• 한국정보통신학회논문지
• /
• 제19권4호
• /
• pp.984-990
• /
• 2015

현대 지식정보사회에서 IT 소양과 활용은 개인의 경쟁력 차원에서 중요해지고 있다. 또한 국가적으로 IT 산업이 국가경제에서 차지하는 비중이 날로 커짐에 따라 많은 국가들이 IT 산업의 육성에 힘쓰고 있다. 특히 IT산업은 소수의 인재가 전체 산업을 이끌고 있어, 정보영재의 발굴과 육성은 국가적으로 중요한 과제가 되어가고 있다. 현재 영재교육은 정부방침에 따라 융합형태의 교육을 지향하고 있다. 본 연구의 목적은 정보영재아동에 있어서 정보과목과 융합과목의 상관관계를 분석하는 것이다. 이를 위해 서울시내 한 대학부설 과학영재교육원의 정보영재아동을 대상으로 재학기간의 성적을 바탕으로 분석하였다. 통계분석 결과 정보과목과 융합과목의 상관관계를 보여주었다. 즉 정보과목을 잘하면 융합과목도 잘하는 것으로 분석되었다. 본 연구결과는 향후 융합과목의 비중, 교육내용의 구성 등에 중요한 기초자료로 사용될 것이다.

• 영재교육연구
• /
• 제11권3호
• /
• pp.23-44
• /
• 2001

기존의 교실에서 교사가 학생들에게 무엇을 또 어떻게 탐구할 것인가에 대한 절차적인 지식을 가르칠 수는 있었으나, 그러한 가운데 우리가 놓치고 있었던 것은 과학을 하는 것(doing science)에 대한 본질이었다. 특히 영재들의 학문적 욕구는 평범한 아이들과는 질적으로 다르기 때문에, 과학 영재들에게 그러한 요구와 필요성은 상당히 큰 것이었으나 그 요구와 필요성에 부합하는 연구와 프로그램의 개발이 뒷받침되어주지 못한 것이 현실이다. 과학 영재를 위한 교과과정은 학습 내용, 학습과정, 산출물에 있어서 영재들을 위해 특수화가 필요하다. 이러한 현실적 문제에 봉착하여, 본 연구는 하나의 작은 시도로서 과학영재들을 위한 프로젝트형 탐구학습의 프로그램을 개발, 현장에 적용, 그리고 제한적이나 그 효과성도 부분적으로 검토하였다. 실제 문제들과 이슈들을 다루는 프로젝트형 탐구학습을 수행함으로서 학생들은 고차원적인 사고 능력을 기르며, 소집단활동을 통해서 학생들이 복잡한 실제 문제들을 창의적으로 해결할 수 있음을 보여주었다. 학생들은 이러한 형식의 수업을 통하여 또한 내용을 배우고 적용할 수 있게 되며 비판적 사고력을 배양하고 평생학습자로서의 자질을 키우며 의사소통능력과 상호협동능력을 자연스럽게 익힐 수 있음을 제시했다. 프로젝트형 탐구학습은 최근 여러 학문영역에서 널리 사용되고 있다. 하지만 아직 영재교육프로그램에서 그 사용은 그리 활발하게 이루어지고 있지 않는 실정이다 프로젝트형 탐구학습은 과학영재들의 특성과 잘 부합되므로 과학영재들을 위한 프로그램에 성공적으로 사용되어질 수 있음을 본 연구는 시사하고 있다.

• 대한지구과학교육학회지
• /
• 제4권3호
• /
• pp.242-250
• /
• 2011

The present study compared the contents and methods of elementary science education in schools and education institutes for the gifted and surveyed the contents and methods of science education for the gifted desired by students in order to set the direction of elementary science education at education institutes for the gifted. For this study, we conducted interviews with a 5th-grade male student and a 6th-grade female student at the science class of the Education Institutes for the Gifted run by Iksan Education Office. Besides, printed materials were collected and used to refer to the contents of education. The results of this study are as follows. First, in school, the student learn according to the curriculum defined by the government and the contents begin with elementary and basic ones and move step by step to deeper and wider scientific principles. On the contrary, in the education institute for the gifted, the contents of teaching materials are decided at the teacher's discretion, and because they target gifted children, their level is higher than that of the science curriculum in school. Second, the most common teaching method in school is lecturing and, next, experiments, group activities, etc. On the contrary, in the education institute for the gifted, experiments are used most frequently, and various educational methods are adopted including lectures, project learning and cyber learning. Third, the contents of science education that gifted children wanted to learn are not limited to any specific area. Science education methods that gifted children wanted were various, including project learning, group activities, experiments, and report making and presentation.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제30권2호
• /
• pp.189-203
• /
• 2011

