• 제목/요약/키워드: research paper citations

검색결과 66건 처리시간 0.026초

공저자 수를 고려한 h-지수 산출 (Calculating the h-index and Its Variants Considering the Number of Authors in a Paper)

  • 이재윤
    • 정보관리학회지
    • /
    • 제33권3호
    • /
    • pp.7-29
    • /
    • 2016
  • 연구자 성과 평가를 위해 널리 사용되는 h-지수는 일관성 부족 문제와 공저자 수를 고려하지 않는다는 문제를 가지고 있다. 이를 극복하기 위해 h-지수와 g-지수, 그리고 공저 보정 방안을 검토하고 2004년부터 2013년 사이의 실제 KCI 데이터를 대상으로 분석해본 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 일관성 결여 문제를 해소하기 위해서는 g-지수를 사용하는 것이 더 바람직하다고 판단된다. 둘째, 연구 성과의 양적인 측면과 질적인 측면을 한꺼번에 반영하는 복합 지수라는 h-지수와 g-지수의 고유한 특성을 유지하기 위해서는 반드시 공저를 보정하여 지수를 측정해야 한다. 셋째, 공저자 수로 나눈 인용빈도를 사용하는 $h_C$-지수와 $g_C$-지수를 적용하면 단독 저술 비중이 높은 인문학 분야 연구자도 공정하게 평가할 수 있고, 특정 분야나 특정 기관에 속한 연구자가 상위 순위를 과점하는 현상을 방지할 수 있다.

과학 및 인문학 분야 출판 패턴의 비교 분석 : 한국학술지인용색인의 서지 데이터를 기반으로 (Comparative Analysis of Publication Patterns in Sciences and Humanities: Based on Bibliometric Data from Korea Citation Index)

  • Yang, Kiduk
    • 한국도서관정보학회지
    • /
    • 제50권3호
    • /
    • pp.23-47
    • /
    • 2019
  • 본 연구는 한국의 연구업적평가 개선에 도움이 될 수 있도록 학문분야별 출판 패턴의 차이를 조사하기 위해 한국학술지인용색인에서 수집한 6개 분야(문헌정보학, 사회학, 생물학, 역사학, 철학, 컴퓨터공학)의 서지데이터를 분석했다. 그 결과에 따르면 상기 6개 학문분야는 규모, 경쟁률, 생산성, 영향력 및 공동연구 관점에서 차이를 드러내었다. 우선, 저자수와 기관수 측면에서 연구 규모는 과학분야가 가장 컸으며, 인문학, 사회과학 순이었고, 저자별 출판율에서는 인문학분야가 가장 높았으며, 사회과학, 과학 순이었다. 또한 "사회학"의 경우, 논문 편당 인용수가 가장 높았으나, 인문학분야의 경우, 저자당 인용수가 가장 높은 것으로 나타나 이는 논문 편당 공동저자 수의 영향으로 보인다. 이처럼 본 연구는 논문 편당 저자수 분포에서도 학문분야별 차이를 발견할 수 있었는데, 인문학분야는 주로 단독 저자의 논문인 반면, 과학분야의 경우 대부분 공동 저술된 논문들이었다. 또한 본 연구는 학문분야별 인용시간의 차이와 핵심저자 및 기관의 분포, 이에 따른 영향의 차이도 제시하였다.

논문의 중요성 및 품질을 이용한 학술 전문가 검색 기법 (Academic Expert Search Method Using Importance and Quality of Papers)

  • 이서희;박윤정;한진수;최도진;임종태;복경수;유재수
    • 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
    • /
    • 제16권12호
    • /
    • pp.458-467
    • /
    • 2016
  • 사용자들에게 필요한 대표적인 연구 결과물과 조언을 제공할 수 있는 대용량 학술 정보를 이용하여 특정 관심 분야의 전문가를 검색하는 기법에 대한 연구가 요구되고 있다. 기존의 전문가 검색 기법은 사용자 프로필, 최근 활동 분석을 기반으로 전문가를 검색하기 때문에 사용자의 프로필 또는 활동 정보를 파악하지 못할 경우 전문가를 판별하기 어려운 문제점이 있다. 본 논문에서는 논문의 중요성 및 품질을 이용한 전문가 검색 기법을 제안한다. 논문의 중요성은 논문의 희소성과 최근 이슈가 되는 토픽을 고려하여 계산한다. 논문의 품질은 인용 수, 저널의 IF, 최신성, 저자관계를 고려하여 논문의 영향력을 평가한다. 제안하는 기법의 우수성을 보이기 위해 기존 기법과 정확률과 재현율 관점에서 성능평가를 수행한다.

