• The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics
• /
• v.34 no.6
• /
• pp.889-904
• /
• 2021

This study is a follow-up study of Kang and Kim (2020). In this study, we derive the sample influence functions of the t-statistic which were not directly derived in previous researches. Throughout these results, we both mathematically examine the relationship between the empirical influence function and the sample influence function, and consider a method to approximate the sample influence function by the empirical influence function. Also, the validity of the relationship between an approximated sample influence function and the empirical influence function is verified by a simulation of a random sample of size 300 from normal distribution. As a result of the simulation, the relationship between the sample influence function which is derived from the t-statistic and the empirical influence function, and the method of approximating the sample influence function through the empirical influence function were verified. This research has significance in proposing both a method which reduces errors in approximation of the empirical influence function and an effective and practical method that evolves from previous research which approximates the sample influence function directly through the empirical influence function by constant revision.

• The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics
• /
• v.33 no.5
• /
• pp.527-540
• /
• 2020

While analyzing data, researching outliers, which are out of the main tendency, is as important as researching data that follow the general tendency. In this study we discuss the influence function for outlier discrimination. We derive sample influence functions of sample mean, sample variance, and sample standard deviation, which were not directly derived in previous research. The results enable us to mathematically examine the relationship between the empirical influence function and sample influence function. We can also consider a method to approximate the sample influence function by the empirical influence function. Also, the validity of the relationship between the approximated sample influence function and the empirical influence function is also verified by the simulation of random sampled data in normal distribution. As the result of a simulation, both the relationship between the two influence functions, sample and empirical, and the method of approximating the sample influence function through the emperical influence function were verified. This research has significance in proposing a method that reduces errors in the approximation of the empirical influence function and in proposing an effective and practical method that proceeds from previous research that approximates the sample influence function directly through empirical influence function by constant revision.

• Journal of the Korean Statistical Society
• /
• v.30 no.3
• /
• pp.499-509
• /
• 2001

We investigate the influence of observations on a test of additional information about discrimination using the influence function and the derivative influence measures. the influence function for the test statistic is derived and this sample versions are used for influence analysis. The derivative influence measures for the test statistic under a perturbation scheme are derived. It will be seen that the influence function method and the derivative influence measures yield the same result. Furthermore, we will derive the relationships between the influence function and the derivative influence measures when the sample size is large. an illustrative example is given and we will compare the results provided by the influence function method and the derivative influence measures.

• Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods
• /
• v.8 no.3
• /
• pp.841-849
• /
• 2001

The influence in fitting an equicorrelation model is investigated using the influence function. The influence functions for the model parameters are derived and its sample versions are used for investigating the influence of observations on the estimators of the parameters. Some relationships among the sample versions are found. We will derive a measure for identifying observations that have a large influence on the test of fitting the equicorrelation model using the influence function method. An example is given for illustration.

• Journal of the Korean Statistical Society
• /
• v.35 no.2
• /
• pp.213-224
• /
• 2006

We investigate the influence of subjects or observations on regression coefficients of generalized estimating equations using the influence function and the derivative influence measures. The influence function for regression coefficients is derived and its sample versions are used for influence analysis. The derivative influence measures under certain perturbation schemes are derived. It can be seen that the influence function method and the derivative influence measures yield the same influence information. An illustrative example in longitudinal data analysis is given and we compare the results provided by the influence function method and the derivative influence measures.

• Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods
• /
• v.12 no.2
• /
• pp.453-462
• /
• 2005

We derive the influence function on t statistic and find its feature; the influence function on t statistic has two forms depending on the value of ${\mu}_0$. Sample influence functions are used to verify the validity of the derived influence function. We use random samples from normal distribution to show the validity of the function. The simulation study proves that the obtained influence function is very accurate to in estimating changes in t statistic when an observation is added or deleted.

• Journal of the Korean Statistical Society
• /
• v.30 no.4
• /
• pp.563-571
• /
• 2001

In this paper, we study selecting a transformation so that the transformed variable is nearly symmetrically distributed. The large sample properties of an M-estimator of transformation parameter that is obtained by minimizing the integrated square of the imaginary part of the empirical characteristic function are investigated when a random sample is selected from some unspecified distribution. According to influence function calculations and Monte Carlo simulations, these estimates are less sensitive, than the normal model maximum likelihood estimates, to a few outliers.

• Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods
• /
• v.15 no.4
• /
• pp.509-516
• /
• 2008

We derive the influence function on the coefficient of variation. Empirical influence function and Sample influence function are used to verify the validity of the derived influence function. To show the validity of the influence function, we carry out simulations with random samples from normal distribution $N(20,1^2)$ and $N(20,5^2)$, respectively. The simulation result proves that the derived influence function is very accurate in estimating changes in the coefficient of variation when an observation is deleted.

• Journal of applied mathematics & informatics
• /
• v.28 no.3_4
• /
• pp.913-921
• /
• 2010

The derivative influence measure is adapted to the Cholesky decomposition of a covariance matrix. Formulas for the derivative influence of observations on the Cholesky root and the inverse Cholesky root of a sample covariance matrix are derived. It is easy to implement this influence diagnostic method for practical use. A numerical example is given for illustration.

• Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods
• /
• v.21 no.3
• /
• pp.213-224
• /
• 2014

In this paper, we study the problem of transforming to normality. We propose to estimate the transformation parameter by minimizing a weighted squared distance between the empirical characteristic function of transformed data and the characteristic function of the normal distribution. Our approach also allows for other symmetric target characteristic functions. Asymptotics are established for a random sample selected from an unknown distribution. The proofs show that the weight function $t^{-2}$ needs to be modified to have thinner tails. We also propose the method to compute the influence function for M-equation taking the form of U-statistics. The influence function calculations and a small Monte Carlo simulation show that our estimates are less sensitive to a few outliers than the maximum likelihood estimates.