2) how it is being implemented. It conducted a situation-oriented analysis in cooperation with three local boards of education. Classroom observations, teacher interviews, questionnaires for teachers and supervisors were utilized and the three major criteria of interpreting the result were the three core concepts of the 7th national curriculum, that is, the degree of '(1)reorganization, (2)student-centeredness and (3)diversification/ specialization' of the curriculum. Detailed documentation on the processes of the local bureaus of education and on the classroom practices are made in order to provide schools and policy makers with relevant and practical suggestions for further improvement of curriculum implementation. Ultimately, The greater the awareness of the intention of the new curriculum on the part of both the staff at the local school boards and teachers, the greater the degree of implementation. And the higher the quality of planning to meet problems, the greater the degree of implementation. Continuous efforts are needed to involve teachers in the process of curriculum implementation. The greater the active support of the teachers, the greater the degree of implementation.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집
• /
• 제34권2호
• /
• pp.69-117
• /
• 2020

이 글은 ⟪2015 교육과정⟫에 따른 중학교 수학 교과서를 분석한 것이다. 중학교 수학 교과서를 분석한 기록을 남기는 것이 훗날의 교과서를 위해 필요하다고 판단하여, 이 글을 쓰게 되었다. 이 글은 주로 (수학교육학적인 내용이 아닌) 수학적인 내용을 다루고 있다. 이 글의 내용에 관한 수학교육계와 수학계의 더욱 깊이 있는 검토와 토론이 이어지기를 희망한다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제15권3호
• /
• pp.209-228
• /
• 2011

Many studies such as Pepin (1999a; 1999b), Kaiser (2002), and Park & Leung (2006) revealed that there is a strong dependence of mathematics teaching on cultural traditions in different countries. This study was set up as a detailed comparison between the intended curricula in Berlin and Hong Kong to explore how cultural tradition influenced the intended curriculum. In this study, the intended curriculum is what the (local, state or national) curriculum developers stipulate in the official documents. The German educational system is influenced by the curriculum tradition called Didaktik. Didaktik is a tradition about teaching and learning. Since 16th century, Didaktik has been the most important tool for planning, enacting, and thinking about teaching in most of northern and central Europe (Westbury, 1998). On the other hand, the education system in Hong Kong is influenced by both the Anglo-Saxon curriculum tradition and the Confucian heritage culture (CHC). It was found in this study that, although many studies revealed that there is a strong dependence on cultural traditions of mathematics teaching in different countries, other factors such as social factors or the education system also played an important part in shaping the intended mathematics curriculum. So a simplistic view of dependence of the curriculum on cultural traditions is not warranted. The formation of the curriculum is a much more complicated process encompassing various factors including needs of society, advancement of technology, and government policies at different levels.