판본별 교감을 통한 『동의보감』의 정본화 (A Comparative Analysis about Various Editions of Donguibogam)

  • 이정현;오준호
    • 한국의사학회지
    • /
    • 제31권1호
    • /
    • pp.57-70
    • /
    • 2018
  • Much research has already been done on Donguibogam. However, comparison of specific characters was not done because researchers found it difficult to compare different editions of the text in one place. Recently, important editions have been published on the Internet, making comparison possible. In this paper, researchers compare eight editions Donguibogam, including the original edition published in 1613 and seven other editions corrected by the Naeuiwon (Joseon Dynasty National Medical Center). The comparison results were summarized and tabulated. The results of the comparison are analyzed and presented in this article as a chart. The result of comparing the characters and the analyzed graph were in agreement. The authors propose that all written and electronic publications of Donguibogam should refer to other editions implied, quoted or referenced within the text and including with proper citations, and reference the original and first edition. Inadequate referencing will pollute future knowledge of this foundational text of Traditional Korean Medicine and may result in perpetration of mis-information. Based on accumulated knowledge and study of historical Korean Medicine texts, the Namsan edition made a mistake in the editing process. The year of publication of Gabsul-yoengyoeng-gegan Edition needs to be studied again and corrections made where appropriate.

A Systematic Review of Evidence for Education and Training Interventions in Microsurgery

  • Ghanem, Ali M.;Hachach-Haram, Nadine;Leung, Clement Chi Ming;Myers, Simon Richard
    • Archives of Plastic Surgery
    • /
    • 제40권4호
    • /
    • pp.312-319
    • /
    • 2013
  • Over the past decade, driven by advances in educational theory and pressures for efficiency in the clinical environment, there has been a shift in surgical education and training towards enhanced simulation training. Microsurgery is a technical skill with a steep competency learning curve on which the clinical outcome greatly depends. This paper investigates the evidence for educational and training interventions of traditional microsurgical skills courses in order to establish the best evidence practice in education and training and curriculum design. A systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed databases was performed to identify randomized control trials looking at educational and training interventions that objectively improved microsurgical skill acquisition, and these were critically appraised using the BestBETs group methodology. The databases search yielded 1,148, 1,460, and 2,277 citations respectively. These were then further limited to randomized controlled trials from which abstract reviews reduced the number to 5 relevant randomised controlled clinical trials. The best evidence supported a laboratory based low fidelity model microsurgical skills curriculum. There was strong evidence that technical skills acquired on low fidelity models transfers to improved performance on higher fidelity human cadaver models and that self directed practice leads to improved technical performance. Although there is significant paucity in the literature to support current microsurgical education and training practices, simulated training on low fidelity models in microsurgery is an effective intervention that leads to acquisition of transferable skills and improved technical performance. Further research to identify educational interventions associated with accelerated skill acquisition is required.

한국-중국간 경영정보학연구의 다양성비교 : 1999년 ~ 2003년 (A Comparative Study on Diversity in MIS Research Between South Korea and China: 1999~2003)

  • 신호균;김영애
    • 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
    • /
    • 제19권2호
    • /
    • pp.23-36
    • /
    • 2010
  • The focus of this study is to analyze between South Korea and China in terms of diversity in Management Information Systems research. As a result, there is herding phenomenon regarding researches in both of the countries compared to other previous studies. There also seemed to be lack of in-depth study of basic theories and connection to related field of study considering the broad topics of management information, unlike other international journals that pursue diversity in control referencing various methodologies, analysis units and many citations. Therefore, both South Korea and China should stabilize theoretical base of MIS through securing independent field of MIS along with founding the fundamentals by searching in diversified fields, methodologies and analysis units with focused topics. The upshot here is that with respect to diversity in MIS from both countries, to alleviate herding phenomenon, enforcing accuracy of data collection and reducing convenience pursuit should be implemented. Also as criteria to select a topic, different kinds of consulting concepts and taking social issues into consideration that helps tool development and analysis power should be done. Through varied methodologies, tool development and analysis power should be assisted and analysis unit should be shifted to organization unit for Korea and team or individual for China only to augment the accessibility. As a limitation for the paper is that the data used in this analysis is secondary data. In addition, although time period used in both countries were the same, object of analysis had homogeneity in Korean case while Chinese one having heterogeneity from 19 different journals. For the future studies, multicultural comparison or time series analysis and their comparison in deeper approach with regard to object of analysis and methodologies can contribute to further MIS diversity.

Analysis of Scientific Papers Included in the Sciences Citation Index Expanded Written by South Korean Plastic Surgeons: 2001-2010

  • Go, Ju-Young;Mun, Goo-Hyun;Jeon, Byung-Joon;Lim, So-Young;Pyon, Jai-Kyong;Bang, Sa-Ik;Oh, Kap-Sung;Shin, Myoung-Soo
    • Archives of Plastic Surgery
    • /
    • 제39권1호
    • /
    • pp.46-50
    • /
    • 2012
  • Background : The purpose of our study was to analyze scientific papers published by South Korean plastic surgeons in journals included in the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), and to evaluate the publication and research activities of Korean plastic surgeon. Methods : We conducted a survey of SCIE papers in the field of plastic surgery published by South Korean authors between 2001 and 2010 using Web of Science software. We further analyzed these results according to the number of publications per year, journals, institution, and type of papers. We also compared the total number of citations to published scientific papers. We analyzed the rank of South Korea among other countries in representative journals. Results : Overall, 667 papers were published by South Korean authors between 2001 and 2010. The number of publications increased dramatically from 2003 (n=31) to 2010 (n=139). Subsequently, the ten most productive Korean medical colleges were identified. All published papers received 2,311 citations and the citation to paper ratio was 3.49. The rank of Korea among other countries in terms of the number of published papers remained in the top 10 during the recent 10 years. Conclusions : Publication output of Korean plastic surgeon over the last 10 years showed a remarkable growth in terms of quantity and quality. Currently, Korea is among the top six countries in representative plastic surgery journals. Korean plastic surgeons have played a central role in this progress, and it is anticipated that they will continue to do so in the future.

