• 한국사회복지학
• /
• 제57권4호
• /
• pp.5-33
• /
• 2005

이 연구의 목적은 문민 정부와 국민의 정부 시기의 한국 사회복지정책 결정구조를 비교함으로써, 1990년대 후반 이후 발생한 한국 사회복지정책의 변화원인을 탐구하는 것이다. 사회복지정책 결정구조를 비교하기 위해 이 연구는 정책 연결망 분석방법을 활용하였다. 정책 연결망 분석은 정책 결정과정에 참여하는 행위자들 사이의 관계 구조를 파악할 수 있게 함으로써, 쉽게 관찰하기 어려운 정책 결정 구조의 특성을 파악하는데 유용하다. 6개의 정책영역과 그에 속하는 52개의 정책사건에 대한 정책 연결망 분석 결과 문민 정부의 정책 결정 구조에서 주변적인 위치에 있던 시민사회가 국민의 정부 시기 동안에는 정책 결정 구조의 중심에 진입하였음을 발견하였다. 반면에 문민 정부의 사회복지 정책 결정 구조에서 비토 지점으로 역할해 온 경제관련 부처들은 국민의 정부 시기 동안 그에 상응하는 역할을 수행하지 못했던 것으로 나타났다. 결론적으로, 두 정부 시기의 정책 결정 구조에는 상당한 차이가 존재함을 알 수 있었고, 1990년대 후반 이후 발생한 한국 사회복지정책의 변화는 이러한 정책 결정 구조의 변화양상과 밀접한 관련이 있는 것으로 생각된다.

• 사회복지연구
• /
• 제39호
• /
• pp.189-219
• /
• 2008

본 논문은 한국의 발전국가 하에서의 사회정책 결정과정 및 정책산출의 동태성을, 1970년대 초반의 국민복지연금제도의 입안과정을 중심으로 분석하고자 한 것이다. 이를 위하여 본 연구는 정책결정과정, 외적 제약요인으로서의 정책맥락(policy context), 그리고 정책결정의 산물로서의 정책산출(policy outputs)을 연결하는 과정지향적 관점에서 통합적인 분석틀을 구성하였다. 이론적 논의와 관련해서는 정책네트워크 모형을 주로 참조하였다. 구체적 분석변수로서는 우선 정책맥락의 경우는 정치, 사회, 경제적 환경의 세 가지 측면에서 분석하였다. 사회정책결정 및 정책네트워크와 관련해서는 i) 창도자, 동기, 촉발장치 ii) 참여자의 수 및 핵심적 행위자 iii) 참여자의 이해(interests) iv) 갈등하는 집단 및 이들의 주장 차이 v) 참여자들 간의 상호작용이라는 다섯 가지 변수를 중심으로 분석하였다. 정책산출은 '주로 반영된 이해'와 '의도한 정책내용의 변화'를 통하여 고찰하였다.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.97-111
• /
• 2016

In the creative economy paradigm, motivation of the opportunity based startup is a continuous concern to policy-makers. Recently, bigdata anlalytics challenge traditional methods by providing efficient ways to identify social trend and hidden issues in the public sector. In this study the authors introduce a case study using social bigdata analytics for conducting policy analysis. A semantic network analysis was employed using textual data from social media including online news, blog, and private bulletin board which create buzz on the startup business. Results indicates that each media has been forming different discourses regarding government's policy on the startup business. Furthermore, semantic network structures from private bulletin board reveal unexpected social burden that hiders opening a startup, which has not been found in the traditional survey nor experts interview. Based on these results, the authors found the feasibility of using social bigdata analysis for policy-making. Methodological and practical implications are discussed.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.129-139
• /
• 2015