The object of this study is to investigate the views of scientifically gifted children about the purpose of scientists' experiments and school science experiments. The children's views were examined using a open-ended questionnaire survey. And then the responses from the children were analyzed with categorization. The results from the study are as follows: First, the children's views about the purpose of scientists' experiments and school science experiments were classified to 2 top-level, 5 mid-level and 21 sub-level categories. Second, it was found that the children considered internal values of doing experiments are more worthy than the social and personal usefulness of the experiments. Third, the gifted children mentioned most frequently that the purposes of the scientist experiment is 'to get the evidences for their theory and argument which is unusual in the regular children's views. Also the discovery of new phenomena and materials, and the generation of new theories and ideas were mentioned as purposes of the scientist experiments. Fourth, the students frequently stated that school science experiments support effective learning of science subject enhancing subject interests and better explanation/understanding. Fifth, relatively many students thought that the purposes of school science experiments are different with those of scientist experiments. Based on the results from the study, some educational suggestions are discussed.

• 인터넷정보학회논문지
• /
• 제17권3호
• /
• pp.87-93
• /
• 2016

현대 지식정보사회에서 정보통신기술은 개인, 사회 및 국가적 차원에서 매우 중요하다. 특히 국가적 차원에서 있어서 정보통신기술관련산업은 매우 중요한 비중을 차지하고 있으며, 다른 산업과는 달리 다양한 기반시설을 필요로 하지 않으며 소수의 인재들에 의하여 단기간에 부흥할 수 있는 장점이 있다. 이러한 관점에서 정보영재 발굴과 교육은 국가의 미래에 있어서 매우 중요한 과제가 되어가고 있다. 과거의 영재교육의 선발은 주로 지필고사를 통해 실시되었으나, 사교육 등 다양한 폐해로 인해 2013년 이후로 관찰추천제 방식이 전면적으로 실시되었다. 본 연구의 목적은 정보영재아동의 관찰추천제 입학제도의 타당성을 분석하는 것이다. 이러한 연구목적을 위해 서울시의 한 대학부설 과학영재교육원에 재학한 정보영재아동들을 대상으로 입학성적과 수료성적의 상관관계 분석을 통해서 관찰추천제의 타당성을 분석하였다. 통계처리결과 정보영재아동은 입학성적과 수료성적의 상관관계를 보였다. 즉 정보영재아동의 경우 입학성적이 좋으면 수료성적이 좋음을 보였다. 본 연구결과는 향후 영재교육에 있어서 관찰추천제의 유용성을 판단하는 데 귀중한 자료가 될 것으로 기대한다.

• 대한지구과학교육학회지
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.74-82
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of the science gifted children's creativity and scientific attitude development by e-PBL based scientific writing program. This program is composed of 4 instructions (13 hours), and its learning contents are made up to guide reading the related science books and understanding the contents through mind map to find out a solution by themselves, also, making an independent problem into group issue and setting up the plan for solution through small group cooperative learning, finally, performing activities like writing, presentation, evaluation and discussion according to the plan for solution. To examine the effect of creativity and scientific attitude by the program, 40 students of elementary science gifted children group in the Busan national university of education were selected for an experimental group. The review result is that, Firstly, the program affected positively creativity improvement of elementary science gifted children, Secondly, the program affects positively scientific attitude improvement of them as well. In conclusion, the program affects positively their creativity and scientific attitude.

