• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제38권1호
• /
• pp.1-11
• /
• 2000

Relining and rebasing are essential for long-term success and oral health in removable prosthodontics. Major features of failures between metal base and relining resins are adhesive failure due to lack of chemical bonding. The purpose of this study was to find a better metal primer and metal surface treatment method that enhance the bonding strength with relining resin materials. The surfaces of ticonium alloys were treated with $25{\mu}m$ sandblasting (Group A), stone wheel(Group B), stone wheel and EZ oxisor(Group C), $75{\mu}m$ sandblasting(Group D) and EZ oxisor application after $75{\mu}m$ sandblasting(Group E). They were subdivided into no primer application (Group I), MR bond application(Group II) and Metafast bonding liner (Group III). Then specimens were completed though being bonded with relining resins. The specimens were stored in $38^{\circ}C$ water for 48 hours and tensile strength was measured using the universal testing machine. The results were as follows, 1. Primer application groups showed higher bond strength than no primer application group(p<0.05). 2. In comparison with primer application groups, MR bond group showed higher bond strength than Meta fast bonding liner application group(p<0.05). 3. In comparison with surface treatment methods, Bond strengths of group A and B were significantly different with group C, D, and E, and group C were significantly different with group D, and E in no primer application group()(0.05). In primer application groups, group A, B, C were significantly different with group D and E(p<0.05). According to results of this study, Metal primer application and metal surface roughening were considered to be advantageous for relining of metal base dentures.

• 대한치과기공학회지
• /
• 제30권2호
• /
• pp.79-86
• /
• 2008

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect retention element formed by metal surface treatment method on the bond strength of indirect composite resin and metal. The metal specimens were cast from Ni-Cr alloy($Rexillium^{(R)}$ III). They were divided into 5 groups by applied retention element: $50{\mu}m$ aluminium oxide sandblasting group, $250{\mu}m$ aluminium oxide sandblasting group, 0.2mm retention crystal group, 10% $H_{2}SO_{4}$ solution etching group, $110{\mu}m$ $Rocatec^{TM}$ Plus system group. Total 50 metal specimens were veneered with Sinfony indirect composite resin system. Specimens were tested for shear bond strength on an Instron universal testing machine and fracture mode of fractured specimens were analyzed by SEM and EDS. 1. 0.2 mm retention crystals were most effective in improving the resin-metal shear bond strength (p<0.05). 2. Sandblasting by $250{\mu}m$ aluminium oxide were more effective than sandblasting by $50{\mu}m$ aluminium oxide in improving the resin-metal shear bond strength(p<0.05). 3. Fracture mode of resin-metal fractured surface were cohesive failure mode in 0.2mm retention crystal, mixed failure mode in sandblasted specimens, etched specimens and the specimens sandblasted with $110{\mu}m$ $Rocatec^{TM}$ Plus system.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.362-371
• /
• 1995

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength between composite resin and glass ionomer cement according to surface treatment methods of glass ionomer cement. Sixty round acrylic cylinders were fabricated. And then, a round undercut cavity(8 mm diameter, 2.5mm depth) was prepared in the center of the every acrylic cylinder. After all cavities were restored by using light-cured glass ionomer cement. A total of sixty acrylic cylinders restored with glass ionomer cement were divided into 4 groups according to surface treatment methods of glass ionomer cement. The surface treatment of each group were as follows : control group : no treatment Group 1 : acid etching Group 2 : sandblasting Group 3 : air-podwer abrasive polishing The composite resin was bonded to glass ionomer cement of each specimens. And the shear bond strength was tested with a universal testing machine at a cross-head speed of 1mm/min and 500kg in full scale. The results were as follows : 1. The sandblasting group(group 2) had the highest shear bond strength with $272.50{\pm}24.96\;kg/cm_2$ and the acid etching group(group 1) had the lowest shear bond strength with $192.89{\pm}29.32kg/cm_2$. 2. The no treated group(control group) had higher shear bond strength than acid etching group(group 1) (p<0.05). 3. The sandblasting group(group 2), air-powder abrasive polishing group(group 3) and no treated group(control group) had higher shear bond strength than the acid etching group(group 1) (p<0.05). 4. The sandblasting group(group 2) and air-powder abrasive polishing group(group 3) had higher shear bond strength than the no treatment group(control group), but there was not significant(p>0.05).

