• 영어어문교육
• /
• 제9권spc호
• /
• pp.39-60
• /
• 2003

The purpose of the present classroom research is to investigate teacher talk in the primary English classroom with special reference to teacher questions. The analysis of the recorded teacher questions reveals that the teacher asks a carefully structured sequence of questions leading to the clear pedagogical goals she has set: to encourage students to correct themselves; to find out what students know; to personalize the task; and to elicit culture talk. It is also shown that her use of display questions is supportive of learning; the teacher provides feedback in a way which is as communicative as possible in the context of the classroom and which facilitates the attainment of the pedagogical purposes. All these findings suggest that we consider how teacher talk may perform communicative functions in the classroom context rather terms defining communicative teacher talk purely in terms of the norms of communication outside the classroom.

• 한국지구과학회지
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.78-90
• /
• 2008

수업 중 발화의 대부분을 차지하는 것은 교사의 발화이다. 그러나 교사는 항상 교사의 입장에서만 말하는 것이 아니라 학생 발화와 유사한 발화를 통해 학생들의 수업에 도움을 줄 수 있을 것으로 생각되나 이에 대한 연구는 아직 부족한 것이 현실이다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 이러한 발화 형태를 유사학생발화라 명명하고, 유사학생발화가 다수 관찰될 것으로 예상되는 방송 수업(EBS의 2005학년도 중 1 과학 수업 중 지구과학 부분)을 연구하여 유사학생발화를 '수업 중, 학생 발화와 같은 역할을 하나, 교사를 통해 이루어지는 모든 발화의 통칭'이라 정의하였으며, Lemke(1990)의 학생발화분류를 토대로 연구 대상인 수업 중 나타난 유사학생발화를 교사가 개입하는 형태의 유사학생발화와 교사가 개입하지 않는 유사학생발화로 크게 유사학생발화를 나누고 교사 개입 유사학생발화로 유사 교사-학생 간 협의(Pseudo Teacher-Student Conferences), 유사 삼단계 담화(Pseudo Triadic Dialogue), 유사 교재 활용 담화(Pseudo External Text Dialogue), 유사 학생 질문 담화(Pseudo Student-Questioning Dialogue), 유사 교사-학생 간 담화(Pseudo Teacher-Student Dialogue), 유사 교사-학생 간 토론(Pseudo Teacher-Student Debate), 유사 실 담화(Pseudo True Dialogue), 유사 학생 상호 담화(Pseudo Cross Dialogue), 유사 동료 학생 발화 (Pseudo classmate talk)를, 그리고 교사 미개입 유사학생발화로 유사 학생 독백/유사 수업 중 잡담(Pseudo student monologue/Pseudo side talk)을 분류하였다. 또한 이러한 분류와 함께 각 유사학생발화의 실례를 소개하고 그 특징을 기술하였다.

• 이베로아메리카
• /
• 제23권2호
• /
• pp.135-178
• /
• 2021

A teacher's talk does not make a simple delivery of information. It reflects the role of the teacher, since the language used by a teacher intervenes in a crucial way in the complex mechanisms that underlie teaching and learning of foreign languages. In this sense, the ways in which teachers give feedback have an impact on the process, not only of learning, but also of teaching. The important role of emotional factors in learning has resonated strongly in the intuition of many second and foreign language teachers. As a result, over the past three decades, research on foreign language acquisition has confirmed the hypothesis that language learning is enhanced by rapport between teacher and student. This study analyses the positive feedback given by native Spanish teachers in the context of university classes in Korea. The positive words from a language teacher are related to forming emotional factors such as motivation, attitude, interest, self-confidence, self-esteem, anxiety, and empathy, which directly influence in the acquisition of Spanish. 35 hours of oral practical classes taught by three native teachers of Colombian, Spanish and Mexican nationality were examined. According to the result, almost all the correct answers from students were corresponded with some type of positive feedback. The most frequent strategies are making a compliment, an approval, a repetition, and laughter or non-verbal cues. It is interesting to observe that teachers don't use only a single strategy to provide positive feedback, but instead combine multiple ways to enrich the positiveness of the feedback.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.26-40
• /
• 2005

Based on the Vygotskian perspective that a learner's thinking is constituted in his or her talk and the assumption that student talk in the classroom may occur in more than one way, this study examined discursive practices of students in Korean high school science classrooms. Data came from $11^{th}$ grade earth science classrooms where the Group Investigation (GI) method was implemented. Data source included verbatim transcripts developed from video recordings of class sessions in which students presented their science projects to the whole class and exchanged questions and answers during the presentations. The analysis of the videotape transcripts revealed five different modes of student talk, including 1) retrieving information, 2) reformulating information, 3) building on one's own experience, 4) elaborating current understanding, and 5) negotiating meanings with others. Considering that each of the five modes had different value for learning science, it was recommended that the teacher should engage students in more active modes of discourse and guide them into more sophisticated understanding of science.

• 아동학회지
• /
• 제22권4호
• /
• pp.213-224
• /
• 2001

This study was conducted to explore the communication processes and contents between cooperating teachers and their student teachers during student teaching conferences. To reach this purpose, five research questions were generated. 15 cooperating teachers and their 15 student teachers from 9 kindergartens located in Seoul and Ilsan city participated in the study. The conferences of each dyad were tape-recorded for further analysis. "Analyzing System for Interaction of Learning" designed by Thies-Sprinthall was used to analyze the data. The research findings were as follows: First, cooperating teachers talked more than the student teacher during the conference. Second, the cooperating teachers used more directive talk than indirective talk. Third, the speaking patterns of the student teachers revealed that student teachers express their opinions frequently(55.6% of total pattern). Fourth, cooperating teachers focused their remarks more on the instructional issues(48.5%). The cooperating teachers emphasized on the operation of class(23.1%), other subject(12.3%), practical guidance(10.7%), self-assesment(5.4%) in order. Fifth, the most emphasized issue by student teachers was the instructional matters which was reported by 53.4% of the entire subjects.

