• Child Health Nursing Research
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.56-64
• /
• 2019

Purpose: This study was conducted to obtain data for the development of an effective fall risk assessment tool for pediatric inpatients through a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic test accuracy of existing scales. Methods: A literature search using Medline, Science Direct, CINAHL, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was performed between March 1 and 31, 2018. Of 890 identified papers, 10 were selected for review. Nine were used in the meta-analysis. Stata version 14.0 was used to create forest plots of sensitivity and specificity. A summary receiver operating characteristic curve was used to compare all diagnostic test accuracies. Results: Four studies used the Humpty Dumpty Falls Scale. The most common items included the patient's diagnoses, use of sedative medications, and mobility. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the nine studies were .79 and .36, respectively. Conclusion: Considering the low specificity of the pediatric fall risk assessment scales currently available, there is a need to subdivide scoring categories and to minimize items that are evaluated using nurses' subjective judgment alone. Fall risk assessment scales should be incorporated into the electronic medical record system and an automated scoring system should be developed.

• 대한음성학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한음성학회 2004년도 춘계 학술대회 발표논문집
• /
• pp.239-242
• /
• 2004

An automatic pronunciation correction system provides users with correction guidelines for each pronunciation error. For this purpose, we propose a speech recognition system which automatically classifies pronunciation errors when Koreans speak a foreign language. In this paper, we also propose machine scoring methods for automatic assessment of pronunciation quality by the speech recognizer. Scores obtained from an expert human listener are used as the reference to evaluate the different machine scores and to provide targets when training some of algorithms. We use a log-likelihood score and a normalized log-likelihood score as machine scoring methods. Experimental results show that the normalized log-likelihood score had higher correlation with human scores than that obtained using the log-likelihood score.

• 정보보호학회논문지
• /
• 제29권5호
• /
• pp.1179-1189
• /
• 2019

사이버보안성 평가란 자산분석, 위협분석, 취약성 분석을 통하여 자산 및 시스템의 위험 수준을 평가하여 적절한 보안조치를 적용하는 일련의 과정으로 증가하는 사이버 공격에 대한 대비를 위해 체계적인 사이버보안성 평가가 요구된다. 이에 CWSS, CVSS 등 사이버 보안 수준 측정을 위한 다양한 지표가 개발되고 있으나 표준화된 보안성 평가 결과를 통해 위험 우선순위에 따라 적절한 보안조치를 적용하기 위한 정량적 방법은 미흡한 실정으로 대상자산이 가지는 특성, 적용되어 있는 환경, 자산에 미치는 영향 등을 고려한 평가 체계가 필요하다. 이에 본 논문에서는 기존의 사이버 보안 평가 방법 분석을 기반으로 정량적 위험 평가 모델을 정립하고 정립한 모델에 적용하기 위한 평가 요소들의 정량화를 위한 방법을 제시한다. 사이버 보안성 평가 시 필요한 정성적 속성 요소들의 수준을 AHP 기법을 통한 보안요건별 가중치, 위협 별 영향도, 취약점 요소 별 점수화를 통한 위협 성공 가능성에 대한 확률값 산출을 통해 통계적 데이터를 적용해야 하는 정량적 방법의 한계점을 보완하여 표준화된 사이버 보안 평가 체계를 확립할 것으로 기대된다.

• 비교교육연구
• /
• 제28권2호
• /
• pp.77-95
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 수업관찰을 위한 양적 측정도구로서 CLASS (Classroom Assessment Scoring System)를 소개하고 그 특성을 이해하는데 목적이 있다. CLASS는 수업의 질을 평가하기 위해 개발되었고 미국 전역에서 활용되고 있다. CLASS는 수업에서 교사와 학생의 상호 작용을 측정하고 주제 영역 및 학생연령 별로 상호 작용을 확인하는 도구로서 세 가지 질적 영역, 즉, 정서적 지원, 학급 조직, 교육지원 등으로 구성된다. CLASS는 학생들의 학습을 위한 핵심으로 교사와 학생들 간의 상호 작용 패턴에 중점을 둔다. 관찰자가 교사와 학생을 10분~15분 동안 3~4번 관찰하며, 관찰은 행동과 반응의 유형에 따라 1에서 7사이의 연속된 등급척도로 평가된다. CLASS의 활용 가능성을 확인하기 위해, 경력이 많은 전문가 교사의 학급과 초임교사의 학급에 적용하여 분석해 보았다. 전문가 교사는 학생들이 주도적으로 수업을 이끌어가는 데 집중을 하였고, 초임 교사는 교과의 내용을 다루는 데 집중을 하였다. 초임교사는 학급 분위기를 긍정적으로 만들고, 학생들에게 피드백 해주는 데 비교적 많은 노력을 기울였다. 전문가 교사는 학생의 의견, 질문, 미세한 감정 등을 파악하고 드러내는 데 보다 많은 노력을 기울였다. CLASS는 교실에서 어떤 유형의 행동과 상호 작용이 발생하는지를 기록하고 이를 분석하는 관찰도구로서 활용이 가능할 것이다.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제23권54호
• /
• pp.167-177
• /
• 2000

The problem of system reliability is very important issue in the nuclear power plant, because the failure of its system brings about extravagant economic loss, environment destruction, and quality loss. This paper therefore proposes a normalized scoring model by the qualitative factors order to evaluate the robust reliability of nuclear power plants under uncertainty. Especially, the qualitative factors including risk, functional, human error, and quality function factors for the robust justification has been also introduced. Finally, the analytical reliability and safety assessment model developed in this paper can be used in the real nuclear power plant.

• Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
• /
• 제40권5호
• /
• pp.211-219
• /
• 2014

Objectives: The purpose of this research was to create a scoring system that provides comprehensive assessment of patients with oromaxillofacial cancer or odontogenic infection, and to statistically reevaluate the results in order to provide specific criteria for elective tracheostomy. Materials and Methods: All patients that had oral cancer surgery (group A) or odontogenic infection surgery (group B) during a period of 10 years (2003 to 2013) were subgrouped according to whether or not the patient received a tracheostomy. After a random sampling (group A: total of 56, group B: total of 60), evaulation procedures were observed based on the group classifications. For group A, four factors were evaluated: TNM stage, reconstruction methods, presence of pathologic findings on chest posterior-anterior (PA), and the number of systemic diseases. Scores were given to each item based on the scoring system suggested in this research and the scores were added together. Similarly, the sum score of group B was counted using 5 categories, including infection site, C-reactive protein level on first visit, age, presence of pathologic findings on chest PA, and number of systemic diseases. Results: The scoring system rendered from this research shows that there is a high correlation between the scores and TNM stage in oral cancer patients, or infection sites in odontogenic infection patients. However, no correlation between pathologic findings on chest PA could be found in either group. The results also indicated that for both groups, the hospital day increased with the tracheostomy score. The tracheostomy score cutoff value was 5 in oral cancer patients and 6 in odontogenic infection patients which was used for elective tracheostomy indication. Conclusion: The elective tracheostomy score system suggested by this research is a method that considers both the surgical and general conditions of the patient, and can be very useful for managing patients with severe oral disease.

• 한국토양비료학회지
• /
• 제49권5호
• /
• pp.572-576
• /
• 2016

Soil quality assessment is an important tool for environmental management in an agricultural field. It can be used to evaluate the health of the soils and to establish the basis for sustainable urban agriculture and soil management. For this study, the chemical properties of the soils used for urban agriculture were examined. Results of the soil analysis for chemical properties were applied to soil quality assessment system, which is composed of principal component analysis, application to scoring function and derivation of soil quality index (SQI). Soil pH, electrical conductivity (EC), organic matter (OM), total nitrogen (T-N) were determined for minimum data set (MDS) according to principal component analysis. Based on the results of scoring for four indicators (pH, EC, OM, T-N), soil pH was the indicator that needs the most urgent management. Results of SQI derivation showed that many of the urban farms appeared to be insufficient score in comprehensive soil quality assessment. In conclusion, soil management practices based on scores derived from soil chemical indicators need to be carried out to maintain sustainable urban agricultural soil environment and to provide easy-to-understand information to urban farmers.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제35권3호
• /
• pp.88-99
• /
• 2007

The AS9100 aerospace standard has become the aerospace quality management system standard instead of ISO9001 and MIL-Q-9858A by international aerospace manufacturing companies. The organization which adopts AS9100 standard is to be certified by an independent third party certification body as IAQG requests. The quality management system certification assessor shall utilize the AS9101 standard prepared by IAQG to assess AS9100 organization. In this paper, AS9101 quality system questionnaire is analyzed and scoring method which characterizes AS9101 is reviewed. Score attained can be utilized as an organizational quality index. Practical data gathered by certified assessors from 2002 to 2007 are analyzed and suggested to improve the organization's system operational efficiency based on the analysis results. Suggestions can be utilized by any organization to prepare assessment or to enhance the level of quality system maturity. This study is applicable to the future as well as present aerospace manufacturing activities throughout the world.

• 정보보호학회논문지
• /
• 제28권6호
• /
• pp.1449-1461
• /
• 2018

소프트웨어 취약점의 수가 해마다 증가함에 따라 소프트웨어에 대한 공격 역시 많이 발생하고 있다. 이에 따라 보안 관리자는 소프트웨어에 대한 취약점을 파악하고 패치 해야 한다. 그러나 모든 취약점에 대한 패치는 현실적으로 어렵기 때문에 패치의 우선순위를 정하는 것이 중요하다. 본 논문에서는 NIST(National Institute of Standards and Technology)에서 제공하는 취약점 자체 정보와 더불어, 공격 패턴이나 취약점을 유발하는 약점에 대한 영향을 추가적으로 고려하여 취약점의 위험도 평가 척도를 확장한 스코어링 시스템을 제안하였다. 제안하는 스코어링 시스템은 CWSS의 평가 척도를 기반으로 확장했으며, 어느 기업에서나 용이하게 사용할 수 있도록 공개된 취약점 정보만을 활용하였다. 이 논문에서 실험을 통해 제안한 자동화된 시스템을 소프트웨어 취약점에 적용함으로써, 공격 패턴과 약점에 의한 영향을 고려한 확장 평가 척도가 유의미한 값을 보이는 것을 확인하였다.

• Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.206-224
• /
• 2017

This article proposes a logic model for assessing the performance of the outcome of public research as a technology valuation method. It consists of two parts and eight steps. The first part is a scoring system and the second part is a validation process of the performance index derived from scoring by valuation method. The scoring in the first part generally requires a focus group method to find out the value drivers and make an evaluation table. The reason why we call it the technology valuation method is that the first part is derived from the simple evaluation of technology value using checklists for value drive. The second part is the regular technology valuation process. The model is designed for the measurement of unquantifiable outcome. Is knowledge or scientific outcome comparable to the measured outcome? If possible, how big is the unquantifiable outcome? This model is based on financial valuation techniques with clear or acceptable market data. Therefore, it cannot work solely for unquantifiable outcomes without comparable measurable outcomes, unlike economic valuation.