• 대한치과교정학회지
• /
• 제45권6호
• /
• pp.299-307
• /
• 2015

Objective: The aims of this study were to compare the shear bond strength between orthodontic metal brackets and glazed zirconia using different types of primer before applying resin cement and to determine which primer was more effective. Methods: Zirconia blocks were milled and embedded in acrylic resin and randomly assigned to one of four groups: nonglazed zirconia with sandblasting and zirconia primer (NZ); glazed zirconia with sandblasting, etching, and zirconia primer (GZ); glazed zirconia with sandblasting, etching, and porcelain primer (GP); and glazed zirconia with sandblasting, etching, zirconia primer, and porcelain primer (GZP). A stainless steel metal bracket was bonded to each target surface with resin cement, and all specimens underwent thermal cycling. The shear bond strength of the specimens was measured by a universal testing machine. A scanning electron microscope, three-dimensional optical surface-profiler, and stereoscopic microscope were used to image the zirconia surfaces. The data were analyzed with one-way analyses of variance and the Fisher exact test. Results: Group GZ showed significantly lower shear bond strength than did the other groups. No statistically significant differences were found among groups NZ, GP, and GZP. All specimens in group GZ showed adhesive failure between the zirconia and resin cement. In groups NZ and GP, bonding failed at the interface between the resin cement and bracket base or showed complex adhesive and cohesive failure. Conclusions: Porcelain primer is the more appropriate choice for bonding a metal bracket to the surface of a full-contour glazed zirconia crown with resin cement.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제41권3호
• /
• pp.379-386
• /
• 2003

Statement of problem. Resin cements are widely used in adhesive dentistry specially on all ceramic restorations. It is needed to find out adequate bonding strength between different porcelain surface treatments, commercially available porcelains, and different resin cement systems. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to evaluate shear bond strength of resin cements bonded to porcelains in three different modalities; 5 different porcelain surface treatments, 3 different resin cement systems and 3 different commercially available pressable porcelains. Material and Method. This study consisted of 3 parts. Part I examined the effect of five different surface treatments on the pressable porcelain. Fifty discs (5 mm in diameter and 3 mm in height) of Authentic porcelain were randomly divided into 5 groups (n = 10). The specimens were sanded with 320 grit SiC paper followed by 600 grit SiC paper. The specimens were treated as follow: Group 1-Sandblasting (aluminum oxide) only, Group 2 - sandblasting/ silane, Group 3 - sandblasting/ acid etching/ silane, Group 4 - acid etching only, Group 5 - acid etching/ silane. Part II examined the shear bond strength of 3 different resin cement systems (Duolink, Variolink II, Rely X ARC) on acid etching/ silane treated Authentic pressable porcelain. Part 3 examined the shear bond strength of Duolink resin cement on 3 different pressable porcelains (Authentic, Empress I, Finesse). All cemented specimens were stored in distilled water for 2 hours and tested with Ultradent shear bond strength test jig under Universal Instron machine until fracture. An analysis of variance(ANOVA) test was used to evaluate differences in shear bond strength. Result. The shear bond strength test resulted in the following: (1) Acid etched porcelains recorded greater shear bond strength values to the sandblasted porcelains. (2) Silane treated porcelains recorded greater shear bond strength values to non-silane treated porcelains. (3) There was no significant difference between sandblasting/ acid etching/ silane treated and acid etching/ silane treated porcelains. However those values were much higher than other three groups. (4) The shear bond strength with Variolink II was lower than the value of Duolink or Rely X ARC. (5) The shear bond strength of Finesse was lower than the value of Authentic or Empress I.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.114-121
• /
• 1993

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect on treatment methods to shear bond strength between composite resin and amalgam when the alloy surface was finished with a diamond wheel or an sandblaster. Forty round acrylic cylinders were fabricated with a diameter of 33mm and a height of 20mm to fit into the device used during shear bond strength testing. A round undercut cavity (diameter, 8mm: depth, 2.5mm) was prepared in the center of the acrylic surface and the cavity was restored using a amalgam. A total of 40 acrylic cylinders with amalgam were divided into 4 groups according to treatment method. The group treatment were as follows : Group 1 : acid etching after finishing the amalgam with diamond wheel Group 2 : no acid etching after finishing the amalgam with diamond wheel Group 3 : acid etching after sandblasting the amalgam Group 4 : no acid etching after sandblasting the amalgam The shear bond strength of composite resin bonded to amalgam of each specimen was tested with a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5mm/min and 500kg in full scale. The results were as follow: 1. After diamond finishing, the non-acid etching group had highest shear bond strength with 7.29kg/$cm^2$ and after sandblasting, the acidetching group had lowest shear bond strength with 4.49kg/$cm^2$. 2. In both diamond finishing and sandblasting group, acid etching of the roughened amalgam surface decreased the shear bond strength. 3. The group treated with a diamond wheel had higher shear bond strength those treated with an sandblaster but there was not significanat.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.103-113
• /
• 1993