• 한국초등수학교육학회지
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.385-415
• /
• 2011

본 연구는 초등수학영재 수업에서 일어나는 교사와 학생간의 언어적 의사소통을 살펴보면서 수업 중 교사와 학생의 발언 흐름과 수학적 의사소통이 활발히 일어나는 상황에서의 교사 발언 유형의 분석을 통해 효과적인 수학적 의사소통의 언어흐름을 제안하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 이를 위해 Flanders 언어상호작용분석 프로그램으로 수학영재지도의 현장 교육 경력이 많고 수학영재교육분야의 전문가 추천을 받은 한 명의 우수 교사의 수업 사례를 분석하였다. 연구 결과 일반 학급 수업에서의 경향과 다른 양태였으며, 수학적 의사소통의 수준이 높고 활발하게 일어나는 과정은 대부분 (질문)${\rightarrow}$(활동 및 사고 대기)${\rightarrow}$(넓은 답변)${\rightarrow}$(활동)의 언어 흐름 형태였으며, 수학적 의사소통을 가장 활발하게 하는 교사 발언의 유형은 비지시적 발언 중 '아이디어 수용'인 것으로 나타났다. 이를 바탕으로 영재학급에서의 효과적인 언어 상호작용의 흐름을 제안하였다.

• 영어어문교육
• /
• 제3호
• /
• pp.185-201
• /
• 1997

This study explores perspectives on responding to EFL students' compositions at the semantic level. In the last three decades, there has been a shift from product-oriented approach to process-oriented one to teaching writing. The shift has led to the criticism of the traditional view on teacher response. The traditional view has been under attack for its overemphasis upon form and ineffectiveness on improving student writing skill. It is also noted that research into students' reactions to the traditional teacher response has been inconclusive. The process-oriented approach, on the other hand, draws its attention to meaning and the logical development of thought as well as linguistic matters. In this context, the present study discusses what EFL teachers need to take into account in providing the semantic-level feedback on students' compositions. Firstly, teacher response to student writing is on-going; teacher feedback involves teacher intervention in the drafting process, the revision process, and the presentation of product. Secondly, in the writing conferences, the teacher provides students an opportunity to talk about writing, assistance and advice on the content/meaning of the written text, helping them expand and clarify thinking about audience(reader) and purpose.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제22권3호
• /
• pp.223-243
• /
• 2019

Researchers have been attending to the potential of curriculum materials as resources for professional development. In order for a curriculum material to fulfil such purpose, curriculum authors should intentionally attend to educativeness of the material. A feature of educative material is that its voice speaks to teachers. In this study, I explore educativeness of Algebra teacher guides by attending to their voice. In particular, I focused on the use of pronouns, modality, and imperatives. Findings indicate that some teacher guides have more educative voice than the others and that the amount each guide talk to teachers were less than sufficient. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.

• 영어어문교육
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.77-101
• /
• 2006

The present study examines various pedagogical functions of conversational repair strategies employed by the teacher in the ESL classroom. As part of interactional resources, conversational repair is defined as the treatment of trouble occurring in interactive language use and is originally designed to deal with communication problems. Research on conversational repair has focused on ordinary conversation and organization of repair practices. Studies on more pedagogical functions of repair sequences initiated by the teacher are very few. The data were from five hours of ESL structure classes in an intensive English institute at a large U.S. university. They were closely transcribed and microanalyzed following the conversation-analytic methodology. The analysis found that ESL teachers' repair techniques not only resolve communication problems but they are also designed to serve several important instructional purposes of teaching the target language. They include creating opportunities of comprehensible input, inducing modified comprehensible output from students, guiding and controlling student output, and initiating corrections by initiating repair.

• 한국학교수학회논문집
• /
• 제22권4호
• /
• pp.439-460
• /
• 2019

본 연구는 교사 질문, 말하기 차례 규칙, 학생 발화 사이의 관계를 파악하고자 수학 교실 내의 언어적 상호작용을 분석하였다. 이를 위해 같은 학교에 근무하고 있는 세 명의 초등학교 교사들(1학년 교사 2명과 2학년 교사 1명)의 수학 수업을 대화분석 기법을 사용해서 분석하였다. 각 교사들의 수업은 일 년에 걸쳐 총 3회 관찰되었다. 분석 결과, 교사가 열린 질문(예를 들어 "왜" 그리고 "어떻게" 질문들과 "동의합니까" 그리고 "동의하지 않습니까" 질문들)을 사용하고 비전통적인 말하기 차례 규칙(교사발문-학생답변-교사 피드백; Mehan, 1979)을 사용하였을 때는 학생들이 자신의 생각을 정당화하고 다른 사람의 생각을 반박하기 위해 교실 담화에 보다 적극적으로 참여하여하는 것으로 나타났다. 하지만, 교사가 닫힌 질문(예를 들어 "무엇" 질문들)을 사용하고 전통적인 말하기 차례 규칙을 사용하였을 때 학생들은 정답을 말하는 것에만 관심을 갖고 짧은 발화만을 사용하는 것으로 드러났다. 본 연구의 시사점은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 교사들은 효과적인 수학-대화 학습공동체를 만들기 위해 열린 질문을 사용하고 비전통적인 말하기 차례 규칙을 사용해야 한다. 둘째, 교사들이 발화기법에 관한 실질적인 지식을 얻을 수 있도록 교육 행정가와 수학 교육자들이 지원해야 한다.