Background: Policy network theory was proved to be an appropriate analytic tool for the current social welfare policy making process. This study aimed to analyze policy making process related to the nurse expansion and policy output while focusing on the interactions and activities among various policy actors. Methods: In this study, we used reports related to the need for expansion of nursing personnel journals, dissertations, newspaper articles, for hearings and debate policies for securing nurse data, and interviews. We examined three components of policy network, that is, policy actors, interactions, linkage of interest. Results: For that to expand the nurse before the 2000s in expanding the supply of medical supplies have been conducted without much disagreement among policy actors under the government's initiative. However, there was lacked a close relationship between the expanding supply of nurses and inaccurate analysis of supply and demand. As the policy is applied between the various policy actors' needs and claims, conflict was intensified and many policy options had been developed. Government only took a role as a coordinator among policy actors in the 2000's. Also, it was difficult to find sufficient and clear evidence that policy-making process based on fair judgment. Conclusion: Therefore, it is urgently required to determine the policy through a social consensus to address the appropriate policy means and the process by correct analysis of the policy issues.

• 한국사회복지학
• /
• 제49권
• /
• pp.264-295
• /
• 2002

This study aims to identify the enactment factors of the National Basic Livelihood Institution in context of policy making process by using Kingdon's policy Stream Model. The findings of this study can be summarized as follows. First, an economic crisis has worsened social problems, and the president Kim Dae-jung recognized these problems as serious and worried about social confusion and polarization. Second, NGOs as like People's Solidarity for Participatory Democracy put efforts into enacting the Act. Also, the president Kim's government faced a series of political crisis and needed political solution including foundation of a new party, which considered social welfare most important. Third, the PSPD designed the Act. But the alternatives of related government ministries were not selected. In conclusion, the National Basic Livelihood Institution was enacted by the combination of these three factors stream. Especially the political stream was strongest.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.57-94
• /
• 2000

Korea's social health insurance system was introduced in 1977, which has made a universal coverage possibly by July 1989. Korean government had pursued a single objective for the last decade to put the whole population under the coverage of medical security, and the objective was achieved within 12 years. The rapid accomplishment is primarily due to such factors as limited benefits, high copayment rate, low contributions as well as rapid economic growth. There are several sources of pressure for the implementation of social health insurance such as health professional group, labor unions, politicians, international organizations etc.. However it is important to look at the feasibility of social health insurance. Among other things, it is necessary to identify the administrative infrastructure of insurance system and to assess income for source of fund. As many developed countries, Korea began to apply health insurance to the employees of the large firms, and the expansion based on employment status. Thus the several funds system was inevitable according to the gradual expansion strategy. However many persons had criticized several funds system in respect with equity and efficiency aspects. In the short history of the Korean health insurance, whether one fund or sever or funds had been the most controversial issue. In Febrary 1999, the National Assembly passed the act of one fund system. From July 2000 separate funds will be unifed under new health insurance scheme. In this study we will analyze the policy making process on implementation, expansion and integration of health insurance system of Korea. And also analyse problems related to policy making.

• 정보화정책
• /
• 제23권2호
• /
• pp.54-72
• /
• 2016

이 글은 최근 주목받고 있는 온라인 청원과 공공문제 해결을 위한 크라우드 소싱 등 디지털 사회혁신(Digital Social Innovation) 사례를 분석하여 시민의 정책 관여가 민주주의에 기여하고 있음을 논증한다. 디지털 사회혁신은 크라우드 소싱이나 온라인 청원과 같은 디지털 기술을 활용하여 정책 수립과 집행 과정에 시민의 참여를 보장하기 위해 노력하는 것이다. 시민의 적극적인 정책 개입을 통해 정책 수립 과정은 물론 정책 자체의 민주성을 강화하는 일련의 과정은 개입 정당성(Throughput Legitimacy)이 강화되는 효과를 가진다. 시민의 동의와 협의 과정은 정책의 투명성, 효과성을 강화함으로써 정책 거버넌스의 질과 효능감을 향상시킬 수 있는 것이다. 이 글에서는 개입 정당성이 민주주의의 발전에 기여할 수 있다는 점을 경험 연구로 증명하기 위해 디지털 사회혁신의 다양한 사례들을 분석하였다. 이를 통해 그 동안 산발적이고 다양하게 시도되었던 디지털 사회혁신이 민주주의의 발전적 요소를 가지고 있고, 다양한 가치를 내재하고 있는 현대 사회의 시민의 참여 효능감을 높이는데 일조하고 있다고 평가하였다. 마지막으로 민주주의의 발전을 위한 개입정당성을 확보하기 위한 노력의 일환으로 디지털사회혁신이 가지는 함의에 대해 제시하였다.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제16권4호
• /
• pp.86-111
• /
• 2006