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the tensile bond strength of composite resin inlays according to the their internal surface treatment and types of luting cement and compared them with the conventional direct resin filling thchnique. Class II cavities were prepared in 50 extracted human molar teeth, and then equally divided into five groups. Group 1 : Cavities of control group were directly filled with P-50. Group 2 : Cavities of resin inlay group were luted with resin cement. Group 3 : Cavities of resin inlay group were luted with luting G-I cement. Group 4 : Cavities of resin inlay group were luted with resin cement after sandblasting. Group 5 : Cavities of resin inlay group were luted with luting G-I cement after sandblasting. All specimens were polished with same method and stored in normal saline for 24 hours before testing. An Universal Testing machine(Model No. AGS-100A, Shimadzu, Japan) was used to apply tensile loads in the vertical direction, and the force required for separation was recorded with a cross-head speed of 5mm/min and 100kg in full scale. The results were as follows : 1. The mean tensile bond strength was lowest in group luted with luting G-I cement, with measurements of $14.45{\pm}0.78(kg/cm^2)$ and highest in group luted with resin cement after sandblasting, with measurements of $49.6{\pm}2.74(kg/cm^2)$. 2. The tensile bond strength was greater in resin inlay groups luted with resin cement than in control group and resin inlay groups luted with luting G-I cement(P<0.05). 3. The tensile bond strength was lower in resin inlay groups luted with luting G-I cement than in control group(P<0.05). 4. The tensile bond strength was greater in resin inlay groups luted with resin cement or luting G-I cement after sandblasting than without that(P<0.05).

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.65-74
• /
• 2019

PURPOSE. To evaluate and compare the effect of different materials and techniques on the shear bond strength of veneering ceramic materials to zirconia. MATERIALS AND METHODS. 136 sintered zirconia cubes were prepared and randomly divided into four study groups according to corresponding methods of surface treatment and materials: GLN (grinding followed by laser scanning using Noritake Cerabien ZR), SLN (sandblasting followed by laser scanning using Noritake Cerabien ZR), GLV (grinding followed by laser scanning using VITA VM 9), and SLV (sandblasting followed by laser scanning using VITA VM 9). Spraying technique was performed to coat the core. Profilometer, SEM, XRD, EDS, universal testing machine, and stereomicroscope were used to record surface roughness Ra, surface morphology, phase transformation, elemental compositions, shear bond strength SBS values, and failure types, respectively. Specimens were investigated in unaged (not immersed in artificial saliva) and aged (stored in artificial saliva for a month) conditions to evaluate SBS values. RESULTS. Grinding and GLN as first and second surface treatments provided satisfactory Ra values in both conditions ($1.05{\pm}0.24{\mu}m$, $1.30{\pm}0.21{\mu}m$) compared to sandblasting and other groups (P<.05). The group GLN showed the highest SBS values in both conditions ($30.97{\pm}3.12MPa$, $29.09{\pm}4.17MPa$), while group SLV recorded the lowest ($23.96{\pm}3.60MPa$, $22.95{\pm}3.68Mpa$) (P<.05). Sandblasting showed phase transformation from t-m. Mixed failure type was the commonest among all groups. CONCLUSION. GLN showed to be a reliable method which provided satisfactory bond strength between the veneer ceramic and zirconia. This method might preserve the integrity of fixed dental crowns.