• 영재교육연구
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.69-92
• /
• 1997

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effects of the enrichment program for the gifted on gifted childrens development of the logical thinking and science process skills. The enrichment program consists of 200 enrichment courses in language arts, mathematics, sciences, social sciences and thinking for children at the age of 30 months to Grade 8. Enrichment programs are characterized as process-oriented, student-choice available, activities-oriented, open-ended, and interdisciplined. Subjects were 123 gifted children from Grade 1 to 3 at the Korean Academy of Gifted Education (KAGE), whose IQ scores were above 130 at their entry point to KAGE. Children were divided into two groups depending the duration of the program participation. Older Group participated in the program for longer than 13 months, while Newer Group did for shorter than 12 months. Mean of IQs of the two groups were not significantly different. They were tested on Logical Thinking Test and Integrated Process Skills Test revised by KEDI into Korean version in 1991. Descriptive statistics were calculated and group differences were analyzed with t-test, and scheffe test. The main finding were as follows: There were not significant differences between gender. Children in higher grades showed higher level of development. Older groups showed significantly higher level of logical thinking level of development. Older group showed significantly higher level of logical thinking and process skills than the Newer group inspite of the similar IQ levels to each other. The longer the gifted child participate in the enrichment program, the higher the development of childrens thinking skills.

• 한국심리학회지 : 문화 및 사회문제
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.143-156
• /
• 2005

영재 교육은 현재 법국적이고 범사회적인 차원에서 관심이 고조되고 있다. 본 연구는 새로운 심리 검사 도구를 통해 밝혀진 영재의 특성이 기존의 영재 선발의 문제점에 주는 시사점을 알아보고자 수행되었다. 연구 대상은 과학/수학 영재 집단이었고 이들의 특성을 명확하게 구분해 줄 통제 집단으로 학업우수자 및 고지능자집단이었다. 영재의 타고난 기질적 특성과 후천적인 성격을 구분할 수 있는 '기질 및 성격검사 JTCI'와 함께, 진단성 지능검사를 사용하였다. 영재들은 흔히 어떤 타고난 특성이 있다고 특징지어지기 때문에, 학업우수자의 비교할 때, 기질 면에서 어떤 차이가 있을 것이 예상되었다. 그렇지만 기질은 물론 성격의 여러 하위 척도 상에서 영재 집단과 통제 집단간에 어떤 유의미한 차이도 발견되지 않았다. 이 결과는 현재의 영재집단은 그 선발 방식의 다면성이나 복잡성에도 불구하고, 시실상 학업성적 우수자와 차별성이 없음을 보여준다. 이 결과를 바탕으로 확대일로 있는 영재교육의 미래에 대한 몇 가지 제안을 하였다.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제25권spc5호
• /
• pp.507-521
• /
• 2007

The purposes of this study were to develop a science program using scientists as the material and to examine the effects of this in teaching science to gifted elementary students. The program included low modules, each of which was devised based on the literature examination of the lives, scientific achievements and contributions of four scientists: Ju-Myeong Seok, Jang-Chun Woo, L. Pasteur, and M. Curie. In this study, the four modules were applied and taught to fifteen gifted children in the 6th grade. After the program was taught to the children, post-questionnaires, examination of the subjects' output, in-depth interviews and classroom investigations were carried out and analyzed by the researchers. The results of the study were as follows. The majority of the subjects showed a considerable amount of interest in the program, participated actively and enthusiastically in the given tasks until they solved the problems, and their output produced a number of novel ideas. The results of the post-questionnaires indicated that the program was appropriate fer the subjects and effective in teaching scientifically-gifted children. Moreover, the analysis of the in-depth interviews conducted with the subjects showed that the subjects had opportunities to think about scientific attitudes, the relationships between science, society and nations, the contributions that scientists can possibly make to society, and the identity of scientists, despite the existence of differences between individual children.

• 대한지구과학교육학회지
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.1-11
• /
• 2011

This study was carried out to analyze primary gifted education systems in Korea and China. The results of the research are as follows : (1) The objectives of the gifted children education of two countries are same. They intend to dig out hidden talent and giftedness of gifted children. They emphasize the development of creativity in the gifted children through the various special teaching methods. (2) Korea has been doing the gifted education limitedly focused on the 4th grade students in elementary school after regular school curriculum, but China has performed gifted education from primary school to university quite systematically. (3) Korea tend to select the students based on the objective sources such as teachers' observation, recommendation, school scores, but this has limit to find out the real potential genius. China has the similar problems, but they consider of the comprehensive talented and abilities in students at school unit level. (4) Both countries have the teacher training systems for study to make more efficient programs and methods in gited education. It has been emphasized the necessity of gifted education to expand the range and target. Most of all it is very essential to train the teachers to manipulate the gifted education programs. The government should be persue the multiplicity and professionality now. So there are so many things to learn from China since they managed the gifted education in a regular curriculum of the school.