Either ways of understanding health care as a commodity or public work are at opposite ends of health care spectrum. These two rival conceptions reflected by viewpoint(ideology) would lead to different directions in policy-making for health care reform. The purpose of this study is to access the value differences of experts' policy views about health care issues by analyzing the extent of consensus among experts in the field of health care. Using primary data obtained through a mail survey of 558 experts in the field of health care, we analyzed the differences of experts' opinions about characteristics of health care market, policy issues and values Gdeology). The study represents from 50-50 split analysis, entropy index, and factor analysis that the wide spread disagreements over health policy, which is a major barriers to effective policy-making, could be caused by the ideological perception differences among experts. This implies that, if values play an important role in policy-making, we should identify the differences in value and seek ways to balance among the diverse values such as efficiency, equity, freedom, and security. For this, the policy issues debated on differences in values should be reconciled for narrowing gaps of experts' perceptions through various ways.

• 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
• /
• 제29권3호
• /
• pp.1-34
• /
• 2020

Purpose Due to the complexity of policy environment in modern society, it is accepted as common basics of policy design to mix up a variety of policy instruments aiming the multiple functions. However, under the current situation of written-down policy specification, not only the public officers but also the policy researchers cannot easily grasp such frameworks as policy portfolio. The purpose of this study is to develop "Policy Attributes Taxonomy" identifying and classifying the public programs to help making decisions for allocative efficiency with effectiveness-based information. Design/methodology/approach To figure out the main scheme and classification criteria of Policy Attributes Taxonomy which represents characteristics of public policies, previous theories and researches on policy components were explored. In addition, to test taxonomic feasibility of certain information system, a set of "Feasibility Standards" was drawn from "requirements for well-organized criteria" of eminent taxonomy literatures. Finally, current government classification system in the area of social service was tested to visualize the application of Taxonomy and Standards. Findings Program Taxonomy Schemes were set including "policy goals", "policy targets", "policy tools", "logical relation" and "delivery system". Each program and project could be condensed into these attributes, making their design more easily distinguishable. Policy portfolio could be readily made out by extracting certain characteristics according to this scheme. Moreover, this taxonomy could be used for rearrangement of present "Program Budget System" or estimation of "Basic Income".

• 대한예방한의학회지
• /
• 제24권2호
• /
• pp.83-94
• /
• 2020

Backgrounds : To reduce the patients' economic burden of herbal decoctions use, in 2012, Korean government decided to implement the pilot project of herbal decoctions coverage in the National Health Insurance. Objectives : This study aimed to analyze the policy decision-making process for the pilot insurance project in 2012. Methods : Official documents, research papers, statistical reports, and news articles, etc. on the coverage of herbal decoctions were searched and collected. We used the Kingdon's Policy Stream Model to analyze how the policy of pilot project of herbal decoctions coverage was decided, and who were the main activists for the decision-making process. Results : Components to be included in the 'Problem stream' were the decline in the profits of Korean Medicine institutions, the contraction of the herbal decoctions use, and the fiscal surplus of National Health Insurance. In the 'Policy stream', there were several model studies for herbal decoctions coverage, and examples of herbal benefits in other social insurances. In the 'Political stream', there were the legislative initiatives by member of the National Assembly and the promotion of insurance coverage by the Association of Korean Medicine(AKOM), etc. Policy window for herbal decoctions coverage was opened by the combination of these three streams with the efforts of policy activists, such as the executives of AKOM, and policy researchers. Conclusions : The policy decision process for health insurance coverage of herbal decoctions was analyzed using Kingdon's model, and the analysis shows that the combination of political streams and entrepreneurs' competencies can be an important driving force in policy decision making.