• Communications of the Korean Mathematical Society
• /
• v.12 no.4
• /
• pp.865-868
• /
• 1997

Let R be a ring with a unity and let M be a unitary left R-module. In this paper, we establish [5, Proposition 2.8] by showing the proof of it. Moreover, from the above result, we obtain some properties of direct projective modules which have the summand sum property.

• The Pure and Applied Mathematics
• /
• v.6 no.1
• /
• pp.9-12
• /
• 1999

The purpose of this paper is to show that by the divisibility of a direct injective module, we obtain some results with respect to a direct injective module.

• Kyungpook Mathematical Journal
• /
• v.49 no.3
• /
• pp.557-562
• /
• 2009

A module M is said to be SIP-extending if the intersection of every pair of direct summands is essential in a direct summand of M. SIP-extending modules are a proper generalization of both SIP-modules and extending modules. Every direct summand of an SIP-module is an SIP-module just as a direct summand of an extending module is extending. While it is known that a direct sum of SIP-extending modules is not necessarily SIP-extending, the question about direct summands of an SIP-extending module to be SIP-extending remains open. In this study, we show that a direct summand of an SIP-extending module inherits this property under some conditions. Some related results are included about $C_{11}$ and SIP-modules.

• Kyungpook Mathematical Journal
• /
• v.50 no.1
• /
• pp.101-107
• /
• 2010

A module M is said to satisfy the $EC_{11}$ condition if every ec-submodule of M has a complement which is a direct summand. We show that for a multiplication module over a commutative ring the $EC_{11}$ and P-extending conditions are equivalent. It is shown that the $EC_{11}$ property is not inherited by direct summands. Moreover, we prove that if M is an $EC_{11}$-module where SocM is an ec-submodule, then it is a direct sum of a module with essential socle and a module with zero socle. An example is given to show that the reverse of the last result does not hold.