의류학 연구 지적구조의 변화 - RJCC 계량정보학적 인용분석 - (Evolution of the intellectual structure of clothing and textiles literature - A bibliometric study of RJCC -)

  • 선준호;김성은;이현정;이규혜
    • 복식문화연구
    • /
    • 제27권4호
    • /
    • pp.299-309
    • /
    • 2019
  • Citation frequency is an important factor in evaluating journal quality and is used as a measure of journal impact. The citation index of a paper plays an important role in linking papers with groups of other academic papers, forming a huge and complex network. This study examines the intellectual structure of apparel research through the bibliometric citation analysis of The Research Journal of the Costume Culture (RJCC). In order to analyze the changes in the intellectual structure of the RJCC, we used the Korea Citation Index's (KCI) data (highly citing journals and highly cited journals). The NodeXL, a social network analysis tool, was used to examine the connection structure between journals. In order to identify the academic influence of the RJCC, we used the KCI journal citation index. Our findings indicate that the RJCC has a high centrality index among the clothing-oriented journals in the same life sciences field. A look at the journals citing the RJCC and the journals cited within the RJCC also showed that more journals of diverse fields have been recently linked through their citations. This suggests that a convergence of interdisciplinary research is underway in the field of clothing. As a result of examining international journals cited in the RJCC, it was confirmed that they were cited in prominent international journals in various fields.

국방 기술의 민수화 우선순위 평가 방법론 : 특허 분석 및 계층분석과정 (AHP) 기반 (A Priority Evaluation Methodology for Spin-off of Defense Technology : Patent Analysis and AHP Approach)

  • 박윤미;설현주
    • 한국국방경영분석학회지
    • /
    • 제36권3호
    • /
    • pp.15-27
    • /
    • 2010
  • 민군 겸용기술은 민간부문은 물론 군사부문에도 이용되는 기술로 이러한 기술은 산업의 경쟁력 확보와 안보 역량을 동시에 충족한다는 측면에서 볼 때 저비용 고효율의 기술이라 할 수 있다. 따라서 이러한 민군 겸용기술 개발을 활성화하기 위한 기술 기획 방법 및 이와 관련된 연구의 필요성은 제기되어 왔으나 실제 이와 관련된 연구는 부족한 실정이다. 본 연구는 민군 겸용기술 개발을 활성화하기 위한 기술 기획에 있어 기술의 겸용성과 이전을 고려한 보다 구체적이고 정량적인 절차를 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 특허와 특허 인용 그리고 특허와 산업 연관관계를 바탕으로 한 기술 개발 우선 순위 도출 과정을 체계적으로 제시하였으며 이 과정에서 계층분석 기법을 적용하였다. 제안한 방법의 유용성을 검증하기 위하여 국방 기술분야 중 항공기 무기체계를 대상으로 사례연구를 수행하였으며, 본 연구 결과는 국방 분야 기술 수요 도출시 민수화 가능성이 높은 기술을 제시함으로써 민군 겸용기술을 발굴하는데 기여할 것으로 기대된다.

Assessment of Mechanical Engineering Research Output using Scientometric Indicators: A Comparative Study of India, Japan, and South Korea

  • Pattanashetti, D.M.;Harinarayana, N.S.
    • Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
    • /
    • 제5권2호
    • /
    • pp.62-74
    • /
    • 2017
  • This study examined the mechanical engineering research output from India, Japan, and South Korea on different parameters including growth, collaboration indices, and activity index. The purpose of the study is to understand the overall development of mechanical engineering through analytical approaches applied on the scholarly outcome of the countries considered for the study. The study focuses on analysing the articles published by India, Japan, and South Korea, and is restricted to articles indexed in the Science Citation Index - Web of Science for the period 2000 to 2014. The ratios of number of paper to citations for India, Japan, and Korea are 20,836: 1,97,679; 24,494: 2,04,393; and 30,578: 2,66,902 respectively for the period 2000-2014. The findings show that there is a decline in Japanese publications in mechanical engineering, whereas other two countries have recorded an increasing trend. While India has tripled its publications in a span of 15 years, South Korea, on the other hand, has doubled its publications in the same span of time. There has been an increasing trend towards collaboration in almost all fields of science and technology. However, the extent of collaboration and their rate of growth varied for one subject to another, one branch to another branch of the same subject, and from one country to another country. The present study analyses the growth of research publications of the mechanical engineering domain including authorship distribution, collaboration indices, prominent journals, and activity index.