1 |
Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 107-128.
DOI
|
2 |
Beyer, C. J., & Davis, E. A. (2009). Using educative curriculum materials to support preservice elementary teachers’ curricular planning: A comparison between two different forms of support. Curriculum Inquiry, 39(5), 679-703.
DOI
|
3 |
Brown, S., Breunlin, R., Wiltjer, M., Degner, K., Eddins, S., Edwards, M., ... Usiskin, Z. (2008). The University of Chicago School Mathematics Project: Algebra. Teacher's Edition. Chicago: McGraw-Hill.
|
4 |
Buschang, R. E., Chung, G. K. W. K., Delacruz, G. C., & Baker, E. L. (2012). Validating measures of algebra teacher subject matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Assessment, 17(1), 1-21.
DOI
|
5 |
Bush, S. B., & Karp, K. S. (2013). Prerequisite algebra skills and associated misconceptions of middle grade students: A review. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(3), 613-632.
DOI
|
6 |
Charles, R., Hall, B., Kennedy, D., Bellman, A., Bragg, S., Handlin, W., ...Wiggins, G. (2015). Algebra 1 Common Core. Teacher's Edition. New Jersey: Pearson.
|
7 |
Collopy, R. (2003). Curriculum materials as a professional development tool: How a mathematics textbook affected two teachers' learning. Elementary School Journal, 103(3), 287-311.
DOI
|
8 |
Cooper, K., & Olson, M. R. (1996). The multiple 'I's' of teacher identity. In M. Kompf, W. R. Bond, D. Dworet, & R. T. Boak (Eds.), Changing research and practice: Teachers professionalism, identities and knowledge (pp. 78-89). Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
|
9 |
Davis, K. S. (2002). “Change is hard”: What science teachers are telling us about reform and teacher learning of innovative practices. Science Education, 87(1), 3-30.
DOI
|
10 |
Davis, A., & Krajcik, J. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3-14.
DOI
|
11 |
Davis, E. A., Palincsar, A. S., Smith, P. S., Arias, A. M., & Kademian, S. M. (2017). Educative curriculum materials: Uptake, impact, and implications for research and design. Educational Researcher, 46(6), 293-304.
DOI
|
12 |
Deemer, S. (2004). Classroom goal orientation in high school classrooms: Revealing links between teacher beliefs and classroom environments. Educational Research, 46(1), 73-90.
DOI
|
13 |
Dowling, P. (1996). A sociological analysis of school mathematics texts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31(4), 389-415.
DOI
|
14 |
Doerr, H. M. (2004). Teachers' knowledge and the teaching of algebra. In The Future of the Teaching and Learning of Algebra The 12th ICMI Study (pp. 265-290). Springer, Dordrecht.
|
15 |
Drake, C., Land, J., & Tyminski, M. (2014). Using educative curriculum materials to support the development of prospective teachers' knowledge. Educational Researcher, 43(3), 154-162.
DOI
|
16 |
Even, R. (1993). Subject-matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: Prospective secondary teachers and the function concept. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(2), 94-116.
DOI
|
17 |
Gumperz, J. J. (1977). Sociocultural knowledge in conversational inference. In M. Saville-Troike (Ed.), Linguistics and anthropology (pp. 191-211). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
|
18 |
Gamoran, A., & Hannigan, E. C. (2000). Algebra for everyone? Benefits of college-preparatory mathematics for students with diverse abilities in early secondary school. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(3), 241-254.
DOI
|
19 |
Geary, D. C., Boykin, A. W., Embretson, S., Reyna, V., Siegler, R., Berch, D. B., & Graban, J. (2008). The Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
|
20 |
Great Minds (2017). Eureka Math. Eureka Basic Curriculum Files. Algebra I. Retrieved from https://greatminds.org/download_pages/eurekabasicfiles?opened_product_id=92
|
21 |
Haimes, D. H. (1996). The implementation of a “function” approach to introductory algebra: A case study of teacher cognitions, teacher actions, and the internded curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(5), 582-602.
DOI
|
22 |
Halliday, M., & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Hodder Arnold.
|
23 |
Hand, V., & Gresalfi, M. S. (2015). The joint accomplishment of identity. Educational Psychologist, 50(3), 190-203.
DOI
|
24 |
Harre, R. (2012). Positioning theory: Moral dimensions of social-cultural psychology. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 191-206). NY: Oxford University Press.
|
25 |
Herbel-Eisenmann, A. (2007). From intended curriculum to written curriculum: Examining the “voice” of a mathematics textbook. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(4), 344-369.
|
26 |
Lappen, G., Phillips, E., Fey, J., & Friel, S. (2014). Connected mathematics 3 teacher's guide. Boston: Pearson Prentice Hall.
|
27 |
Herbel-Eisenmann, A., Kristmanson, P., & Wagner, D. (2011). Modality in French immersion mathematics. In M. Setati, T. Nkambule, & L. Goosen (Eds.), Proceedings of the ICMI Study Mathematics and language diversity (pp. 144-152). Sao Paulo, Brazil.
|
28 |
Izsak, A., Caglayan, G., & Olive, J. (2009). Meta-representation in an Algebra I classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(4), 549-587.
DOI
|
29 |
Koljonen, T., Ryve, A., & Hemmi, K. (2018). Analysing the nature of potentially constructed mathematics classrooms in Finnish teacher guides - the case of Finland. Research in Mathematics Education, 20(3), 295-311.