• 대한치과교정학회지
• /
• 제29권4호
• /
• pp.445-456
• /
• 1999

최근에는 교육수준의 향상, 소득증대, 대중매체의 발달 등으로 인하여 성인 교정환자의 수요가 상당히 증가하고 있다. 성인환자는 어린환자에 비해 상대적으로 구강내 도재수복물을 장착하고 있는 경우가 많아 도재치에 대한 교정용 브라켓의 직접접착의 기회도 증가하고 있다. 자연치에서는 법랑질을 산부식하여 비교적 쉽게 접착력을 증진시킬 수 있으나 도재치에서는 임상에서 브라켓이 너무 쉽게 탈락하거나 오히려 도재파절의 위험성이 존재하여 도재치에 대한 효과적인 직접접착법에 대하여 관심을 갖게 되었다. 그러나, 이러한 접착효율에 대한 다양한 연구가 있었으나 아직 정설로 받아들여지는 것은 없는 실정이다. 본 연구는 임상에서 비교적 간단히 이용할 수 있는 몇 가지 방법을 in vitro 상의 실험을 통하여 그 결과를 비교검토하여 효과적인 방법을 제시하고자 시행되었다. 우선 장석형 도재인 Ceramco II로 도재 시편을 제작하였다. 도재의 표면처리방법은 Glazing한 도재 자체를 사용하기 위해서는 무처리하였으며, 거칠기를 부여하기위해서는 불화수소산으로 산부식하거나 Microetcher II로 Sandblasting, 또는 불화수소산과 Sandblasting을 복합처리하였다. 접착레진은 화학중합형 인 Ortho-two와 광중합형인 Transbond를 사용하였다 모든 시편에는 도재 프라이머를 도포하였다. 실험군은 7가지 군으로 나누어 브라켓의 전단강도를 측정하였다. 1. 도재의 표면처리에 대한 비교에서 Ortho-two군내에서는 불화수소산이나 sandblasting으로 표면거칠기를 부여한 군이 무처리군에 비해 높은 전단강도를 갖는다. Transbond군내에서는 각각의 표면처리에 따른 유의성있는 차이가 없었다. 2. 불화수소산이나 Sandblasting처리군에서는 화학중합형 레진인 Ortho-two가 광중합형 레진인 Transbond보다 높은 전단강도를 갖는다. 3. 도재 파절율의 비교에서는 무처리군이 표면거칠기를 부여한 군에 비해 매우 낮은 파절율 갖는다. 4. E(Transbond+Intact)군의 평균전단강도는 134.4kg/$cm^2$ 로 본 실험군중 가장 낮은 것으로 나타났다. 이것은 선학들이 제안한 임상적용가능 전단강도보다 크므로 7가지군 모두 임상적으로 교정력을 가하기 에 충분한 전단강도를 갖는다. 그러나, 도재의 파절율을 고려해볼 때 파절율이 상대적으로 낮은 무처리군이 임상적으로 더 효과적일 것으로 사료된다.

• 대한치과교정학회지
• /
• 제31권3호
• /
• pp.381-391
• /
• 2001

상, 하악 구치의 협면은 아말감으로 수복되어 있는 경우가 많으며, 접착 술식과 재료의 발달로 아말감에 교정용 브라켓의 직접 접착 술식이 가능하게 되었다. 그러나 아말감은 치아 협면의 일부분만을 차지하는 경우가 많아 주변의 법랑질에서도 접착력을 얻을 수 있으므로, 임상적으로 통상의 교정용 레진을 사용하여 직접 접착 술식을 시행하고 있다. 그러나 아말감 충전물이 있는 치면에 대한 교정용 레진의 직접 접착 술식의 접착강도에 대한 연구가 없는 실정으로 이에 본 실험을 시행하였다. 상, 하악 소구치를 포매하여 지름 1.5mm, 2.0mm, 2.5mm, 3.0mm의 아말감 충전물을 형성한 후 sandblasting 시행군과 비시행군으로 나누었다. no-mix type의 교정용 레진인 Ortho-one을 사용하여 브라켓을 접착한 후 전단결합강도를 측정하고 접착 파절 형태를 관찰하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. 아말감 크기에 따른 비교 시 아말감 크기 1.5mm군의 전단 강도가 다른 군들에 비해 유의성 있게 높았고, 2.0mm, 2.5mm, 3.0mm군간에는 전단 강도의 차이가 없었다. (p<0.05) 2. Sandblasting 시행여부에 따른 전단결합강도의 차이는 없었다. (p<0.05) 3. 각 군간의 비교시 아말감 충전물의 면적이 브라켓 기저부 면적의 약 $61\%$를 차지하는 G군, H군의 전단결합강도는 대조군의 $50-60\%$ 수준으로 급격히 감소하였다. (p<0.05) 4. 브라켓 접착 파절 형태의 관찰 시 sandblasting을 시행하지 않은 군에 비해 sandblasting시행군의 mARI score가 유의성 있게 높았다. (p<0.05) 이상의 실험결과는 아말감 충전물의 크기가 브라켓 기저부 면적의 약 $50\%$이하일 때 sandblasting시행여부에 관계없이 통상적인 교정용 레진을 사용하여 직접 접착 술식을 시행하여도 임상적으로 적절한 전단강도를 얻을 수 있음을 시사하였다.