DOI
|
30 |
Liang, J. H., Heckman, P. E., & Abedi, J. (2012). What do the California standards test results reveal about the movement toward eighth-grade algebra for all? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(3), 328-343.
DOI
|
31 |
McCrory, R., Floden, R., Ferrini-Mundy, J., Reckase, M., & Senk, S. (2012). Knowledge of algebra for teaching: A framework of knowledge and practices. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(5), 584-615.
DOI
|
32 |
National Mathematics Advisory Panel (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
|
33 |
Nathan, M. J., & Koedinger, K. R. (2000). Teachers’ and researchers’ beliefs about the development of algebraic reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(2), 168-190.
DOI
|
34 |
Parks, A. N. (2010). Metaphors of hierarchy in mathematics education discourse: The narrow path. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 42(1), 79-97.
DOI
|
35 |
Reyes, X. A., & Rios, D. I. (2003). Imaging teachers: In fact and in the mass media. Journal of Latinos and Education, 2(1), 3-11.
DOI
|
36 |
Ahl, L., Koljonen, T., & Helenius, O. (2017). The voice of curriculum developers in teacher guides. For the Learning of Mathematics, 37(2), 35-39.
|
37 |
Alshwaikh, J. (2016). Investigating the geometry curriculum in Palestinian textbooks: towards multimodal analysis of Arabic mathematics discourse. Research in Mathematics Education, 18(2), 165-181.
DOI
|
38 |
Ball, L., & Cohen, K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is-or might be-the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6-14.
DOI
|
39 |
Parks, A. N., & Wager, A. (2015). What knowledge is shaping teacher preparation in early childhood mathematics? Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 36(2), 124-141.
DOI
|
40 |
Peercy, M. M., Martin-Beltran, M., Silverman, R. D., & Daniel, S. (2015). Curricular design and implementation as a site of teacher expertise and learning. Teachers and Teaching, 21(7), 867-892.
DOI
|
41 |
Roth McDuffie, A. M., & Mather, M. (2006). Reification of instructional materials as part of the process of developing problem-based practices in mathematics education. Teachers and Teaching, 12(4), 435-459.
DOI
|
42 |
Remillard, J. T. (1999). Curriculum materials in mathematics education reform: A framework for examining teachers’ curriculum development. Curriculum Inquiry, 29(3), 315-342.
DOI
|
43 |
Remillard, T. (2000). Can curriculum materials support teachers’ learning? Two fourth-grade teachers’ use of a new mathematics text. Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 331-350.
DOI
|
44 |
Remillard, T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211-246.
DOI
|
45 |
Rennert-Ariev, P. (2008). The hidden curriculum of performance-based teacher education. Teachers College Record, 110(1), 105-138.
|
46 |
Reyes, X. A., & Rios, D. I. (2003). Imaging teachers: In fact and in the mass media. Journal of Latinos and Education, 2(1), 3-11.
DOI
|
47 |
Sanchez, V., & Llinares, S. (2003). Four student teachers' pedagogical reasoning on functions. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6(1), 5-25.
DOI
|
48 |
Reynolds, C. (1996). Cultural scripts for teachers: Identities and their relation to workplace landscapes. In M. Kompf, W. R. Bond, D. Dworet, & R. T. Boak (Eds.), Changing research and practice: Teachers professionalism, identities and knowledge (pp. 69-77). Washington, DC: The Falmer Press.
|
49 |
Rotman, B. (1988). Towards a semiotics of mathematics. Semiotica, 72(1/2), 1-35.
DOI
|
50 |
Rowland, T. (2005). The pragmatics of mathematics education. Taylor & Francies e-Library.
|
51 |
Shkedi, A. (1998). Can the curriculum guide both emancipate and educate teachers? Curriculum Inquiry, 28(2), 209-229.
DOI
|
52 |
Smith, J. B. (1996). Does an extra year make any difference? The impact of early access to algebra on long-term gains in mathematics attainment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18(2), 141-153.
DOI
|
53 |
Spielhagen, F. R. (2006). Closing the achievement gap in math: The long-term effects of eighthgrade algebra. Journal of Advanced Academics, 18(1), 34-59.
DOI
|
54 |
Stein, M. K., & Baxter, J. A. (1990). Subject-matter knowledge and elementary instruction: A case from functions and graphing. American Educational Research Journal, 27(4), 639-663.
DOI
|
55 |
Stein, M. K., Kaufman, J. H., & Sherman, M. (2011). Algebra a challenge at the crossroads of policy and practice. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 453-492.
DOI
|
56 |
Stump, S. L. (2001). Developing preservice teachers' pedagogical content knowledge of slope. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 20(2), 207-227.
DOI
|
57 |
Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2003). Higher order thinking skills and low-achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 145-181.
DOI
|
58 |
Sugrue, C. (1997). Student teachers' lay theories and teaching identities: Their implications for professional development. European Journal of Teacher Education, 20(3), 213-225.
DOI
|
59 |
Taylor, P. C. (1996). Mythmaking and mythbreaking in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31(1-2), 151-173.
DOI
|
60 |
Wilson, M. R. (1994). One preservice secondary teacher's understanding of function: The impact of a course integrating mathematical content and pedagogy. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(4), 346-370.
DOI
|
61 |
Zohar, A., Degani, A., & Vaaknin, E. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs about low-achieving students and higher order thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(4), 469-485.
DOI
|
62 |
Hermans, H. J. M. (2013). The dialogical self in education: Introduction. Journal of ConstructivistPsychology, 26(2), 81-89.
DOI
|